• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
sparcebag

Cormorants Problem?

Recommended Posts

sparcebag

Does anyone think cormorants are a problem in our area,count them and report to DNR they may consider eradication for Long lake nesting site with enough complaints! Read on:Thank you for sending us your observations of cormorant numbers on Diamond Lake. We

appreciate hearing what other folks are observing and will keep your observations on file

and in mind as we consider the broader context of cormorant management in Minnesota. The

numbers of comorants observed, particularly during migration, is steadily increasing, as

you have observed. There is also one very large colony on Long Lake in Kandiyohi County

and you are no doubt seeing birds that are nesting there feeding on Diamond Lake.

The authority we have to control cormorant populations is prescribed by a federal rule

that requires that we only initiate control at those sites where there is strong evidence

of impacts to public resources, most notably, fisheries populations. We have authority in

Minnesota to take upwards of 7400 birds each year. Approximately 2000 are taken by

private aquaculturists and another 3,000 - 4,000 are being taken each year for the last

three years at Leech Lake. Concern about their growing numbers has been raised at a

number of sites throughout the state, most notably Lake of the Woods and up in the Rainy

River system and we continue to monitor the status of the cormorants and other public

resources at these and other sites where complaints have been registered s in order to

assess what actions, if any, might be taken.

Again, thank you for your input and observations.

Lee A. Pfannmuller

Ecological Services

Minnesota DNR

confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ralph Wiggum

Yeah! Usually, I see 2 or 3 on Games, but last weekend, there was flocks of 20+ birds!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slotlimit

I think I posted this before but I can't remember. Back when Mike Obrien was the GW around here he told me to shoot as many as I wanted, where to shoot them, and how their flight patterns went out of some of the area lakes. It was in 71 Bait with Ron Shimmick standing thier also. I'm not sure if those rules still apply with the new GW in the area. I would ask him first before hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eye_Hammer

Last year in our bay on Norway, there was at least 75 in a

flock on the water. They were constantly diving to feed.

I say get rid of all of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

Only problem with that is they are federally protected birds in the 50s-60s they were open target practice.Now its a federal crime BUCO bucks fine!They are recovering too well from the DDT ban!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slotlimit

Hey Sparce,

Just to throw a little fun at you. I believe this is what you said:

REALITY: On lakes that have good natural reproduction, just the opposite is true. To

increase the average size of walleyes caught by anglers, usually it’s the medium-sized

ones that need to be released. Most walleye lakes are loaded with small 6- to 12-inchers,

so releasing those fish doesn’t help much. And so few really big walleyes are ever caught

that releasing one doesn’t make much of a difference.

Well they used to have pictures of dead Cormorants in 71Bait with their bellies cut open and guess what? They were filled with those "Cigar" walleyes and I believe walleyes up to 14inches. (I'm sure they don't just eat Walleyes) But if taking those fish improves the lake wouldn't you want about 500 Cormorants swimming out in front of you on Diamond?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

Slot I thought people would think I wrote that about eyes but not till after I read it! Its actually a quote from the DNR site I copied grin.gif,went out yesterday afternoon got 2 for supper! the ole girl said dont come back unless ya got supper!got out at 2 home at 4 one 18" one 14" perfect for us. cool.gifBut I coulda et more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sartell Angler

Quote:

I think I posted this before but I can't remember. Back when Mike Obrien was the GW around here he told me to shoot as many as I wanted, where to shoot them, and how their flight patterns went out of some of the area lakes. It was in 71 Bait with Ron Shimmick standing thier also. I'm not sure if those rules still apply with the new GW in the area. I would ask him first before hand.


My guess is that the individual you mentioned wouldn't like the idea of you posting that he gave you permission to break a Federal game law on a statewide forum such as this...

I would delete your post slot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LODFFB

eye hammer are you talking about the bay going into Little Norway? They get bad in there My parents have a cabin over there you can walk across the ugly birds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slotlimit

Well their were about 2 or 3 other guys in the shop at the same time. I also wonder how many people Ron told to go ahead and shoot away. I also was no friend of OBrien in fact that was the first time I had ever even talked to the guy. So my guess would be that he really doesn't care. I never did shoot any.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

The new cos or GW are OK guys so is the new forester,But it seems they dont let anything go,got my neighbor for burning,sittin in boat by dock no PFD,I have talked to Tim but now another new CO hav'nt seen him yet.The forester last year had monthly burn permits now there back to yearly.The morel here KEEP CLEAN DONT VIOLATE!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

I did a dogpile search on 'leech lake cormorants' and found a 2006 report on the cormorants done by the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe. A couple of exerpts - note the part about the percentage of walleyes in the diet:

Historical Cormorant Information

Recent increases in the number of cormorants has led some people to call them exotic or over

abundant. A historical review of information for this area, as well as throughout the region,

indicates that this is not the case. Cormorants are simply recolonizing areas that they have been

absent from due to human persecution and low population levels due to contaminants like DDT.

Historically cormorants were probably more abundant in Minnesota than they are today. In our

review, we looked for information on both cormorants as well as white pelicans as both species

frequently nest together and often raise the same controversies.

Small yellow perch make up about 75% of the diet in all

years sampled. This is higher than many other cormorant diet studies, but not unexpected

because small perch are a very abundant prey species in Leech Lake. Cormorants have been

noted in many studies to feed primarily on fish species that are very abundant and easy to catch.

Shiners have been found to make up second most common food item in the diet samples. The

third most common species found was trout perch, a species that is fairly abundant in Leech

Lake, but is probably unfamiliar to most people. This species has also been found to be a

common diet item in other cormorant diet studies. All other species made up about 5% of the

diet. Walleyes make up less than one percent of the diet and they are almost all young-of-the-year.

This is a much smaller figure than anyone expected and would seem to indicate that direct

cormorant predation on walleyes is not a big factor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

Black--I suppose they ought to stop killin them then? right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eye_Hammer

LOD, I have a cabin on the main lake, down past the landing, to the SW. I have seen them on Little as well. Last year they were just swarming in the water. The Cormies are part of the reason all the small perch from 2 winters ago are gone. The small perch were abundant 2 years ago. Probably why the eyes didn't bite well last year. Haven't seen a lot for perch this year. I am not advocating the irradication of the cormorant, but!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sniper9

I shot one last year and recieved a verbal warning and I was told if I was seen shooting another one he would have to give me a ticket, He told me to find a more secluded spot he could see me from the road!!!???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slotlimit

Their you go. I guess the new one might not care too much either. He was trained in by OBrien.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

Kill as many as you want, legally or illegally. I wack raccoons at will because I think it helps the local nesting birds and I kill gophers when they start digging up my corn food plot or digging under my buildings. Just be aware that killing federally protected birds is a federal offence and all it takes is the wrong warden or judge and you could be a bunch of trouble.

I just think that its kind of amusing when people blame cormorants for poor fishing when scientific studies prove that walleyes are a very small portion of their diet, in this case 1%. Let me repeat that - 1%. They go out fishing, don't catch anything, happen to see a bunch of cormorants and whos fault is the poor fishing? The cormorants, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trollenslow

Blkjack---The study was done in 2006. This was after the cormorants had all but depleted the walleye pop. When there are no walleye's to eat what would expect to find in there stomachs. This is not rocket science. This was just a political offering done to appease some people.

I will say several years in a row of poor hatches along with the rusty crayfish (study still being done) have contibuted to the problem but far and away the cormorant was the main culprit.

I have a place up on leech and have seen the flocks that were on the lake before any contol was put on the cormorant. It was sickening to see these gangly birds in such great numbers.

Think want you want but the cormorant or any other animal for that matter when out of check will effect the balance of nature.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trollenslow

FWIW.-- The cormorants nearly exploded in pop. in just a few years. These were the numbers that were on Leech before any cormorant radication. There were 2800 nesting pair on little pelican island with a total of 10,000 birds. The facts are these birds eat 1 lb. of fish per day.

10,000 birds each eat 1# a day= 10,000#s a day times 30 days in a month=300,000#s a month times 5 months=1,500,000#s of fish eaten by these 10,000 birds given that they eat 1# of fish a day every day for those five months.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
J'sBait&Sport

WOW.........

J.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sparcebag

Trollin thats why I started this thread! I hope people conplain to the DNR! I watched this spring and saw so many, I counted them each morning,my lowest count was 175 birds the highest was, ooo.gif well I stoped at 600! Thats when I contacted the DNR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
trollenslow

I would complain VERY loud and OFTEN because it took just short of a public lynching of the DNR to sit up and take notice and do something about the exploding cormorant pop. on Leech Lake. With the bird being federally protected it took alot of political manuevering to get a plan in place and implemented.

The poor walleye fishing on Leech Lake in those years had such an economic impact on the Walker area. The DNR had a lot of pressure put on them before they reacted. They were backpeddling and double talking trying to defend themselves, saying that studies indicate that the cormorant was not the problem. I remember being told that very thing, cormorants only eat perch. I was born at night, but it was not last night!

The cormorants destoyed the trees on Little Pelican Island, standing there leafless, quite a site.

I would'nt try to take matters into your own hands wink.gif because of the federal protection placed on the cormorant, but alot of locals were contemplating that very thing.

Vegetable oil sprayed on the eggs,(killing the embryo)to discourage nesting, along with Fed. sharpshooters have reduced the numbers on Little Pelican Island.

I would say Leech is still a year or two away from being a walleye destination despite the Governors success this opener.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • SkolVikingsGuy
      Wondering if this coming Memorial Day weekend would be a good weekend to come up or if the fishing is slow?  Would love to have the kids catch some easy walleye if possible.  
    • BobT
      Got a reply from the DNR to my last question, which included a reference to tournaments. She forwarded my question to another and I'm still waiting for that reply. 
    • PSU
      In case anyone is interested. The link says 2017, but inside the link says 2018 https://www.cityautoglasswalleyeclassic.com/copy-of-2017-winners  
    • Rick
      A region-wide effort to better understand West Nile virus in ruffed grouse is getting underway in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.  “In the Great Lakes region, West Nile virus has been found in a small number of grouse with no known population-level effects at this point,” said Charlotte Roy, grouse project leader with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. “Still, we want to let hunters know we’re in the first steps of monitoring the virus, and we’re planning to do some limited testing of birds this fall.” In 2017, West Nile virus was identified in more ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states than in the past. The virus has been present in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for about 17 years. West Nile virus has been documented in more than 250 species of birds; however, not all birds develop clinical disease from the virus. Corvids (including blue jays and crows) are very prone to illness and death from the virus, while other species may be less so or may not develop symptoms at all. Last year, Michigan had 12 positive cases of West Nile virus in ruffed grouse. Prior to 2017, only one positive ruffed grouse had been found in Michigan, and that was in 2002. The virus was confirmed in one ruffed grouse in the early 2000s in Minnesota, and is yet to have been detected in a Wisconsin ruffed grouse. West Nile virus in ruffed grouse has become a topic of concern because of a recent study in Pennsylvania reporting that the virus may have contributed to population declines in areas of lower-quality habitat or where habitat was scarce. Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin are in the early stages of planning to test samples from grouse this fall but at this point there is no evidence that the virus is having a population-level impact in the Great Lakes region. “By monitoring birds at a regional level, we will be able to gain a better understanding of this disease in ruffed grouse,” said Kelly Straka, state wildlife veterinarian with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Ruffed grouse are hunted annually by around 300,000 hunters across the three states. Preliminary reports from 2017 hunters were mixed across the Great Lakes region. While the virus could impact brood survival of grouse, other factors such as cold, wet springs during nesting and hatching; drought conditions; or habitat decline can also affect birds seen and harvested. Biologists in the region are optimistic that the great habitat for ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states will help populations thrive despite the virus. “We are looking to hunters and outdoor enthusiasts to help us in this endeavor,” said Mark Witecha, upland wildlife ecologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. “This is an excellent example of agencies and organizations taking a proactive approach and working together to expand our knowledge about WNV and ruffed grouse.” Recently, the Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Health Committee held its annual meeting in Traverse City, Michigan. West Nile virus was one of the topics for state wildlife health leaders. More than 25 wildlife health professionals from 13 Midwestern states and Canada were in attendance. Individual agencies are currently reviewing ways they will be monitoring their grouse populations for West Nile virus, and additional information will be shared when more details are determined. Like humans, wild animals can be exposed to West Nile virus and survive the exposure. Currently, there is no evidence of humans becoming infected by consuming properly cooked birds or by handling birds. Research has shown dogs can be infected but are very resistant to developing clinical signs of the disease and are considered an end host. Ruffed grouse hunting is open in the fall and Minnesota hunting information can be found at mndnr.gov/hunting/grouse. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • TheEyesofanAngler
      what temp is between 55-60 degrees in central minnesota 
    • gimruis
      Isn't that something how they don't recognize the blind as a problem?  I've had turkeys walk literally right next to it too.  Nice bird FishandFowl, hope you didn't pulverize it too bad.
    • Rick
      An angler from Stillwater has set a new record for lake sturgeon in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ catch-and-release category.  Jack Burke and fishing buddy Michael Orgas were recently on a lake sturgeon fishing trip to remember. Fishing on the Rainy River in Koochiching County, the duo was having a lot of success fishing for Minnesota’s biggest fish, landing 20 fish in three days including six lake sturgeon over 60 inches before hooking into the new state record – a 73-inch long lake sturgeon. “We had been having some great action and knew there were big fish in the Rainy River,” Burke said. “This particular fish took about 45 minutes to reel in. When we got it closer to the boat it blew some bubbles and came to the top; I knew it was a huge fish!” Burke caught the fish on May 4, around 11 a.m. using a muskie rod supplied by his fishing partner Orgas, with 80-pound braided line rigged with a circle hook and crawlers. The fish measures 73 inches in length and 30 inches in girth. This beats the previous record by 3 inches that was set by two separate anglers who both boated 70-inch fish on the same day in April 2017. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish in each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • gimruis
      I went out on Saturday for about 5 hours and my friend and I caught a lot of crappies but they were mostly all dinks (8-10 inchers).  We only caught 4 of them over 10 inches.  Plus a few small bass and one pike.  We released all of them.  Water temp was right around 60, a little warmer up shallow in a bay.
    • Rick
      Avid angler Dustin Stone caught a new state record silver redhorse in the certified weight category of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ record fish program.  Stone caught the 10-pound, 6-ounce silver redhorse while fishing for lake sturgeon on the Rainy River in Koochiching County on April 28. He was fishing with 80-pound braided line tipped with a night crawler. “We had been doing very well fishing for sturgeon, landing seven fish over the 60-inch mark,” Stone said. “We started catching a bunch of suckers and redhorse before this fish, so this fish felt quite a bit bigger than the others.” Fortunately for Stone, his fishing buddy had extensive knowledge about fish like silver redhorse, and Stone almost released the fish until his partner advised him to check the weight and current record on that species of fish. The new state record silver redhorse was weighed on a certified scale at a meat shop in Granite Falls, where two observers witnessed the weighing. Two DNR fisheries experts in the Ortonville office confirmed the species identification of silver redhorse. The official weight is 10-pounds, 6-ounces with a length of 26-3/4 inches and a girth of 17-1/2 inches, beating the previous state record of 9-pounds, 15-ounces held since 2004. “I’m glad the DNR does this record fish program. It’s fun to see the records. I’m kind of addicted to this now and I’m going to try and break a couple more!” Stone said. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish of each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • gimruis
      Sorry I meant to type "when you have your limit" that culling is illegal.