320x240 vs 480x480 color

[zachp]

Is there much difference as far as screen definition goes for the 320x240 versus the 480x480 in the color depth finders? I have a LMS-334 and am considering getting another depth finder for the bow but would like to get something a bit cheaper and still stay in color.

[Giant_Jackpot]

Screen definition depends on pixels per square inch. If the 320x240 and the 480x480 have the same screen size, then the definition will be better on the 480x480.

[cold one sd]

If the pixels are the same size the screen will be rectangular with 320x240 and square with 480x480. Example, 2.4"x3.2" vs 4.8"x4.8".

[sparcebag]

I went from a 240 pix to a 320, Man what a difference! now I'm thinkin goin to 480!!

[Central Bassman]

if you fish alot and will be using the locator alot then i would go with the more pixel unit. You will be really glad you it, it give you a more defind look and will really bring out the detail alot better. my .02

[katoguy]

As others posted, the higher the pixels the better the resolution (definition). Go with the highest pixel count in color you can afford.

I jumped from a 320 to a 640 last year for my bow unit. Wow. I just equaled it with my console unit because of how impressed I am with the 640 vertical pixels.

[fishinalot]

Zachp

Reeds have a sale and closeout on the 334. At the Sportsman show now going on in MPLS, they were $450 out the door, that included sales tax. I picked one up and I'm sure they would still honor that if you called them by Monday. It seem like a great unit for that money, now have to find the time to learn how to use it.

[Central Bassman]

Thats a Great deal for a 334!!!