• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
cupper

Broadheads...

Recommended Posts

cupper

Hey folks. I was just wondering what kind of broadheads you would reccomend to a newbie like myself. This season will be my first archery season. I got my bow las Nov and have been practicing with it since. There are so many choices for broadheads and I was just wondering what all of you think. I am leaning towards fixed-blade because I have heard some horror stories about mechanicals not opening up, but I also heard Jeff at Cabin Fever saying that the new Rage mechanical broadheads were so popular last year that they couldn't keep them in stock. I have one buddy who uses thunderheads and one who uses crossfires. Looking forward to your input.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
VMS

I recently switched to G5 montec broadheads from Thunderheads. I really liked the design, and had heard good things about flight characteristics. With my old thunderheads, I always had to readjust my sights since they flew lower and to the right out of my set-up. The montecs were right on target as my field tips.

I prefer the instant cutting tips too. The profile of the head is much smaller than the thunderheads which I like too.

Lots of good blades out there so you will need to decide on what you feel will work best, then shoot it and see how well it performs.

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cliffy

I am rather new to the sport as well....but I have had good luck with 100 grain Slick Tricks and 100 grain G5 Strikers. Both BHs have been super sharp out of the box, hold their edge well and fly the same as FPs (at least for me). I have a cousin that used the two blade RAGE BH last season and he said it worked great...brought down a nice buck..etc. I have also used 3 blade Muzzy (100 grain) in the past and they also worked well. I tried the the 4 blade Muzzy MX-4 last season and ended up throwing them away..they just didnt fly worth a darn for my set-up....but I have heard others say good things. I am also interested in trying the new Muzzy MX-3s. Good luck in your search.

Cliffy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
koonie

If your bow is well tuned most broadheads will work well for you. I say most because sometimes a certain broadhead just will not fly well for a certain setup.

Make sure you paper tune your bow. If you can get your arrows to fly "straight" through the paper you should be alright.

There are a whole bunch of good high quality broadheads out there. I wouldn't necessarily go with the first broadhead some salesman says sold out last year. Every year something new comes out and it winds up being a hot seller because it's new. If you can try out a few different broadheads and see what works well for you. This can be a bit expensive though.

Our best seller last year was the G5 broadhead. We sold them probably 2 to 1 over everything else we carried. Muzzy has a great reputation but I have heard several people say they just won't shoot well for them. I myself tried the Wasp Boss Bullet and the Wasp Hammer. The Hammer was pretty good but the Boss Bullet flew exactly to the same point of impact as my field points so thats what I shot during the season. If you are thinking of shooting expandable broadheads you may want to figure out how much kinetic energy you are getting because that is important in opening the blades.

Anyway, try out a few if you can, do some more internet research(broadhead testing sites,forums,ect), and by all means ask your fellow hunters. I'd ask hunters mostly because we all started where you are now. Salesmen are in it for sales and may not always have your best interest at the top of their list. I see this everyday as I'm in the business so to speak. There are a lot of guys that will push stuff without having even tried it and that is one of the things I dislike about working is sporting goods sales.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rippinlip

I am also back into the game after a little time off as far as bow hunting goes. If anybody would be willing to get together and shoot some different broadheads we should work something out. Everbody brings a different broadhead and we can exchange to see how they shoot.

Would save some on buying multiple heads and still do some field testing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jonnyICE-MAN

Last year was my first year bowhunting and I went with the three-blade rages and won't switch for nothing, simply love them. Practiced with the MX-4's and they didn't fly very well. I brought down two doe's and they literally blew a hole right through them. I highly recomend you give them a try at least, I say thier worth the money!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
thewalleyeguy

Muzzy's. Personaly i use 4 blade 90's and i love them smirk.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Walleye Guy

I am new bowhunter and currently a Muzzy guy. The MX-4 100's flew great out of my Switchback XT last year. I'll be honest in that I didn't shoot anything other than the MX4's. They were recommended by Cabin Fever and they shot just like my field points. I harvested my first archery deer with the MX-4s. I may experiment a little this summer but I'll be surprised if I find anything that works better in my set-up than what I have been using.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Royce Aardahl

Find one you like and tune it to your setup. hit the deer in the vitals and they all work. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tenpoint

eyeguy is right. Shot placement is everything. Just for the record, a lot of deer have found the way to my freezer from 100 grain 4 blade muzzys. If I do my job, they do theirs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LoneRanger

Wow, Cliffy, you mentioned all of the broadheads that I have looked at. I think that the G5 Strikers and the Slick tricks are the best fixed blade broadheads that I've seen, but I might go with the 2 or 3 blade Rages. The owner of Mike's archery in St. Cloud shot a black bear with one of the 2 blade Rage broadheads and had a pass through, and the hole was huge!

Well, that's my 2 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pooh

muzzy 3 blade 100's worked great for me and Montec G5 worked great for me. was not impressed with MX4s which i pawned off and the guy that bought them from me threw them away. shuttle t points didnt shoot well for me and neither did the american broadhead company heads including the sonic and liberty. slick tricks shot the best but montecs are easy to resharpen thats why i went with them

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roosterslayer

I shoot Slick Tricks, and they fly great. The only broadhead that I didn't have to move my sights do to the different flight pattern between my field tips and broadheads. But like it was said before any broadhead will work as long as you do your job and put right through the wheel house.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

I think we're fortuanate to have lots of good broadheads to choose from. Find one that shoots good out of your bow and as others have mentioned, SHOT PLACEMENT is the key.

I personally like a replaceable blade broad head so they can be razor sharp, if I miss and hit the ground, I put in new blades. And the ones that I practice with are old blades.

Just for the record, I shoot Thunderheads. They work and I'm not going to spend a couple hundred bucks trying different broadheads when I have a good one already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
UMDSportsman

I am new to the sport of bowhunting. My father has an older bow and everything needed, so i decided to pick up his bow and start shooting it last summer. we are about the same draw length, so i just put a new sight on and got comfortable with how it shoots and i knew my boundaries. This year for christmas my brother in law gave me a dozen new cabela's carbon arrows and some 3-blade 100 grain muzzys, i have heard a lot of good reports about them. I also personally know the man who designed the new Rage broadheads, and if i would switch, they would be the first ones i would try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • ducksnbucks
      Thanks guys for the info. Had a great time with the girls yesterday afternoon. We caught bluegills up to 9", crappies to 11", saw a lot of nice bass, and as we wanted, caught some nice cats. All fish were between 19 and 24", extremely fat fish and lots of fun to catch. The girls were thrilled at the action and all fish were released to be caught another day. Bluegills were not creating beds yet but the crappies were starting to. Thanks again and have a good one!
    • LoonASea
      With your boat on the trailer,,, with the bow slightly raised (like you're on plane) make sure your motor is as close to 90 degrees to the ground ,,, Most pulling is caused by one side of the prop cutting more water then the other side ,,, Good place to start any way 
    • CJH
      Anybody have any water temps on the Chain?  I'll be up in Alex this weekend to get the boats in and just wondering where its at. Thanks!
    • Wheres_Walter
      We fished Frazer bay Friday and Saturday afternoon-sundown.  Early evening we did best in 30-35 FOW on lindys and chartruese jigs with chubs.  The last 90 min before dark we had more success at 7-12 FOW.  Nothing big but we caught a lot of 10-14" fish, more than enough to fill a skillet for our group of 5, plus put a few in the freezer.  All around great weekend, look forward to hitting it again this weekend.
    • Borch
      Good to have you back fishandfowl!  Gotta love it when a plan comes together.
    • osok
      As stated above most likely the Trim tab under the cavitation plate. Might have came loose, or corroded away if it's a sacrificial Zinc type. Agree with Leech, did you make any changes to your boat recently?  
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has determined that a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) is required for the Fargo-Moorhead Diversion Authority’s revised flood risk management project.  The DNR will prepare the SEIS to analyze modifications in the revised project proposal. The DNR invites comments on the scope of the SEIS through June 11. The scope will determine what will be evaluated in the SEIS. Broadly speaking, the SEIS describes the proposed project, identifies environmental impacts and considers mitigation and alternatives that may lessen those impacts. The supplemental review, which is not an entirely new EIS, will focus on those aspects of the revised project that were not evaluated in the original environmental impact statement (EIS). The DNR will conduct the SEIS work concurrently with its review of the Diversion Authority’s permit application for its revised project. The proposed Fargo-Moorhead flood risk management project is a dam and diversion channel system designed to divert flood waters around Fargo, North Dakota; Moorhead, Minnesota; and surrounding metropolitan areas. The DNR denied the Diversion Authority’s previous permit application in October 2016 because it included insufficient mitigation; it did not meet state and local plans, rules and statutes; and there are alternatives that can provide needed protection. Since then, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton created a joint task force to develop engineering options to address concerns about the project’s impacts. The project applicant considered the task force’s work in developing the current project proposal. DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr said substantial changes to the original proposal require additional analysis. He said the DNR’s determination that an SEIS is needed is entirely separate from the agency’s ultimate decision about permitability. The SEIS will help ensure that the potential impacts of the project, as revised, are thoroughly assessed and disclosed, he said. “I want to emphasize that Minnesota continues to support enhanced flood risk management for the developed portion of the Fargo-Moorhead area that can meet Minnesota state standards,” Landwehr said. As required by state law, the DNR will not decide on the permit application until the SEIS is deemed adequate. The SEIS adequacy determination is not a project approval, but is rather a decision about whether the supplemental review was completed properly. The DNR is expected to complete the SEIS and adequacy determination in fall 2018. A permit decision is expected soon thereafter. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is preparing a federal supplemental environmental assessment for the proposed project, which is similar to the state SEIS in scope and purpose. The DNR will accept comments on the scope of the SEIS during a 20-day period beginning May 22 and ending June 11 at 4:30 p.m. A copy of the SEIS is available for public review at: DNR Library, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, MN 55155. DNR northwest region office, 2220 Bemidji Ave., Bemidji, MN 56601. Minneapolis Central Library, 300 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401, Government Documents, 2nd Floor. Moorhead Public Library, 118 5th St. S, Moorhead, MN 56560. Fergus Falls Public Library, 205 E. Hampden, Fergus Falls, MN 56537. Fargo Public Library Downtown, 102 3rd St. North, Fargo, ND 58102. Written comments on the scope of the SEIS must be received by Monday, June 11 at 4:30 p.m. Comments may be mailed to:  Jill Townley, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Road, Box 25, St. Paul, MN 55155-4025. Comments may be emailed to: environmentalrev.dnr@state.mn.us with “Fargo-Moorhead SEIS” in the subject line. If using the email address, include your name and mailing address so that you can be added to the mailing list. Comments may be faxed to 651-297-1500. The SEIS preparation notice, and additional details about the proposed project and the DNR’s review process are available on the Fargo-Moorhead project page. ###   Frequently Asked Questions What is this project about? The proposed Fargo-Moorhead (FM) flood risk management project is designed to divert flood waters around Fargo, North Dakota; Moorhead, Minnesota and surrounding metropolitan areas. It would control flows through the Fargo-Moorhead metropolitan area by placing high hazard dams on the Red and Wild Rice rivers. The dams, along with two tieback embankments, would then stage water in an upstream staging area. Water would drain from the upstream staging area into a 30-mile diversion channel around the metropolitan area that would outlet north of the metropolitan area. What is the history of the DNR’s involvement with the project? The DNR prepared a state environmental impact statement (EIS) for the Diversion Authority’s proposed project. That EIS process concluded in June 2016 with the DNR’s EIS adequacy determination. On Feb. 18, 2016, prior to completion of state environmental review, the DNR received an application for a Dam Safety and Public Waters Work permit for the FM project, listing the Flood Diversion Board of Authority (the Diversion Authority) as the applicant. Based on the October 2016 Findings of Fact for the Dam Safety and Public Water Work Permit Application, the DNR denied the permit application for the proposed FM project. In early 2017, the Diversion Authority informally coordinated with DNR staff regarding the permit denial by engaging in work sessions aimed at addressing the DNR’s concerns and discussing potential options moving forward. Later in 2017, North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum and Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton created a joint task force to discuss flood control options and make recommendations. The task force created a technical advisory group that included engineers and staff from the Diversion Authority and the DNR. The technical group presented the task force with engineering options to address concerns about project impacts. What is the revised project design? On March 16, 2018, after considering the recommendations of the task force and technical advisory group, and engaging in additional discussions with the DNR, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Richland-Wilkin Joint Powers Authority, the Diversion Authority submitted a permit application for a revised FM project, known as “Plan B.” The “Plan B” project changes the alignments of the southern embankment alignment, the eastern tieback and the western tieback. This plan also allows more flows through town. These component changes result in a new inundation and staging area, and also result in modifications to, and elimination of, some project structures, such as the Comstock ring levee. Plan B also results in reduced impacts to Minnesota acres, cemeteries and organic farms. What will happen next? The DNR has determined that these project design changes are “substantial and may affect the potential significant adverse environmental effects of the project” and has ordered preparation of a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS). The SEIS is designed to evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed project that were not assessed in the original EIS. During the SEIS process, the DNR will also be reviewing the Diversion Authority’s Plan B permit application. However, the DNR cannot make any decision on the application until the SEIS process is complete. The DNR currently anticipates completing the SEIS in October 2018, and making its permit decision shortly thereafter. Additional information about the SEIS and permit application are available on the Fargo-Moorhead project page. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • DRAGFOOT
      We did well Thursday, Friday and Saturday out front of Pine just out of the gap in 19ft. Got on the lake just fine Saturday....was actually better than the previous two days as far as rough water is concerned I thought.
    • ANYFISH2
      Welcome back Fishandfowl! Congratulations on your bird. It seems like it has been a tough year for many. Hope you can stick around and share your adventures with us some more.
    • Stephen L Johnston Jr.
      I saw the guy who bought our cabin, Ryan Aker, came in 4th. A couple of 7lb fish and i thought i saw a team with a 10lb fish also. Shhhhhh, the shallow is a secret. We fish quite often in 5' or less, Often watching the guides out on the sandy flats from a far