Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Comments for the DNR


BLACKJACK

Recommended Posts

so because i dont know what a 220 is i cant post a comment? If you would read my post it wasnt bashing trapping or pheasant hunting if i had time to trap i would but since i presently live in the metro area im not able to trap. like i said in my post i dont think as many pheasant hunters' dogs get in the traps as it is dogs that are dumped off by people because they dont want them or cant get rid of them. There i chimed in again!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • walleye101

    30

  • gorrilla

    24

  • poutpro

    14

  • BLACKJACK

    10

Quote:

so because i dont know what a 220 is i cant post a comment?


Nobody was saying you were bashing trapping or pheasant hunting. Its just the issue with 220's is all about conibear style traps that are made to kill the animal that gets caught in them. This wouldnt be as big a deal if it was just a foothold because the dog would come out with minimal injuries. It helps to know what you are talking about before voicing your opinion for the sake of our sport, because even though you said you helped on a trap line once you now labeled yourself a "trapper" in the eyes of the general public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poutpro,

Don't mean to compare trapping skills.

As I have said I do not want to see the 220 banned.

But, we cannot continue to pretend that there's no problem.

DNR needs some rational comments on this issue. Not just finger pointing and denial.

What would be some reasonable ways to regulate how this trap is used to significantly reduce the chances of taking non-target animals?

I agree there are those who would like to see all trapping banned. I doesn't take 100's or even dozens of unfortunate incidents with hunting dogs or someones pet, to give the anti's plenty of leverage in our always anxious media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From Walleye 101 to:

Quote:

Poutpro,

By your logic, trappers should have the right to make any type of set anywhere if it is effective at taking predators and provides the trapper a source of income. If it is indiscriminant set that kills non-target animals as well, I guess that is just part of the business. Heck, trappers loose a few traps every season, hunters should just expect that they may loose a dog now and then, just part of the business.

I am a trapper myself and member of the MN trappers association. It is just your type of narrow minded logic that will likely mean the end of the sport for the rest of us responsible trappers.

No one is suggesting that 220's be outlawed. They are a safe and efficient tool if used correctly. That is not setting them in baited cubbies where hunters with dogs have every right to be. If that is the only set you can catch racoon in you should invest in some trapping lessons.


Then you go on to say in a later post lets keep this civil???

I've been reprimanded on this site for sarcasm before, yeah I couldn't believe it either...

I think this is one of many good topics so lets keep it going in the right direction. I think Poutpro is making great comments.

If we spend a little more time and effort educating trappers and hunters (as well as any dog owners) ALL the details about 220 sets and especially WHEN to expect to see them in the woods, hopefully we can avoid the word restriction.

I love my pooch, and used to trap, so I understand what could happen to him on public land if he encountered a 220 or a snare or thin ice or a car or a bear. I'm willing to invest a little more effort to support the Minnesota Trapper's Association to continue there efforts to educate new trappers with there membership funded trainings. Maybe more adults and non trappers need to learn too.

The 220 is the best, most efficient, and humane tool for predator control. It just needs to be put in the hands of responsible educated trappers, not taken from them...

Lord knows I can be disagreable at times, but us sportsmen need to stick together without falling into the dreams of PETA and start taking away our own rights!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that education is and excellent tool and the DNR is headed in the right direction in that aspect. However, I dont know why the MTA is in charge of the certification training and not the DNR? The DNR does all the other classes but the trapping class. As a member of the MTA I am glad they are so eager to help further the sport but maybe our member fees could be used on other things then the trapping classes. If the DNR took it over they could then charge the 5-10 dollars like all the other classes they offer. I think that if the DNR did offer it along with their other classes it would attract more people to our sport. I didnt even know of the classes till last year when congress was trying to make it manditory for any one born after 89. Just my thoughts for the night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an accurage comparison. Slot limits are not designed to limit the harvest to the "fish of a lifetime". Point restrictions would be more akin to setting a statewide miniumu 30" size walleye restriction.

I don't feel it is appropriate for force everyone to adhere to trophy hunting or fishing across the board.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

J jake...

I totally agree with you on that one. Its like the DNR doesn't want to step up for the trappers. I didn't even know MTA had this on their shoulders until I attended a trapping convention in Isle this year with my cousin.

Moose season - DNR session, turkey season - DNR session, elk season - DNR session, but trapper training - MTA funded. Funny, even though the DNR requires the certification(which I don't mind being required). Why don't they(DNR) at least fund MTA to do it since they are the leading resource on the topic anyway. Maybe I'm wrong, but it seemed to me from how they talked at the convention, it was the MTA's $...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6) Deer regulations, especially point restrictions. I’m against point restrictions, in the farm lands where I slug hunt, that four point might be the only deer you see. Don’t let a vocal minority, the trophy rack hunters, dictate our deer hunting regs.


One thing to consider is that the antler point restriction might be a tool with the goal of increasing doe harvest not trophy production. This can be used to more effectively reduce the herd. The thing I like about antler point restriction is that it can be used rather than earn a buck. Also, I don't believe the antler point restriction should be used in farmland areas, where overpopulation is not such an issue.

I think we all agree that we hope it doesn't have to come down to either of these regulations, and I dont think it will as long as us hunters or the weather can effectively control the population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

One thing to consider is that the antler point restriction might be a tool with the goal of increasing doe harvest not trophy production.


I could understand this point but is that what is being proposed? It would seem that a more controlled harvest would be gained by doing what we have been doing with antlerless permits only in reverse. In other words, an antlered permit would be more effective than a point restriction and it would be less likely that mistakes would be made since we are already accustomed to identifying a legal antler.

It would be interesting to see the results in those zones where either sex was permitted last fall and how it affected doe harvest. My guess is that a majority of deer hunters will take a doe as easily as a buck because most of us are in it for the meat more than the trophy. It's only a select few that will wait for that big buck.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BobT,

Here is some data on the 2005 deer harvest. Hopefully the link works and the information is of use if you are interested in the harvest in each zone.

http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/publications/wildlife/populationstatus2006/populationstatus2006.pdf

As far as the antler point restriction is concerned, I dont think it is being proposed, its only being used currently in state parks. That along with earn a buck and early doe seasons are being researched to find out what it most effective and which might be supported by the public if any of the three are ever considered.

Wallegator

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting post. One of my good hunting buddies lost his dog to a trap on state land (WMA)in West Central MN 2 years ago. Somebody posted earlier that they doubt it happens often, but it happening once is too much for me. I support trapping 100%, but as somebody who spends many hours on public land pheasant hunting, knowing that it could happen to my dog scares me. My dog means the world to me, and having to worry about something like a trap killing him is unacceptable to me. I would gladly take the reduced number of pheasants over a better chance of him being killed by a trap. Is there not some happy medium in this? I do not know trapping at all. Somebody please enlighten me as to what can be done to keep dogs safe, and also keep trappers successful? What education is required right now? Do traps have to be posted with bright markers of some type? Do traps have to be posted with names on them? I think a trapper would be much less likely to leave a trap in a bad spot or improperly set if his name was on it. I sure wouldn't wanted an armed hunter showing up at my front door with his dead dog in his arms! Do conibear traps have to be set in cubbies? Is there a way that even a smaller dog like my brittany could still get caught in one while it was in a cubby? Would much stiffer penalties for illegal trapping practices make a difference? Please, somebody enlighten me on some of these details. I think many avid hunters like myself still know very little about trapping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traps need to be tagged with your name, and if you were born after a date, im not exactly sure but I think its like 1986, you need to take a trapper's education class in order to get a liscense. Traps do not need to be in cubbies. With trapper education, trappers are going to learn which sets are going to be high risk for making incidental catches, and will be encouraged not to make these sets. The sets I put on public lands where a dog could get at, are made as cubbies with the trap set back into the box about 6 to 8 inches. These boxes are dogproof. I don't know if flagging trap sets is the answer either. This would lead to a HUGE increase in trap theft, which is already a huge issue for trappers now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

What education is required right now?


Trapper education/certification is required for new trappers born after a certain year(not sure which) currently. As mentioned earlier, I believe the MN trapper's association is stepping up and taking the financial responsibility on their shoulders(why not the DNR?)

Quote:

Do traps have to be posted with bright markers of some type?


No, and that would not work either, unfortunately since dogs can't read or interperet ribbons and it would be like marking $10-$300 dollar bills thoughout the wilderness. Some unethical types would like nothing more than to steal all the $25 dollar traps with $200 dollar furs in them...

Quote:

Do traps have to be posted with names on them?


Yes, and ALL trappers do it. Its the law. If you want to debate that with me, I'll say if you aren't tagging your traps or placing traps where they don't belong then you don't deserve to be called a trapper and you are nothing short of a criminal deliberately or stupidly giving the good guys a bad name.

Quote:

I sure wouldn't wanted an armed hunter showing up at my front door with his dead dog in his arms!


Just because we are often carrying guns while hunting, it is NOT to be confused with weapons and ANY person threatening another in that manner would also be a criminal, NOT A HUNTER. GET IT STRAIGHT!

Quote:

Do conibear traps have to be set in cubbies?


No. They often are for raccoons, fisher, mink, and bobcats. If you have those animals in your area, there is a possibility that conibears are around since they can often work best in a cubbie. Knowledgable trappers(through experience or training classes) have developed conibear sets that are less likely to catch hunting dogs. Elevated cubbies for bobcats and fisher work well. The use of non dog attracting baits(sweet smells versus meats or glandular lures) for raccoons can work as well. I've even seen cubbie designs which have an entrance area before trap is contacted to allow only smaller target animals into the 7"(220 conibear) opening. Larger dogs would be safe, although ankle biters might be at risk yet.

Basically through education trappers should be aware that on public land or private land where hunting dogs may be, it is very prudent for the sake of the practice of trapping that all sets be made in safe locations and if not possible to avoid bodygriping sets in locations not suitable.

This is NOT to say trappers shouldn't be allowed to set on public land. If done properly, hunters and trappers can coexist. They need to. Hunters also need to take some responsibility on their shoulders too and be aware of the trapping seasons up north for fisher and bobcat (late November through parts of December) and protect their grouse dogs since IMO this is a poor time to have a pooch in the woods anyway with all the Muzzleloader deer hunters still sitting on stand.

Quote:

Would much stiffer penalties for illegal trapping practices make a difference? Please, somebody enlighten me on some of these details. I think many avid hunters like myself still know very little about trapping.


Do stiffer penalties stop deer poachers? Notice I didn't say illegal deer "hunters". Poachers are poachers whether doing illegal things with guns or traps, they don't get to be called hunters or trappers and we don't want to have them lumped in with us either.

For all the avid hunters that have questions about trapping and/or conibears, I suggest get yourself enrolled on a trapper education course and learn about it thoroughly. It'll do everyone some good to learn how to manage our critters better and will help keep our hunting dogs safer too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

poutpro, what makes those cubbies dogproof?

A couple years ago a local trapper caught a couple of dogs - kids pets - by putting conibear traps in buckets and the dogs stuck their heads in - two dead dogs was the result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When my dog almost got caught in connibear trap - it nicked her nose - I was a lot younger and dumber and hot headed. I've always wondered how long I would have waited - with a baseball bat - for that trapper to show up. Hopefully it would have been a couple of days so I had time to cool off!!!!! Don't underestimate the consequences of catching and killing someones friend!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BLACKJACK, I don't know why you asked poutpro about the dog proof cubbies?

And why you don't simmer down, you always have such extreme post on here. A few less !!!!! would allow people to get something out of this post and get along better.

As far as the dog proof cubbie boxes go, they have long entrance areas like 8" squares of about 24" in depth, so a large animal like a dog can't get his head far enough into it to to trigger the trap, but a raccoon or fisher will squirt right through. Like I said previously, it won't protect the yapper breeds, but it sure does a good job on the larger sporting breeds.

The only down sides to this set, is that they are very labor intensive, heavy, and sickout like a sore thumb(trap thieve magnets) because of their size. When a trapper assesses and area as one that is remote and especially if it is private or land locked, he will usually opt for a much more open cubby such as a notched pail or natural cubby. They often work better on trap shy animals as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to see the posession limit for roosters increased but not the daily. I like the idea of point restrictions for deer, how will we be able to see the potential for deer if they are taken when they are 4 or 6 pointers. I would like to have a no point restriction for youth though. That's just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I also would like to say I'm not a trapper unless trapping a few pocket gophers counts, but i'm all for trapping. I am a big time pheasant hunter. Could a solution be to not allow trapping on public land during the months of Oct-Dec unless it is done under the water or in muskrat dens ect. Then allow trapping after the hunting season is over. Then if you have your dog out on public land between the months of January-September then it is your own problem to watch out for your dog. Like I said I don't trap so maybe this isn't a viable situation. Just a thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gorrila,

I believe he asked poutpro about dog proof cubbies because poutpro brought it up in his post. He uses cubbies where the trap is set back 6-8 inches and said they were dog proof. I am also curious, what makes that a dog proof set?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I was trying to explain in my previous post, the conibear is set back in a constructed tunnel or entry way far enough the dog can't get beyond his head and neck to reach the trap. Smaller target animals on the other hand can fit their whole bodies through and whammo.

As far as the suggestion on who gets to use the public land when, the trappers already are very limited as to when they can target some species like fisher, bobcat, otter, marten.

I think its just as prudent to be aware of these seasons as a dog owner and avoid them for the short duration of the season(hunters get three months and trappers about 3-6 weeks as it is for these species).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Could a solution be to not allow trapping on public land during the months of Oct-Dec unless it is done under the water or in muskrat dens ect. Then allow trapping after the hunting season is over. Then if you have your dog out on public land between the months of January-September then it is your own problem to watch out for your dog. Like I said I don't trap so maybe this isn't a viable situation. Just a thought.


If they closed the trapping season from oct-dec trappers might as well sell all thier traps because that is the prime furbearer period. most trappers stop trapping well before the close date of mar-15 due to furbearers losing their winter pelt. this would be a very bad solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks walleye. Sometimes you just have to consider the source and ignore it. Sitting behind the keyboard makes it easy to spout off. After awhile people judge you by the quality of your posts and just don't bother to read them if they're too far out or acidic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is how I make mine dog proof. The trap is back so far in to box that a hunting dog couldn't get his neck into the trap. Even if one did get his nose far enough to hit the trigger, it would just get him on the snout, but not around the neck. Also, some people make a smaller round hole in the entrance, so that there is no way that a dog can get in, but coons and mink can go throuhg it. Let me see if I can find some pics to post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dog3.jpg

dogproof2.jpg

Here is an example of a dogproof cubbie set that I found online. The trap should be set back far enough in the bucket and a hole is cut in the front so that a dog can't get into it. Now this doesn't work for small dogs that could fit their body into that hole, but the hole is pretty small, so most hunting dogs would not get into it. Also, it is important to use scents that dogs aren't as attracted to. I couldn't find any pics of the boxes that just have the trap recessed back into the cubbie, but I will keep looking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you poutpro,

Finally this thread has come around to folks looking for and suggesting practical solutions to a serious problem rather than pretending there is none.

Anyone setting a trap capable of killing has a responsibility to make every reasonable effort to ensure it is selective for the intended target. Unfortunately as long as it is legal to set unguarded baited cubbies on public land some folks will because they are quick and easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing speaks stronger than money.

All conibear traps must be labeled with owner name, address, and phone number.

The trapper must be liable for his own actions on public land. If the trap kills a domestic animal - they must be liable. The trapper can pay the owner the actual replacement value of the hunting dog. ie - $1000 to $5000.

While this certainly does not provide emotional relief to the dog owner --- Money speaks louder to many than just an apology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poutpro, where did you find the commercially made dog proof cubbies? I have only seen the wooden version in a Fur Fish Game magazine.

Blackjack, I only wonder if your referring to yourself in the last post...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

The trapper must be liable for his own actions on public land. If the trap kills a domestic animal - they must be liable. The trapper can pay the owner the actual replacement value of the hunting dog. ie - $1000 to $5000.


There are quite a few people out there that would disagree with this. The arguement could be made that the dog owner should have better control of his dog. It could be further argued that if a dog owner has 5000 dollars invested in his dog, and doesn't have it under control it shouldn't be on public land to start with. And further, it can be aruged that if a persons dog trips a legally set conniber on public land, the dog owner should reimburse the trapper for the amount the trapper would have made from that particular set.

There are many different sides to a story. Trappers and hunters own public land equally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Jake,

Thanks for the info. I didn't know how long the season was and someone posted trappers only get 3-6weeks. Being that January and Feb. are the coldest months of the year wouldn't the coats on the animals being trapped still be good. If so why not make the season 8 weeks long and trap during Jan-Feb. Like I said before I'm no expert it's just an interesting topic so why not learn about it from some of you who know what you're talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.