• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
BLACKJACK

Comments for the DNR

Recommended Posts

BLACKJACK

The Strib was saying that the DNR is going to have some informational/comment sessions around the state on some issues. Heres what I sent to the DNR, I was wondering what others thoughts were on issues facing the DNR.

-------------

I probably won’t make it to one of your info meetings but here are my comments:

1) Pheasant limits – 2 to 3.

- I say no. As an avid pheasant hunter, I like to see more roosters around later in the season, why get more of them slaughtered in the first two ‘easy’ weeks of the season?

2) Pheasant possession – Yes raise the possession limit. If you’re an avid pheasant hunter and go out 4-5 times a week and have some success, you have to ‘work’ at cooking some up in order to stay legal. I’d like to be able to enjoy my pheasants at my leisure, taking them out of the freezer when I have time and enjoying them.

3) Conibear traps – restrict them, especially the big ones!!! As a guy who almost had his dog caught in a big conibear trap, I don’t want to see my dog – or anyones dog – caught in one. Restrict the big ones to water sets and nothing on land, even up north in the grouse woods, that a dog can get there head in.

4) Bows cut from 40 to 30 pounds. As a bow hunter, I want to cut down any bad publicity and I think that 30 pounds would cut down your margin of error; it would have to be a perfect heart/lung shot. I say no.

5) One dollar surcharge on deer license to pay for food shelf donation. I say yes, it would be good publicity. But only for deer processing, not any other deer management/predation costs.

6) Deer regulations, especially point restrictions. I’m against point restrictions, in the farm lands where I slug hunt, that four point might be the only deer you see. Don’t let a vocal minority, the trophy rack hunters, dictate our deer hunting regs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

Quote:

4) Bows cut from 40 to 30 pounds. As a bow hunter, I want to cut down any bad publicity and I think that 30 pounds would cut down your margin of error; it would have to be a perfect heart/lung shot. I say no.


I can agree with all of your statements accept I wonder about this one. I don't necessarily disagree but I have a question.

The regulation setting the minimum draw weight was set when arrow speed was considerably less than it is today. With the advances in bow technology arrow speeds have increase considerably over the years not to mention the improvements made in arrow and broadhead designs as well. I don't know the typical specifics but I would guess that a 30# bow today probably sends an arrow faster than a 40# bow of just 20 years ago. That does seem to support lessening the draw weight.

Secondly, lower draw weight would mean less to hold and I'm thinking, improved shot placement. Coupled with the improved arrow speeds and better broadhead designs this may compensate for any lack of impact energy.

Third, lower draw weight might mean more hunters able to participate. I realize that 40# is not a tremendous weight to hold but it might be for some.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Powerstroke

The consideration for a 30lb weight limit comes from trying to get more "youth" size bows to qualify for hunting. What is known now about kinetic energy proves that a properly equipped 30 lb bow can hunt deer.

We all know that you can wound a deer shooting 80lbs if you make a bad shot, so proper shot placement is always important. More energy doesn't mean more kills if you shoot poorly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

I would sure hate to see 220 connibear traps made illegal on land. They are the main way that I catch raccoon, and I have never had a dog caught in a trap. I beleive that it is a very rare occurence, and that there are many other things that kill more dogs that 220 traps. I think that a lot of trappers would be upset if they were banned, they aren't really the right size for water sets. Too small for beaver, too big for mink.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

How big is a 220?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
loupepsi

Very well stated

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sportfish

I like how people say they have to shoot that fork horn, becuse if they had a point restriction they wouldnt shot a buck. Well next year that fork would be leagal and would be bigger horns and bigger body(more meat). Just shoot a doe if you can't stand not getting meat!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

A 220 is 7" X 7". It is possible that your dog got caught in a 330, which currently is illegal to have set on land. I think that the trapper education requirement will help a lot to teach trappers how to avoid these accidental catches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dillon

I hate the idea of antler point restrictions. Even though in recent years we have been passing up a lot of smaller 8 or 10 pt. racks, I still think each hunter should be able to make their own decision about what is big enough for him or her to shoot. Some hunters don't have as much time to spend in the woods as others and shooting a smaller buck might be a success for them.

I also think that a lot of hunters are using the perceived lack of big deer as an excuse for their lack of success. The truth is there are good numbers of big deer in the woods. Just don't expect it to be as easy as it looks on TV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
J48jake

Quote:

3) Conibear traps – restrict them, especially the big ones!!! As a guy who almost had his dog caught in a big conibear trap, I don’t want to see my dog – or anyones dog – caught in one. Restrict the big ones to water sets and nothing on land, even up north in the grouse woods, that a dog can get there head in.


Another issue that boils down to people not knowing anything about the topic and using the dreaded R-word. 220's are a great tool for the trapper and a lot of pheasant egg seeking predators are trapped in them every year. There are many other options to reduce the unwanted animal catches in the 220. On public land they could be flagged with a certain color ribbon to indicate a trap has been set there or there are ways a trapper can "dog proof" there traps. Personally I trap on my own land and I think I should be able to us 220's because they really are a useful tool to the trapper. I am not telling pheasant hunters what kind of gun they have to use or what kind of dog they have to hunt with.

Just my 2 cents

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

That is a good point about the eggs. Think how many pheasant and duck eggs will be saved by all of the raccoon and skunks that were caught with 220 traps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Good point. That will make the guy carrying his dead pheasant dog back to his truck feel a whole lot better!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kgpcr4

I sure hope they dont put a point restriction on. THat would suck in my mind. Alot of people dont have the time to scout and hunt alot and any buck to them is a trophy so i am dead set against it. I know one land owner who told me "the day the tell me i cant shoot any buck is when i start gun hunting in October" I would aslo like to see the pheasant limit stay right where it is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

Quote:

...trapper. I am not telling pheasant hunters what kind of gun they have to use...


Very old law. No hunting anything with shotgun larger than ten gage. Hard to find one these days, but don't go shooting pheasants with a cannon loaded with shot please. shocked.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
J48jake

Quote:

Good point. That will make the guy carrying his dead pheasant dog back to his truck feel a whole lot better!


Like I said, I support some sort of flagging or marking of traps on PUBLIC land, Any dog worth anything will listen to you when you call it back away from the marked trap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Scott K

To simplefy things why doesnt dnr just close buck for a year, and have a doe only. That would make all bucks bigger, and thin out this so called over populated deer population. Im sure there are several reasons not to do this, but it would work. Maybe do it once every 10 years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dstrey

To ban an effective way of controlling predators just doesnt make any sense to me, a dog would have to try pretty hard to crawl into a 220. I havent trapped for a long while but i support it in every way. More traps out there = less predators = more pheasants.

As far as not allowing anyone to take a buck for an entire year. That would cost the dnr tons of money in lost license sales. Where I hunt many people go hunting for a set of antlers, i dont think they would even buy a license for a doe. I shoot at the first deer I have a decent shot at and if it were a very nice buck, I would be fairly pissed if I had to let him walk by.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

Why is it that pheasant hunters think that their sport and their dogs are more important than any other sport? A lot of people trap for a seasonal income, and by taking away the 220, it would cut down on their income. If something is bad for the pheasant hunters, well I guess it should just be banned.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

I would actually like to see how many dogs actually get caught in 220s each year. I have talked to quite a few trappers, and all that use 220's have said that they have never had a dog in one. Maybe we should not allow vehicles to drive down gravel roads when they see someone hunting pheasants in the adjacent section because their dog could get hit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Poutpro,

By your logic, trappers should have the right to make any type of set anywhere if it is effective at taking predators and provides the trapper a source of income. If it is indiscriminant set that kills non-target animals as well, I guess that is just part of the business. Heck, trappers loose a few traps every season, hunters should just expect that they may loose a dog now and then, just part of the business.

I am a trapper myself and member of the MN trappers association. It is just your type of narrow minded logic that will likely mean the end of the sport for the rest of us responsible trappers.

No one is suggesting that 220's be outlawed. They are a safe and efficient tool if used correctly. That is not setting them in baited cubbies where hunters with dogs have every right to be. If that is the only set you can catch racoon in you should invest in some trapping lessons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
poutpro

Have you read any of the posts? Obvoisly not, people ARE saying that they want to outlaw the 220. Also, did I ever say that I think traps should be set in any manner? The only thing that I am saying is that the pheasant hunters think that all game laws should be formed to be best for only pheasant hunters. Also, did I ever say that the 220 was the only way that I catch raccoons? I don't know how you are coming to all of these false conclusions. The few dogs that get caught in traps are being caught by those that set traps irresponsibly or illegally. Why do you think a law is going to change this? I beleive that trapper education is the answer to the problem.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye101

Yes I have been reading the posts. I just went back and re-read all the posts on this topic and only the first post mentioned restrictions on the use of conibers. I did not see any post advocating for outlawing them.

If we cannot have a civil conversation about some reasonable restrictions on where they should be allowed and what type of set is more of less dangerous, that is when you end up with laws proposed to outlaw them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
J48jake

I am with poutpro, I would still like to see actually stats on dogs getting caught in 220's. And I don’t want to hear any sob stories about someone’s dog getting trapped in a 220. A 220 is only 7x7 but I am sure it won’t be long till it follows the path of the 330 and is banned on land. There is just more pheasant hunters then there is trappers and unfortunately politics is all about numbers and money.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kaz2611

im not a bow hunter so not sure the impact a lesser draw weight would have like stated arrow speed has increased alot since the 40lb draw weight was introduced and i agree that for some they may be a little more stable for a cleaner shot and if lowering it to 30 lbs will enable more youth to hunt THAT WOULD BE EXCELLENT .

point limit : lets see that deer is blazing by you at 30 mph can you count how many points it has? with proper deer management there is no need for this law. a bigger rack doesnt mean the deer has more meat

banning the 220 im not a trapper but i have experienced running a trap line with a friend some years back i really enjoyed it peta has been beating down on the trapper for years and now sounds almost same with pheasant hunters yeah i agree if my dog stepped in a trap id be pissed off i dont think this happens alot with hunting dogs that are actually out hunting pheasants with their owners as much as it does to dogs that have been dumped off on side of the road because theya re no longer wanted heres an idea for pheasant hunters if your hunting private land ask the owner if he traps and if so ask if he has sets in the area you are planning on hunting with your dog. for public land no real good solution there other than most trappers like sets near culverts or on fence lines so maybe be cautious in these areas. trappers trap alot of racoons and skunks along with fox and coyotes all of which love pheasants and pheasant eggs. take away trapper and soon the pheasants will follow. BTW i enjoy hunting pheasants more so than any other game outside of deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jameson

point limit--not needed. Big bucks are taken on public land every year in MN. Get out there and scout and hunt harder.

My comment to the DNR:

I just finished guessing my 2007 license fees for hunting and fishing. $233.50 Thanks for the bargain! I think thats really cheap for all the time I spend doing those things. Oh, and the full freezer of venison. laugh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Cliff Wagenbach
      I do not think that there are docks at the overnight campsites but some do have sandy shorelines. Most of the shore lunch/picnic  sites do have docks but are not overnight camping sites. Cliff
    • Getanet
      Thanks for the info guys. Looks like I have some research to do. Chucker, do you know if Hinsdale Island has a place to dock a boat ?  I'd hate to have it banging against rocks all night.
    • Rick
      The new northern pike fishing regulations, which were announced recently and go into effect on the May 12 fishing opener, have three distinct zones to address the different characteristics of pike populations in Minnesota, according to the Department of Natural Resources.

      Each of the zones – north-central, northeast and south – provide protection for different sizes of pike, and there are reasons for those differences. “We’re continuing to let anglers know there are new pike regulations for those who want to keep pike on inland waters,” said Chris Kavanaugh, DNR northeast region fisheries manager. “We also want to share the thinking behind the new regulations.” North-central zone
      The north-central zone is the largest of the three zones, and here the possession limit is 10 northern pike, but only two can be longer than 26 inches; and all from 22 to 26 inches must be released. “We’re responding to angler concerns about the over-abundance of small, or hammer-handle, pike in the north-central zone,” Kavanaugh said. Through anglers keeping small fish but protecting the 22 to 26 inch pike, the objective in the north-central zone is to both reduce the abundance of small pike and allow medium size pike to grow larger. The advantages of growing larger pike are twofold. While protected these medium size pike will eat small pike, helping reduce abundance of small pike. And when they eventually grow out of the protected size range they will be a more desirable size for keeping. Southern zone
      In the southern zone, where reproduction is limited, the regulation intends to increase pike abundance while also improving the size of fish harvested. Anglers in the southern zone can keep two fish, but the minimum size is 24 inches. “The management issue in the southern zone is the opposite of what’s happening in the north-central zone,” Kavanaugh said. “With low reproduction, stocking is often necessary to provide a pike fishery in the south. Here we want to protect young pike and give them a chance to grow.” Growth rates are much faster in these southern lakes so most will reach the 24 inch keeper size in a few years. Northeastern zone
      In the northeastern zone, pike reproduction is good but these lakes do not have the high density problems of the north-central zone since they still have a nice balance of medium to large pike. Here, it makes sense to provide protection for large pike while they still exist. “The trophy pike of the Arrowhead Region have definitely made some great stories and photos over the decades,” Kavanaugh said. “But these fish grow slowly in the cold water and if too many anglers keep trophy pike here, they’ll be gone.” In the northeastern zone, anglers can keep two pike but must release all from 30 to 40 inches, with only one over 40 inches allowed in possession. Other considerations
      Anglers who want to keep pike will need to be prepared to measure them. Those planning to take advantage of the expanded bag limit on small pike should familiarize themselves with the extra cuts it takes to fillet the fish. New pike regulations do not affect border water fishing regulations or special regulations that cover individual lakes, rivers and streams. Darkhouse spearing regulations for pike differ slightly and those regulations are listed in the spearing section of the regulations booklet. For more information on the new zone regulations visit mndnr.gov/pike or contact a local area fisheries office. Contact information can be found at mndnr.gov/areas/fisheries or in the printed fishing regulations booklet. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The lingering cold weather is delaying ice-out on Minnesota lakes and rivers, which could make it difficult for DNR crews to have the 1,500 public water accesses it manages ready in time for the May 12 fishing opener. “I want Minnesotans to know that we are doing everything we can to get ready for the fishing opener,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr, “but mostly what we need are warmer temperatures and sunshine.” There are approximately 3,000 public water access sites statewide, and the DNR’s Parks and Trails Division manages about half of them. “Winter weather is always a challenge to Minnesota’s public water access sites,” said Nancy Stewart, water recreation program consultant. “Because of the late ice-out this year, DNR crews will have a shorter window than usual to get boat ramps and docks ready for the May 12 fishing opener, but we will have as many of them ready as possible.” Every year, repairs are needed at hundreds of sites, because freezing temperatures and ice cause concrete to crack and buckle on the ramps. In some years, crews can get a head start on that work, even before ice-out, but this year the snow has prevented them from assessing damage, and the ramps can’t be re-leveled until the ground thaws. In the meantime, crews are busy rehabbing docks by, for example, changing bumpers and wheels as needed so that they’ll be ready to pop in when the time comes. “Even if every last dock isn’t in by the opener, there will be places to fish and boat,” said Stewart. Helpful resources on the DNR’s Public Water Access website include: A map showing where ice-out has occurred. Phone numbers for DNR Area Offices for updates. Boaters and anglers can also get their questions answered by calling the DNR Info Center: 888-646-6367 (8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday-Friday, 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunters are reminded that applications for bear hunting licenses are being accepted now through Friday, May 4, wherever Minnesota hunting and fishing license are sold, online at mndnr.gov/buyalicense and by telephone at 888-665-4236. A total of 3,350 licenses are available in 13 permit areas. Bear licenses cost $44 for residents and $230 for nonresidents, and there is a $5 application fee. The season is open from Saturday, Sept. 1, through Sunday, Oct. 14. Notification to lottery winners will be made by Friday, June 1. Lottery winners will receive a postcard in the mail and can check online at mndnr.gov/licenses/lotteries/index.html to see if they were drawn. The deadline to purchase licenses awarded by lottery will be Wednesday, Aug. 1. Any remaining unpurchased licenses will be available over the counter starting at noon on Monday, Aug. 6. An unlimited number of bear licenses will be sold over-the-counter for the no-quota area that includes east-central and far northwestern Minnesota. No-quota licenses are valid only in the no-quota area. Hunters with a no-quota license can harvest one bear. Bear hunting information is available on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/hunting/bear. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • chucker1101
      There are 11 sites on/around Hinsdale Island, managed by the State DNR through one of the local parks (used to be Bear Island, it now might be Soudan Mine Park). Here's a link:  http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/destinations/state_parks/lake_vermilion_soudan_underground_mine/Hinsdale_map.pdf I think they're free to use, first come / first serve.  #11 is my favorite. I've heard that the ones on Hinsdale island have occasional visits from bears.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Check the lakevermilion.com site for a list of public campsites on Lake Vermilion. Cliff
    • gunner55
      We'll be making a trip in to GR again. in the next couple days. See what it looks like then.
    • TomWehler
      Hi I don;t know really if there is a list or not? Hmmmmm. good question? How do ya find out? I do know House boats tie up n camp to some of the smaller ones. So guessing fair game for campers also?? Fast simple way to find out those islands n locals might be to call Vermilion Houseboats n ask a few questions or drop by with a load Hoogies.  That 4 sure get some answers... KEEP OUT, PRIVIATE PROPERTY signs, Boat Lifts, docks ~ cabins n Reputation and of course GUNS n DOGS take care of the lite work for rest of us island owners. : ) 15 years ago Bonnie n I were going fishen an teasing Marauder crew of our hounds NO BOAT TODAY!  We jumped in boat on back dock, told them to have fun, be back soon. Driving around front of island to tease them an pick up front docks we see a boat pulling in to east side of island. I motor over an I ask if I can help them. Two dudes, kind of laurel n Hardy type couple. They say hey man, you a lake cop? Were on vacation an don't want no trouble, Go %$# @#$%^ an back off we are here 1st an need to take a dump. Before I say anything Bonnie says, well bud yer on private property an if you like staying healthy you should get back in yer boat really fast or you gonna know why in 10 seconds. : ) "Yeah well no one can own an island so just back off.....this aint nothing to do with you" That is when the four hounds turned corner of shed full blast in silent sneak attack mode.  : )Guess they were wrestling or chasing frogs or simply in shock that we did not let them in boat cause it took them about 1 minute to react to the voices. But maybe they were just waiting for right moment to GET IT ON! Becky arrived 1st....Buddy, then Barney an then Bailey....... One united big bark turned the dudes heads an you never seen two guys leap into a boat so fast just shy of four mouths full of teeth.... : ) Fat guy flew over the lil guy what seemed like 10 feet right into the bow of boat. Lil guys legs moving so fast to climb into boat an move it off show at same time all while screaming top of his lungs........HELP HELP HELP!!! Bonnie just says as I motor along to front docks to get hound pals.  "Talk to the hounds, this aint got nothing to do with us ~ remember" Fun couple of minutes! Later out on lake they apologized an asked info on places to camp an were sorry for being real DICKS. Told them to maybe got to DNR office in town an ask them about island camping as at the time I had no idea. Actually got to know them pretty good an laugh about this online every summer when they come to lake or when see them on lake once in a while. : ) Keep on rocken! T      
    • Hoey
      Yesterday there was open water, half way from the bridge to narrows used for netting and stripping.  It won't be long now.  The gates are still locked too.