• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

Recommended Posts

crazyice

Just thought I would pass along some info I heard today. No parking is being allowed anymore along county rd 11 apparently on sunday about 50 vehicles were parked on BOTH sides of the road and traffic could not meet. I heard that some vehicles were towed, but now no parking will be inforced by the police.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
NW angler

So is the inevitable end to Silver Creek fishing?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crickschop04

I guess that those who were fishing there illegally will just have to be happy that they were able to fish there as long as they did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crazyice

I drove by it today along county 11, there are now no parking signs up along the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bugman

It looks like if you park anywhere along 55th Ave, be prepared to recieve a ticket. Each time I drove by on Sat. and Sun. a sherriff was there writing them. Has anybody had any problems on the side roads?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fatcat45

It's too bad we can't fish a lake that was paid for by taxpayer's.... mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smg04

i was not there last wkend when all the problems were happing but i did talk to one of the officers that was there the other day,apparantly some yahoos were parked on each side of the road out far enough that it was down to a one lane road and traffic couldnt get through, not only that but there were 2 1/2 cases worth of beer cans and bottles left in the ditch, and also a few of these "sportsmen" decided to get lippy and act like a bunch of A-holes to the officers when they were there just to ask people to move there cars and trucks in the first place,so thats when they decided to start enforcing the no parking signs, i guess enough was enough, and honestly i dont blame the cops one bit, we can thank a small few of our fellow "fishermen" for this, not only have we lost a great resourse that i for one really enjoyed, but we left a huge black eye on the face of all fishermen in the roch. community, i hope these few punks and [email protected]#$ups are very happy with themselves!!! mad.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
penguin

'Open rebellion' at Silver Creek Reservoir

Mon, Jan 22, 2007

E-mail this story

Reader Comments

You must be a subscriber to comment on this story.

If you are a subscriber, you need to login.

For information on subscribing to PB Online click here.

By Jeff Hansel

The Post-Bulletin

Property owner Martha Bowman calls it trespassing.

Fisherman Dean Sinnwell thinks it's great fishing that should be shared with the public.

Property owner Chris Manahan says taxpayers paid for it, so it's public. The DNR and Olmsted County Sheriff's Department say it ought to be open.

But the wife of a deceased Halverhill Township board member, along with the unanimous township board, say keep out.

Who's right when it comes to Silver Creek Reservoir?

At issue is whether it's legal for anglers to climb a fence, scale the dam and access the manmade lake, or if their only legal recourse is to walk or boat in through Silver Creek.

On a recent bitterly cold Saturday, the ice was 6 inches thick -- and the parked cars and pickups were thicker; 22 vehicles lined Olmsted 11 at about 2:30 p.m. on Jan. 13.

"It's open rebellion," said Pat Carr, a Rochester city councilman and South Zumbro Watershed Joint Powers Board member.

One thing is clear: The water itself is public, as are all Minnesota waterways. The Department of Natural Resources says if a roadway crosses over a creek or river, the public has "riparian rights" to park legally and walk from the roadway down to the water.

Silver Creek Reservoir also is public because Silver Creek flows into it after abutting Silver Creek Road.

But parking and access to the water are divisive issues and opinions on both sides are strong.

Haverhill Township Board members and many landowners say they were promised the land surrounding the reservoir would remain private.

Joan Flores says her late husband, Richard Flores, was on the Haverhill board when the reservoir project was first proposed.

"I was opposed, and Richard was opposed, to putting the dam there, period," she said, "... and it was promised, that it would not be a public area."

But a public area indeed it is, in practice if not legally. Ice houses dot the reservoir and anglers come and go as if the area is open for public fishing.

Often, anglers stop first to get permission from Manahan to get to the water. Going in with permission from a landowner, said Sheriff Sgt. Fred Czekanski, is legal -- and so is crossing public land to reach the reservoir.

"We put the question to the attorney general and the attorney general says it's a public waterway. You can not restrict access to it," Czekanski said. But the attorney general's office denies ever offering an opinion.

"The property out there is owned by the South Zumbro Watershed Joint Powers Board, managed by the city of Rochester, so the city of Rochester would have to be the complainant on any enforcement that goes on out there," said Sheriff Capt. Mark Darnell. "They have stated that enforcement is not a priority."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bogsucker

The permit issued by the State of MN DNR to construct the dam specifically states that the waters impounded by the dam are to be open and unobstructed to public use. The township and county have the right to restrict parking as a safety concern however there was at one time a parking lot at the Haverhill WMA adjacent to Silver Creek Reservoir area though there is no drive approach to the parking area. The city has proposed a lot on the west side of the dam but apparently Haverhill Township is not being cooperative.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smallieobsession

Maybe an enterprising landowner out there would like to offer up parking and lake access out there. Say $5 per access or some kind of season/annual pass. Just an idea...they do it on Mille Lacs and other places. This would be a 100% legal way to access. Maybe have to look at zoning to see if something like that could be done out there but I bet it could.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icemac33

There is begining to be enough gray matter in this subject to choke a horse.There is a little more in the paper that isn't here. An agreement between the township and the city or county that no one can now find? A Sheriff with an opinion from the Attorney General that is now being denied as ever being offered? What is going on here? It sure is a big mess for some fishing rights. It doesn't sound like there is much of an issue with the straight-forward legal issues here. It can legally be fished and the South Zumbro Watershed Joint Powers Board (City of Rochester) doesn't have a problem with people parking(unless they are parking like idiots) . I personally have a problem with my government, city,state, or federal, doing public works projects, while making promises that they don't keep. You or I could be next in this account. Joe Soucheray calls it "getting wind-milled".I wouldn't want a bunch of hunters or fisherman showing up in my backyard flaunting a legal loophole. My belief is that good sportsmen should stay out of this area until someone can get something in black and white. We are our own best ambassadors on this subject, and others like it, and it is always going to be an iffy prospect until these wishy-washy government officials can sit down and hammer out an agreement. If this agreement was made as the township claims it was, there are two options here.1) Offer some compensation and get it open. 2) STAY OUT. I would sure like to have another great fishery close to Rochester but I will stay out until this clears up. I would ask others to do the same. Lets get this cleared up and then work on opening up the west half of Upper Red. grin.gif All personal opinion,no offense meant to anyone, and 'nuff said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crazyice

Amen to that! I agree that it isn't worth getting fishermen a bad name by pushing the limits of this. I think that it will all work out in the end and hopefully everyone involved will be happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bogsucker

It's not just the reservoir that access is being restricted. The Haverhill Wildlife Management Area Haverhill WMA which is open to public hunting is adjacent to the reservoir. We have 2 public recreation areas that Haverhill township is denying reasonable access to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bogsucker

Quote:

. I think that it will all work out in the end


That the problem, when will it end; it has been going on for years!!! I have seriuously considered filing a lawsuit to force haverhill TWP to cooperate with the city and DNR to provide access to the PUBLIC areas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icemac33

I don't know the specifics of the Haverhill WMA in the original agreement, but it doesn't seem like there should be any questions as far as a WMA that has been designated officially by the DNR. I am also not a fan of lawsuits.I don't foresee any firm action taking place out there in the foreseeable future with out some legal action though.Waiting it out may be the only action on this one.If the lawyers get involved, it is going to be strung out for years, at best. Best case is a parking lot and moral-dilemma free fishing in a few years. Worst case is that things come out of the woodwork and the original agreement shows up as stated by the Haverhill board. By that point there are two distinct teams all steamed at each other and the landowners and the board shut it down to any activity for time eternal. Screwed huh? How many landowners are involved on this on the township side? Has the city of Rochester made an honest effort to reach out to these landowners specifically? Does the township have a problem with this if the landowners are happy? Seems like the Manahan gentleman was already fine with this.Has there been an orchestrated effort by the sportsmen affected by this issue to talk to these landowners, either on this site or others? Lots of questions .I would love to fish this but I see both sides here. I realize our tax dollars went to build this, but I wouldn't be welcome to set up climbing equipment on the side of the government center just because it was there and I saw it as a recreational opportunity. Hunting geese at Silver Lake Park? Sorry, not allowed.Rules are rules and someone is not being honest here.That is the heart of the matter. It would be my opinion that the city of Rochester needs to make more of an effort to come together on this and get it over with instead of waiting for the attorney general or DNR to step up and do something definitive. That would be the best use of our tax dollars in this situation, as far as I'm concerned.Once again,personal opinions. Anyways, heres to good fishing. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DuaneW

Drove by Silver creek Res Sat after fishing Chester Woods. No luck either I might add. The sheriff was ticketing only the 3 cars that were parked on Cty 11.There were 4 cars parked in front the OPEN gate 5 cars were parked across the street in acorn field and 4 more were parked up at Silver Creek RD. I guess if you park legal you can fish there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tyler Holm

The only legal way to access Silver Creek Res is by walking/swimming/canoeing up the creek on the SE corner. Just because they are not ticketing certain parked cars, does not make it legal. That body of water has not officially been open to public fishing. Sorry

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gust35

I was talking to a guy last thurs. night. He talked to a C.O. The C.O. said that it was legal to fish Silver Creek Res. So I believe the DNR and I went fishing there last afternoon and did fairly well. Caught some nice crappies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bogsucker

The permit issued to construct the dam contains the following language;

"Any extension of the surface of said waters resulting from work authorized by this permit shall become protected waters and left open and unobstructed for use by the public."

Note the words "unobstructed for use by the public". I've yet to see any reference to this permit by any of the "officials", I am sure they must have been aware that a permit was issued to construct the dam.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
C&R Guy

You guys have to consider the land owners. If it's their wish to keep their property private, then it should be just that. Wait until this is settled in a court of law, then you may have the right to fish there, until then stay away, please!!! Keep the honor of Anglers strong!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gregh

This whole thing needs to be put to bed!! Do you ever wonder why its getting harder to get permission from land owners to hunt and to just get out in the outdoors? This is a perfect example. We as outdoorsmen need to consider more then whats happening NOW whats it going to be like for your younger generations.Think about it before you push the limits for some personal satisfaction. Theres a bigger picture here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Reservoir Dawg

Ok, I have to add my .02 cents here. I have talked to both Olmsted County deputies and a CO about accessing Silver Creek Res. Its perfectly legal as long as you don't park in the posted areas. I don't have any idea about the original agreement with Haverhill township but as stated the one person quoted who lives on the pond,Chris Manahan, is for the fisherman. Now as to the two women quoted in the paper they are well known activists, one lines a 1 1/2 miles to the east and the other lives on Hadley valley road so they are not living near the water.One of the women went to city council meetings to fight where a water tower was being built by Century HS,because it ruined her view of the city on the way to work.

The CO told me at the township meetings these women and their relatives showed up but, no fisherman.

Personaly, I don't fish there, to much of a pain to get to the water.But these are the facts I've dug up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crickschop04

I guess it depends on who you want to believe the govt. or the land owners. Hearing something from the DNR or Sheriff doesn't do a lot for me considering that they are the one opposing the land owners. Thats about the same as me saying "I talked to a land owner and they said it was illegal." I caught some nice crappies too. At about 3 different places within 15 min. of Silver Creek that are not in the middle of a legal dispute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gust35

IF THEY DO NOT WANT ANY PEOPLE ON THAT RES. THEN WHY IS THE FRONT GATE OPEN FOR ANYBODY TO ENTER THE LAND. SUNDAY THE FRONT GATE RIGHT OFF COUNTY ROAD 11 WAS WIDE OPEN AND A TRAIL WHERE PEOPLE WHERE PULLING THEIR SHACKS WENT RIGHT OVER THE DYKE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gregh

As a haverhill landowner,I would love to see it opened up completely without any bickering!! but as it stands now the people (some people) of haverhill are just digging there feet in to fight this!!)The people going out there are not helping the situation at all. This whole thing just seems pointless, I'm glad I dont have to figure it out.To each there own but I'm staying out of there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • DLD24
      I have a couple Garmins and I like them a lot, especially the new touchscreen.
    • smurfy
      So any idea how far along the lakes are to opening up. Headed that way first weekend of May.
    • eyeguy 54
      Volk, a community prevention specialist for the state Department of Human Services and also a member of the Lincoln city council, asked to put to rest a rumor that he snagged the fish. He hooked the fish in the mouth, he said, and it wrapped itself in line as it fought. The mouth hook was certified by Game and Fish, Volk said. A snagged fish would not count as a record.
    • eyeguy 54
      where are these videos? Game and fish said not snagged. hmmmm. 
    • Sculpin
      Cube the breast meat, and marinate it in buttermilk overnight, then dredge it in whatever you use to fry fish, and pan fry it until golden brown.  I like to use peanut oil, because you can get it really hot. You only need a half inch or so of oil in the pan, they fry up quickly. Very good, and I have tried it many ways. You could trim out the dark meat, and do it the same way.
    • huntnfish
      Definitely a huge fish. I don’t know if it was snagged or not but there are a couple videos that look like a hook being removed from the back of the fish. Kind of tough to tell for sure from the videos though. If you go to the ND game and fish Facebook page you can find them. 
    • Rick
      Warm temperatures and dry conditions mean increased wildfire risk, so the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will restrict open burning in the following counties effective immediately: Anoka, Benton, Chisago, Douglas, Grant, Hennepin, Isanti, Kanabec, Mille Lacs, Morrison, Pine, Pope, Ramsey, Sherburne, Stearns, Stevens, Todd, Traverse, Washington, and Wright.  The state will not issue burning permits for brush or yard waste in these counties until restrictions are lifted. “Escaped debris burns are the number one cause of wildfires, so that’s why we issue these restrictions,” said Casey McCoy, DNR fire prevention supervisor. “They really work—we’ve reduced wildfires by nearly a third since we started spring burning restrictions in 2001.” McCoy encourages residents to use alternatives to burning, such as composting, chipping, or taking brush to a collection site. For information on how to compost yard debris, visit the DNR’s guide to composting yard debris. People who burn debris will be held financially responsible if their fire escapes and burns other property. Burning restrictions will be adjusted, including extension of restrictions to additional counties, as conditions change. For information and daily updates on current fire risk and open burning restrictions, visit the Minnesota DNR website. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Flying a drone can be a lot of fun—but it can be downright dangerous during a wildfire, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  “Most people wouldn’t dream of driving their car in front of a fire engine that’s responding to a fire,” said Casey McCoy, the DNR’s fire prevention supervisor. “Flying your drone during a wildfire is just as reckless: we have to ground our planes until the drone gets out of the way, and that slows down our ability to fight the fire.” This happened last year during a wildfire in Little Falls: DNR pilots had to land firefighting helicopters because a drone was buzzing overhead. According to McCoy, “interfering with fire operations in this way is dangerous for our aircraft, firefighters on the ground, and the general public.” The reason drones pose such a problem is because they fly at roughly the same altitude as wildfire suppression aircraft. Even a small drone can cause a fire-fighting helicopter to crash if the drone makes contact with the aircraft. Flying a drone over a wildfire isn’t just dangerous, it’s illegal: Federal law prohibits interfering with firefighting operations, and that includes flying a drone over a wildfire. To protect firefighting aircraft, temporary flight restrictions may extend over a 5-mile radius of a wildfire. Even if temporary flight restrictions are not in place, people will be penalized if their drone is caught near a wildfire. Be fire wise and fire safe. No photo or video is worth the risk. Drop the drone near all wildfires. For more information about drones and wildfires, log onto the National Interagency Fire Center. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • eyeguy 54
    • rundrave
      Where are you seeing this reported?