• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Knute78

Muzzleloader Scopes and Regular Fire Arms Season

Recommended Posts

Knute78

I don't want to debate the ethics and use of muzzleloaders with scopes on them. I just have a question regarding the use of muzzleloaders and scopes during the regular firearm (shotgun/rifle)season to settle a debate my friend and I are having. I will not mention which side of the debate I am on.

Can scopes be used on muzzleloaders during the regular fire arm (shotgun/rifle) season in MN?

Thanks for any and all responses.

Chad

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
JEV

Yes, Scopes are allowed during the regular firearms season on muzzleloaders. Open sights only during the designated muzzleloaders season.

JEV

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

Agree, scopes are a-ok in the regular firearm season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog

3rd that. Scopes allowed during regular gun season, not allowed unless by special medical permit during the muzzleloader only season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

Thanks guys, that solves it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

Well, I 4th that if it matters.

100% legal during regular firearms season.

Take it off for ML season though. Simple as that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

Now that it's solved, do we get to hear what side of the argument you were on wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Code-Man

What is the reasoning behind not putting scopes on muzzleloaders? I don't know why it would hurt the hunting any. I just think there would be less wounded deer if scopes were alowed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

I was on the side that agrees that they are perfectly legal with scopes during the regular gun season. I am not completely sure how I feel about the scope issue during the actual muzzleloader season. I'll just stay within the laws as they are now and be happy with it. If I am in the woods and hunting legally I am happy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ddsbyday

No, there will be more. Scopes are legal during the regular season because so called hunters are lobbing 12 gauge sluggs at 45 degree angles and shooting white horses with riders on them with the excuse that they thought they were shooting at a deer. It happened a couple of years ago! If you can not make a clean shot with open sights from 20-40 yrds. hunt the regular season. I do not think that extending the free for all into mzzl. season will do anything other than have a bunch of deer die slowly from infection from leg wounds tossed out from hunters taking shots that were well beyond the range of the weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

This is exactly where I did not want this post to go.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

But that is your opinion and I do respect that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sutty

Accidents happen too often but the old fart shooting a horse didn't have anything to do with the scope/no scope question

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xedge2002

I think the reason they don't allow scopes during the muzzle season is to keep it more of a primitive weapon. That is the whole point of the muzzle season, to offer a challenge to hunters where you only get one shot with open sites. I agree the kill rate would be better with a scope on muzzleloaders but just because you have the ability to kill out to 150 yards doesn't mean you should do it with open sites. Besides, I like the fact that you have to challenge yourself and only take the shots you know you can make to kill a deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

Xedge, I could not agree with you more.

A person needs to know their own personal limits when hunting with whatever weapon they choose, scope or not. Clean safe kills should always be the #1 priority when deciding to take an animal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
koonie

Nicely put Xedge. I couldn't agree more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hines R

During Regular Firearms season scopes are allowed on whatever legal weapon you decide to take with you to the field.

I don't think that incident with the guy shooting that horse had anything to do with whether their was a scope on that gun or not. I don't know for certain but I kind of remember that the story made it sound like he had a regular shotgun he was shooting slugs out of. I didn't think it was a scoped gun. I don't know for certain though.

Hunter's can wound animals by taking to long a shot with iron sights the same as they can by taking to long a shot with a scope. It's having the common sense not to shoot that makes the difference.

I like the idea of the new headlamps that deer can't see. I can think of 2 incidents I know of from last year that if they had been walking to their stand wearing one of those green headlamps they would have lived.

Ryan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

I agree that the purpose of having a muzzleloader season is not for the purpose of taking more deer but to offer a more pristine hunting experience. After all, if you are merely just hunting with black powder and not interested in the atmosphere, you can use it during the regular firearms season.

Also, even though the orginal poster expressed the intention of this thread was not to go down this route, the original poster's questions were ansered and then the thread took a new turn. Whether a new thread is started or this one continues, I don't see any difference. In either case, I do think it could evolve into an interesting exchange of viewpoints.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
USDA3

Though I know this is yet another turn in this thread, I still feel compelled to comment. I have noticed several posts containing the word "weapon" describing a firearm. As a MN Firearm Safety Instructor this is one topic we try to instill in youngsters from day one. The word "weapon" is not to be used to describe a firearm in the instance of hunting and shooting sports. Maybe if this could become common language for adults children will learn early the difference in a weapon and a firearm. I see the difference from a law enforcement and military standpoint because firearms are used differently in their line of work. So...as ethical hunters working to protect the sports we love please try to use the terminology in its correct meaning! sorry just an opinion!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

BobT

I didn't mid the thread taking this new turn. I just know I have read similar fourms about muzzleloading in years past that got very heated and I'll just say "boarderline" in conversation. I like debates about issues like this when they are done respectively and both sides of an argument can be heard without attacking peoples individual selves. I prefer to hear a debates about the issues not, the what ifs, and the I know a guy who said that he saw, etc... I like straight facts and opinions.

I agree that the muzzleloader season should be a more "pristine GUN hunting experienc", and if that means I cannot use a scope during muzzleloader season I am fine with that. There are so many seasons and options out there and that is why I originally asked the question if scopes were legal on muzzleloader during the regular firearms season. They are, and now I know I have that option if I choose to use it.

Anyways, gun season is too far off at the moment, I am just going to keep practicing with my bow, and cannot wait to get into the woods and enjoy the quiet solitude of mother nature bow in hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ddsbyday

I like your response and agree. To me it is as simple as not bringing a knife to a gunfight. Both are weapons, so is a sharpened end of a tooth brush. There has to be a line drawn. If I can't make a fatal shot without any sights at all at 20-30yrs I will watch canned hunts on tv. If you can not do it anymore don't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

At the onset, separation of these two terms seems a little...well...petty but after giving it more thought I can see your point and agree it is a good one. One way this is important is that the anti-gun proponents like to use this term when describing firearms and for good reason. It instills the idea in others that a firearm is always a weapon but in reality this is by far the least used purpose of a firearm.

Good point!

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
USDA3

Thanks Bob, I agree..before I ever bacame a FAS instructor, I would have felt very similar to most hunters in the sense that calling a firearm a weapon made no difference to me, but after time and thought you see the point. Most of the anti's use this term and just giggle every time we as sportsmen use the term, it only fuels there cause. I guess it's just a little thing many individuals can do to protect our right to own firearms in America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • ANYFISH2
      Thanks for the reports guys.
    • MinnowBuckets
      The last few days have been pretty hot on areas of the river for a lot of nice bass between 16-18 inches, topping out at 19 inches for my largest. Many were fish located on spawning beds, some hitting aggressively and immediately, and some not interested in even acknowledging the bait. I started out with a 4 inch wacky worm on a VMC wacky weedless jighead, but found that I was getting larger, more aggressive fish by switching to a 5 inch wacky. I would Imagine that the spawn will be all but over within a few days. 
    • RGSports
      I have some Cotton Cordell crankbaits for all, all brand new in original packaging.  I have multiples of every color.  Asking $3 each, will ship for a $5 flat rate.  Can also meet, live in Elk River MN. Wally Stinger 3 1/2 Inch - Sparkle Firetiger, Chartreuse Perch, Purple Passion, White/Red Head 4 3/4 Inch - Purple Passion, Gold Perch, White/Red Head, Chrome/Blue Jointed Wally Diver Perch, Monkey Puke, Gold/Black, Chartreuse Red   Send me a message or call/text at 320-420-9805 to purchase.
    • IronDioPriest
      Hi folks... I wanna specifically address fishermen and women, boaters, outdoorsmen and women, and their spouses and significant others. Also, anyone who believes that our right to access public waterways supported by our tax dollars, and managed for our benefit by the DNR, should not be infringed upon by special interests... listen up... You may or may not know about a new program in Wright County to limit access to three lakes in the Annandale area where wealthy lake-home associations have coerced the County Board into implementing a pre-launch "AIS Inspection Station" in the city of Annandale. Anyone wishing to launch a watercraft on Lakes Sylvia, Pleasant, and John, must first travel to the city of Annandale (miles away from any boat landing), go through an inspection process, and be given permission to launch their boat in the form of a zip-tie on the trailer. There are MANY problems with this inspection regime. One problem is its hours of operation. It is open from sunup to sundown. This means that if you wish to go fishing in the evening, or at night, or early in the morning, you must first travel to Annandale THE DAY BEFORE you wish to access the lake, and get your zip-tie. Needless to say, this will undoubtedly prove to be a big enough burden on boaters and anglers that many will simply choose to go elsewhere, which, we contend, is the unstated goal of the Lake Associations who have funded this effort to lobby the County Board. They want non-residents off "their" lake. Another problem is the fact that these lakes are already unfortunately infested with AIS, which means inspecting boats on the way IN to the lake makes no logical sense. Only inspecting boats in their way OUT of an infested lake will have any chance of slowing or halting the spread of AIS. Another problem is that local businesses in Annandale, Southhaven, and to a lesser extent Clearwater and Maple Lake, will be adversely affected by the reduction in commerce that WILL occur as people from outside these fine communities decide to take their watercraft elsewhere. Another problem is the scope of this program, and the stated goals of those who are promoting it. They have said point-blank that they hope to have every county in MN look to Wright County as an example of what can be pushed through, as Lake Associations state-wide are organizing their resources and their political clout in an effort to see similar County ordinances implemented throughout Minnesota. This could, in the future, lead to a scenario where every boater who does not own lake property will first be required to travel to a central County Inspection Station in whatever county they wish to launch their boat, before they will be given permission to launch at a lake that may be many miles away from the station. We believe this is an infringement on the rights of Minnesota boaters and sportsmen to freely and responsibly access our public waterways. Even the DNR is skeptical of this program, but since it is a county matter, they are accepting it for now. Sorry for the lengthy statement. Now I'd like to ask you to take action. We have organized a social media page, over 600-strong now.... Our goal is to gather as many concerned people as we can in this group - and then appeal to the Chambers of Commerce in these fine cities, to organize themselves and appeal to the County Board for a reversal of this misguided policy, on the grounds that it will harm them economically as people take their dollars elsewhere to avoid the infringement of the inspection regime. If you haven't already, and you are concerned about liberty to access public waterways without undue burdens placed upon your access, would you consider lending your voice to ours, and joining our group? Thank you! Join Us!
    • delcecchi
      Actually, merc has Verado and "four strokes" . I have seen a fair number of mercs on west end but very few verado which have a distinct silhouette.
    • Rick G
      Not as easy to find bullheads in the chain as it was in the 80s-90s.... but you will still get a few here and there. The cats took care of most of the bullies over the yrs😉
    • Horseshoe_Don
      All sizes.  no bullheads in the chain.
    • ducksnbucks
      Thanks guys for the info. I think we will head out tomorrow and give it a shot. Will report what we find, thanks again! 
    • Mike89
      that's a monster ya mean!!!!!
    • monstermoose78
      The Tom turkeys are not playing well the hens are around and have come into the decoys. No Toms to be seen or heard. Lots of ticks today.