• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Boedigheimer

Gargantuin Walleyes

Recommended Posts

Boedigheimer

This question is directed to the Red lake veterans that experienced the walleye glory days.

Has Red lake ever put out really big walleyes, maybe 10 pounders? Just by sheer numbers of fish, I would expect to see some 5-8 pounders, and according to what I've read these fish are already showing themselves.

But does Red lake have the ingredients for truely big eyes?

Or is it destined to be the greatest bingo factory in the state, not that there is anything wrong with that!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

In my memory a big walleye in the past was 18 inches. Once in while you would hear of a bigger one but if you had a stringer full of 18 inch walleyes you really had something. I remember once my Uncle coming in with a stringer of 20 to 25 inch fish in the early 1980's and we were amazed. We were told it was genetics, lack of structure, etc., etc. I think now that we are seeing bigger ones, 25/26 inches that have to be from the old original stock that bigger walleyes from URL are posible. The last 10 years are the first 10 years that the Red Lakes were not netted since about 1910. Were we keeping the size down with the netting? I think we are really in uncharted waters with this because we haven't been here before.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Boedigheimer

90 years of netting!! The fact that the lake held up to 90 years of virtually unregulated and unmonitored commercial and angling harvest are a true testament to the lakes resiliancy.

I must applaud the tribe for using restraint and not opening the flood-gates on its netting operations. Maybe history does not have to repeat itself!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

It will be interesting to see what happens to the walleye size in the future. I personaly think the walleye that are stumbling onto crappie hooks and pike rigs are much bigger than the ones I used to catch growing up. Heck they are attacking my large sucker minnows on tip ups, in the eighties the sucker minnow could have ate the walleye! laugh.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mjen

I have heard the lakes with big walleye are the ones that have an abundance of oily prey for them like ciscoes or tulibee. I know Red has tulibee but do ciscoes need deeper/colder water?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Ciscoe and Tulibee are the same fish... Red has Whitefish but it lost most of them a couple years back when the water got pretty warm during the summer. Still a small population in the lake.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
moose099

Hey Labs, those whitefish are definitely in the lower lake. Much deeper water in the lower lake. As for those wondering about huge walleyes back when. Yup, back in the late 60's I remember watching the stripping operation on the Blackduck River. 10 to 12 lb females were commom with every size class below represented. The Lake was very healthy and better regulated back then. Jim Isenrich(sp?) ran the Redlake fishery back then and did an excellent job. Kelly's dad probably knew him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

Quote:

Yup, back in the late 60's I remember watching the stripping operation on the Blackduck River.


I was born in "56". Just how old are you moose???? grin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
moose099
laugh.gif 1944 My Friend

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Geez Moose... was the glacier even done forming the lake back in '44? hehehe grin.gif You old man!

Look at me poppin' off, you'll be fishing every day starting in a couple months, right? I'll still be at work wishing I was born in '44! crazy.gif

Let me know when you'll be back up in the area, we need to wet a line together...

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

Quote:

I have heard the lakes with big walleye are the ones that have an abundance of oily prey for them like ciscoes or tulibee. I know Red has tulibee but do ciscoes need deeper/colder water?


Shiners my freinds shiners, mini or snack sized ciscoes. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

I must say you are well preserved moose. grin.gif If I keep drinking Capt Cokes will I look that good at that advanced age. grin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take'Em

Capt Cokes can make anyone look good if you drink enough of them shocked.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
moose099

No doubt in my mind Kelly. You keep doing what you are doing what your doing and thinking the way you are thinking and you will be young and preserved forever!! grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif

Labs, please keep going to the office, I want my SS check to keep coming!! grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif You can count on hearing from me. We do need to wet a line. Maybe we can talk Kelly into joining us if he is not stuck in a Rice Paddy that day blush.gif I'll make sure I have the youth juice for him. grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Slabby

that's interesting Labs on white fish disappearing because of the high water temps. I caught 2 this year and those were the first ones for about 3 years.

Did shiners bite it for the same reason? I thought they just got scarfed up by the walleye ooo.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Kelly or his Dad Jim would know more about the shiners... I guess I was under the impression they were lunch also. Jim had told me they were at the lowest population ever on the lake... Ever wonder why all those little perch are gone?

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fishing tech

3 years ago I was fishing on the ice in the rain on Red. I caught 7 walleyes, 6 of which were 22inches. I was out for probably 2.5 hours. I would say there is going to be some big ones out there. I did mark the spot in my gps just in case I get back up there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Bog Man

My dad used to new Whitefish for many years w/ Ed Hudec, and we saw LOTS of big walleyes and northerns in the nets. One walleye was easily 8-10 pounds, and that was maybe 10-15 years ago.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GConda

I can give you a story from the 30's. My old man was born next to Hudecs and grew up there. His story was about spearing off the bridge on the Tamarak opening fishing. Said he was the only one there. His biggest walleye was 8.5 lbs and that was with a spear! Said he never did see any big walleyes in those times. Northerns were a different story. 35lb in a net and 28.5 with a reel. Seems using a rod and reel was rare back then. Gary

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Agronomist_at_IA
      Well......The issue is that the biologists, scientists, and others have looked at the compiled data regardless if the data is good or bad, and have no consensus on what is really wrong or going on or how to fix. So out of confusion and not understanding on what's going on they've taken a course of action which doesn't seem to be working. Leaving a bunch of large walleyes in a lake with low forage doesn't work to well. If young recruitment of walleye isn't happening, maybe they should look at trying something else.....  
    • Wanderer
      I bet that success rate goes up this weekend if the rain doesn’t get too crazy.   It should be 10% + Anyfish’s buck at least. 😉   At least you can have someone around to help you drag it out.
    • ANYFISH2
      74 deer harvested, 5 or 6 bucks topping 200 pounds.  Right around 10 % success rate.   Info per area wildlife manager.
    • Wanderer
      This is what I heard from someone who hunted:   The 200 lb mark was broken by at least one buck.   Deer sightings were OK.   Bears, bears, bears... gorging on acorns.   About 700 hunters participated.   Success rate unknown.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has announced that regional wildlife manager Cynthia Osmundson will become the supervisor of the agency’s Nongame Wildlife Program, effective next month. Osmundson will replace the recently retired Carrol Henderson.  “Minnesotans have been strong supporters of the state’s nongame program, and it’s my desire to build on that success and continue to connect people with wildlife,” Osmundson said. The donor-supported DNR Nongame Wildlife Program works to help more than 700 species of Minnesota wildlife thrive. Nongame wildlife are species that are not legally hunted, with a focus on species that are rare, declining or vulnerable to decline. Minnesota’s Wildlife Action Plan is an important guide for this work. This partnership-based, 10-year conservation plan is designed to ensure the long-term health and viability of Minnesota’s wildlife and to enhance opportunities for people to enjoy it. “We are so fortunate to inherit the strong foundation Carrol Henderson and his team of wildlife professionals have built over the years,” Osmundson said. Osmundson most recently served as regional wildlife manager in the DNR’s Central Region, where she and her team focused on key priorities affecting the 50,000 acres of wildlife habitat in 23 counties including the Minneapolis/St. Paul metro area, and outreach to diverse communities. Before that, Osmundson was the statewide forest habitat coordinator in the DNR Wildlife Section. She has also worked as a planner for the Minnesota Forest Resources Council and as an assistant refuge manager in Montana and Wisconsin with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Born and raised in Minnesota, Osmundson earned her bachelor’s degree in zoology from the University of Montana and a master’s degree in wildlife biology from the University of Wyoming. While there, she had opportunities to trap and tag grizzly bears, as well as raft the Colorado River in search of endangered fish and peregrine falcons. More information about the DNR Nongame Wildlife Program can be found at mndnr.gov/nongame. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      A 43 1/2 inch pike caught by a member of the Women Anglers of Minnesota on Mille Lacs Lake sets the first northern pike state record in the Department of Natural Resources’ catch-and-release category.  Angler Maddy Ogg caught and released the huge pike Oct. 6 during what she described as a cold and windy day of fishing. She and companions Mike Buckingham and Jenni Buckingham got an early start that morning, soon landing two fish at the same time. “On the way to the lake that morning, we saw eight bald eagles and shortly after we started fishing, we landed a double – I knew it was going to be a good day of fishing,” Ogg said. Five hours later, while trolling the edges of plants in 12 feet of water, Maddy had a strike that bent her rod hard. Even though most record-fish stories include a long dramatic battle between fish and angler, fortune was going their way. “I had to reel fast because the fish swam towards the boat, causing nearly constant slack in the line,” Ogg said. She landed the pike and now claims the first Minnesota catch-and-release state record for the species. While pike can often be lively once in a boat, in this case the cool temperatures and calm behavior of Maddy’s pike made for an outstanding catch-and-release scenario. While the 43 1/2 inch pike may have set the record, it likely will not be the only trophy pike pulled from the big lake. Mille Lacs has a growing reputation as a trophy pike fishery, with some fish reaching the mid- to high -40 inch and range and exceeding 20 pounds. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish in each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunters in central, north-central and southeast Minnesota need to bring their harvested deer to be tested for chronic wasting disease on opening weekend of firearms deer season Saturday, Nov. 3, and Sunday, Nov. 4.  The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is requiring the testing to determine whether CWD may have spread from captive deer to wild deer in central and north-central Minnesota. The DNR also will require hunters to have their deer tested in much of southeastern Minnesota Nov. 3-4 as well as Saturday, Nov. 17, and Sunday, Nov. 18, because of its proximity to 18 known instances of CWD in wild deer centered around Preston, and to determine if the disease has spread from captive deer to wild deer in Winona County. The mandatory sampling requirements mean that after field dressing their deer, all hunters in affected permit areas need to take them to a sampling station. DNR staff will remove lymph nodes, and the DNR will submit them for laboratory testing. Hunters should check mndnr.gov/cwd to find the permit areas where sampling is required. “Hunters help combat CWD spread by submitting samples for our surveillance program,” said Lou Cornicelli, wildlife research manager. “Thank you to hunters as we work to help safeguard the health of Minnesota’s deer populations.” Hunters must register their deer by phone, internet or in person. The DNR will not make harvest registration available at CWD sampling stations. The DNR website will have test results available at mndnr.gov/cwdcheck; hunters can enter the nine-digit MDNR number from the deer’s site tag into the search box. The page will then display the results of the test. If the result reads “Pending,” the final results are not yet available. The DNR reminds hunters who harvest deer in area 603, the disease management zone, that carcass movement restrictions remain in place. Deer cannot be removed from the area until a not detected test result is received. Area 603 hunters must take their deer to one of three sampling stations: Forestville State Park, Strongwell in Chatfield, or Preston. The DNR will provide space in a refrigerated trailer at its Preston forestry office for area 603 hunters who need to store their deer while waiting for test results. A quartering tent and hanging racks also are available to hunters who choose to properly quarter or de-bone the meat so it is free of brain and spinal column material, which allows the meat or quarters to be immediately moved out of the area. Hunters not in a mandatory testing area can collect their own lymph node sample and submit it for testing to the Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory at the University of Minnesota for a fee. The DNR has made a video showing how to collect a lymph node sample available at mndnr.gov/cwd/videos.html. The DNR website at mndnr.gov/cwd contains complete information about mandatory CWD testing, a video explaining the process, an interactive map showing sampling station locations and a related precautionary feeding ban. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will restrict recreational use of off-highway vehicles (OHVs) in some areas during the upcoming firearms deer hunting season. Vehicles affected by the restrictions include all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), off-highway motorcycles (OHMs) and registered off-road vehicles (ORVs) such as four-wheel drive trucks that are not being used in conjunction with deer hunting by a licensed deer hunter.  The restrictions, which apply to state forest trails and access routes but not to state forest roads, aim to protect recreational riders from potentially unsafe riding conditions and minimize conflicts between deer hunters and recreational riders who may inadvertently disturb them. Licensed deer hunters may still use these routes in conjunction with their hunting activity: Before legal shooting time. From 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. After legal shooting hours. Effective dates of the recreational riding restrictions will be: Nov. 3 – 18 for the northeastern Minnesota 100 Series deer season. Nov. 3 – 11 for the Minnesota 200 Series deer season. Because recreational OHV trails located in southeastern Minnesota close Nov. 1 each year, no additional OHV riding restrictions are necessary in that part of the state. While many have voluntarily opted not to ride forest trails during deer hunting and small-game seasons, recreational State Forest use has become a year-round activity for many. DNR officials remind everyone who visits Minnesota’s state forests this fall to put safety first. For more information, see the 2018 deer season map or contact the DNR Information Center at [email protected] or 651-296-6157 or 888-646-6367 (8 a.m.-8 p.m. Monday through Friday, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Walleyehunter82
      Coming up Thursday evening staying at Adrian's for the weekend.  We plan on fishing out in the gap or maybe the river some.  Anybody fishing out there this weekend?  Depths? Any info would be greatly appreciated. Thanks 
    • going4it
      Any results from the Thursday Friday hunt?