Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Season limit


Recommended Posts

There has been talk about reduced limits or limited seasons. What would you think of some sort of season limit? I know there is a posession limit (although I'm sure there is more than 1 deep freeze in violation!)

What about say X number ducks per person per year? The same thing with pheasants?

lets hear what ya think....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I'd be okay with a smaller daily bag limit, but then again where I hunt it's mostly wood ducks, so on a good day you get 2-4 ducks (2 woodies with bonus teal or mallards). I don't hunt enough that an overall season limit would affect me & that might slow some "meat hogs", but how the heck would you ever enforce that unless you're going to start registering every duck you shoot? You want to talk about a costly nightmare...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who, what, when and where did you hear this? Is this just run of the mill talking or is there "official" talk of this happening. My opinion is that neither will make much of a difference in this state, particularly if the rest of the flyway does not follow the same rules. If you talk to most duck hunters this year, bag limits were not an issue because they did not see any ducks. Season length is a shot in the dark because much of the state is done for ducks way before the end of the season. That one depends on the weather. A shorter season would have little impact im my opinion. We need habitat. That is all there is to it. More of our license money needs to be ear marked for habitat only. I also feel we need more sanctuary (refuge)land for breeding and nesting. It is frustrating to think that people are looking for easy fixes which will only result in the same thing...no ducks. If we shorten the season or reduce bag limits, I bet we will be having this same conversation in a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess what I was trying to get at is that it seems like a small % of the hunters are shooting a lion's share of the birds. (meat hogs) as they were refered to. I enjoy hunting as much as the next guy. But for someone to go out and shoot birds every day all season long just doesn't seem right.

I'll agree that registering birds would be a major pain/expense. I just wanted to stimulate conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a great idea, and NOT that hard to implement. You get tags with your deer license, now you could get tags with your duck license too. Use up your tags and you are done, EVERY bird in your possession must have a tag marked with date of kill.

Voluntary restraint is an idea that is quite obviously totally lost on some so more forceful methods may be necessary!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here we go again...

Season lenghts, limits-it all means very little when most guys shoot 4-6 birds a year. So much has to do with habitat. Guy's are making a living raising minnows in our duck ponds. Farmers are draining critical wetlands. Most of these guys do this without thinking it could harm waterfowl in the long run.

I personally hope we have a 60/6 next year with the mallard limit raised to 5 or 6. There are THAT many mallards around. This always comes up, people pointing the meat hog finger. It usually happens because YOU can't or don't shoot as many birds as you'd like. BUT if I hunt 25-30 times a year and limit about everytime, that's some valuable meat for my family. When you ground duck/goose into burger you can substitute it for beef in about anything. Enough with the meat hog thing. It's a little old.

In fact, I would guess I'm more responsible with my game than those guys who shoot 6 ducks a year and leave them in the freeze cause they "heard" they taste strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF shooting less ducks is so bad, why do duck groups such as DU advocate voluntary restraint to help the resource?????

Clearly habitat is a big (the biggest I'd say) issue, but you are just a meat hog defending being a meat hog for your selfish reasons, that's not about being so great for the resource as you claim in your last sentence.

If you grind up all these ducks/geese into burger I sure hope you know you still have to count them in your posession limit!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey lawdog. When did I say shooting less was bad?

I said many guys who shoot a few birds a year are guys who typically do the waterfowl thing for something to do, not so that they can hurry home and eat duck. They probably don't know how to cook it and probably will never try.

The only way I would ever be over my possession limit is if you counted the birds in my gut. There's 6 people in my house and I'm sure we've had 100+ ducks and I know about 25 honks eatin all ready.

My point was, don't look for excuses why YOU didn't shoot any ducks this year. It's not my fault that you did not. I don't like being called a meat hog. We take what we shoot very seriously.

The fact is, you did not shoot birds because most likely the habitat in your area sucks. Why would a duck want to go to a sucker/carp infested pond when he could set out in the flooded corn/wheat fields up here? That's the issue here. The right habitat does not exist in much of the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you're right Lawdog, grinding, making jerky etc. in an attempt to reduce your possession limit does not work, they still count til they are consumed.

A season limit is a great idea. Shooting 100-200 ducks is too many. We all seem to agree on the the decline of habitat in the state so shouldn't we shoot less ducks until the habitat improves instead of trying to justify shooting that many ducks by saying most guys only shoot 6 ducks and waste them but I grind mine up and feed my family. I'll be surprised if we have 6-60 next year and even more surprised if they raise the mallard limit Matt. There were very few mallards in most of the state, your hunting area being an exception. I know some guys who only shot 6 or 8 ducks. They ate them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Shooting 100-200 ducks is too many.]

According to who? Just because you had a pitifull year? People need to open their eyes, there are ducks around, but you cant see them driving down 94 or from your recliner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to chime in on this one. What will the season be? who knows but we will find out come Aug.

As far as the meat hog stuff, you guys should realy get off that. I had the worst season I have ever had. Reason, weather and nothing but the weather. Yes, the habitat in this state needs help but for you to call some one a meat hog because he goes out and bust his butt to find those birds and drags in a half mile to get them now he is a bad hunter? Please! I shoot a limit when I can, we have limits for a reason and most guys do not shoot a limit very often so us guys that do even out the scale.

Many times last year I took limits and most of those times I went home and had fresh duck for dinner. I bust a hump finding those birds and about 300 miles round trip to find those birds. I am not saying you can't find good numbers around the cities because we have. We have even shot our limit 20 minutes south of the cities last year.

Fact is after pheasant opener rolls around the duck hunters are cut in half if not more and by deer opener there is only a handful of guys still out there duck hunting.

As for DU promoting selective harvest, why did I see a DU show and they where in Mexico shooting pin tails left and right? I believe the limit down there is 4 a day and they shot there 4 a day. I wouldn't call that selective harvest by any means. Would you????????

You guys need to realize there are hunters out there that are hardcore to the bone when it comes to duck hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think its a jealousy thing when some hunters start calling others meat hogs. They're unwilling to put in the time and effort that it takes, so lets label the hunters that do 'meat hogs'. Lets face it, duck hunting is hard work! Wading thru muck, poling a boat thru muck and reeds, getting up at 3 AM, throwing out 6-8 dozen decoys is hard work! But the people that put in the effort usually get the best shooting, and I personally don't begrudge them shooting a lot of ducks - because they'be put in the effort that it takes to be successful. And using different methods of cooking/processing/grinding just tells me that they're responsible enough to eat what they shoot.

I know that I used to shoot a lot more ducks when I was younger, but nowadays its easier to just roll over and go back to sleep, or just pass shoot a few ducks early in the morning and call it a day. A season limit is not the answer, its a small number of hunters that are shoot a lot of ducks, most hunters shoot <10 a year. Better habitat is the key.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well said Jack!

I do not do too much travelling for ducks anymore, havnt had to in the last few years.

Many times we get up at 2 to get THE spot, but it pays off more times than not. We usually put out 8-10 dozen dekes, the worst part is picking them up, yes, hard work. We PLUCK almost every duck we shoot...again...hard work.

I laugh at the guys who come out onto the lake 10 minutes before shooting, end up getting a crappy spot beacuse all the good ones have been taken, then they leave before 9 am without ever lifting thier guns. These are the guys complaining about lack of birds and us so-called "meat hogs". For cripes sakes! Get out of bed a little earlier for once. Stay in your spot until AT LEAST noon, and maybe you'll get a few birds. Quit calling until you are blue in the face and quit shooting at birds that are 100 yards out of range! All these things will increase your bag so you too can become a "meat hog".

As far as the season goes, the only reason it will be lowered is because of all the stuff going on in the press. There are plenty of mallards around to have a 6/60 again. I would not mind however to see the scaup limits lowered even further.

But PLEASE open it OCTOBER 1st this year. NOT Sept 24th!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, as long as a hunter is within the limits of the law, he has every right to shoot ducks (and other critters). Shooting over 100 ducks in a season is nothing unusual for someone who puts in the work and if that is their passion, I say go for it. I personally had the worst year of duck hunting ever and still took many ducks. Nothing better than fresh duck on the grill...or marinated...or in the crock pot...oooooh, I better stop. Kind of wish I had some in the freezer right now. I think that if we talk about restraint, we need to talk to the skybusters out there. Many of these ducks are hit and eventually die and become fox feed. Now that is a waste in my mind. In my opinion, MN should be able to rival if not surpass the Dakotas as far as duck numbers go. We just need to get back all the habitat that we have lost. That is wishful thinking on my part. However, I think we have come to a cross roads and people are starting to listen. Please get involved in your local conservation groups and be part of this process. We as waterfowl hunters have a lot of power if we could get our voices heard, you just never know! Good luck all!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that it is time to act, but I dont believe that we are on the verge of a collapse as some have said.

It's typical Minnesota if you ask me. Wait until it is almost too late to do something about it...kinda like the stadium issue...lol...had to get that shot in there!!

I would LOVE to see the wetlands we used to have. I once worked for a surveyor and looking back at the initial surveys of the area just blew me away at how much water there was. Entire lakes are now gone...just makes you sick.

I'm not sure if it could ever change. Maybe we should elect a DICTATOR of Minnesota to demand that wetlands are restored..lol, thats pretty much what it would take. Land prices are insane, even the cost of 3 new stadiums would not put that big of a dent in what we need. Things need to be done on a federal level as well, and thats even harder to get done than at the state level.

Something should be done, but not under the leadership or direction of a certain colunist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You guys have said some good things...

What we need is a severe drought for a couple years. Dry up the sloughs, kill the fish, allow vegetation to regrow and thin out the moron, meat hog calling duck "hunters".

Then watch it rain and the ducks will return...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Better hope the Dakotas stay dry when the rains return here. Because if the Dakotas dry up, and the rains come back there, they will have plenty of duck drawing power too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Better hope the Dakotas stay dry when the rains return here. Because if the Dakotas dry up, and the rains come back there, they will have plenty of duck drawing power too."

If you're interested in the total duck #'s to go up(not just MN), we need the dakotas to have good habitat as well. It may mean less ducks in MN, but overall it will be better for the birds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree.

I thought you were getting at the ducks would come to MN again if the conditions dryed up and reflooded after some nice veg growth and minnow kills.

A nice wet spring in ND, with a dry summer and fall in ND would be fine with me. wink.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some very good dialogue going on here, indeed. Very good points brought up as well! It is a complex issue we are dealing with, and a lot of you were hitting on many of the key issues. Here are a couple of things I'd add to the discussion:

Voluntary Restraint: I remember this meaning "Don't shoot hens". Has this changed to "Don't shoot ducks"? If there is one thing I've observed, it's that the guys that are shooting over 100 birds a year, are the ones who are ADAMENTLY against shooting hens. I think it is your average-joe-weekend-warrior who doesn't hunt a lot, who is shooting up the hen population (and no, I'm not referring to you FM'er's out there who only have time to hunt weekends). They shoot hens because they don't hunt much and shoot whatever they can get. They can't tell the subtle gender differences of a bird in flight, (let alone the difference between a pintail, gadwall, or wigeon in fight). And they frankly don't care because they don't respect the resource... these are the "Slob" hunters out there. The sky-busters, and "Call-Blasters" and the people you see at Wal-Mart buying cheap "gimmicks" at the last minute before opener.

My point is this-- I respect Matt for being a good hunter, and for eating what he kills. Hunters like him are the ones who DON'T skybust, DON'T shoot hens, DON'T break laws to get birds, and DO respect the land and owners, DO work hard to get birds, and ultimately DO NOT cripple and lose game like the many slobs out there.

Every license we sell generates $$ for the ducks. There are always going to be those who hunt only a couple of times a year, those who hunt 3/4 of the season, and yes... even slob hunters. Our dilema in MN is that there are too many hunters for the state to support. Much is due to the decreasing habitat (as already pointed out), as well as the HUGE number of sportfishermen (that push birds off large bodies of water-- roosting/staging areas in the fall)... not to mention their influence on aereators going up in so many lakes (which prevents any winter-kill, which contributes to NO FRESHWATER SHRIMP anymore), bad farming practices, excess rough fish, etc, etc, etc... Even low fur prices have an effect on the big picture of our local bird population.

Anyhow, I am not trying to write a book, but just add a few more concepts to this big picture. The Dakotas have WAY less people in their state, and countless miles of potholes located in isolated, large sections of land. I'm sure the Dakotans are now feeling the pressure of out-of-staters, which must be a Catch-22 for them. Nice to generate the money, but not too happy to have people infringing onto their turf in persuit of birds on their turf. Out-of-staters have ruined a lot of their pheasant hunting opportunities due to it becoming such a $$ thing for landowners. Outfitters and guiding services seem to be popping up all over our there more and more.

There are no easy answers, but it's good to see a group of caring hunters addressing the issues and brainstorming ideas.

Duck-o-holic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you think I had a pitiful season Goosepimp? I never said that. It wasn't the best but I still shot a few ducks.

Tom, when you were guiding you had specific rules about what fish could be kept and said you were criticized by other guides for it. Why then do you assume that anyone who supports restrictions to prevent a hunter from shooting 100+ ducks is a lazy skybuster who can't get out of bed and plays yankee doodle on his duck call all morning? Why not the same attitude toward the harvest of ducks as the harvest of fish or do you think fish can be overharvested but not ducks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't have a proplem of someone shooting lots of ducks when they are eating them. I love 'em and also have made duck burger grin.gif

I do however, know some guys down SE MN that hunt nearly every day and don't eat any duck. They try to give them all away. I just don't get that!? if you just want to shoot go the range!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee Ybone...

We are talking apples and oranges here.

A fish can produce hundereds of thousands if not tens of millions of offspring. How many ducklings can the average hen produce in her lifetime? There's a big difference there.

I never said that people who support reduced limits are what you said I said.

I said that most of the people who complain about the lack of ducks are those who dont put the time in to find the birds or who do not know how to maximize their chances for a successful hunt. Not all the people who had terrible seasons are this way. Most did not have the time or resourses to travel and find birds, which is what it takes now days.

I only hunt weekends now, except for a weeks vacation. I'm lucky enough to hunt good water and good areas and I feel very fortunate to do so. We shoot our share of ducks, but we also use all of them and enjoy eating them.

Most people want hunting to be easy. Well, hunting is not easy and it never will be again in this state, at least not in the forseeable future. If a guy goes out and shoots over 100 birds a year, more power to him/her as long as they use what they shoot.

Besides, you can't really shoot and release now can ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TV,

I know a few slobs like that too...that's something that REALLY irks me, much like the guys who shoot birds and then make the comment "the cat's gonna eat good tonight". Makes me want to puke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can't shoot and release but you can shoot and scare! grin.gif

I put in my time and effort to get my birds and I will never feel bad about taking a limit. I don't care if the other guy on the pond comes out 10 minutes before shooting and he dosen't pull the trigger or the guy that wants to only drive 15 minutes to a place that has 100 other people there and he complains that there are no ducks. He just does'nt understand and he never will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's what bugs me about alot of these "hunting" videos. Foiles, Zink, "hunters"? I don't think so. We call them shooters. They've told me themselves that they shoot limits and give them to the locals. I have nothing against giving meat to a needy family. But day after day of shooting and these guys have probably never cleaned one of those birds... It's a disgrace to what waterfowl hunting is all about. AND to have to travel to Canada on a guided hunt to make a good video???? C'mon, my favorite videos are the older Duckmen videos. You really can't beat that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've kind of gotten off topic and I would like to steer it back to the original subject.

I think we could perhaps borrow from the deer hunting model. You buy a basic license and it comes with 12 tags for 12 ducks. For the most part this will cover the weekend warriors who shoot 6-8 ducks per year. After those first 12 are used up you can purchase additional tags by the dozen for something like $10. The limit on these additional tags would be the theoretical limit for ducks per season (e.g. 6/60 = no more than 29 additional sets of tags could be purchased). The additional money raised could be used for habitat improvements akin to the state duck stamp.

True, it will cost more for people like Matt or I, but the fact is we are disproportionally using the resource. This isn't a statement of right or wrong, mind you. Just a statement of fact.

One benefit to this paradigm is that it would help both individuals and the state keep better tabs on how many ducks are shot each year.

Just my two cents.

Wh1stler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with one thing in your post and that is that the DNR really has no idea how many birds are shot in MN.

Why should I and others who shoot a lot of birds have to pay more? Typically it is others like myself who hunt alot that put alot back into waterfowl. We're the guys out there in the off season working on habitat, supporting Delta etc... Now I'm going to get penalized if I shoot over 100 ducks? I don't like the idea.

Most guys don't shoot ducks in MN. It's too hard and most are too lazy.

We don't need to make things more complicated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
    • leech~~
      As I get older it's really not just about sending bullets down range.  Some of it's just the workmanship of the gun and the wow factor. The other two guns I have really wanted which I'll never have now because of their price, is a 8mm Jap Nambu and 9mm German Luger.   Just thought they always looked cool!  
    • jim curlee
      I had a guy hit me with a lightly used 1969 BAR, he wanted $1650 with an older Leupold scope. More than I think they are worth, I made an offer, he declined end of story.   You know if you look at the old brochures, a grade II BAR sold for $250 in the late 60s, $1650 would be a good return on your investment.    Why would anybody want a 50 year old gun, they are heavy, have wood stocks, and blued metal.  I guess mainly to keep their gun safes glued to the floor. lol   You can probably buy a stainless rifle that you never have to clean, with a synthetic stock you never have to refinish, is as light as a feather, and for half as much money, perfect.   I'm too old for a youth gun, although I've shrunk enough that it would probably fit. lol   No Ruger 10/44s.   Jim      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.