• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
avrg.joe

DNR deal rejected by tribe

Recommended Posts

avrg.joe

I just heard on the radio that the tribe has rejected the DNR's proposal. They said the matter will be brought before an arbitrator.

What do you think will come of this?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kidd

I believe the Band is confidant that an arbitrator will rule in their favor; otherwise they would continue to negotiate. The one fact in their favor is that we are 70,000 pounds over our limit and if you believe the DNR projected safe harvest limits we truly are damaging the resource. One hope we have is that an arbitrator can ask the DNR to reevaluate the safe harvest limits. Let's hope this works out for the best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

What ever happened to good ol' Mother Nature controling it's own resources?

If we NEVER touched the lake in the first place, the MUSKIES wouldn't be in there, and the WALLEYES would be just fine.

At some point we will ALL be taught a valuable lesson on taking matters into our own hands that are way too huge and complicated for us to possibly comprehend. By that I mean the DNR and all the "special regualtions" that supposedly "protect" the lake.

Just how I see it: Leave it alone, and let it do it's own thing.

PCG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

PCG,

Jkrash has this posted in the Vermilion forum. I don't think that the problems that are occuring on MilleLacs have anything to do with the current Muskie population.


Join the sportsman club of Lake Vermilion. If your not a member you should be, they put out some great articles in there news letter so people don't have to speculate on the health of Lake Vermilion and it's fishery.
Here's a article that I copied.

"But the ?#!@% things eat all the walleyes." From the minute muskellunge, or muskies, are introduced into a body of water, that is the usual response from anglers. They have concerns about their fishing because the muskie is the top predator (with the exception of the angler!) in an aquatic ecosystem. Muskies have a reputation for being voracious predators as well. But do anglers have anything to be concerned about? Let's take a look.
What exactly do muskies eat? If you answered "Anything they want to" you pretty much hit the nail on the head; however, they do have definite preferences. The size and shape of the prey are important factors in determining whether or not it is prime eating for a muskie. For instance, it seems that they really don't like bluegills. In a northern Wisconsin lake that contained a tremendous number of stunted bluegills, muskies were stocked in great numbers. However, the size and number of bluegills remained the same. Shape of bluegills probably had something to do with this. Bluegills (as well as crappies and bass) have a body shape that is deeper than most other fish. Combine that with some wicked spines, and you don't have a really great meal. Muskies prefer a more slender, less *****ly meal. They
also prefer to eat the largest possible prey item they can find so they don't have to eat as often. This feeding strategy saves them a great deal of energy and may be why they are more difficult to catch! Preferred forage of muskies varies from region to region, but they all share similar characteristics. For example, in the St. Lawrence River, redhorse suckers are a favorite meal; in Wisconsin white suckers are the main fish in the muskies' diet. Here in Minnesota and into Northwest Ontario, whitefish and tulibees are the choice of muskies. Notice, all of these prey species have several similar characteristics, they lack spines and can be quite large.
What about walleyes? In a recent study conducted in Wisconsin, researchers looked at the contents of some 224 muskie stomachs and found only one walleye (13 inches). Ah! So muskies do eat walleyes! Of course they do, but not very often. In fact if you think about it, because of their spines, even a modest-size walleye (>14 inches) is too big to be eaten by all but the very largest muskie. Since large muskies are uncommon, even in the best lakes, they aren't going to eat a great deal of walleyes. But what about the small walleyes you might ask. Obviously, small walleyes are the most vulnerable to muskie predation. Most likely, young walleyes eaten by muskies are mistaken for or are eaten in addition to yellow perch. In the years which young walleyes are plentiful, more are going to be eaten by muskies; that's just the way the odds are. Conversely, when they aren't so plentiful, not as many are going to be eaten because the chances of a muskie encountering a young walleye drops. This is just Mother Nature's way of protecting the species. Sure, muskies eat walleyes, so do largemouth bass. Crappies love small walleyes, as do predators! For young muskies, the tables are often turned. Several studies have shown that largemouth bass just love muskie fingerlings. In fact, as few as 10 percent of stocked muskies may survive the first year of life because largemouth bass predation is so great!! Simply put, predators (man included) are opportunistic feeders and take the excess of what nature has to offer.
Finally, there is another way to look at the walleye-muskie relationship. The fact is, walleyes and muskies have naturally co-existed in the Upper Midwest and Southern Canada since the last ice-age, some 10,000 years ago. If muskies ate, walleyes at the rate that many proclaim, they would have finished the job centuries ago! Lake of the Woods, Leech Lake and Mille Lacs all have world-class walleye AND muskellunge fisheries. Why? Because they have excellent supplies of forage fish needed to supply muskies AND walleyes with food. The fact that a lake can support both species indicates a very healthy fish community.


Since the muskie stocking program began, there have not been major changes in the populations of the other species present in Lake Vermilion. Test net catches of walleye have been stable throughout the period and are currently above the long-term average for the lake. There are several reasons it is unlikely the introduction of muskie will impact the walleye population. Studies have shown muskie and northern pike prefer prey species with soft fins, such as tullibees and suckers as previously mentioned. Muskie maintain a population level much lower than other species and are therefore unlikely to cause large changes. Also, muskie and walleye generaily occupy different habitat types and tend to be geographically separated from each other. Although muskies probably consume some walleyes, this low level of predation has not affected the walleye population and it is not anticipated that it will in the future.

If your intrested in Muskie fishing join you local chapter of Muskie Inc.


------------------
Paul
PWaldow123@attbi.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
avrg.joe

D-man

You may be right, the night ban may not happen for now.? But it is obvious the band wants even more restrictions than the DNR offered. I heard they want to shut the lake down to hook & line fishing though the end of the year. Then next year, barbless hooks, a fish sanctuary ( an area of the lake off limits to fishing ), plus even a tighter slot. Heads up, its going to get nasty!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I don't think the tribe is doing the right thing by going arbitration, but iam not going to tell them that. I don't think we will see a tighter slot, i think we will see the barbless restriction and maybe a bigger slot to get people fish and off the lake. The 4 limit will stay. The heat is on the DNR. I think they know something about the tagging study that is suggesting there are far more fish in the lake that they think there is. They know what they are doing know is not working. I think we will see the harvest of both the sportsperson and band will increase. I think the DNR knows the kill rate needs to go home with the sportsperson and not with the seagulls.

------------------
MILLE LACS AREA GUIDE SERVICE
651-271-5459 http://fishingminnesota.com/millelacsguide/
click here

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SuddenlySummer

Is this "Fish Sanctuary" proposal for all fishing or just those of us who don't get to use a net?

Might as well draw a line down the middle of the lake.

Eventually it will keep moving further and farther East. (URL)

But hey, after the population is decemated, WE get to pay to fix it.


You never know. Maybe we'll get a new crappie hole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

That article basically tells me that Muskies create competion for the same prey that the ol' Walleye Gator likes to eat.

I havn't heard that there isn't enough Walleyes; I keep hearing that the Walleyes are too skinny...Malnurished.

What does that mean??? Mille Lacs has always had alot of Walleyes. Why is there a shortage of prey for them now? And why does everyone keep sayign that the next Record Muskie will come out of there?

Anyone see a corralation?

PCG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I think the lake has turned the corner as far as the bait fish are concerned. The last couple of trips I took revealed large masses of some type of fish that has lit up my graph. I wish I had a camera to confirm what I have been seeing. The few fish that have come to my boat are looking very healthy. There was an article in the St Paul paper last week that told about the DNR test netting and the amount of perch that are showing up. This part looks good.
Now the down side , the newest action by the "keepers of the land" who claim they would never do anything to harm the balance of nature. (their quote) I wish we could all live by 2002 standards and rules that are for one nation under God!
Dino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigeyes

Ok, what exactly would be the benifit of a fishing sanctuary? Assuming it work, which I don't possible see how it could, That would mean fish in this area would go through more natural cycles of boom bust since angling pressure wouldn't be affecting them. Isn't the whole point of DNR lake management to moderate these affects by active management? Walleye and the baitfish they feed on in this lake are very much roaming fish, I belive on some days they may go a few miles. How are they going to keep them in a sanctury and why would you want to?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

BIGEYES

Why would anyone want to? C'mon man, I'm sure you've kept up with the threads on "the Mille Lacs issue".

So . . . consider which DNR would be most likely to be in favor of a "fish sanctuary" (hint: it ain't the one that's headquartered on Lafeyette in St Paul).

With that in mind, the MN DNR may have as one of their objectives to moderate boom and bust cycles by active management. But I believe that one of the main objectives of the "other DNR" is to test the limits of how severly they can restrict HOW, WHEN, AND WHERE you and I can fish Mille Lacs (or more acurately how, when and where we CAN'T fish Mille Lacs).

If a fish sanctuary is successfully imposed, we have gone a looooooong way (I'd say waaay to far) down the road of how restrictive the "other DNR" can be toward those of us who don't even fall within their jurisdiction. I could even be convinced (pretty easily I might add) that we are too far down THAT road already.

Brace yourselves guys, avrg.joe was right "this one could get naaaasteey"!

[This message has been edited by GEM EYE GUY (edited 09-19-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye

I think someone in another post hit the nail directly on the head. The tribe is doing what it can to keep anglers off the lake and out of the resorts and baitshops on Mille Lacs. Make the businesses suffer and force them out of business. Buy the businesses and create a monopoly on the whole lake.

I've always been on favor of slot limits. I think they create better fishing. I wish other lakes in MN would have them. But this crap the tribe is trying to bring about now is really pi@@ing me off. What do we have to do to get a casino built right down the road from theres. Hit them in the pocketbook is what would fix them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

See...I hate to tell ya "I told ya so"! More slots, less fish, tighter regs, and now barbless? Ya right, so I suppose now it'll be illegal to have barbed hooks on your lures(in your tacklebox) while out on the lake--At least it'll give the CO's something to do..."Pull over, I want to check your hooks and smash down all your barbs"! It won't be long now until the indians(and I use the word lightly) own the whole kit-and-kaboodle. But then, that's just my point of view.
rolleyes.gifGeez...drain the lake! rolleyes.gif

[This message has been edited by HtchEyeCatcher (edited 09-20-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
avrg.joe

This article may be of interest to some of you.

Go to www.outdoornews.com

Click on, Band to DNR: Choose a mediator

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Schnauzer

Well, it looks like arbitration won't happen until at least the end of October if not some time in November. So, even if they rule in favor of the indians, it appears at LEAST October and the next full moon are saved. That is the good news. The bad news is potentially the future of Mille Lacs and I hope the arbitrators use common sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dan97

And what of ice fishing with a night ban. Think about it. Is going to arbitration just a ploy to bring this (possible) ban closer to the hard water season? Would this be a final blow to the "non-native" businesses around the lake?

WHAT A MESS!!!!

Dan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hoyter

I've seen several references over the past many months about going to a barbless hook requirement for the lake. In case you haven't tried it, start thinking about how you're going to keep a minnow, leech, or night crawler on your hook without a barb! (If we can fish the lake at all.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
EconGuy

Hoyter,
Try cutting a short piece of small rubber or plastic tubing (about 1/8th inch). After you hook your minnow or leech, slide the tubing over the point of the hook. Make sure to use as small a piece as possible so it doesn't interfere with your hookset.
EconGuy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • PRO-V
      Calling them would be your best bet. Maybe you can reserve some on a card.
    • delcecchi
      starft you off.... https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/lake.html?id=69066000 http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/lakefind/data/lakemaps/b0537011.pdf Status of the Fishery Ely Lake is located approximately 2 miles SE of the city of Eveleth. This popular lake is highly developed with homes and cabins. There is a small seaplane base and two public swimming beaches also located there. Water clarity is good and large amounts of aquatic vegetation can be found throughout the lake. 

      There is a concrete planked boat ramp and dock located near the NE end of the lake off Cedar Island Drive (CR629) for public access. The parking space is somewhat limited near the ramp. Several private accesses are also present. 

      Thirteen species of fish were sampled during the 2017 survey on Ely Lake. Gill nets, trap nets and night electrofishing were all used to sample the fish community. Small bluegill were common in the gill net catch (34%) and abundant in the trap net catch (57%). Other panfish species including hybrid sunfish, pumpkinseed, green sunfish and black crappie were also sampled in good numbers. Largemouth bass outnumbered smallmouth bass in the 2017 sample. Walleye (16%) contributed to the gill net catch and several were sampled in the trap nets. Yellow perch are present in average amounts and some good sized pike were again sampled during the 2017 survey. 

      Bluegill numbers in 2017 (72.1/trap net) were much higher than the long term average (31.6/trap net) on Ely Lake and greatly above average (7.9/trap net) compared to other similar lakes in the area. The average bluegill sampled was 5.6 inches long and about 6 years old. Approximately 66% of the bluegill sampled with the trap nets were under 6 inches with a maximum size recorded of 8.0 inches. Bluegill sampled with the gill nets had a similar size structure. Approximately 7% of the hybrid sunfish sampled in the trap nets were 8 inches or larger. Several pumpkinseeds were also in this size range. 

      Largemouth bass (92%) and smallmouth bass (8%) were sampled during the night electrofishing effort. The average largemouth sampled was 10.9 inches which is similar to the historic average of 10.6 inches. The biggest largemouth sampled was 18.5 inches. Approximately 33% of the largemouth sampled were 12 inches or larger. The average smallmouth sampled was 9.8 inches which is slightly larger than the historic average (8.4 inches). The largest smallmouth sampled was 16.8 inches long. Approximately 32% of the smallmouth sampled were 12 inches or larger. Largemouth bass were also sampled from the gill nets and trap nets in numbers above average. 

      Walleye numbers in 2017 (6.2/gill net) were similar to the historic average (6.1/gill net) on Ely Lake and slightly above average (5.0/gill net) when compared to other similar area lakes with walleye. The average walleye sampled was 15.5 inches and about 4 years old. Approximately 34% of the walleye sampled were 15 inches or larger up to a maximum of nearly 29 inches. Walleye fingerlings are currently being stocked during even-numbered years and in 2017 approximately 62% of the walleye aged came from years where stocking occurred. 

      Northern pike numbers in 2017 (1.1/gill net) were similar to the historic average (1.3/gill net) and below average (3.2/gill net) compared to other similar area lakes with pike. The average pike sampled was 26.8 inches which is similar to the historic average length of 26.3 inches. The largest pike sampled in 2017 was 35.2 inches long and sampled with a trap net. 
    • gizmoguy
      Yes they do. Many resorts are set up for summer usage. Understand you can't use your FH in the storage lots. Only in a summer use lot. You have to pay for it. The cost is in addition to your winter fees. Usually more $ but the season is longer. The county requires the resorts to have bathroom facilities within a certain distance. Mac's Twin Bay has summer lots as do many others. Hunter's Point is another. Doubt Brandt's is set up for summer.
    • DRAGFOOT
      Sweet! Heading back up tonight through the weekend. Bringing the wife and little one this time instead of my buddies, hopefully the weather cooperates.
    • Neutz68
      Heading up Sat morning and will be looking for Shiners. Anyone know if the Gateway and/or Kab Outdoors have them in stock??    Thanks for the input.
    • crappieslapper
      Hi Guys & Gals, My brother in law recently purchased a property on Ely Lake. All the boys are invited up this year on Memorial. Unfortunately nobody in the family has been on the lake before. I thought I would reach out to the pros here on the forum to see if anyone would be willing to give us a few tips on fishing this lake. Thanks in advance, Dan
    • crappieslapper
      Hey Forum, My brother in law just purchased on Ely Lake. Memorial weekend will be the first time on lake. Wondering if anyone has some experience/tips they would be willing to offer the Ely lake rookies. Thanks so much. Dan
    • huntnfish
      I made it out last Sunday and did some searching for walleye. The search didn't produce any walleyes, just northerns and smallies. The water temp on the main lake was 58-59 with the bays being about 5 degrees warmer. The people I have talked to have had similar issues finding the eyes. We missed some fish that left the shiner all chewed up. Most of the fish marked were out in that 18-21 foot range which seemed pretty deep for this early. It could have been Saturday's cold front that pushed them a little deeper though. 
    • Hoey
      SRJ - Thanks for the report.  I heard the bite was very-good to excellent, off the rocks/reefs, in the mud/sand.  I will be at the lake fishing this weekend.  
    • srj
      What a couple perfect days for LOW on Monday-Tuesday. Fish seemed to be biting well from shallow to deep and from the south side to up north.  Caught fish from 7 - 28 feet in good numbers and sized from small to large. There seemed to be a lot more fish on sand and mud than rocks. Quite a few males caught near rocks were full of milt. Biggest an 28 1/4. Most on jig and minnow but some on crankbaits. Sure a big pack of charters hanging around the Knight Island shoal. Warm, calm and no bugs!! Hope Memorial weekend winds stay light. My new to me Ipilot Link Bluetooth remote somehow changed to German, Dutch or some other language on the display. Anybody ever have that happen? Good luck this weekend.