• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Whiskeywalleyes

Mille Lacs Sticker

Recommended Posts

Whiskeywalleyes

Could this possibly be an option?
To fish Mille Lacs you need to purchase an extra 10$ sticker on your boat for a year.
Have the DNR regulate this but yet have a private firm impose this deal.
The money can go towards new walleye fingerlings and new baitfish place into this lake.
Us anglers need to be pro-active..
would this work?
I know we all hate more regulations, but if we had a private group collect the funds so us anglers knows that the money purchase towards a stickers would be strictly directed into Lake Mille Lacs.I would pay10 bucks for my future kids to be able to fish like we have in the past..
10 for a individual boat.
30 for a charter.
and 500 fine to DNR if you don't have a sticker.
It would all generate money, very similar to Salmon stickers, extra permits such as ocean fishing.
Could this be a new direction for Mille Lacs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Whiskey, I agree on your point some sort of reg. should be put on the lake I think thats a good Idea. Also more boat landings would be good or just some over flow parking. Are the boat landings always crowded? or is it just because the fish are biting? But the sticker is a good idea. If it all goes to the benifit of the lake, but wouldn't it take time to stock the lake with bait fish? also they should do something like that on other lakes as well? But for Rec. boaters and other groups you will find conflicts this would have to be regulated by the DNR? or Private inspectors? Who would monator the sticker? You would need major support from all anglers for that to fly! But YOU got my Vote! Brettskee

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hoovey

Some friends of mine were discussing a similar idea. They discussed having to purchase a Mille Lacs permit in order to fish the lake. The money generated from the permit would go to the tribal interests and in exchange the tribes would agree to a limited harvest (not several hundred thousand pounds) and let the DNR go back to managing the lake exclusively. Thus allowing more angler harvest and a more balanced ecosystem in the lake. Sounds good to me but I'm not sure it would fly with the tribes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Borch

Money is not gonna fix this problem. Unless the Mille Lacs Band will accept payment in exchange for their harvest. With the ruling I don't know if we can do an end around the judgement even with the band's permission.

As far as stocking Mille Lacs. It's sorta like trying to stock pheasants in South Dakota. Who's gonna waste their money on that when mother nature will eventually fix the problem if you let her. Anything we add will be a drop in the bucket compared to what the lake will do itself.

Plus I just hate the idea of setting precendence of paying for permits to fish public waters. What happens when Leech has a down year, then Winni, then Lake of the Woods. I've already got that ugly boat liscense sticker on my boat. I'd hate to be required to add 10-15 more as the dnr finds this to be another means to get more money out of us. The DNR has a history of fighting any outside control of it's funding. Unless it's legislated it won't happen.

Personally, I against it(Like you haven't figured that out by now). wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Grabs

I would have to agree with Borch, throwing more money and permits at this already complicated and confusing problem will only make things more complicated and confusing. We can't fix a problem by slapping a band-aid on it, we need to focus on the root cause of the problem, first determine if there is a problem, most of us believe there is, and go after the solution at the root of the problem instead a short-term solution. The treaty is here for the long-term unless some higher authority decides otherwise, and until then we should be looking at long-term solutions not short term permits and stocking the lake with bait fish.

Just my 2 cents.

------------------
fisherman2.gif

[This message has been edited by Grabs (edited 07-09-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
weekendjunkie

im not real familiar with the treaty and what it limits and allows. but, to let a PRIVATE company become involved in public fishing? think aboiut that. 1. board of directors...say 50k apiece?sound fair?... secretary? whats she make? how much does paperwork cost? we cant cover our costs to manage this fishery on $10 so we have deemed that you will now pay $20 or $30. why not $100 or a $1000. do you see where im goin with this?

[This message has been edited by weekendjunkie (edited 07-09-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I also am NOT in favor of imposing water specific fees, The DNR has more than enough money to do a proper population survey, and set bag limits accordingly. They are just not doing it, and it is their fault, not the guy who wants to go out and catch some fish. I see the whole thing as a failed attempt to create a world class C&R fishery, not to mention the treaty settlement.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I think a special permit/sticker could quickly open up a huge new can of worms between the tribal authority and the DNR?

I would bet they would wish a cut of the funds or renegotiations of the catch ratio formula for tribal netting, because by federal law they have ownership of a % of the fishing rights?

???

A private sportsman’s coalition selling a sticker to raise funds used to help the lake may be viewed as separate from any state or federal legal obligations, and less likely to be viewed as a threat by the tribal authority?

???


------------------
Backwater Eddy..><,sUMo,>

Backwater Guiding
"Ed on the RED"
(701)-281-2300

[email protected]

http://home.talkcity.com/ResortRd/backwtr1/index.html

[This message has been edited by Backwater Eddy (edited 07-10-2002).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huskminn

I have to agree with the others here who believe that money is not the problem with the Mille Lacs fishery.

As a point of clarification, the allotted tribal take is not several hundred thousand pounds....it's 100,000 lbs. this year. I haven't heard the numbers on what the bands netted this spring, but in years past, they haven't come close to taking their entire allotment. It is the sport anglers that have an allotment of several hundred thousand pounds.

The DNR's tagging study currently underway may or may not result in a change of their management plan. Incidentally, there was no fuss at all when they reqeusted the funding for that study.

Mille Lacs doesn't need to be stocked with anything.....it will eventually fix itself. We may not all like how it fixes itself, but there's not much we can do about that.

There are private coalitions and organizations comprised of resort owners and, I presume, sport anglers. PERM is one of them. The bands do view them as a threat, because they are organized efforts to change the status quo on the lake. The DNR doesn't particularly like them, either, because PERM continually challenges the DNR's numbers on fish population and sustainable harvest percentages. Granted, PERM is protecting its member's own interests, but, as we all know, somewhere there in the middle of the situation is the truth.

I don't really know where you should send your $10 to help the lake. You might be better off keeping it in your account so you can afford to drive a little farther down the road in a couple of years when Mille Lacs is in the recovery room.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

Those of us old enough to remember can tell you the DNR had its hands full with the old Leech Lake "stamp" (later "non-restricted licence") program. As a matter of fact, wardens would ask that anglers produce a Minnesota license, but did not enforce the non-restricted provision. Also, vendors would talk anglers out of paying the extra $$ when making the license purchase.

The program, if used, would have to be for all anglers (not just boat owners) on Mille Lacs, but it would be fraught with difficulty.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fish-on

I'm glad to hear you are thinking and tying to come up with solutions. We all need to do that. A sticker like you proposed would be treating the symptom and not the disease that causes the symptom. We need to get away from this allotment mess altogether. Having a sticker would simply further complicate things, and wouldn't really solve anything... seems like putting a bandaid on the broken leg to me. We just need to go back to managing the lake through sound biological principles with an eye toward good natural resources stewardship. How we can do that, is anyone's guess....

------------------
Bernie Barringer's 10,000 Lakes Guide Service
http://fishingminnesota.com/bernie
Call toll free 800-890-FISH (3474)
[email protected]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I think that stocking is definately not needed, Mille lacs is a walleye factory with poor management. Trying to harvest out the slot is what is responsible for the large skinny fish we are catching now. I say let it go back to what it was, a large lake capable of producing lots of average size fish and an excellent perch fishery. Stop stocking the muskie as well. $0.02

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • redlabguy
      I haven’t seen many posts lately which means I’m not the only one struggling to find fish. I ventured out of Frazer into Big Bay today and fished 20 fow on a shore line pulling a spinner/crawler  at 1 mph and got a limit of nice fish in a half an hour. They hit almost as soon as I got the bait to the bottom. Just me and the lab- - otherwise, we would’ve put a lot more fish in the boat. It was the third place I tried. It’s good advice to fish where you see fish on the sonar.  RLG
    • yoppdk
    • srj
      Sounds like a great time, Hoey. Keeping active with old friends is really important...……….as I have advanced well past "middle age", most of my friends I fished/hunted with have either died or quit the outdoors pursuits. Bummer. However, Thursday I head to Morson with one of my remaining partners to spend a few days at his place at Sportsmans Landing, always a good time. That part of LOW is really fun! Endless rock humps to fish, and little traffic. A couple years ago, I got my bud into jigging raps and similar lures. Big fun jig rappin the sand flats in that area. And usually, we catch a few crappies for a great meal. One observation  after many years of fishing LOW north and east of Big Traverse involves the rock humps.....anyone with thoughts on this, please weigh in. In big Traverse, the rock bite peaks in July and slowly peters out. There are still good days, but by late August, you have to run and gun to find fish on the rocks. However, in Sabaskong, Little Traverse and areas north and east of Big Traverse, the rock bite stays very strong. On Whitefish Bay, my best rock fishing was the last couple weeks of August. My thought is it is because of the pressure on  the US side and the lack thereof on the Canada side. Opinions? Good luck.
    • Borch
      I was fishing 18-25 fow.  I cruised several humps that topped out around 17-20 fow and found fish on about 1/2 of them.  I only fished spots I marked good numbers of fish on them.   By horizontal I mean either making long cast and snapping the jigging rap back sharply or trolling 1- 1.2 mph and having enough line out that there would be a little slack before my next snap of the rod at that speed/depth.  You don't feel the hit.  The fish is just there on the next snap that then turns into a hook set.   I've also fished them vertically but many times the more horizontal presentation works better.  At least for me.   I caught fish on both 7&9 sizes.  But the 7s are easier on my arm with repetitive snapping of the rod.  These fish heavy and I've fished them like this in more than 30 feet of water. Metallic perch was the best color for me this weekend followed by rainbow trout or chartreuse.   Even caught several pike and crappies doing this type of fishing.  Moonshine shiver minnows work well too.  They get the nod when there is most on the bottom.  They fish cleaner that the jigging raps. 
    • delcecchi
      when was the most recent time it started normally?   You did start mixing oil in gas when you disconnected the injection system, right?    
    • opsirc
      I have a 1984 40hp evinrude, when to start this year after it has been sitting for 5yrs. It was drawing so much juice that it melted one one the terminals off. The only thing different is I disconnected the oil injection system because it was in constant alarm. Did this after talking to the service dept at a outboard motor dealership. Everything else is the same, when i parked it would turn over with no problem, now hard turning. Anyone have idea i am out of them.   Thanks
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of a zebra mussel in East Silent Lake in Otter Tail County.  A property owner contacted the DNR after finding a one-half inch zebra mussel attached to a native mussel near a dock in about two feet of water. DNR staff conducted follow-up searches of more than 1,500 objects in East Silent Lake and found no additional zebra mussels. The lake will be added to the infested waters list, because the DNR verified the initial report. The lake will be monitored for additional zebra mussels. “It’s helpful that lake users are being vigilant and are contacting us when they suspect they’ve found a zebra mussel,” DNR invasive species specialist Mark Ranweiler said. “We ask people to keep the specimen and send us a photo, to assist with identification and confirmation.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft and trailers of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport. Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. Zebra mussels can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species. More information is available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Lohmwil
      Hey Borch, What do you mean by horizontal presentation for jigging raps?  How deep were the mid lake humps you were fishing?  I've been experimenting with jigging raps this year and have caught some on them, but not a lot.  One final question, I've been using size 7.  What were you using?  THANKS.
    • Borch
      The eyes I got from 11 - 11:45 am.  The gills and crappies from 2:30 - 4:30 pm.  We did a picnic lunch and a boat tour of the lake as it was Wanda's first time on Osakis.   The panfish bite was very good.   Enjoyed our time as well.   Was hoping to see you before I went to get Wanda and left active fish. 
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed a report of zebra mussels in Eagle Lake in Kandiyohi County.  A property owner contacted the DNR after finding a one-half inch zebra mussel on the north side of Eagle Lake. DNR staff conducted a two-hour snorkel search and found one additional zebra mussel on a settlement plate attached to a dock. The lake will be monitored for additional zebra mussels. “It’s helpful when lake users contact the DNR if they think they’ve found a zebra mussel or any other invasive species,” said DNR invasive species specialist Eric Katzenmeyer. “We ask people to keep the specimen and send us a photo, to assist with identification and confirmation.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft and trailers of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. Zebra mussels can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species. More information is available at mndnr.gov/ais. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.