Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Good news for non-landowner turkey applicants


Mark Christianson

Recommended Posts

Well, at least I think this is good news.
I sent an email to the DNR last week, suggesting that they re-think the landowner permit process.
As it stands, there is a gaping hole for landowners to get preference.
A person can own property that is nothing more than open fields, yet he/she receives preference for a permit. My thoughts are that if you receive landowner preference for a turkey permit, you better darn well have some turkey habitat to benefit in the lottery process. Here is a reply from Ed Boggess in the DNR in regards to my suggestion to rethink the generalization of landowner permits.

Mr. Christianson:
A bill addressing the issue you raise recently passed the legislature
and is on the Governor's desk to be signed into law. Under the revised
statutes, the requirement that the qualifying land be agricultural or
grazing land will be removed and any landowner receiving a license in
the separate drawing will be restricted to hunting only on the land they
own or lease in the zone where the qualifying land is located. Someone
who does not own or lease property with turkeys on it will therefore
have no incentive to apply in the special landowner drawing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol ! I like it. and i don't see anything wrong w/ it. Landowner wise either, how can you bit%&. thanks for the tip.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not so sure about this one.....

While I do agree that people abuse the system by putting up "junk" land to hunt on, and reap the benefits of getting a tag most years......I'm not so sure this is the solution.

IMO, this system will result in only the largest landowners in the state applying for landowner permits, resulting in an overall LOSS of private lands to hunt (as published in the DNR's Spring Turkey Hunting Workbook). I own 40 acres in SE MN, but would never dream of applying for a landowner permit for a few reasons.

If I'm going to allow hunting on my land, I'm not going to be further restricted in doing so. I'll apply for a later season or get a surplus tag and still hunt nearly every year. I also wish not to have my name, address, land, and phone number published in a document for hunters. If I didn't hunt my land, I'd have no problem.....but demand far exceeds supply....especially when you're talking about some hunters that think the land is public year-round, for deer, squirrel, duck, grouse, and pheasants.

I feel that these small to mid-range acreage landowners will stop applying for landowner permits, and reduce the amount of land available to public hunting. These lands simply cannot sustain the amount of pressure that is out there, and remain quality hunting opportunities.

I believe this is only a very small band-aid to a much greater problem. A more extensive public hunting land access program is needed in this state. Hunters need to have quality public lands to hunt, enough of them to sustain pressure, and landowners need to be compensated for the various costs, time, and inconveniences that such access comes with. A bill was introduced this year to address some of these problems but I believe it was struck down.

It's my thought that you get out of it what you put into it. Just like anything, it takes time, patience, and a substantial amount of energy to prepare, scout, and secure land for the season. While this method of looking at platbooks and maps may seem old-fashioned and time consuming.....it does work. Knocking on doors may not be convenient, but it is effective. Furthermore, it keeps those great turkey spots great. Were they published haunts, I'm not so sure they would be as good.

Any other thoughts?

Joel


Link to comment
Share on other sites

My experiences for securing land to hunt, has been relatively easy.
In fact, the couple times I used the landowner info, I have been struck down. In one case the guy said his other family members were hunting.
I don't even bother looking at the book for landowner applicants any more.

In my experiences, I don't think what you are stating is a very big issue. (Access to quality habitat being more limited if more landowners are not applying for "landowner permit".

The farmers I have gotten permission from, are anxious to get the birds out in some cases. We had a landowner tell us to take 2 each. Doh!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jnelson,
You failed to mention if you receive a landowner permit each year? If you do, could this be the reason you do not agree?
In 442, it takes three years to draw a early season tag. Landowners receive them every year. Many landowners in 442 DO NOT allow public hunting even though the regulations state they must. Claiming they already have people. I say fine- let those individuals hunt their OWN land.
As a member of the NWTF, this bill has been heavily lobbied for. The NWTF sees only positive things happening- landowners will create habitat to hunt- in turn creating a larger population or it will equilize the distribution of permits and introduce the fine sport to many more people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seamonster:

You have made a poor assumption. I have never applied for or received a landowner permit, even though according to you, and apparently the NWTF, I should have good reason to do so. I am sorry if I have offended you with my opinions, and I wish not to create any ill-will. Please read this as one man's opinion on the situation, nothing more or less.

As stated in my previous post, I do not agree with landowners abusing their landowner permit priveleges. I have also been turned away by landowners, but because I don't know whether they have people hunting for sure or not, I do not draw conclusions or accuse them of cheating the system.

In the zones I have hunted, it takes at least 3 years to draw a 1st season permit as well. However, I've been drawn 3 of the past 5 years by applying for later seasons. One of the years I wasn't drawn, I successfully obtained a surplus permit. This year, I tagged along on several hunts, and still had a blast. Also, at least for the zone I hunted this year, in 2003 landowner/tennant permits never reached the 20% level for any season but the first one! The opportunity to hunt exists for both landowners and those who don't own land.

I think we agree on the ends, just not necessarily the means to the same goals. I'm not sure the current system is working well, and I wouldn't necessarily be opposed to changing it....I just had a problem with the proposed changes. My suggestion would be to try and get organizations such as the NWTF to put more local and state pressure on a walk-in type hunting program. I think such a program would more fairly reward hunters, willing landowners....and in turn reward more taxpayers in this state.

Just like bigbass, I haven't had too much problem securing land to hunt provided I started early and was flexible (most permit areas are quite large). Access may be a problem in the areas closer to the cities, but I have never had a problem in at least 3 different permit areas.

I understand that some landowners may abuse these tags, just as some slob hunters trespass. However, I don't favor weakening an already flimsy incentive structure for landowners on account of sour grapes.

I think the end result will be less total acreage for public hunting. That is, if anybody pays attention to the new law (seems to be a tough one to enforce). I don't think private landowners will be influenced to do any more habitat work than they already do. The change will result in more successful applicants that are non-landowners, but less available land. The difference in acreage may not be that big an issue as bigbass said, but I'm not the one having problems getting on land either.

Joel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

I guess I've never had trouble getting onto land that was in the landowner permit drawing in the area I am currently hunting in.. I hunted two such properties this spring. Two others that I had permission to hunt this spring were in the program last spring but not this year. But got permission this year because of the relationship I built with them last spring. I also hunt public land.

I know for a fact that several guys apply and recieve landowner permits for land that does not hold turkeys. But I was given permission to go ahead and try. It's funny because I drove past one of these properties while scouting and actually saw a group of birds passing through. But there was nothing there to hold them and it would had been a **** shoot to hunt there.

Some zones are much tougher to get onto. For instance 418 is one that I have hunted in the past. It's a very popular zone with no surplus permits available the past 2 years. It's a 3 year wait to draw a season beginning in April. I received permission to hunt 3 different landowner properties. But was turned down by more than 15 other permit winners. Many had friends that they let on which technically meets the requirements I guess. Also knocking on doors there was less effective as it seemed everyone knew someone who was hunting and didn't want someone else potentially shooting their birds or crowding them.

I guess what I'm thinking is that if I was a land owner with less than 400 acres I would not apply for the program. These bird do move around and if you're confined to a 40 - 100 acres chunk they may not be on your land during the 5 days you have to hunt. How many of us would be happy only have one property to hunt? Personally this spring I had 6 differet properties totally about 1300 acres to hunt. Several days I hunted at least two of these and over the course of the season I hunted on 4 of them.

I know I'm not happy with just one place to hunt.

Borch

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The proposed changes sound fine to me, but I'm not opposed to the landowners having more preference. They pay the taxes, which are getting ridiculous, plus their crops feed the birds all year, why shouldn't they have some extra perks? I own land that doesn't currently happen to be in a turkey zone, but either way I guarantee I'm doing everything I can afford to do to improve the land for deer & turkey, as well as waterfowl, I'm fortunate enough to live on a small river. There are no turkeys on my property yet, but I'm sure there will be soon, as I know I've heard them less than a mile away. Those pine trees that wildlife love cost money & are a lot of work to keep mowed & the dead ones replaced until they get big. I've never applied for a landowner permit & doubt that I would if I didn't have turkeys on my land or very close by, because I wouldn't want to have to open up my land to public hunting. I've seen all the garbage that gets thrown on public land & on the lake ice fishing, it's ridiculous. I'd much rather have someone come & ask me about hunting on their own, that knows I don't have to let them hunt, & I think that's the way most landowners feel. I don't like walking up to strange places & knocking on doors to hunt, but I have to say when I have done it, most experiences have been favorable. I got to know too different landowners this year who I'd never met & both were very helpful & more than willing to let us hunt turkeys. Both landowners have relatives who bowhunt deer there, but don't hunt turkeys, at least yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Correction: two landowners, not "too" landowners. Guess I spell like a redneck anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jnelson,

The landowner tag abuse is very large in 442. I could provide more than 20 names whom I know are applying with acres that are NOT at all turkey habitat. Some even have land within the city limits! I have contacted the DNR on three seperate occasins- nothing ever materialized- the DNR does not want to deal with it. I have had a CO admit this to me, he claims it is not enforcable!
I have access to thousands of acres in another zone and have hunted there for the past several seasons. Access personally, is not my issue!
The resources of Mn SHOULD be equally available for everyone. Period! Yes- I could hunt a later season with leftover permits or zones and time periods with less applicants. BUT why should I have to when others(these landowners) do not. This is not equality.

Providing more habitat... always a great idea! A walk-in program... Excellent for habitat and access... Not economically feasible in MN's agriculture region. The states that have had success with this, have done so with marginal farmland/grazing land that costs few $. Mn has tons of public land- Where is it located and why? Iowa has very little public land, again $$$$! You do not see huge expanses of habitat!
The current Deer landowner permit allows the landowner/family member to harvest the deer only on the land owned by the landowner.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seamonster:

I’m sorry to hear of the abuse of the system in that permit area. It’s too bad when a loophole allows folks to exploit a certain part of the hunting laws. However, I think as a whole, the main ideas and general framework of this system have worked out pretty well for the turkey hunters in Minnesota. It could use some tweaking, but let’s look at the numbers for 442.

This year, 135 landowners were successful landowner/tenant applicants, and secured 10.5% of the total pool of 1,280 tags available in zone 442 from seasons A-G. These landowners filled their 20% quota for only seasons A & C, leaving many more tags in all other seasons.

If these guys are getting preferential treatment, it’s only in the earlier seasons, where they get ~20% of the tags allotted for the whole time period. You speak of equality, well 10.5% vs. 89.5% doesn’t seem equal to me. Minnesota’s public resources should be available to everyone, I agree, but private land and access to it is not a public resource. It’s a privilege that you and I both should be very grateful for. The wild turkey, now that’s a harder one to finger…..public or private, both? Without the DNR and NWTF, the wild turkeys range and numbers would be a drop in the bucket compared to what they are today. However, without private landowners and habitat, those released turkeys would not share the same success they do today.

It’s my thought that 10.5% of all the tags in the zone is a small price to pay, considering over 90% of southern Minnesota (the stronghold of MN’s turkey population) is in private holding. These lands and the owners that plant turkey food and provide habitat, offer us the chance to enjoy the sport we love. These folks, for the most part, try to be good stewards of the land, pay taxes on the land, and generally let us hunt there. From a farmer’s perspective like my dad’s, it’s they who are getting the short end of the stick. They pay taxes, forfeit crops to the birds, maintain habitat, and hunters come out there to hunt them, generally for free. I think we’ve all got it pretty good, especially compared to the proposed changes.

If a walk-in or similar program is not feasible, how else do you propose gaining better access to such lands? Lease land? Throw up our hands and quit? I’m curious as to your solution.

As for the current deer landowner permit system, I don’t think I need to tell you how different the two species are, regarding population levels (over a million vs. ~60,000), range (statewide vs. ½ the state), and hunting technique….among other differences.

Again, these are only my opinions; feel free to disagree wholeheartedly. You can also email me by clicking on my username on the main part of the turkey forum. Good luck to all of us in finding the answers, whichever ones may be correct.

Joel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • lilakerr
      Covid-19: Can you take online classes? These are some top tips to help you achieve better outcomes. Here are some top tips to succeed in your online classes for 2021. Treat your classes like a job Be selective in where you study Keep an eye on your internet usage Take care of yourself Another semester, another year! Due to the pandemic, things may look different in your schooling this year. Many students are now taking online classes, despite having only had experience with in-person classes. The content is unchanged, but it can be difficult for students to adjust to the new learning method. Online classes can be difficult if you aren't already. This article will share tried and tested tips that were passed on from previous students. These tips can help you to succeed in online classes. Treat your classes like a job It is easy to feel that your education is more informal now that you don’t have to travel and attend in person. You can certainly benefit from attending lectures in your pajamas. You can boost your motivation to study seriously by not doing any work in bed, or in your pajamas. sets clear boundaries as to when it's time to work and when it's time for you to live. Do not mix the two! If you are part of a full-time program, you might try to maintain a 9am-5pm work schedule at home. You should start work every day at 9am. Take your lunch break at a time that you choose, then work until 5 pm. This is a great method to keep you committed to your work and allow your school to continue to be your school. You might find it difficult to put your school away if you are a workaholic who doesn't have a set schedule. Be selective in where you study It is easy to stay focused when you are sitting in a lecture. It's easy to focus when you have only one thing to do: pay attention and learn from your teacher. Online learning can lead to distractions. Living with people can make it difficult to focus if they are also cooking, watching TV, or talking with you. All the noise can distract you from your goal. Avoid the common spaces in your home to create a peaceful space for studying. You don't need to study in your living room or kitchen. Instead, use your bedroom. While office space is a great option, we don't all have the luxury to do so. Make sure you have privacy and minimal foot traffic in your home. Keep an eye on your internet usage Online learning is hindered by the ease of accessing virtual distractions. If you watch an online lecture while simultaneously receiving messages notifications, it can cause you to lose your focus. You can set your laptop as "Do not disturb" so that you don't get distracted by notifications. Additionally, it is a good practice to have your lecture/or assignment fully displayed on the screen while you finish them. If you do this, you could accidentally lose your focus by filling up extra space with social media or news browsing. Clearing out extra browsing space can help you focus. Take care of yourself This is our last and most important tip. Be kind. Online learning isn't an easy transition. If you are not as productive or having difficulty staying motivated, it's normal. That's normal. You should take care of yourself. Alternative opinion in studentjob.co.uk article: http://www.studentjob.co.uk/blog/5757-best-online-exam-help-top-five-websites-you-can-trust  
    • alexmoss8432
      or spammers lol 
    • alexmoss8432
      I usually listen to audio books 
    • BrianF
      Fished solo Sunday and Monday afternoon.  Began by targeting smallies, but couldn’t buy a fish which was odd because the conditions were juicy - calm, cool, cloudy, drizzly.   Frustrating to say the least!    Figured if I was gonna get skunked, then it might as well be swinging for the fence.  Switched to Muskies at 7:30 and got lucky as heck, putting three in the boat over the next two hours, including a porker 48”er.  Felt very content the rest of the evening.    Got back out on the water Monday afternoon under post-frontal high skies and was fortunate to trick this lonely blonde an hour into the day.  Missed another a short time later and had some follows before pulling the plug to head home.  Didn’t want to leave that’s for sure!  All East end fish caught casting btw and all released unharmed.   Water temp was 71. 
    • MasonDavis1
      I recently found an interesting thomas king essay topic on this site. God, I'm so glad that now I shouldn't waste time surfing the web. By the way, the rest of the topics from the list were also very interesting.
    • MasonDavis1
      The main keywords of this essay “can virtue be taught essay”. Plato presents Socrates’ views on the question of virtue and knowledge. It can be taught in many dialogues, including Meno. Socrates offers many arguments regarding virtue in this dialogue. These arguments cover how virtue is defined, and whether people can attain it. He discusses how virtue can be achieved, including whether one is born virtuous and whether it can be taught. This essay will address the question of whether virtue is possible to teach. Plato answered that virtue can't be taught. This essay will argue that Plato could have asked the questions differently and given him a different response. Particularly, I argue that Plato could have asked whether virtue can be learned rather than asking whether virtue is taught.   Meno asks Socrates whether virtue is possible to teach. The argument is then shifted to another question: what is knowledge? Meno then proposed an interesting paradox. One cannot find anything new. Either one already knows the answer, in which case it is unnecessary to search for it, or one doesn't know it and can't recognize it once it is found (Plato 1997: 80d-e. To put it another way, if one doesn't know what virtue (arete) is, he cannot search for it. Because he will not be able to recognize it when he finds it. Socrates proposes a solution to this problem, which is based upon the Pythagorean view on the immortal soul. The idea that the soul can reincarnate and be destroyed after death of the body is an example of this. It is clear that one cannot acquire new knowledge, but it is also obvious that we are constantly learning new things. Therefore, learning must be a matter recollection of past lives experiences and knowledge. Also, remembering is more important than teaching.   He demonstrated the Meno with a young boy from slavery who didn't seem to have any geometry knowledge. He was able to prove that the boy knew certain mathematical theorems by asking him questions.   Meno again asks his original question. He wants to know if virtue can be taught or if one is born with virtue. Socrates agrees to continue, but says they need to find common ground because neither one of them can define virtue at this moment. Meno agrees that virtue cannot be taught if it is not knowledge. If it is knowledge, it can be taught. Meno points out that it is only possible to teach something if you know what it is. It is unlikely that someone who doesn't know how to drive a car can teach another. Meno and Socrates agree that no one knows what "virtue" means and can therefore not be taught.   Socrates claims that virtue can be taught if we are able to learn from those who teach it (Plato 1997: 96c). Socrates asserts that there are teachers who can teach horsemanship, medicine, and other skills. These teachers are recognized by everyone as legitimate, but people disagree on whether they actually teach virtue. Thucydides was the father of two sons. Neither of them were considered to be virtuous. It is claimed that Thucydides taught his children many disciplines. However, it seems that he couldn't find a teacher who could teach virtue, even though he had teachers for other areas of life that he valued. Even though he was virtuous, he could not even teach it. Virtue is not a form knowledge. To make something knowledge, one must be able teach it to others. Socrates concluded that virtue cannot and should not be taught, and that there are no methods or means by which one can acquire virtue. Refer to: Virtue is simply "shown that it will come to us whenever it comes" (reference).   Plato might have received a different answer if he had asked the questions differently, according to my opinion. Plato could have asked whether virtue could learn, rather than asking whether virtue can ever be taught. To put it another way, asking if one can be taught something implies that the relationship between a student or teacher is involved. However, asking if something can be learnt means that the student (or someone with similar life experiences) is asking if a teacher has taught you geometry. To ask whether I learned geometry, it is to simply ask whether it was taught to me by a teacher or if I learned it myself from a book or some other source.   There are many ways to learn. To learn something one doesn't need a teacher. Learning can be done by studying virtue-filled people, even though they may not know it. A man might be learning virtue and his "teachers" could be virtuous even though they may not be living. Experience is another form of learning. Experience can be a great way to learn virtue. This would mean that the "teacher" is a combination of life experiences and reflective nature. Another form of learning exists. Even if he can't explain how he learned it or what he knows, a man can still learn. After someone has experienced a certain problem in their life, he may be able to detect that his relative is also experiencing the same issue. He can recognize it but cannot explain how. Another example is the musician or painter who has learned their craft and can perform well but cannot explain what it was.   The question of whether virtue can or cannot be taught is therefore a different and more narrow one than the question of whether virtue can actually be learned. Plato was right when he said that virtue can't be taught. It is likely that many people know of or have heard of people who can recite the "rules of virtue" but cannot put them into practice. This is a clear indication that virtue cannot be taught. As I mentioned, being virtuous is similar to being able to play a musical instrument, which is instinctual. It could be argued, for instance, that the ability to recognize when to help a friend, or when to give it to him, is something we instinctually know.   This means that, although virtue cannot be taught, it is possible to learn virtue. Plato suggested that virtue is inherent. This is true to a certain extent. Some people have an extraordinary capacity for virtues such as compassion, empathy, and the like. Since they were born. Others, however, seem to have a lack of moral consciousness. This seems to be a problem because virtue cannot exist without it. This does not mean that virtue cannot be learned, but that the foundation is inborn.   The same way we understand that it is possible to preach virtue but not practice it, so too can the reverse. People can improve their understanding of virtue and may find that they are more virtuous through reflective practice. As they get older, their perceptions of what it means to act in a virtuous manner change. Plato might have received a more positive answer if he had asked different questions (e.g., if he had asked if virtue could be learned instead of if virtue could be taught). Alternative sources: https://proessays.net/essays/analysis-of-class-and-virtue-essay-by-parenti
    • Thongtm
      I have used a Cutco for the past 5 years and its blade has performed flawlessly.   https://nhacaicacuoc.com/nap-tien-fb88/   Để biết về bí quyết rút tiền khách hàng có thể tham khảo bài viết: cách rút tiền fb88 https://nhacaicacuoc.com/rut-tien-fb88/ Xem thêm các bài viết khác tại: https://nhacaicacuoccom.blogspot.com/    
    • james_walleye
      Red, the moose was near birch island. As far as the lead bite goes....I had heard it was lights out a week ago. No doubt from what I've seen that before 9am you can get into a good bite. For me it's been poor after that. I'd be real curious if others are finding that as well. I have tried deeper areas as well and they weren't good after 9am for me either. 
    • delcecchi
      Good thing DNR is going mostly bucks only in the north....   Apparently all those deer I see along the road aren't enough
    • redlabguy
      That is great to see! Between Birch Point or Birch Island and Pine? Great to see wherever! Last one I saw was in Quetico umpteen years ago.   I’ve been wondering about lead core. I’m starting to find fish with lindy rigs (although I’ve started to use tungsten worm sinkers) or spinners with crawlers in 18-20’ near steep rocky shore.    Your wildlife shot reminded me of one I took about a month ago along 77. Thought I’d share it. not as cool as a moose, though!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.