• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
jlm

Scouting Cameras

Recommended Posts

jlm

Ok, we have all heard of them and some of use them (scouting cameras). Those of you that use them, are they worth the money? What are the pros/cons of using a scouting camera. Please do not start an ethical debate on these, it only takes away from the thread in my opinion. If anyone has pics, please feel free to post them, we all the love 'em!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Flash

My brother-in-law uses one on his hunting land. Did it help his hunting in any way? I don't think it did. It is fun though to see what is walking by the stand when you are not there. You still have to be in the stand to shoot the deer. Personally I do not think deer move at the same time every day. Wheather has a lot to do with it. One thing that is fun is know there is a nice buck in the area. Makes going out hunting easier when you know there is a buck using the area. Keeps you moral up.
Flash
"Set the Hook"

[This message has been edited by jlm (edited 07-02-2004).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SCAT

I have a friend in the UP of Michgan and they have used them for last few years and he has had pictures of the last 3 bucks he has taken prior to rifle season! Others that have used then said that any large bucks vacated the area after being photod. Maybe the camera, may be the does left too...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

Scouting cameras ROCK!
I have 3 now, and plan on getting more.

The week before rifle season last year, I had 7 different bucks visit a homemade scrape.
Trouble is, we didn't see any of them. frown.gif
But it was just exciting to know what was in the area. I did get a photo in October of the buck I shot on the firearms opener.
I hang a camera on the feeder here at work. I have several dozen pics of the deer that live right here in Plymouth. No massive deer, but several real nice bucks.

I'd post pics, but me don't know how to do it.

It's worth your money!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

I have a scouting camera and like it, but the batteries, film, and developing get a little expensive.

Between my land and the neighboring properties we have a few hundred acres to hunt, and the scouting camera does not change or affect how, when, or where we hunt.

I mostly like having it to see what's using my food plots and walking around on my property. Gets pretty exciting when you get photos of shooter bucks, gets pretty depressing when all you get are photos of does, fawns, or nocturnal deer.

I've got friends that have taken photos of deer they later shot. I'd like to do that. Maybe this year .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

What kinds of cameras are you guys using? What do you like or dislike about them? Any pictures of big bucks? Anybody use a digital?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I have 2 Stealthcams. They are $70 at Gander.
I also have a TrailTimer. Gander sells them for about $250.
They are all 35 mm.
The Stealthcams are a bit confusing to understand, but with time and re-reading the instructions a few times, its fine.
The Trailtimer is a far superior unit.
But in the end, they all take pictures. When you get the prints, you wouldn't know which camera took which pics.
I have several pictures are very nice bucks. I need to figure out how to post them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jlm

BLB-
You have to get someone to host your pictures before you can post them here. There are numerous sights where you can load your picks. If you go to the open water forum there was a thread related to this. The last post in this thread was on 6/25 so you will have to scroll through a little. Post away, I am interested in looking. We are also going to start a brag board soon so if you figure it out, please let everyone know how to do it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

How about the flash, do you think that scares the deer so they avoid that area? And how about batteries, will they last quite awhile, even in cold weather? How fast will you go thru a roll of film? Even with a 30 second delay, I would think that if it was in a good spot that you could go thru a roll in a couple of nights.

Thats why I'm really contemplating a digital one. If you spend $300 on a digital vrs $150 for the other one, at $7 for processing, after 21 rolls the digital would pay for itself. Has anyone tried a digital?

Was just out to Cabelas site looking at the trail cameras, getting the lust bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

I also have a Stealth Cam, the more expensive model -- I think it's called an MC1-D or something like that. It was under $200.

I like the price, and the photos I get seem just as good as the ones my friends are getting with more expensive cameras. I think the location - distance and lighting - have more to do with a good photo than does an expensive camera. There's a really good flash on this camera so my night photos usually turn out pretty good.

I don't like the construction -- too much plastic -- and it just SEEMS unreliable. I'm never sure if it's going to take good photos or not, but after using it a little I've got the hang of it and it's worked fine for the last several rolls of film. My friends with the more expensive cameras have the same issues -- sometimes the camera works great, the next time it doesn't seem to take photos, or takes them of nothing, etc.

Batteries, film, and developing are not cheap. I've looked at digital cameras a little, and for me the key is being able to leave the camera in the woods all the time but still retrieve your photos, whether by a removable memory card or by a monitor you can view on and download to. I do not like the idea of taking the camera down and bringing it to my computer to access the photos (I live 250 miles away from the land I hunt and have the camera on).

Usually I have my camera on my food plots. A trick is positioning it so the deer are only 10-20 feet away, such as on a trail where they come in, or in a funnel, etc. I find it interesting to 1) look for big bucks (usually I get photos of small bucks), and 2) see how much the food plots are being used in daylight vs. darkness (mostly darkness, especially once hunting season starts, and the two biggest bucks I've photoed were both well after dark).

I think setting up on a trail in the woods vs. on the edge of a food plot would be a better way to get photos of nice bucks - the cameras have delay settings on them, and there's usually so many does / fawns / small bucks moving around in the food plots that I think sometimes the bigger bucks walk past the camera while it's in it's delay mode. For example, last year I spent 3 consecutive days bowhunting over a food plot (80 yards by 20 yards) of brassicas that the deer were hitting hard, and had my camera there and set with a 5 minute delay between photos. I saw 21 deer in the food plot while hunting, and the camera took photos of only 3 of those 21 deer, because they walked behind the camera, or too far away for the sensor to pick them up, or too slow for the sensor to think they were moving, or too close together during the delay, etc. etc. etc.

I like my camera, but I'm glad I didn't spend any more money on it. Sorry for the long post, but hopefully this info helps.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PerchJerker

I just read BlackJacks post again and realized I didn't answer a bunch of his questions.

I don't think the flash scares the deer - it may startle them a little, but does not scare them. This is from personal observation and from setting the camera to take 2-3 quick consecutive photos when the sensor is triggered. My theory is the noise from winding the film does more to startle them than the flash of light (which might be a vote for digital).

My camera uses 8 c cell batteries. They've lasted anywhere from 2-3 weeks to 6-8 weeks. I've never noticed a difference in battery life from usage or temperature, except for in really cold weather when they go down fast.

I usually use a 24 exposure roll and set a 5 minute delay between photos. Depending on location, sometimes I only get a few photos a week, and sometimes the camera records 30-40 events in a week. Sometimes I use a 12 exposure film if I'm there for a long weekend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

Thanks for the info Perchjerker!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

Finally back in town.

BJ
As far as the cameras scaring deer.....
I have watched deer walk past the camera I put out behind the house, and when it snaps a picture, they just stand there in amazement. Now these are deer that live around people, so I have no idea how the ones in the real wild act, but I really don't think it bothers them.
As far as batteries, they aren't that bad. I can get a few, to several weeks out of them like PJ says. I had a camera out after deer season last year, that I got in late January, and the batteries were still working when I retrieved the camera.
I have my cameras set to take a single picture every 10 minutes. Then again, I have them on food plots now.
If I put them on a trail, I set it for a picture every minute.
I have a friend that has mastered the art of posting pics. I'll get some out here soon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ben1022

I've used a few diff't cameras and I like what they do for me. First off, I work close w/guys who get the "good guy price" for these toys and that's how I got to use them. Another instance is when I was at a trade show and got to do a product reveiw for one. So here goes...film/developing gets expensive. If you are going to use them, you have to consider you're going to get a lot of picutures. Regardless if they're good or bad, you're looking to find something out and the pics can get expensive. I used a 35mm camera on one and it was great. But, the expense of running back and forth from the camera and the developing started to outwiegh what I wanted to know. So, I got to use two diff't digital ones and they are the ticket. However, I'd suggest a digital that gives reasonable battery life. I honestly don't need pro quality photos...just good enough to see what is out there. So, black and white vs. color is fine for me and something that can flash quickly. Some cameras are tricked into being "off" until something sets them off. However, they don't instantly turn on and sometimes the subject can be thru the window before it snaps. Major pluses of digital...store lots of pics (few trips to camera), replace CF cards and take one home to look at and get info. It's easy to log your info if you care to and most have IR or little flash so it doesn't spook game. I'm not totally convinced flash spooks game to the point they leave the area but that's another discussion.
A draw back I had w/one digital was that it inadvertently went off. They said that if too much sun/heat was on the camera, it could set it off. So, I had a bunch of pics I was scouring looking to see what set it off and was about crazy thinking I was missing something.
I thought it was going to be the answer to me shooting a huge animal w/little scouting and was way wrong! However, it still provides good info on time of movement and I find it good to correlate that w/the weather and other factors. It also lets you know if nothing is using the area so you don't waste time hanging in a tree that's unlikely to produce.
Overall, it's a nice aide and useful tool and the anticipation of getting the info is a lot of fun. Good luck in your search and hope you find it useful too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

Well, I wonder if this will work:

Here is a pic in my backyard. Notice the doe staring at my Mckenzie target in the background. (PS, I had a buck attack that same decoy and knock it over. Proof was in the holes in the rear end of the target)
47b4df24b3127cce85cdfc6333000000001610

Here is a nice 8 pt hovering over a scrape I made:

47b4df24b3127cce85cde552f2950000001610

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

IT WORKED!!!!

Here is a pic of a nubbin buck with a bullet hole in his right front leg. This was after firearms season. I have 2 other pictures of the same deer and he is favoring the leg by the looks of it. I also found tracks in the snow from a deer dragging a leg across the surface of the snow, so I am 99.9% positive that it is a gun wound.
47b4df24b3127cce85cdf834b2650000001610

Here is one of the many bucks around where I work. At least they used to be there, until a bunch were eliminated via sharpshooters last year. frown.gif
47b4df24b3127cce85cdfd08f2c30000001610

Here is the one I bagged opening day of firearms season:
47b4df24b3127cce85cde440b21f0000001610

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I use shutterfly.com for my pics.
Basically upload your pics to shutterfly. View the pic and do a right click on the photo.... in enlarged mode... properties.... copy the url address and paste into the spaces between the image tags like this....URL.www.shutterfly.blah.blah. If all else fails look at one of the posts that worked, in edit mode.

Is this easy to understand?
I cut and pasted from an email a friend sent to me, and it was quite simple.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jlm

Great pics BLB, thanks for posting them. Can you give everyone your method of posting so that others may do the same? It would be greatly appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

I use a 35mm CammTrakker, it was a spendy unit, 3 years ago, I think they still are. It takes great pictures & works pretty well. I've had it out in the last position on a trail deep in the woods for probably 6 weeks. There hadn't been much traffic, but I checked it last night & it was full, so should have pics in a couple days. I've had some trouble with it tripping & taking pictures of nothing, but also have gotten some really cool pics. That's excluding the second film I ever developed that was half full of pictures of the secretaries from my office dressed in hunting garb, carrying guns, bows, antlers, etc. Don't tell any of your hunting buddies where you put your camera. Let's just say they got me. I was crabby for the first month or two about all the scent they left by my stand, during season, but it's pretty funny even to me now.

I set it for a short time span a minute or less along a trail, at least 5 minutes if on a food plot or near a salt lick. Put it on a salt lick one time that was heavily used with the delay on a minute about 2pm. Pulled it a week later, the 20 pics that had been remaining when I moved it there were gone by 6am the next day, oops. Batteries & film do get expensive, but they're pretty cool. I try to put it in spots that aren't directly by stands, because it did spook them off that salt lick for a while. I just put them within a few hundred yards of a stand, maybe on a trail I'm not sure how much is used.

I'll see on this film, I had it out for a while last fall & think I may have a pic of a dandy buck that galloped pasted my stand bowhunting last September. He came from the direction of the camera & there wasn't anything else in the vicinity I could think of that may have spooked him. I think it was 12 pointer, but was busy trying to draw, didn't make it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLACKJACK

bigbucks, you're the first person I've heard say that the camera and flash spooks deer! I've always wondered about that.

You're also the first person that has said that they have a Camtracker, I've been looking at them for years, but always thought they were spendy. And the digital is even more spendy!!! Been checking the Cabelas and Bass Pro catalogs, now there are other brand digitals out for half the price. My sister, who works in a a film store in Rochester keeps telling me to get a digital because she sees the guys bringing in the rolls of film all the time, that could get spendy!!

Anyone here try one of the digitals? How big of a computer does it take when you download? Any thoughts on digital trail cameras?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I don't doubt it scares some deer.

But why would you have cameras near a stand while hunting though?
That would seem to be too risky to have that 12 pt coming in, and get a face full of flash.

My cameras are out of the woods when I am hunting. There are enough other things to worry about a big bruiser getting distracted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

The camera was 200 yards from the stand & it was early September. Most of the deer I photographed when it was on a short delay, just stood there & had picture after picture snapped without spooking, it's just that they didn't come back to that spot for a while. Where I had it positioned was on a field edge, it really wasn't on a trail that even leads to the stand I was in. The camera may have had nothing to do with spooking the deer. That was one of four times I saw him, the only one while hunting. He did a lot of running every time, he actually acted like a fawn, & it wasn't rut time. I think he was just wierd or hyper or something. He'd run around in the hayfield, then stopped & feed for a little while & then run out. I was watching from my garage from about 300 yards away, it was just goofy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uncle Grump

I've been reading this post w/ interest - and would like to get one of these, but...

I hunt alot of public land, and even the private land I hunt gets alot of other hunters on it - I don't have exclusive access.

My question concerns theft. How are you securing your cameras?

UG

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

Unfortuneately, I just pray they are there when I go to check them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bigbucks

First off, I got that film back from last week, no picture of the big buck I mentioned that bolted by me last fall, so it wasn't the camera that spooked him that time. I haven't really figured out the posting picture thing, but I didn't really get too many good ones. I had the camera on too narrow of a trail & mostly got facials of deer from about 2'.

I bought two padlocks & about 3' of chain to chain my camera to the tree if it's anywhere I think there could be other people coming through that would mess with it.

In other years I've gotten quite a few pictures of bucks during the day if I put the camera on a trail back in the woods say 200 yards or something like that. Anything closer to the edge they're mostly at night.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Hoey
      ....is a City Park.  Land of Memories  with a lot of Minnesota and Blue Earth River shore access and I believe you can access the confluence of the rivers there as well.   Another attraction not really connected to fishing is Minneopa State Park with the falls on one side of the road and drive through buffalo herd area on the other.  Parks require a car window sticker for entrance.   Good Luck
    • mrpike1973
      I like them when it's dead calm they seem to work great then. When it gets a little ripple on top not as effective but still learning with them. Thanks for the report jigginjim
    • Mike89
      class of 70 here, and the park across the river  is Land of Memories if I remember correctly...
    • Rick
      Anglers can play a role in a proposed fishing regulation change for northern pike on Lake Vermilion that would simplify northern pike regulations by bringing them in line with the new statewide zone regulation starting in May 2019.  Anyone who wants to ask questions and give input about the regulation proposal can attend an open house scheduled by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources for 6 to 8 p.m. Wednesday, Aug. 22, at the Tower Civic Center, 402 Pine St., in Tower, Minn. Lake Vermilion northern pike are currently managed under a special regulation that requires all pike from 24 to 36 inches long to be released and only one fish over 36 inches is allowed in a three-fish possession limit. Under the northeast pike zone regulation, all fish from 30 to 40 inches long must be released and no more than one over 40 inches is allowed to be kept in a two fish possession limit. Spearers would be allowed to take any size pike but would be allowed only one fish over 26 inches in the two fish possession limit. “We are interested in the public’s preference about this because either regulation will help maintain the size of pike anglers enjoy on Lake Vermilion,” said Edie Evarts, Tower area fisheries supervisor. “Northern pike have done well and average size has increased under the special regulation that began in 2003. But a shift to the statewide zone regulation would simplify regulations while still protecting a portion of pike.” Public comment on the pike regulation can be submitted through Wednesday, Sept. 26. Questions or comments may be directed to the Tower area fisheries office, 650 Highway 169, Tower, MN 55790, by calling 218-300-7803, or emailing [email protected] Additionally, an open house about this proposal and other fishing regulations under review is scheduled for 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Sept. 26 at the DNR Central Office, 500 Lafayette Road in St. Paul. Staff will take comments on this proposal and other fishing regulations under review around the state. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in Bay Lake, near Deerwood in Crow Wing County. Last fall, a lakeshore owner reported finding the shell of a dead zebra mussel, but additional searches with DNR zebra mussel detection dogs could not confirm the presence of live specimens. Recently, a guest of another lakeshore owner reported finding a live specimen that a DNR invasive species specialist confirmed to be an adult zebra mussel. Additional water sampling showed the presence of veligers and in-lake searches confirmed a reproducing population of zebra mussels in Bay Lake. “Most of the new zebra mussel reports are brought to our attention by people who are out using Minnesota’s public waters in the summer months,” said DNR invasive species specialist Tim Plude. “We appreciate the vigilance of folks reporting them to the DNR, as well as the partnerships we have with lakeshore owners.” Signs at lake accesses have been updated to alert boaters to the presence of zebra mussels. Zebra mussels are transported over land by human activity, and lake users can prevent their spread. It’s an important reminder to follow the state’s invasive species laws:
      • Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species,
      • Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and
      • Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. The DNR also recommends boaters take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody:
      • Spray with high-pressure water.
      • Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees for at least two minutes or 140 degrees for at least 10 seconds).
      • Dry for leave least five days. When transporting water-related equipment such as boat lifts, docks, swim rafts or associated equipment, Minnesota law requires a 21-day drying time to destroy attached organisms, before placing that equipment in another lake. Zebra mussels are an invasive species that can compete with native species for food and habitat, cut the feet of swimmers, reduce the performance of boat motors, and cause expensive damage to water intake pipes. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • rumeye
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      PSU, Lindys, bobbers with leeches and crawlers. Trolling with cranks and spinners are now good also. Cliff
    • ANYFISH2
      Thanks everyone.  Will spinning gear hold up along the river? I have a couple heavier casting rigs i will bring to handle the cats(hopefully). Any tips on gear/lures/bait to have? Also, considering I am from very central MN, I have caught your usual species.  Any species in the river there, we/I could target that are not very prevalent here? Examples, goldeye, quillback, drum, ect.  less than common fish? Always looking for new fish to add to the list. Thanks again.
    • Lohmwil
      I'll plan on being there.  Sounds like fun
    • Hoey
      That park is Sibley Park.  Areas there for parking with a very short walk to the river.  Water is high i believe.  And plenty of areas for your family to enjoy as well, with a playground and picnicking areas.  I grew up in Mankato, a Scarlet from the class of '78.  40th reunion this year.  I will be in town on Saturday, driving my Mom around to visit family, graves, and places we have lived.  Good Luck!!!