• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Recommended Posts

MnSportsman

I'm puttin this post here for opinions on what is considered a keeper size.( I'm talking for a meal, not trophy size)
The reason why I'm asking is that I have not fished for trout further south than my area(N.Goodhue County) since 1994., & do not know the recent conditions well enough for the area that I used to fish primarily for trout.(Whitewater South to Caledonia & then West towards Hwy 63.) The times have changed there due to flooding, & pressure, etc. I had no problem prior to '94 in finding fish in the 12-16"range (personal best was 19.5" rainbow; Very nice, & it went back in the water BTW!) & caught many in the 8-12" range that went back to grow. Thru the years that I did fish in that large area, we generally kept fish in the 12-14 to eat, & put smaller & larger than that slot back. Sort of our own personal rules for not pressuring the fish population( be it wrong or not, that was our rule.)But, as I have not actively fished in that area since then, I'm hoping for some insight from you that fish it more regularly in the recent years. The population of trout here in my area is strong, & even though I do not fish for trout actively here in my "back-yard", there are still many trout of that size flourishing here. This area is not stocked anymore,to my knowledge, although the local sportsman club did for many years.
Note:
A 4#+ was caught not 75 yds from my house last year.(I know the guy & he KEPT IT TO EAT! Man was I P.O.'d. I told him so too! He said."Tough crap! My fish.." frown.gif (Gene is a good guy, but his views on fish & game are almost opposite of mine.))
Anyway sorry ta ramble... wink.gif
Share your views....I'll be lookin'for "em!
smile.gif

------------------
Good Luck & Watch your bobber!
MnSportsman
Proud to be a member in good standing, of the
"Church of the Divine Wilderness"!
wink.gif

[This message has been edited by MnSportsman (edited 01-26-2001).]

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim W

Hello,
I think from personal experience the smaller trout 9-11 inches are by far the best to eat. Catching and eating fish this size will not affect the over-all stream trout habitat! It's when we keep the trout that are more likely to spawn 12-16 inchers and spawn with healthy results, will we start to see changes in our favorite bodies of water!
Here I go again! 15 years ago I use to frequent the South Branch of the Root river! Over the years this section has been over-run!(South of the Carimona Bridge) I couldn't tell you exactly why, but back then I could almost guarantee myself a 16+ trout every time out. Not any more! However, I haven't fished that section for a couple of years, so it might have improved.

When discussing this issue with one of SE Mn's fly fishing guru's, Wayne Bartz, He expressed that in response to C&R and the DNR's attention to streams, he believes that the average size and # of trout has noticeably increased from 15-20 years ago. Keep in mind, he specifically fishes by casting flies!!!

Getting back to the question, smaller tastes better!!!!!!!! Jim W

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MnSportsman

Jim, Glad to hear from you! Over the last few days, I have been thinking about this a lot. I've discussed it with a few friends I know & they are also curious to know the conditions down in that region. None of us have been done there for a long time & were hoping that the stocking program & the envirnment work that the sportsman clubs & T.Unlmtd. had done was helping the "white bellies" turn into "red bellies".(Hope the floding last year didn't kill too many & ruin the work that ws done!) If Mr. Bartz thinks the size & #'s have increased(I assume due to stocks turning native & reproducing well.) then the fishing that we enjoyed should be coming around again. In part the # & size gain could be due to the size of the fish being stocked too.There's a lot of variables to consider here, huh? I see your point about keeping the smaller ones for the pan & letting the larger ones grow & reproduce. On the other hand, (I hope this wouldn't happen!)I wonder about the effect that the stocking of larger
fish, if they are larger than before, doesn't stress the environment & have an adverse effect on the now "native/prev. stocked" fish? Lack of food due to #'s not allowing the fish to get larger, I guess is what I'm trying to ask.
<Geez , this one has got us going ,Eh? smile.gif >
'Nuff said for now. smile.gif This is great, I luv it!

------------------
Good Luck & Watch your bobber!
MnSportsman
Proud to be a member in good standing, of the
"Church of the Divine Wilderness"!
;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DARK30

HEYO!

I DON'T KEEP UM ANYMORE BUT I ALWAYS FIGURED THROW THE SHAKERS BACK 11-12" AND LESS,EAT (OR GIVE AWAY)THE ONES UP TO ABOUT 16-17", AND RELEASE ANYTHING OVER BUT THAT SEAMS TO BE "OLD DAYS".LAST YEAR I NOTICED THE SHAKERS WERE ALMOST THE ONLY THING COMIN OUT. THESE FISH SHOULD BE RESPECTABLE THIS YEAR THOUGH. MY BEST FISH WAS 24" (RELEASED)
UPSTREAM FROM THE OLD BARN RESORT.
(that is 24.5" sorry randy!)
WET NETS!

------------------
cast,cast,cast,cast......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
J.A.Say.Tree

THIS IS GREAT!!!!!!!! I can't hardly believe all this chattin' goin' on! It's super to finally hear from the SE fisherman. I knew they were out there!

I whole heartedly agree with the catch & release practice for OUR trout. Each fish is such a beautiful resource, and certainly worth catching numerous times. On that note, last year I had a little affair with a pretty decent browner that I nicknamed "the mutant." She had been stabbed just above the tail by most likely a heron, and her growth was stunted (lengthwise that is). This was a 18-incher in a 14-inchers body if you can picture that. Anyway, I ended up catching her on 3 separate occasions within 2 weeks until one of the floods we had must have moved her along. Each time was equally a great fight, and I hope I can somehow run into her again this spring!

Anyway, although I release nearly all trout I catch, I am a huge fan of throwing them on the weber every once in a while. However, one thing that I have learned over the years is that nothing beats a fresh trout for cooking. I don’t care what anyone says, a trout you pull out of the freezer after more than a month can be down right disgustingly fishy tasting. YUCK!

Now that we’ve hopefully persuaded the freezer fillers, I want to tackle this smaller is better eating deal. I have had my share of different sized trout on the grill, and I gaurentee you that I can cook you two 8-inchers to taste just as good as a 16-incher. That is if (and this is a big IF) they are native trout or have at least been weaned of the pellets for a year. I know of a few streams where the natural reproduction is phenomenal, so when I get a hunger for the grill, I head there to harvest a couple nice native 11/12-inchers. I know I’m in for some tasty treats & I also know I’m not harming the resource.

This brings me to my last point. Certain streams, rivers, creeks, etc…, are more apt to grow large fish. It is in these waters that it is even more crucial to release the larger fish (if you want to someday get a trophy). When a trout reaches a certain size (I’d say 13-14 inches), they change they’re diet & begin attacking larger meals such as chubs, suckers, crayfish, other trout, etc…(ingredients that grow big browners!). When they’re 15-16 inches, they really start packing it in. When they’re 19-20, they can eat a half dozen 6-inch chubs in one setting. Get the picture? The bigger they get, the faster they grow! That’s why the big ones need to go back. So they can strap on the feed bag and turn into a fish of a lifetime.

JA!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I agree with keeping trout less than 12" to eat. I personally shrink the range to 10" - 11". Personal preference .... Splitting hairs ? Maybe .... Anyway, I'm a flyrodder myself and I think overall Mr. Bartz is right the average size of the trout is up, but not everywhere and I think it's partly due to some streams being made more accessible and just an increase in the number of people fishing for trout. Especially early in the season when the "Meat" fishermen are out to get their freezers stocked. The ones who always keep their limit and usually fish in groups. Another thing affecting trout size is people not adhering to the special regs on certain streams that are designed to increase the average size and or natural population of the trout in the stream. I've seen people drowning worms in single barbless hook artificial bait only areas,they left when they saw me coming. I guess I am a little off the subject, but less face it, if each of us needs do his/her part in helping to preserve our fishing resources so that our kids and grandkids in my case can enjoy fishing as we do.

Hey .... Smaller is better !!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MnSportsman

Thnx for the replies! I do want to emphasize the point that I am not saying to keep for for the pan, fish that that are over 12". I am trying to say that when I was fishing down that way more regularly,1975-1994, those lengths I listed for keeping(12-14"), did not seem out of line for those times. As I sit here I just held up a regular sheet of paper & realized that since the distances are 8-1/2 x 11" that I still don't consider myself out of line.So, I'll trim down my 14" top end(for eating) to 12", but I can't see myself keeping a trout 8"long..Don't get ticked off at me!! I'll keep listening/reading here.

Give me time ta think, will ya... wink.gif LOL

I'm trying to see if I can change my thinkin'& I'm not able to convince myself yet, because of the memories of before. Man , We caught a lot of fish that were larger than 12"....
That's why I posted in the first place.Maybe its 'time to re-evaluate. Thanks for helpin'me guys! smile.gif keep up the good posts!

------------------
Good Luck & Watch your bobber!
MnSportsman
Proud to be a member in good standing, of the
"Church of the Divine Wilderness"!
;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest

I agree MnSportsman 8" is too small ... I mean maybe .... No .... I can't think quite that small either ! What I do is I only try to keep 11" fish. I carry one of those green fish bags(creel) with the spring closing top. It has a ruler printed on it. I just measure 'em quick.

Tight Lines

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • chucker1101
      These aren't campsites to bring your Ranger fiberglass or decked-out Lund into. They're better fitted for smaller 14-16 ft alum boats, something you can drag on shore. Though i'm sure you can figure out how to secure something bigger. Cliff is right, most have sandy/pebble shorelines to pull a smaller boat onto. Almost all of them are well-protected from the prevailing WSW wind. You're gonna get wakes rolling into shore from passing boats, though, as it's a pretty well traveled section of the lake.
    • brrrr
      I camped at a couple sites a few years ago.  no docks, but most of the sites had a half way decent place to put the boat in.  one had a decent log to tie to.  another I threw a couple anchors out back and was able to tie off to a couple trees to keep the boat close yet off the rocks. 
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      I do not think that there are docks at the overnight campsites but some do have sandy shorelines. Most of the shore lunch/picnic  sites do have docks but are not overnight camping sites. Cliff
    • Getanet
      Thanks for the info guys. Looks like I have some research to do. Chucker, do you know if Hinsdale Island has a place to dock a boat ?  I'd hate to have it banging against rocks all night.
    • Rick
      The new northern pike fishing regulations, which were announced recently and go into effect on the May 12 fishing opener, have three distinct zones to address the different characteristics of pike populations in Minnesota, according to the Department of Natural Resources.

      Each of the zones – north-central, northeast and south – provide protection for different sizes of pike, and there are reasons for those differences. “We’re continuing to let anglers know there are new pike regulations for those who want to keep pike on inland waters,” said Chris Kavanaugh, DNR northeast region fisheries manager. “We also want to share the thinking behind the new regulations.” North-central zone
      The north-central zone is the largest of the three zones, and here the possession limit is 10 northern pike, but only two can be longer than 26 inches; and all from 22 to 26 inches must be released. “We’re responding to angler concerns about the over-abundance of small, or hammer-handle, pike in the north-central zone,” Kavanaugh said. Through anglers keeping small fish but protecting the 22 to 26 inch pike, the objective in the north-central zone is to both reduce the abundance of small pike and allow medium size pike to grow larger. The advantages of growing larger pike are twofold. While protected these medium size pike will eat small pike, helping reduce abundance of small pike. And when they eventually grow out of the protected size range they will be a more desirable size for keeping. Southern zone
      In the southern zone, where reproduction is limited, the regulation intends to increase pike abundance while also improving the size of fish harvested. Anglers in the southern zone can keep two fish, but the minimum size is 24 inches. “The management issue in the southern zone is the opposite of what’s happening in the north-central zone,” Kavanaugh said. “With low reproduction, stocking is often necessary to provide a pike fishery in the south. Here we want to protect young pike and give them a chance to grow.” Growth rates are much faster in these southern lakes so most will reach the 24 inch keeper size in a few years. Northeastern zone
      In the northeastern zone, pike reproduction is good but these lakes do not have the high density problems of the north-central zone since they still have a nice balance of medium to large pike. Here, it makes sense to provide protection for large pike while they still exist. “The trophy pike of the Arrowhead Region have definitely made some great stories and photos over the decades,” Kavanaugh said. “But these fish grow slowly in the cold water and if too many anglers keep trophy pike here, they’ll be gone.” In the northeastern zone, anglers can keep two pike but must release all from 30 to 40 inches, with only one over 40 inches allowed in possession. Other considerations
      Anglers who want to keep pike will need to be prepared to measure them. Those planning to take advantage of the expanded bag limit on small pike should familiarize themselves with the extra cuts it takes to fillet the fish. New pike regulations do not affect border water fishing regulations or special regulations that cover individual lakes, rivers and streams. Darkhouse spearing regulations for pike differ slightly and those regulations are listed in the spearing section of the regulations booklet. For more information on the new zone regulations visit mndnr.gov/pike or contact a local area fisheries office. Contact information can be found at mndnr.gov/areas/fisheries or in the printed fishing regulations booklet. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The lingering cold weather is delaying ice-out on Minnesota lakes and rivers, which could make it difficult for DNR crews to have the 1,500 public water accesses it manages ready in time for the May 12 fishing opener. “I want Minnesotans to know that we are doing everything we can to get ready for the fishing opener,” said DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr, “but mostly what we need are warmer temperatures and sunshine.” There are approximately 3,000 public water access sites statewide, and the DNR’s Parks and Trails Division manages about half of them. “Winter weather is always a challenge to Minnesota’s public water access sites,” said Nancy Stewart, water recreation program consultant. “Because of the late ice-out this year, DNR crews will have a shorter window than usual to get boat ramps and docks ready for the May 12 fishing opener, but we will have as many of them ready as possible.” Every year, repairs are needed at hundreds of sites, because freezing temperatures and ice cause concrete to crack and buckle on the ramps. In some years, crews can get a head start on that work, even before ice-out, but this year the snow has prevented them from assessing damage, and the ramps can’t be re-leveled until the ground thaws. In the meantime, crews are busy rehabbing docks by, for example, changing bumpers and wheels as needed so that they’ll be ready to pop in when the time comes. “Even if every last dock isn’t in by the opener, there will be places to fish and boat,” said Stewart. Helpful resources on the DNR’s Public Water Access website include: A map showing where ice-out has occurred. Phone numbers for DNR Area Offices for updates. Boaters and anglers can also get their questions answered by calling the DNR Info Center: 888-646-6367 (8 a.m. to 8 p.m. Monday-Friday, 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Saturday). Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Hunters are reminded that applications for bear hunting licenses are being accepted now through Friday, May 4, wherever Minnesota hunting and fishing license are sold, online at mndnr.gov/buyalicense and by telephone at 888-665-4236. A total of 3,350 licenses are available in 13 permit areas. Bear licenses cost $44 for residents and $230 for nonresidents, and there is a $5 application fee. The season is open from Saturday, Sept. 1, through Sunday, Oct. 14. Notification to lottery winners will be made by Friday, June 1. Lottery winners will receive a postcard in the mail and can check online at mndnr.gov/licenses/lotteries/index.html to see if they were drawn. The deadline to purchase licenses awarded by lottery will be Wednesday, Aug. 1. Any remaining unpurchased licenses will be available over the counter starting at noon on Monday, Aug. 6. An unlimited number of bear licenses will be sold over-the-counter for the no-quota area that includes east-central and far northwestern Minnesota. No-quota licenses are valid only in the no-quota area. Hunters with a no-quota license can harvest one bear. Bear hunting information is available on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/hunting/bear. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • chucker1101
      There are 11 sites on/around Hinsdale Island, managed by the State DNR through one of the local parks (used to be Bear Island, it now might be Soudan Mine Park). Here's a link:  http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/destinations/state_parks/lake_vermilion_soudan_underground_mine/Hinsdale_map.pdf I think they're free to use, first come / first serve.  #11 is my favorite. I've heard that the ones on Hinsdale island have occasional visits from bears.
    • Cliff Wagenbach
      Check the lakevermilion.com site for a list of public campsites on Lake Vermilion. Cliff
    • gunner55
      We'll be making a trip in to GR again. in the next couple days. See what it looks like then.