Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Shotgun zones


huntnfish

Recommended Posts

It looks like MN is considering getting rid of the shotgun zones. 

 

https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/sports/outdoors/4994139-Shotgun-zone-elimination-bill-gains-traction-in-Minnesota

 

I used to hunt in a shotgun zone but now hunt in the big woods with a rifle. The thing that always confused me with the shotgun only zone was that you could hunt with a rifle caliber pistol. I know Iowa, Illinois, Michigan, and others have started allowing straight wall rifle cartridges instead of just shotguns. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IceHawk, you make some very good points here. I have to agree with you 100% and I hope our legislators take some of these ideas and make a good choice.Thanks for your thoughts..

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bet the major rifle manufacturers are for it.  Virtually every person that hunts with a shotgun or muzzle loader will go out and buy a rifle/scope.  Its a big advantage to be able to shoot twice as far and considerably more accurate.  I'm guessing the effeciency rate of harvesting deer in the southern half of the state would go up considerably too.

 

As for it being more dangerous...perhaps.  But being in the woods or field with thousands of other hunters carrying high powered rifles is already dangerous, as is climbing into an elevated tree stand in the dark.  So ya there is always going to be risk.  Lotta sketchy hunters out there already Icehawk.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ll agree there’s always risk - that’s why blaze orange and now pink are mandatory.  And I can’t speak for other hunters but from my experience there’s been at least marginal relief in knowing those slugs drop faster out in farm country.

 

I can’t clearly remember ever hearing a rifle bullet whiz by me while hunting.  And unfortunately I know what an incoming .308 round hitting the dirt 10 feet from does sound like.  But I can still distinctly remember the sound and uneasy feeling I had BOTH times I had shotgun slugs whiz by me while hunting. One time I could see the hunter who shot and one time I couldn’t.

 

I’m sure people will migrate to rifles in those areas if they can but would there be a mass buy?  Maybe, I don’t know.  What I do know is people shooting slugs out of their bird gun haven’t yet bought a designated slug/deer gun, many people already own a deer legal firearm, and I’ve had more people by far ask me to borrow my slug gun than any of my rifles.  
 

I see no GOOD reason to make the change.  Increase the risk for what gain?

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN
17 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

I’ll agree there’s always risk - that’s why blaze orange and now pink are mandatory.  And I can’t speak for other hunters but from my experience there’s been at least marginal relief in knowing those slugs drop faster out in farm country.

 

I can’t clearly remember ever hearing a rifle bullet whiz by me while hunting.  And unfortunately I know what an incoming .308 round hitting the dirt 10 feet from does sound like.  But I can still distinctly remember the sound and uneasy feeling I had BOTH times I had shotgun slugs whiz by me while hunting. One time I could see the hunter who shot and one time I couldn’t.

 

I’m sure people will migrate to rifles in those areas if they can but would there be a mass buy?  Maybe, I don’t know.  What I do know is people shooting slugs out of their bird gun haven’t yet bought a designated slug/deer gun, many people already own a deer legal firearm, and I’ve had more people by far ask me to borrow my slug gun than any of my rifles.  
 

I see no GOOD reason to make the change.  Increase the risk for what gain?

Well said couldn't agree more ? There's risk in all kinds of hunting we do that's why we have gun safety classes , Laws and regulations out there.  Ive had slugs zip by me as Tracie not a fun experience.  You want to experience see high risk hunting try duck hunting with a couple guys in a duck boat. Common sense and safety considerations have to be considered at all times in any kind of hunting. I honestly don't believe everyone will buy rifles if it becomes legalized in slug zones. I have multiple high power rifles legal for hunting,   and doubt I would use anything more than my 220 in a slug zone if passed. See no reason to if that deer is out behond my range and shooting ability with the weapon I chose,. Why risk safety factors take chances  by taking unethical shots and wounding a animal. The animal birds  gets my respect time and time over . Think before you shoot has always been my moto. There are different stages everyone experiances in hunting.  The excitement learning period as a newbie youth or less experienced hunter .  The all about the kill bragging rights kind of hunter the look at what I did and shot. Then there's the seasoned experienced hunter who has been there done it, The hunt is more about experiances , friends,  laughs and memories made on a hunt. Safety factors are considered before a reaction is made. You get more out of enjoying what the good lord has gave us nature at it's finest more so then the kill.  Glad I'm in that latter stage in my hunting career. ?

Edited by IceHawk
  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The shotgun zone was never about safety it was about the herd.

 

Senseless old rule that needs to go away. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, MJ1657 said:

The shotgun zone was never about safety it was about the herd.


Really?  Never heard it put that way before.  All my life I’ve only heard it touted as a safety rule.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nope it was created to protect the herd in the southern part of the state. At the time there were not as many deer around and limiting the range you could shoot in farm country cut down on the harvest. With modern day slug guns and muzzle loaders the law is now about useless. 

 

There is an article about it in last week's outdoor news if anyone's interested. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a lot more range on a rifle bullet than on any shotgun or muzzle loader, and yes it was for the safety aspect of it....

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to mention the southern part of the state is more densely populated than areas in the rifle zone. I used to deer hunt with a hand cannon chambered in 7mm-08 a half hour north of Mankato. I quit since the land was being sold and developed to the point there was no safe shot anymore. I know the area well and knew what the limits were. It was just wasn't safe. Not with a round that travels at 2700 fps out of a 14" barrel.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, MJ1657 said:

There is an article about it in last week's outdoor news if anyone's interested. 


I’ll check on it.  I haven’t read the whole issue yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I emailed the DNR about the chance that the straight walled rifle cartridge rule would come to MN late last year. The DNR said the shotgun rule had nothing to do with safety and was only instituted to limit the harvest of deer. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Knowknot said:

There is a lot more range on a rifle bullet than on any shotgun or muzzle loader, and yes it was for the safety aspect of it....

You are correct about the range of a rifle bullet.

You are incorrect that the shotgun zone was for the safety aspect.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN
20 hours ago, MJ1657 said:

The shotgun zone was never about safety it was about the herd.

 

Senseless old rule that needs to go away. 

Great info always thought it was for safety reasons.  Very possible back in the days when  it was implemented the deer herds population were way less for sure. I remember as a kid hunting up near Remer MN . Our group was lucky to get 1-2 deer for a group of 10. some years lucky to see one. ?This year I had 31 deer go by me in a 7 day season boy times and numbers have changed. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/14/2020 at 8:26 PM, MJ1657 said:

You are correct about the range of a rifle bullet.

You are incorrect that the shotgun zone was for the safety aspect.

 

While it may have originally been implemented to protect the deer herd in the southern half of the state, there has not doubt been an increase in urban sprawl/development there since then.  That is something I think the legislators/DNR should consider and I think what some of the other posters are a little worried about now.

 

Common sense and practical gun safety goes a long way in the field or woods.  If every single one of us practiced it, no one would be in danger regardless of what weapon we are using.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's sad that this is a sportsman's website and there are guys here afraid of guns. 

 

We wonder why we have problems. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

in my opinion it doesn't matter what hunters are using they are all capable of accidentally killing something i grew up in South Dakota and i don't even go out during deer firearm season way to many guys in this state go out and get loaded themselves before they even touch a gun people forget about drinking and firearms in November it's even more deadly than drinking and driving

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

just my 2 cents but I'll gladly spend the money to go hunt in SD where I'm not worried about guys that are still drunk from last night popping off rounds within a mile of me

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MJ1657 said:

It's sad that this is a sportsman's website and there are guys here afraid of guns. . 

Anyone who understands firearms should be afraid of an idiot using them.   Perhaps afraid isn't the right word:  ?sickened.  ?appalled.  ?disgusted.

 

I'm blessed to hunt in the rifle zone on private land...  Very near me, though, I can tell you of recent things I'm aware of involving "sportsmen:"  shooting over roadways, hunting on private land w/o permission, car hunting, substance consumption while hunting, and the ever-popular shooting a deer and then going to buy your management permit after the fact and tagging it...

I don't fear guns:  I fear morons out there.  There's lots of 'em.

"It was a huge deer; It wasn't a clear shot but I had to fire a few rounds anyway..."

"The deer was full run and I fired a few shots but only found a couple drops of blood..."

"It was still pretty dark and I couldn't tell if it was a doe or a buck when I shot, but it was big!..."

 

IceHawk commented on respect for the animal and "think before you shoot":  SECOND THAT!  Many "sportsmen" don't (whether it's hunting/fishing/etc...) and shouldn't be using either a rifle or a shotgun or a muzzie...

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN
52 minutes ago, Squirrelhawke said:

just my 2 cents but I'll gladly spend the money to go hunt in SD where I'm not worried about guys that are still drunk from last night popping off rounds within a mile of me

I have to politely disagree with you on that. To say that careless hunting doesn't exist in SD and other states is totally false. I pheasant hunt private land in SD and  over the years witnessed some unethical safety stuff out there that blew me away. We watched guys (SD plates) with roll bars and bus seats mounted in the back of there trucks perform drives through grass fields. Jumping deer and shooting at them out of backs of there trucks. Plus many times snow goose hunting I watched SD plate hunters shoot at snows off roads not ditches, out windows doing drive byes etc. So unsafe hunting practices happen everywhere.  

 

 Yes DNR was contacted !

Edited by IceHawk
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't remember which gun magazine I read this in a few years back but, they did testing on rifles versus slugs. Rifle bullets still drop fairly fast after 200yds. When they hit the ground they quickly stopped or broke up harmlessly. By comparison a slug which weighs much more could act like a bowling ball and bounce retaining considerable weight and a higher ability to cause damage. It doesn't matter which one you fire over a hill - NOBODY should take such a shot with anything!!!

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Times have changed and obviously projectiles have changed.  I don’t fear guns and never will.  But I’ll always pay attention to who operates them and how.

 

Time will tell if it’s a good idea or not but I really don’t think changing to rifles will automatically make shooters more accurate.  Seems to me the change would just eliminate an enforcement item.  People will shoot as good as they want to/prepare to shoot.

 

I guess I’ve moved to neutral on the subject.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders

Being an archer for so long I like the slug gun. Guess it doesn’t matter much to me. I hunt south of Rochester during gun season. Last 5 years longest shot was 45 yards. I really like that close encounter. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, eyeguy 54 said:

I really like that close encounter. 

 

#1 reason I bowhunt, 25 yds is my range. 2nd would be the earlier season, sit in the boat in the afternoon chasin fall eyes, hunt a m and p m. 3rd would definitely be gun hunters with a "brown it's down mentality"..... No worries anymore of #3, since I hunt my private land. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders

I love archery hunting but rifle is family time a full week of hanging out. I live on the edge of shotgun and rifle in Princeton let the rifles bark state wide!! 

  • Thumbs Up 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

It's unreal so many here are against carrying a rifle. 

 

It's easy to see why the anti gun crowd is gaining momentum. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN

 

20 minutes ago, MJ1657 said:

 

It's unreal so many here are against carrying a rifle. 

 

It's easy to see why the anti gun crowd is gaining momentum. 

Not sure who this pertains to,  but speaking for myself I hunt with both in fact I own 15 rifles of all calibers. In know way am I against carrying a rifle, I hunt my land up N in Pequot  lakes all the time when up there  with my 30-06 or my 270. When hunting locally in a slug zone I use my 220 savage or my 11-87 fully rifled slug gun. . I also have been a archery muzzleloader hunter for a very long time and own and hut with them also. What I am against is opening a can of worms in a area I don't think is setup to handle high power rifles. If we allow rifles are we going to draw the line of AR style weapons being allowed to be used?  Safety is my number one concern. As I stated in numerous posts. Its all a personal opinion and everyone has one and has that right to one. Do we agree with everyones not always.   If there was a vote I would vote no just because of my personal views and opinion. And for the guys that want it great that's there right,. Will it change my opinion if rifles are allowed  heck no. Do I feel any different twoards someone that thinks it should be allowed a strong no. As hunters we need to stick together because your right antis are after our guns and rights as hunters. And a strong core equals a strong fight.  

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
    • leech~~
      As I get older it's really not just about sending bullets down range.  Some of it's just the workmanship of the gun and the wow factor. The other two guns I have really wanted which I'll never have now because of their price, is a 8mm Jap Nambu and 9mm German Luger.   Just thought they always looked cool!  
    • jim curlee
      I had a guy hit me with a lightly used 1969 BAR, he wanted $1650 with an older Leupold scope. More than I think they are worth, I made an offer, he declined end of story.   You know if you look at the old brochures, a grade II BAR sold for $250 in the late 60s, $1650 would be a good return on your investment.    Why would anybody want a 50 year old gun, they are heavy, have wood stocks, and blued metal.  I guess mainly to keep their gun safes glued to the floor. lol   You can probably buy a stainless rifle that you never have to clean, with a synthetic stock you never have to refinish, is as light as a feather, and for half as much money, perfect.   I'm too old for a youth gun, although I've shrunk enough that it would probably fit. lol   No Ruger 10/44s.   Jim      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.