Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Quality Bluegill Initiative


Recommended Posts

Tom Sawyer

As I stated on FB yesterday, "About time", long overdue. 

I'm all for it, but the problem I see on these lakes with reduced bags have some serious culling mortality during winter. Granted these lakes won't normally be on the radar of most meat hunters, but sadly those that do keep fish, constantly upgrade. Also, naming trophy lakes can also put a target on their back, and actually increase pressure. Some lakes that have trophies aren't on the list because of this exact reason. 

Not a fan of plucking fish from beds in spring. That should be considered harassment. Some areas should be closed during spawn on such lakes. 

 

Edited by Tom Sawyer
  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
eyeguy 54

I like the idea. Maybe 5 daily with 10 possession limit or 10 daily with same possession. Wife and I both love gills and it seams like 6, 8 or so inchers is about just right. Nice to have a meal once week or so.  Would be difficult to have a family fish fry tho and I would not like that. We do that maybe three times a year. Grandkids love a few pieces. 

  • Yayyyy 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
eyeguy 54

If just certain lakes with the limits it would not be a problem to get enough on other lakes for the family fish fry. 

  • Wow, ❤ 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Sawyer

For those of you that are for new regs to help protect this fragile resource, please attend meetings and voice your opinion. Sadly opposed viewpoints out way those in favor. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN
IceHawk

I'm all for limit changes on certain lakes but definitely not all lakes. Personally some stunted lakes could use more of the smaller gills taken out. AND in some with bad genetics it doesn't always work.  Pleasant Lake by St Cloud MN has a 5 fish gill limit. I lived on this lake for a few years  fished it fairly hard and sadly even with the rule never really saw trophy gills so does it work in all lakes?  Love the  5-10 fish rule on Gills on  Known Trophy caliber lakes for sure and adding more lakes  In time after seeing the results. Saw some on the list that IMO needed something done because of fishing pressure Osakis, Irene, Grove and hopefully the Horseshoe Chain of Lakes if I could get my way. I have fished all of these above waters hard for 30 years plus. I have seen the decline in trophy gills on these waters. I personaly am more up for a protected slot on panfish. Say all but 1 gill over 9 mandatory release. For crappies same all 12 over go back except one over. My biggest pet peeve and something that definitely needs to be addressed is fishing spawning beds during spawn This is probably one of the biggest reasons we are seeing a decline in trophy fish. Male gills are very very  vunarable during this time. There aggressiveness makes them very easy to over harvest. I guess my Last thing even if or whenever these rules get voted in or out,  Is as Anglers stewards of the sport we educate teach people how important it is to follow some of these guidelines without a law to help the future of our fisheries. 

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Having fished more lakes with 5 fish limits on bluegills I can see the difference. Besides tiny lakes in the middle of nowhere all the 10 inch gills I've caught in past winters have been from lakes with restrictions and I can say the same for the 13+ crappies too. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • I Like it 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

New regs are long over due.  Could use it on other species like walleyes and crappies too.  Might not help much at this point though.  Its very difficult to regulate this with a shortage of people to do it (not enough COs).  Its gonna take more of a cultural shift.  People are gonna have to start targeting them for the sport/enjoyment of it rather than just to harvest them.  Like bass or muskie fishing with voluntary release.  And I don't see that happening anytime soon.  Heck, just look at all the sunfish and crappies being harvested just on this website.  Just my 2 cents

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

I would like to see a measurement also put in place to lower harvest of big bull gills.

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78

I hope they put some limits on lakes by me. It’s hard to watch the guys go pull the males off the nests every spring. I try to educate as many fishermen to release those gills over 8 inches and explain why it’s important to do so. 

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 2/14/2020 at 8:03 AM, gimruis said:

 Heck, just look at all the sunfish and crappies being harvested just on this website.  Just my 2 cents

 

I'd like to see it applied to Gills + Crappies.  I'd also like to see it instituted state wide where appropriate.  Long overdue.

 

3 hours ago, Rick said:

I would like to see a measurement also put in place to lower harvest of big bull gills.

 

I have no problem with a protected trophy slot or like.  

Edited by CJH
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Official Fishing Report Team - MN
IceHawk

Really surprised there isn't more feedback from viewers on this one? It's a great topic lets see some more thoughts and opinions on this. If you are against it don't be afraid to put your opinion up. I promise you I personally wont cut you down or judge you because how you feel. I as others are am  really interested in finding different ideas and some solutions to help the declineing trophy panfish in MN .  Be nice to get a bunch of opinions on this.   I will be attending listening  and voiceing  my thoughts and others in any upcomeing meeting on this subject. 

Edited by IceHawk
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Creators

I know a group of us have talked a lot about this recently.   I really like the 10 or 5 depending in the lake.  The 1 over 10" if someone wants a trophy gill.

 

For crappie regs just look a bit south.

  • Thanks 1
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
HoleHoppingGills

My thought and by the way I'm a huge gill and crappies guy. Id like to see all MN lakes with a regulation that 9 or 9. 5 inch go back ASAP on crappie!!. Been seeing a lot of.lakes destroyed by fishermen taking limits of small fish. Use to fish a small.lake near Tonka few times a year and always did well on quality panfish... I went there few years later like I always did in the spring off a dock to catch spawning crappies. Lake has no access,  anyways some guys were fishing and had there kids to obviously use them for fish limits, Watched this guy pull in a 5 inch crappie, turns around lifts up a metal basket out of the water. This basket maxed out and completely full.of 5 to 7 inch crappies.  About 6 in the party kept EVERYTHING. Tried it few times that winter which I normally did back then.... no fish population at all.  Just my thoughts sorry so long lol

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer
16 hours ago, IceHawk said:

Really surprised there isn't more feedback from viewers on this one? It's a great topic lets see some more thoughts and opinions on this. If you are against it don't be afraid to put your opinion up. I promise you I personally wont cut you down or judge you because how you feel. I as others are am  really interested in finding different ideas and some solutions to help the declineing trophy panfish in MN .  Be nice to get a bunch of opinions on this.   I will be attending listening  and voiceing  my thoughts and others in any upcomeing meeting on this subject. 


You might not find much opposition on forums cuz the people that use them are learners.  This is our life and we’ve paid attention to what goes on out on the water/ice.  We’ve had our times when we’ve realized what our own actions have meant and make efforts to be better sportsmen and conservationists.  If all of us here kept every legal fish we catch up to our limit, we’d be WAY over on possession - who can eat that much fish?  We don’t view a freezer full of fillets as food security, we view a lake full of swimming fillets as food security and fun security.  Making a smaller withdrawal from the lake here and there is better than living on a couple jackpots per year when one really lands on em.
 

That statement might sound arrogant but I believe it to be true.  

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

I would love to see more restrictions on all species but they have to include a protected slot.  There are so many success stories it should be obvious by now.  It seems to work better when a mid-range length is protected or all fish over a certain length go back.  I have heard concerns that restriction will reduce interest including from out of state (economic impact), but with better fishing I doubt that is the case.  I think what helps with this is allowing 1 trophy over a certain size in your limit.  As for the stunted theory...as a kid I fished a lake where I could limit out on 8" crappies any time but never caught one over 9".  We were told to keep as many as possible so we could thin them out.  A 9" minimum was put on the lake.  And like magic when I went back and fished as an adult almost all the crappies were just under 9", but I caught a limit between 9-12 inches.  I remain somewhat skeptical of the stunted fish theory...not that it does not exist, but it is an overused excuse.  Just reducing the limit does not help...you need to add the slot with it.  Or just use the slot, which is somewhat self-limiting in what you can keep.  For some, reducing the number you can keep is a psychological boost...with less effort they can say we limited out!  For others, reducing the limit is not limiting, because they just keep adding fish to the freezer with no fear of getting caught over limit, whereas for a slot there is high risk of keeping illegal fish while on the water.  With the new northern regulations, I have already seen the impact in increasing size...all fish from 22-26 go back and now I am seeing those small northerns get some bulk (it is not because they are stunted and people are keeping all the northerns under 22" to thin them).  I don't think that "educating" people is effective; if you care, you already know.  It needs to be legislated.

Edited by whateverisbiting
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78

I release all gills over 8 inches and I release most fish i catch. The photo was of one of a few nice ones released today. I was able to chat with some young guys who were impressed with the number of fish I was catching. They all asked why I was not keeping all of the gills and I said I only keep them when I am going to eat them as they are best fresh. I also explained the importance’s of release big bluegills and to eat those 7-8 inchers. Both you guys said that make sense and both said they would release the big gills from now on.

87EA576A-097E-41B7-9D5B-0DB732D07290.jpeg

Edited by monstermoose78
  • Thumbs Up 3
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 9 months later...

 

That's cool, and I understand with what you're trying to do.

 

My opinion is that if you keep an 7 inch bluegill, it cannot grow to 10 inches or 12 inches, etc.

 

Same if you shoot a spike or fork buck.  It may not grow into a quality but it will never get there if you shoot it.

 

I'm in it to catch big fish and hunt quality bucks.  Not to catch dinks and shoot spikes.  Some people are meat hunters and some are trophy hunters.  I fall in the category of the latter, some people do not.  I understand it, I just disagree with it.

Edited by gimruis
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78
1 hour ago, gimruis said:

 

That's cool, and I understand with what you're trying to do.

 

My opinion is that if you keep an 7 inch bluegill, it cannot grow to 10 inches or 12 inches, etc.

 

Same if you shoot a spike or fork buck.  It may not grow into a quality but it will never get there if you shoot it.

 

I'm in it to catch big fish and hunt quality bucks.  Not to catch dinks and shoot spikes.  Some people are meat hunters and some are trophy hunters.  I fall in the category of the latter, some people do not.  I understand it, I just disagree with it.

It takes big bluegills to have big bluegills. Lakes can handle the smaller ones taken out most of the time. I don’t keep fish often but when I do I practice selective harvesting of the more abundant smaller fish. Also you can learn to tell male bluegills from female bluegills, so keeping the 7-8 inch females does not hurt the population like taking the largest males out of the lake. I love catching large bluegills, but I don’t keep them. The bluegill below is a large female what was released and in my eyes a 10 inch bluegill is a trophy. I hope it grows and catch it when she is 11 inches. 

FA9E06E6-4603-4B97-B164-C8A2AB011D82.jpeg

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders
monstermoose78

This is a male bluegill. Notice the orange and more blue part of the lower jaw. Females are yellow on the chest. 

E2B2EDAB-2270-4398-8163-5C240015CAB0.jpeg

Link to post
Share on other sites
DonkeyHodey
23 hours ago, gimruis said:

My opinion is that if you keep an 7 inch bluegill, it cannot grow to 10 inches or 12 inches, etc.

Same if you shoot a spike or fork buck.  It may not grow into a quality but it will never get there if you shoot it.

 

I'm in it to catch big fish and hunt quality bucks.  Not to catch dinks and shoot spikes.  Some people are meat hunters and some are trophy hunters.  I fall in the category of the latter, some people do not.  I understand it, I just disagree with it.

the counterpoint is that not all 7 inch bluegills will ever grow to be a 10-12 incher.  Many spikes will end up roadkill.

Selective harvest (culling the herd) whether bluegills or whitetails can give you a better chance of getting the trophy.  (There's lots of skinny walleyes starving to death in Milles Lacs (but I better walk away from that can o' worms...))

This concept of selective harvest is quite well accepted by the DNR in terms of Northern Pike.  in the past few decades, lakes with prohibitive harvest length simply ended up with infestation of hammer handles...  Most skinny 16 inchers aren't going to ever be a 30 incher and will die of "old age" at 24 inches or choke on a stocked walleye.

 

One could make a good argument that along with protecting big male bluegills, another aspect of bluegill protection is filleting more 16-22 inch norts from your favorite bluegill lake.  

(while norts do eat sunnies, they prefer long-skinny fish--perch/walleye/bass:  as norts eat the perch, the sunnies overpopulate.  norts also eat small bass (who bass grow up to more consistent consumers of small sunnies than the norts do))

For me this is a win-win situation (since I personally love eating norties)

 

I do like to eat lots of fish--I also like to throw lots back.  Growing up, I never dreamed that a sunfish could be "too big to keep" but I know now and my kids know it too.  (my pop still gives me a funny look when I tell him about throwing back sunfish that are too big to keep...)

 

I could make a similar argument about "culling the herd" with Sconnies and Iowegians, but that might get me in trouble with the department of homeland security...

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, DonkeyHodey said:

One could make a good argument that along with protecting big male bluegills, another aspect of bluegill protection is filleting more 16-22 inch norts from your favorite bluegill lake. 

 

Yes, lets get rid of a lot more of those tiny aggressive pike that are overpopulated here!  The problem is that no one wants to keep those annoying slimy bastards.  If people would stop harvesting pike over 25 inches and keep the smaller ones this problem could go away.

  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, gimruis said:

 

Yes, lets get rid of a lot more of those tiny aggressive pike that are overpopulated here!  The problem is that no one wants to keep those annoying slimy bastards.  If people would stop harvesting pike over 25 inches and keep the smaller ones this problem could go away.

Well get to it. 😊 I do my fair share. Not at all afraid of a little slimy snot rocket.👍

  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
popriveter

My dad also thinks I’m crazy when I say a sunfish is too big to keep, but their biology is different than most fish-and certainly different than deer (as referenced above). 
When you have two biologically different types of male with vastly disparate size potential, that factor has to drive our decisions about what we keep.

I grew up near a lake with a stunted sunfish population. The sunnies were all tiny and no one ever kept any. It had no launch and almost no fishing pressure. I couldn’t figure out why the sunnies stayed so small year after year.
One year, it had a major winterkill and was restocked. The new population of sunfish grew large. It wasn’t the forage or water quality. The genetics had been altered by overfishing and the population was stunted and that winterkill was the chance it needed for the genepool to reset. That was about the time I learned about bulls/sneakers and learned to keep the smaller fish. I was careful about harvest and quiet about this little sleeper lake. I was usually the only person fishing it.

There was excellent size structure for a few years until word got out and it got fished hard one year. It went right back to dinksville and never rebounded. 

Populations of large sunfish are really fragile and easily exploited and a genetically stunted doesn’t grow no matter how long they live. 
We need anglers to be educated and self-controlled or they all end up stunted. 
Bass and Muskie guys have figured it out for their fisheries. Panfish fisheries have room for improvement.

  • Thumbs Up 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
whateverisbiting

Popriveter that is a very interesting case study and demonstrates when genetics are the issue.  I have also seen the opposite where it was simply pressure and regulations fixed it.  Seeing all the different responses on there really confirms that everyone is a bit right because the answer is "it depends on the lake".  So statewide regulations help in some cases and not in other cases.  Personally, I prefer to err on the side of regulations which prohibit taking a mid range population while allowing a more limited number above the range than below the range.  That has seemed to help most lakes and most species.

 

Can some enlighten me what a "sneaker" is?

Link to post
Share on other sites
popriveter
2 hours ago, whateverisbiting said:

Can some enlighten me what a "sneaker" is?

There are two types of male sunfish. The Bull is a male that grows large, wears deep colors to attract a female and guards a bed. The sneaker stays small his entire life and looks like female. He sneaks onto the spawning bed of the bull by imitating a female, and he only gets to pass on his genes if there is no bull around.

When anglers remove bulls from the population, the sneakers are the only males reproducing and the whole population now has little genes. In a nutshell, that’s how population stunting happens.

For more in-depth info, use your search engine to find this article online “Big Battles, Big Gonads: The Crazy World of the Bluegill Spawn”

It’s a good read

  • Thumbs Up 2
  • Thanks 1
  • l Love It 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

    • 7sixes
      By 7sixes
      Hey all...I am a noob ice fisherman and want to be as safe as possible...
       
      The lakes around my area have about 2 feet of ice and the warm weather the past few days has me nervous driving my Ford Ranger on the ice...

      I am assuming that I should not be concerned yet BUT I just wanted some reassurance before I go this evening.
       
      *There is no major flow in the lake FYI*
       
      Thanks for any help and sorry if this is asked too much!
    • lakesareaoutdoors
      By lakesareaoutdoors
      Coho Salmon are unlike any fish I've ever targeted. There's not a ton of opportunities to catch these fish through the ice, so to be able to do that makes it that much cooler. Went went out on Lake Superior near Duluth, MN. This was on Sunday. Such a cool experience! 
       
       
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      By LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...  A warm up triggered some nice walleyes and saugers up on Lake of the Woods this week.  A mix of walleyes and saugers with some pike, perch, eelpout and tullibees being caught in 29-33 feet.  Using a bait with rattles or vibration to attract fish is helpful.  On the deadstick, try a glow hook with a live minnow or even a glow bead above the hook.  Set bait 6 inches to a foot off of the bottom.  Try gold, glow colors, chartreuse and pink good color choices this week.  Electronics are helpful to show suspended fish as well as how fish are reacting to your presentation.  
      On the Rainy River...   Morning / evening bite producing some walleyes on the river.  The snowmobile trail on the river from Baudette to Wheeler's Point to the NW Angle staked and groomed.  Use caution and work through a resort, outfitter or gain info from a bait shop as there is current and areas not fit for travel on the river.
      Up at the NW Angle...  With the border closure, there are four ways to travel to the NW Angle without crossing the border.  1.  NW Angle Guest Ice Road from south shore up to the Angle.  2.  Snowmobile trails across the lake.  3.  Lake of the Woods Passenger Service (bombardier).  4.  Lake Country Air flying service.
      A lot of nice walleyes caught up at the Angle this week with a mix of other species.  Walleyes in 24 - 30' of water.  Some resorts are fishing on or adjacent to structure, others fishing deep mud.  Some resorts are fishing the deep mud.  Some anglers catching walleyes with small jigs tipped with a plastic that mimics bugs and worms in mud.  Plain hook or a glow jig with a live minnow on deadstick.  Communicate with your favorite NW Angle resort for specifics.  Ice fishing on LOW through March.  


    • imhatz
      By imhatz
      Hey guys we are all set for our trip to Sand Point May 21, 2021. Plan to fish pike and crappies. I have been going to this lake since 1982 and now have a new generation crew. They have been going 12 years with me. We normally stay in Browns and fish that area and Grassy. We are in King Pin site this year and plan to fish towards Swanson Bay and up and around Wolf Island. Any pointers. Thanks
    • eyeguy 54
      By eyeguy 54
      New rules for purchasing a combination license in MN. 
      DNR adjusts how married anglers and hunters buy combination licenses
      Both members of married couples who want to purchase a combination angling or hunting license in person will need to be present at the sales location starting Feb. 18, when the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources will begin requiring both spouses to provide and verify their own complete customer records on file to purchase a combination license.
      “These changes will bring the DNR into compliance with state and federal laws that require collecting this information for angling or hunting license sales,” said Steve Michaels, licensing program director. “The information helps prevent licenses being sold to people with violations or unpaid fines.”
      Customers will continue to pay the same price for combination licenses, which are discounted compared with purchasing two individual licenses.
      When purchasing a combination license in person, both spouses must be present, and, if age 21 or older, also must provide their current Minnesota driver’s licenses or identification cards. If both spouses are not present, the person present may purchase their part of the license and their spouse may obtain their license at a later date at no additional charge.
      If a spouse does not have a record on file with the DNR, that spouse can create one with their full name, birth date, social security number. If they are a Minnesota resident age 21 or older, they also will need a current Minnesota driver’s license or current Minnesota identification card. They can create their record anywhere DNR licenses are sold, or call the DNR license center at 877-348-0498 or 651-297-1230 Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. New resident customer records for people age 21 and over cannot be created online.
      “Thank you to all our license purchasers for patience adjusting to these changes and for buying a license,” Michaels said. “Your license dollars pay for a great deal of DNR conservation work and leverage more federal funding that supports hunting and fishing opportunities and habitat work.”
      The DNR offers the following married combination licenses:
      Angling, valid for fishing.
      Conservation angling, valid for half the possession limit, per spouse.
      Sports, valid for fishing for both spouses and small game hunting for one spouse.
      Super Sports, valid for fishing for both spouses, small game for one spouse, includes two state trout stamps, and waterfowl and pheasant stamps for one spouse. It also offers the choice of a firearm, archery or muzzleloader deer license for one spouse.
      Family nonresident angling, valid for one or both parents and dependent children under age 16.
      Also check out the DNR website - https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/licenses/combo.html
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      By LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...  Despite te cold weather, some good fishing reports up on Lake of the Woods this week.  A nice mix of walleyes and saugers being caught in 29-33 feet.  The cold weather made some of the fish less active, so coaxing them was key.  Using a jigging line in one hole with lures that put out vibration or noise was helpful.  That combined with a deadstick in your second hole with either a glow jig or plan hook and a minnow.  Keep the jigging line moving to attract fish.  Try gold, glow white, glow red, wonderbread and pink.  Lures that glow, have a glow stick or make noise are effective in the stained water.  
      Electronics are helpful to show suspended fish as well as how fish are reacting to your presentation.  Some bait shops and resorts will rent units for the day. 
      On the Rainy River...   Morning and evening bite producing some walleyes on the river.  A variety of areas being fished with low flow and cold temps.  The snowmobile trail on the river from Baudette to Wheeler's Point to the NW Angle staked and groomed.  Use caution and work through a resort, outfitter or gain info from a bait shop as there is current and areas not fit for travel on the river.
      Up at the NW Angle...  With the border closure, there are four ways to travel to the NW Angle without crossing the border.  1.  NW Angle Guest Ice Road from south shore up to the Angle.  2.  Snowmobile trails across the lake.  3.  Lake of the Woods Passenger Service (bombardier).  4.  Lake Country Air flying service.
      A lot of nice walleyes caught up at the Angle this week with a mix of other species.  Walleyes in 24 - 30' of water.  Some resorts are fishing structure, others fishing deep mud.  Jigging with noisy lures 3-4' off of the bottom is a good way to pull in fish.    Plain hook or a glow jig with a live minnow on deadstick.  Some days, the jigging line is hot, others the bobbers are going down.  Communicate with your favorite NW Angle resort for specifics.  Ice fishing on LOW through March. 
       


    • JBMasterAngler
      By JBMasterAngler
      What are the hours for parking at park point? I can’t remember if it’s 6 AM or sunrise, or anything in between. 
    • JBMasterAngler
      By JBMasterAngler
      Just curious how far some of you have walked across a lake to find a fishing spot? I don’t officially know myself, but assume I’ve done 3 or so miles round trip on Mille Lacs looking for tullibee. I’m probably going to try and double that (and more) in search of them again, late in the season. Has anyone traveled via bicycle across ice? I’m considering that too. Oh what we’re willing to do for a fish 🙄 😳🤣
    • eyeguy 54
      By eyeguy 54
      What’s your rod box. I grabbed a Flambeau today to upgrade since a good buddy made me a 36 inch ice rod. I added foam to the bottom and took out the dividers and it looks like it will work dandy. Got them all in and some boxes for different plastics.  Won’t know till it warms up!  All snug when I close it up. 


    • Rick G
      By Rick G
      Here are a few pics of some of what I have been using this winter.  Everyone is well aware of how effective plastics can be for panfish... But have you tried the new hard baits? Most of the time, they don't need added bait, you can fish them plain.  I have found great success this winter with the Clam pinhead minnow, both the jointed and non jointed version. For some reason , the crappies and big bluegills love this bait..often preferring it unbaited, this is especially true for the jointed version.. I have been using small spoons with great success for years on panfish... just never found one that needed no bait.
      The Kenders K-rip and T-rip are some of the new style of minnow baits, they also fish better unbaited. The T-rip is so tiny, even smaller bluegills can take it, so the big ones definitely have no problem inhaling this bait.. The wonderbread and natural perch have been my go-to colors this winter.  
      Next time on the water, give either the T-rip of pinhead a try, you might be surprised how well you do😉 I sure was!



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • smurfy
      well gentlemen, i got my fires under control and moved, but i woke up this morning feeling pretty tough.🤒🥴 i waited till this afternoon to decide but unfortunately i need to bow out tomorrow. 😪 with the current status of things 😷😷 i do NOT want to risk giving this to anyone else. i'm certain its just a head cold but not taking chances...... i feel pretty rough.   sorry guys i was really, really looking forward to fishing with you guys, and didnt want to wait any longer letting you guys know..........good luck, have fun. i'm sure there will be other opportunities before ice goes away!!!!!!🤧
    • smurfy
      yea maybe!!!!!!!🤣🤭
    • Wanderer
      Maybe it’s her that can’t be trusted, eh? 🤣
    • whateverisbiting
      I fully agree that lakes go through cycles but that negates nothing I said.  MNs best walleye fisheries are that way because they have a slot.  Rainy, Winnie, Leach, Mille Lacs, and Red were destroyed and the slots brought them back.  Lake of the woods a slot was put in before it got depleted and that fishery is awesome so easy to catch a limit there and a great mix of small fish and jumbos...just a matter of time for other lakes.  Can you be more specific what lakes you are referring to that have just large fish and no slot?  If it is not one of the well known lakes be careful if you name it here its fished out in 3 years if it does not have a slot guaranteed.
    • leech~~
      Fun looked like you guys a blast!  👍
    • whateverisbiting
      I don't think it will impact anything... but I also agree it is dumb.  It's not logical that I can buy it on line sight unseen but need to be present at a store. 
    • Mike89
      they are a team!!!     
    • walleye101
      Minnesota's best walleye fisheries are anything but stable populations. These populations are constantly cycling with new robust year classes recruiting to the fishery every few years. Harvest of excess spawning stock actually stimulates frequent strong recruitment. The closest thing we have to stable walleye populations are lakes dominated by old fish with low to moderate recruitment replacing natural mortality from the aging population. 
    • smurfy
      In other words, she don't trust you in any store alone???🤔😅🤭
    • Wanderer
      Guys, going back to the original post, the DNR did this to be in compliance with state and federal laws, not just be a PIA.   It doesn’t have to make sense, it just has to make code, as my saying goes.   We don’t normally make a special trip to buy our combo license; we just pick it up at our best convenience either heading to the lake or doing other shopping.  It’s really not going to be that significant of an issue for us since we do travel and shop together fairly regularly. 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.