• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Ballyhoo

Lake of the woods dnr survey

Recommended Posts

Ballyhoo

Follow the link to read about the plan the DNR and steering committee has for LOW.  I think it is a step in the right direction but personally wouldn't mind seeing the season on the Rainy River close April 1st.

 

https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/lakeofthewoods/index.html

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRAGFOOT

I want the fishing activity for the local economy, but it would be kind of cool if they could close the Rainy River for spring fishing to see how that worked out, but that's probably not realistic.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slammer

I like the changes for the winter season limits and Rainy.  Wouldn't bother me if Rainy was closed in the spring either.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ballyhoo

Even with the walleye season closed, the area will still be busy with Sturgeon fishermen. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRAGFOOT

I'm not trying to start an argument, but it seems I've heard of a lot of incidental walleyes being caught during that time. Carry on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
srj

My opinion is no fish kept. The Rainy is such a special fishery that I think we can all eat burgers. In that cold water, with almost everyone fishing jigs, hooking mortality is surely very low. I've fished the spring run since the years where you would not want to eat the fish.....thanks Boise.  I hope this special fishery isn't taken away from us...….unless compelling evidence can show we are damaging the LOW fishery.

I hope all interested folks weigh in on the plan. To me, it is obvious the fishery is changing, but is it just natural cycles or are we putting too much pressure on the resource? One observation: sure not many charters fish near the south shore these days. Why are those fish gone?

Whatever it takes...…...we need to keep this lake special. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PRO-V

Just my 2 cents but it sure seems like the south shore bite and the bad shiner runs of the last few years are related. Don't see anywhere near the bait balls we used to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slammer

I agree with srj,  whatever it takes.  They could lower the open water limit to 3 eye/2 sauger.  Dont think too many would oppose that.  With the wheelhouse craze over the last 10 years,  you could almost figure somthing had/has to change.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FowlSki

I’d like more restrictive limits and changing the size limit to less than 14 and 18-28 released for walleyes and less than 13 for sauger.  Way too many tiny fish being cut up in the cleaning shacks in the winter.  Catch and release on the rainy makes sense too.  Seems most folks go for the big fish anyhow.  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dnovak

For walleyes I wouldn't mind seeing a minimum size restriction and keep the slot on big fish with the option of keeping one trophy fish (if you so choose.)  But if we are going to make changes, IMO it makes the most sense to implement them on the lake for the entire walleye season.  Cutting out your 2 "under" fish during the spring run isn't going to make a difference.  (I go up every year for a week.  I maybe eat 2 fish while I am there and bring home my 2.)  I would also like to hear what the experts have to say on hooking mortality rate during spring run. I don't think I have ever seen a dead walleye floating by in the many years I have fished it.  I do agree with SRJ though, the Rainy River is something truly special.  I don't know it there is anywhere you can go and have that kind of potential of catching true trophy fish!   So, if it takes making the spring run a C&R season to keep it alive, it wouldn't break my heart. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DJ_Slick

Tightening the winter limits to match summer just seems logical, and doesn't bother me one bit.  I actually supported this idea years ago.  Personally, I don't think the summer limit need to be reduced, but I wouldn't necessarily oppose it either, depending on the proposal.  I think the current slot is fair, and a minimum size is unnecessary.  Reducing the winter limit would probably eliminate a few of those "tiny" fish being sliced up in the cleaning shack.

Eliminating the spring river season wouldn't bother me either, but the proposed catch and release only still lets people have a chance to catch those big spring ladies without significantly reducing the population, particularly of the supposedly lower number breeding males.  Can't really say I've ever heard of a game fish or animal where the male population is being considered a reason for concern over reproduction...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TooBusy

I am pleased they are looking to stay ahead of the situation before it becomes a bigger problem.  There is no doubt in my mind that the amount of winter fishing pressure has increased significantly.  It stands to reason that is going to result in more fish going into a bucket.  Cutting back from 8 fish to 6 in the winter is a step in the right direction, but it is not going to have much effect on the walleye take during that time as 4 walleyes could still be kept.  I would be interested in the implementation of a minimum size, at least for walleyes.  I do not know If that would make much difference on the overall take and would like more information on the subject.  Like anything else, people have different standards for what is considered a keeper.  My personal standard for eaters for walleye is 15" - 18", but that is my choice. 

Saugers are considered a high volume/numbers target, and since they do not get anywhere near the same length as walleyes, the acceptable minimum is probably harder to establish.  My personal minimum for saugers is 14".  Again, that is just me.   

I really don't know what effect the Rainy spring run has on the fishery.  To me it would make sense to make it a catch and release season only.  As stated by someone else, the water is cold, and fish are generally caught jigging, so it would appear that hooking mortality would be relatively low.  I have fished the Rainy in the spring in the past,  but I decided a couple of years ago that I would not participate in the spring run any longer. 

There is no doubt that I like to eat fish, but at the same time, even if the entire lake was strictly catch and release (not that I am suggesting this), I would still spend the same amount of time fishing.  That being said,  at this time I support the recommendations coming out of the Lake of the Woods Fisheries Input Group.  I would support even more restrictive policies, but could not bring myself to support things staying exactly the same or more liberal limits.

Only time will determine how this all plays out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRAGFOOT

I don't see why the winter limits are different, nobody has ever given me a good answer on that. Winter has the most fishing pressure but also the bigger limit. There is also no denying the increase in the amount of wheelhouses.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
srj

It would seem unlikely the DNR has anywhere near an accurate number for fish kept during the winter. The number of fish caught and eaten by guys in wheelhouses and sleepers is seemingly uncountable. It's a big lake but the road network for us anglers to pursue the schools of fish in the basin is amazing. I am starting to wonder if there is a correlation between the winter catch with the wheelhouse numbers explosion and the fact the south shore bite only lasts a couple weeks in the spring. Also, it was not all that long ago the ice fishing was pretty good most of the winter without going out 10 miles or more. It's hard to imagine Big Traverse getting a significant dent in the population by anglers in the winter, but it does make me wonder. North and east of the big basin, the fishing has stayed consistently good even with all the charters making daily runs north.

Our new Large Lake Specialist surely has an interesting and challenging job. Hopefully, one of these days when someone asks him the simple question "Where did the fish go?", he will have an answer.

Participate and good luck

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Borch
      The gulp crawlers in packages are tougher than those in the alive container.  The one in the picture is from the alive container.  Both versions work well on spinner and slow death rigs. 
    • Borch
      Gulp crawler.  In the spot the walleyes were going in there was a pile of 3-5" perch that tore up the real crawlers.   Gulp crawlers took care of the issue and the eyes liked them too. 
    • delcecchi
      When we go to Quetico, barbless or mashed down barbs is mandatory.   To tell the truth I haven't noticed that we lose more fish with barbless than barbed.   Not catching muskies though.  Pike, walleye, bass, lake trout. 
    • delcecchi
      Vermilion might be down a little, but not much.  Your lakes might be different.  
    • whateverisbiting
      Is that a gulp worm?  I am not on Osakis but cant fish with live bait without the bass, sunnies, and perch hammering it instantly.
    • fisherjmb
      My parents were up yesterday and Wednesday and they did pretty good. Out in the mud in about 33-34 feet. Lots of boats were trolling but they did well looking for pods of fish and then spot-locking over the top of them and jigging with leeches and frozen shiners. 
    • Jmnhunter
      i havent been out in for atleast a month out there but check out walleye dan's facebook, he usually posts a report weekley; https://www.visitbrainerd.com/blog/fishing-report-july-16-2018/
    • ifishwalleye
      Hi, I’m looking for a fresh report for this weekend. Thanks in advance! Good Fishing!
    • roony
      Is the water starting to recede on the lakes East of Orr? I heard it was really high on Myrtle. We're coming up to Black Duck in a week or so, just wondering if things are getting back more towards normal. 
    • AlwaysFishing23
      I’ve fished sylvan heavily the last two years. Done very well. Many nice pike, bass, walleye, and bluegill. For pike trolling shadraps pretty much any where will get you all the 20”-25” pike you want. Plenty of dence cover all over for bass and that is the usual bass presentations. And for gills in the spring the channel between the two bays was VERY good this past spring went three days in a row and got 2 limits each time ( two angles in the boat) and relesed many many more.  Also the panfish limit on sylvan is 5 per person so be aware of that. I was out there 2 weeks ago and did ok. Again two limits of nice gills and a handful of pike but it took a lot of work to find them. I’m unsure of the walleye fishing out there but have heard it’s a good lake. Im not an expert on sylvan but know a little so hope this helps ya out. Good luck!