• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

papadarv

Ice house license law change

Recommended Posts

papadarv

Yesterday the MN DNR announced a license requirement change effective NOW for this ice season. All Wheel House and other fishing structures which cannot be folded / collapsed must be licensed even if you remove the house when you get off the ice. 

Screenshot_20171121-153715.thumb.png.8dff67a0d88b1d3db37beb45c8196df5.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PRO-V

Next year you will have to buy one for wearing long underwear or pac boots.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ZachD
8 hours ago, PRO-V said:

Next year you will have to buy one for wearing long underwear or pac boots.

If I remember right you used to have to get a license a while ago before they changed it to the if you occupied it rule.

I don't think 14.33 a year is going to break anyones bank. Hopefully they use the extra money for stocking purposes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PRO-V

Not by itself it won't but they raised the price on licenses for everything. Once you add it all up I'll bet you never got that big of a raise at your job. I paid for an ATV license since they first came out and we didn't get squat for it for over 20 years. What a joke, not to mention debacles like Mille Lacs Lake management. AAARRGGHHH!!  I gotta quit now before I pop a vein.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ib_jigged

Really no different than using your boat.  $14,000 fish house and $14.33/year is going to kill you??

What gets me is at the lake we are at in the summer, mostly out of state people in the campground and all of their boats, never leave that lake and they are all licensed out of state and not in MN.  That is a chunk of money the state does not see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

The 200 foot rule gets me a little but it has to be defined somehow what is occupied and what isn’t.  

So for a wheelhouse we get to buy tabs to have on the road and a sticker to have it on the ice and go away for a little while.  Seems pretty close to double taxation since any LE can find out who the owner is from the current plate.

Plus the spear shack that I might want to keep up over the weekend.  2 tags plus license.

Combination sports license

2 trout stamps

Waterfowl stamps

Pheasant stamp 

Turkey license (stamp now included)

Deer license for all seasons

 

The bucket is getting heavy with all the drops in it.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
2 hours ago, Wanderer said:

The 200 foot rule gets me a little but it has to be defined somehow what is occupied and what isn’t.  

So for a wheelhouse we get to buy tabs to have on the road and a sticker to have it on the ice and go away for a little while.  Seems pretty close to double taxation since any LE can find out who the owner is from the current plate.

Plus the spear shack that I might want to keep up over the weekend.  2 tags plus license.

Combination sports license

2 trout stamps

Waterfowl stamps

Pheasant stamp 

Turkey license (stamp now included)

Deer license for all seasons

 

The bucket is getting heavy with all the drops in it.

 

2 Trout stamps.  Did I miss something and need to go back and get another? :confused:

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jim Almquist

Wife you dummy :P

I know the problem first hand !!

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer
11 hours ago, leech~~ said:

2 Trout stamps.  Did I miss something and need to go back and get another? :confused:

With 2 trout stamps you can keep double your limit.

You heard it here first on the interwebs! ;)

Me and Mr Williams will swing by and say Hi this winter in Ely. :D  That is, if we can get around your sled!! :lol:

Happy Thanksgiving!

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
10 hours ago, Wanderer said:

With 2 trout stamps you can keep double your limit.

You heard it here first on the interwebs! ;)

Me and Mr Williams will swing by and say Hi this winter in Ely. :D  That is, if we can get around your sled!! :lol:

Happy Thanksgiving!

Ok but with all those Trout. Bring a tow rope as I may be stuck in the slush! :grin:

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
13 hours ago, Jim Almquist said:

Wife you dummy :P

I know the problem first hand !!

Hey, I resemble that remark!! :angry: 

Plus my wife only went fishing with me once the whole time that we have been married and she brought a book! I got her trained in right away. Sorry about your training problem! :lol:

Edited by leech~~
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer
12 minutes ago, leech~~ said:

Sorry about your training problem! :lol:

Double the lines for down rigging you dummy! :lol:

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
leech~~
3 minutes ago, Wanderer said:

Double the lines for down rigging you dummy! :lol:

Ok as long as she reads a book and stays the heck out of the way! :P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DRAGFOOT

Well, I have to pay for registration on my boat trailer to run it on the road, and the boat to run it on the lake, why shouldn't wheel houses?  I guess I don't feel bad for the wheel house guys.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

A boat and trailer are two separate pieces of equipment.  The trailer is titled and the boat isn’t.  You can have one and not the other for any amount of reasons.

The wheelhouse is one item and titled, hence the plate.  Shelter tags primary purpose (besides raising money) is to officially verify who is responsible for it.  You can do that with a plate number.

Is what it is.  But I’ve just been having more difficulties considering the license fees as just another drop in the bucket.  If ALL the money was used for managing wildlife and habitat I’d have an easier time with it.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kettle

Wasn't too long ago that you had to liscense all fish houses including portables that were fished in just for daily non overnight use

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

I think back then you were supposed to have a shelter tag to sit in your vehicle to watch tip ups too.  

Yah, I know it was worse before but it was nice to have some relief for a little while.

I forgot to add to the above license fees:

Snowmobile registration 

ATV registration 

Canoe, kayak, anything over 10 feet reg.

Every trailer tabs (I cling to my trailers that have the lifetime sticker).

I guess it could be worse... Fact is, I have to buy the shelter tags anyway cuz I will be leaving my hub house up overnight a few times and will leave the wheelhouse unattended overnight once.  First World problems in ice fishing. ;)

  • Thumbs Up 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Paradice

It's not that it's any significant amount of money.  It's just that it won't go towards anything useful.  Imagine if everyone put $5 into the kitty for their 3 most fished lakes for the season and the money went towards dumpster rental and free garbage bags at the landing.  Or perhaps a dedicated fund to open up the thousands of lakes in MN that don't have public access?   

  • Thumbs Up 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

A bump on this post for two reasons:  I wasn’t 100% clear the wheelhouse needs a shelter license to be on the ice no matter what...  go ahead, call me half blind.  I thought the 200 ft rule applied here too.

The other: I’m going through mail and have a collection of 8 registration renewals that are due.  I go whine to the wife a little and she asks, Do I have enough shelter licenses for this weekend?

No!! :mad:  Not if I want to set the hub house out and not babysit it.  Need to pick up that second one tomorrow.

Drip

Drip

Drip

Drip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tom Sawyer

If your cabin is less than 200 ft, your fine...

A shelter meeting the new definition of portable only needs a license when a person leaves it unattended, meaning they are farther than 200 feet from the shelter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer
58 minutes ago, Tom Sawyer said:

If your cabin is less than 200 ft, your fine...

That’s the way I read it the first time too.  Re-read the first paragraph where it says wheelhouses OR dark house shelter.....even when occupying it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Borch

So how I read it is if I drag my flip over house out with all my gear and go hole hopping, which I often do, I gotta stay within 200 feet of the portable or license it.  Does this apply if the portable is not set up in this scenario.   I think they call it a sled in that condifion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Wanderer

@Borch

It used to be that way, calling the flip over a sled if it wasn’t set up.  I don’t know if that’s still a go with the regulation change.  Just going by the press release on the subject, I’d say NO, but there are always more details.

You might want to get the official word from them.  The biggest thing that changed here is they want those fees and aren’t afraid to say so anymore.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • monstermoose78
      Seeing lots of birds turkey 🦃 time
    • Ten point
      Just got back from LOTW fishing for us was slow. But if you put the time in and watch your electronics it can still be good. We're fishing in 32ft lot of small fish just need to keep the hook away from them several good fish still coming thru. A few slot fish up to 26 1/2 inches walleyes 15 to 17 saugers 14 to 16 lot of water under the snow in spots.
    • smurfy
      checked again tonight from hwy 23. north of the bridge to the dam is open with a bit of ice on the edges. south of the bridge still has ice but is looking pretty iffy.
    • Wanderer
      Thanks for the report.  I didn’t hear any news from my buddy’s last trip up there so I assumed it was bad.  I texted and asked; yup it was bad.  He’s finally burned out for the ice season after the back to back bad trips and putting his gear away.     One of his buddies did an 8 man/5 day trip for lakers in another part of Ontario.  8 fish total.   I agree, it can get better before the end though if a couple things work out weather wise.
    • BryonG
      I say that if this gets passed, those lakes are on their own, no stocking, nothing supported by the dnr, if they want their lake all to themselves, they can support it. 
    • monstermoose78
      Thinking blue on Saturday 
    • sweede
      Mar 19, 2019 Wright County AIS public meeting recap:   The Wright County passed the AIS ordinance with a 3 to 2 vote. Now it is entirely up to the DNR commissioner to approve it. The Wright County commissioners said that if the DNR does not approve it by April 15th, the whole proposal is dead for good.   Here are some more details from the meeting. There were about 50 people attending, 99% lake shore owners. They all applauded the proposed ordinance (except for the self-certification part). One after another they spoke about how much trouble their lake is in and how much it has cost them to keep AIS at bay. They did a great job of presenting “the sky is falling” to the county commissioners (I always find it interesting that there is no mention of restrictions on lake shore owners using lawn fertilizer that turns the lakes into a green slimy mess. Seems to me that would be a no brainer if you really cared about the lake). Most made a point that they are not trying to privatize their lake and are offended when they hear that. On the other hand, not once did anyone mention that we need to come up with a better way that does not restrict access. Only one lone fisherman addressed the council and said that he bypassed the three test lakes last year and will bypass the additional lakes if this passes, too much hassle. Hmm, funny how that works. Imagine if this catches on and all the lakes are restricted, sell the boat I guess. There was also mention of a need for an exit inspection process. Not sure what that means, but didn’t sound like it would be in lieu of the proposed inspections and you may end up having to get inspected before and after you go to the lake.   Also of interest, the commissioners said they have received many inquiries from lake associations around the state and there were several other lake association representatives at the meeting to observe and see how they could implement this same strategy. So Wright County will be the test case for every county in the state to run with this. What a disastrous precedent. Not to mention the regulations and tags would be different for every county, making it cumbersome and impractical. The self-certification will have a cost of $10 to $40, so multiply that by how many counties you fish.   What you can do if you want to stop this from happening: The entire fate of this proposal now rest on the DNR. The Wright County commissioners will meet with the DNR commissioner on Mar 21. If the DNR does not approve the plan by April 15, it will be dead. Send your concerns to these DNR contacts right away so that they receive it before they meet with the Wright County people.   [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]     PS,  you can read the emails send to Wright County on this link. Notice how organized the lake associations are with their form letter that you just sign and send. In particular, notice the one from the Clearwater association #34 on the page (see where this is heading?). http://www.co.wright.mn.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/6489?fileID=13556  
    • sweede
      Mar 19, 2019 Wright County AIS public meeting recap:   The Wright County passed the AIS ordinance today with a 3 to 2 vote. Now it is entirely up to the DNR commissioner to approve it. The Wright County commissioners said that if the DNR does not approve it by April 15th, the whole proposal is dead for good.   Here are some more details from  the meeting. There were about 50 people attending, 99% lake shore owners. They all applauded the proposed ordinance (except for the self-certification part). One after another they spoke about how much trouble their lake is in and how much it has cost them to keep AIS at bay. They did a great job of presenting “the sky is falling” to the county commissioners (I always find it interesting that there is no mention of restrictions on lake shore owners using lawn fertilizer that turns the lakes into a green slimy mess. Seems to me that would be a no brainer if you really cared about the lake). Most made a point that they are not trying to privatize their lake and are offended when they hear that. On the other hand, not once did anyone mention that we need to come up with a better way that does not restrict access. Only one lone fisherman addressed the council and said that he bypassed the three test lakes last year and will bypass the additional lakes if this passes, too much hassle. Hmm, funny how that works. Imagine if this catches on and all the lakes are restricted, sell the boat I guess. There was also mention of a need for an exit inspection process. Not sure what that means, but didn’t sound like it would be in lieu of the proposed inspections and you may end up having to get inspected before and after you go to the lake.   Also of interest, the commissioners said they have received many inquiries from lake associations around the state and there were several other lake association representatives at the meeting to observe and see how they could implement this same strategy. So Wright County will be the test case for every county in the state to run with this. What a disastrous precedent. Not to mention the regulations and tags would be different for every county, making it cumbersome and impractical. The self-certification will have a cost of $10 to $40, so multiply that by how many counties you fish.   What you can do if you want to stop this from happening: The entire fate of this proposal now rest on the DNR. The Wright County commissioners will meet with the DNR commissioner on Mar 21. If the DNR does not approve the plan by April 15, it will be dead. Send your concerns to these DNR contacts right away so that they receive it before they meet with the Wright County people.   [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]     PS,  you can read the emails send to Wright County on this link. Notice how organized the lake associations are with their form letter that you just sign and send. In particular, notice the one from the Clearwater association #34 on the page (see where this is heading?). http://www.co.wright.mn.us/AgendaCenter/ViewFile/Item/6489?fileID=13556  
    • LoonASea
      That was last years swap meet flyer 
    • JBMasterAngler
      I just checked the Two Harbors webcam, and it’s still frozen. However, the ice cutter was in the background carving out the shipping lanes. Personally, I think the ice season on the big pond is over!