Gillnetting on Mille Lacs Article

[HUSL]

Here is an article that was published by the Hamline University School of Law's Journal of Public Law and Policy regarding the current legal implications stemming from Indian netting on Mille Lacs.

I hope that this article will help in some way to effectuate changes on and around Mille Lacs. Thank you to all who support sustainable fishing for all on Minnesota's lakes.

http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cg...6&context=jplp

[pushbutton]

[northender]

Here is an article that was published by the Hamline University School of Law's Journal of Public Law and Policy regarding the current legal implications stemming from Indian netting on Mille Lacs.

I hope that this article will help in some way to effectuate changes on and around Mille Lacs. Thank you to all who support sustainable fishing for all on Minnesota's lakes.

http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cg...6&context=jplp

Well, who can argue with this? No doubt, many have been preaching this stuff for years. Many doubted that preaching. Anyone ready to pounce on those preachers now?

[PurpleFloyd]

It says

Quote:

If you're reading this page you may have mis-typed the link or it may have been truncated if you copied it from an email. If that is not the case, please report this error to the site administrator and we will correct it as soon as possible.

[delcecchi]

It says

If you're reading this page you may have mis-typed the link or it may have been truncated if you copied it from an email. If that is not the case, please report this error to the site administrator and we will correct it as soon as possible.

And if you enter "netting" into the search box, it takes you to

http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/jplp/vol35/iss2/4/

Clicking the "download" link on that page will get you to the pdf of the full article.

[leech~~]

It says

Huum, sounds like all the DNR reports! Nothing.

[northender]

Got this link from another site--hopefully works for all now.

http://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=jplp

[leech~~]

You go kid. By the time you get your expected doctorate next year. Maybe you can try and make a change?

Matthew Steffes, Juris Doctorate Expected May 2015, Hamline University

School of law.

[pushbutton]

Well, who can argue with this?

[desert_bulls]

Maybe you should come up with an article like that with references then saying the opposite of that article

[northender]

Just what I figured---no legit argument to the contrary of this writing by a soon to be PHD.

[pushbutton]

Ha....got a few fancy degrees myself. One of which graduated with honors doing a paper on Year Round Intensive Leaf Lettuce Production in Intercontinental High Latitude Regions. It was exceptional. lots of spiffy quotes from all kind of experts on all aspects of the project......thing is though....I never actually grew any lettuce

[northender]

Ha....got a few fancy degrees myself. One of which graduated with honors doing a paper on Intensive Leaf Lettuce Production in Intercontinental High Latitude Regions. It was exceptional. lots of spiffy quotes from all kind of experts on all aspects of the project......thing is though....I never actually grew any lettuce

In other words--on the paper's merits--you can not challenge the content with any viable, legal standing based viewpoint?

[delcecchi]

In other words--on the paper's merits--you can not challenge the content with any viable, legal standing based viewpoint?

The court decided. As I understand the legal process, it is now up to the other side to prove their position in a convincing fashion. So it is not up to anyone to challenge his content, it is up to him or some hypothetical client to do the challenging and convince one or more judges.

Until then it is just red meat to the diehards.

[pushbutton]

Show me some credible info where the future PHD has any standing or expertise on Native American Sovereignty issues or Marine Biology and did not just not grow any proverbial lettuce either.

[pushbutton]

The court decided. As I understand the legal process, it is now up to the other side to prove their position in a convincing fashion. So it is not up to anyone to challenge his content, it is up to him or some hypothetical client to do the challenging and convince one or more judges.

Until then it is just red meat to the diehards.

Exactly......put him on your legal team then..... if your so convinced of the paper's validity. It should be a slam dunk...right?

[Stick in Mud]

Thanks for adding the article. It reminded me of Reason #249 why I didn't go to law school....Can you imagine having to footnote nearly *every* sentence?!? The footnotes are longer than the actual article itself.

I did find it somewhat interesting that in the "Probably Causes" section, the non-native harvest wasn't even mentioned. Odd omission, that.