Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Strib Article: New Study Sheds Light on Wolves, Moose


TylerS

Recommended Posts

Well when they run out of deer they will find something else to chase, deer numbers in the NE were crashing back in 2008.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought the best part about this was that they still need to do more research. It would suck to actually "complete" a study and not have a job any more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders

What, no talk about Climate change either, but they did say it maybe the Wolfs. So they know a little about what they are doing! whistle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree,I think the study is a good one,and yes wolves are a factor,but when you see numerous moose for a few years in a row with no hair due too excessive tick infestation due to warm winters,many of these moose also died.

Yes I also seen wolves work in a area for moose also.

Also the DNR had a deer study back in 1995-1997 where like winter of 1995-96 90% of the fawns died because of the hard winter, yes wolves ate good,but majority of dead deer were untouched,friends and I found over 20 dead deer just curled up and not fed on.

Nature has many punches,yes wolves is one of them and also hunters also is one of them when we over harvest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more complicated than a simple predator / prey relationship. It has much to do with climate change 1st and foremost and this IS the main factor for low deer numbers in the north, then secondary impacts are the food that depends directly on the climate itself then.... predators like Black Bear, Coyotes and Wolves. Coyotes and Bear probably account for more white tailed deer calf mortality state wide than the wolves do but people LOVE to bi##Ch about the wolf. They (we) have for thousands of years as a matter of fact. (wolves are just soooo easy for the simple to blame because they are visible, highly publicized, news worthy, discussion worthy, recently managed and a success story, and they happen to have been interjected as the villain in many of our childhood fairy-tales. After human impacts and manipulation of environment, pressure, hunting, deer vehicle collisions etc THEN comes - predator prey relationships like Bear, Coyote, and wolf - then comes - disease, parasitism - food source availability and carrying capacity of ecosystem, quality and availability of shelter from elements, cold and deep snow, but, the thing is - all of this and more is included on the list of things that effect deer populations and any ecological population study - is exceptionally difficult due to vast size and number of variables - and rarely is a single definitive conclusion arrived.

Just WAY easier to say - Its cuz of the wolves and move on. Human nature guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uh, folks be talking about moose, not deer. Cold winter, deep snow etc don't seem to be an issue with moose.

And please please don't confuse climate with weather. Deer are affected by weather more than climate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Studies in the 70's showed bear average about 3 deer a year,and mostly fawns shortly after birth. Even male Fischer averaged 0.5 deer per year.

In many deer populations with established territories, a wolf pack will take between 2-3 deer per sq. mile on average. A territory many times is 36 sq. miles or so.

I think bobcat was like 1 deer per year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 'we have more fun' FishingMN Builders

Studies in the 70's showed bear average about 3 deer a year,and mostly fawns shortly after birth. Even male Fischer averaged 0.5 deer per year.

In many deer populations with established territories, a wolf pack will take between 2-3 deer per sq. mile on average. A territory many times is 36 sq. miles or so.

I think bobcat was like 1 deer per year.

Strib Article: New Study Sheds Light on Wolves, Moose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Much more complicated than a simple predator / prey relationship. It has much to do with climate change 1st and foremost and this IS the main factor for low deer numbers in the north, then secondary impacts are the food that depends directly on the climate itself then.... predators like Black Bear, Coyotes and Wolves. Coyotes and Bear probably account for more white tailed deer calf mortality state wide than the wolves do but people LOVE to bi##Ch about the wolf. They (we) have for thousands of years as a matter of fact. (wolves are just soooo easy for the simple to blame because they are visible, highly publicized, news worthy, discussion worthy, recently managed and a success story, and they happen to have been interjected as the villain in many of our childhood fairy-tales. After human impacts and manipulation of environment, pressure, hunting, deer vehicle collisions etc THEN comes - predator prey relationships like Bear, Coyote, and wolf - then comes - disease, parasitism - food source availability and carrying capacity of ecosystem, quality and availability of shelter from elements, cold and deep snow, but, the thing is - all of this and more is included on the list of things that effect deer populations and any ecological population study - is exceptionally difficult due to vast size and number of variables - and rarely is a single definitive conclusion arrived.

Just WAY easier to say - Its cuz of the wolves and move on. Human nature guys.

References?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Not sure how they did the wood back then, but now they have plastic I'm sure you could bend into a circle if yea needed. 👌
    • Wanderer
      What I really wanna know is:   How’d get that lattice to curve like that?  Bomb diggity!
    • monstermoose78
      Fish Newton lake is great for walleyes. Everyone goes to basswood and forgets about newton. The late fall pike bite in pipestone is amazing and it’s a great time to catch the big walleyes are up there feeding too.
    • gimruis
      It would cost you 830 bucks to watch every game this NFL season under multiple platforms.   I don't have peacock or espn+ or whatever they want me to have, so I'll just have to relent on being able to watch a few games.  I refuse to cave in to their demands just to watch the Packers play the Eagles in Brazil.  I think last year peacock had the exclusive rights to the Miami/KC playoff game too.  I'm sure that will occur again in January.
    • leech~~
      Well it's a win, but it wasn't to Purdy with all the turn overs and penalties!  
    • leech~~
      Oop, must be another Vikings game.  So far it's been a Prudy game, Viks!  😁
    • leech~~
      Another prediction.   Under the cloud of "Woke Inclusion" Just like the Mn state flag and the Mn Twins, the Vikings name will be going away in a few years! Their already making them look like Snow flakes!  We can't have the uniforms of angry Norwegian people!  Sounds funny but. Wait for it! 😒
    • leech~~
      Just sayen, not all the loyal old fans, can pay for the NFL viewing package!    
    • Wanderer
      New frontiers.  Expand the market; make more money.  Despite some PR moments, they’re not in it for charity.   BUT, they might want to take a moment and see how that worked out for NASCAR.  Not that having to buy premium channels to watch races was the only problem but it sure helped kill the fever for a lot of people.
    • leech~~
      Get ready. Any bets in a few years the average Joe NFL fans aren't going to be able to watch their local teams, unless it's pay for view!  Sounds like their greasing the wheels now.  There are 5 international games this year! ☹️ "The NFL will play a regular season game in Madrid, Spain in 2025, as the NFL prioritizes global growth and expands the International Games to new cities and markets around the world."
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.