• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • Join In - We Share Fishing Reports & Outdoor Information Here

     
      You know what we all love...

      The same things you do!!!! Share what you love & enjoy in the outdoors as well as thank those whose posts you 'appreciate.'

      Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
fish_hunt_guy

DNR walleye reproduction seminar

Recommended Posts

fish_hunt_guy

I went to the meeting last night in Isle with an open mind. But after listening to the speaker I realized he really is in denial. Just a government politically correct puppet nothing more. He was very contradictory saying it doesnt affect the spawn to have nets out during the spring, but angling might and often does hurt the spawning becuase anglers can concentrate on areas with lots of fish. And netters dont!? At first he didnt have an opinion about what happened on Red Lake years ago becuasue he wasnt a part of the solution, but then at the end of the night when the topic came up again he said it was a totally different situation than Mille Lacs for various bogus reasons he explained? He also said there was no correlation to there currently being an influx of small walleye in the lake and the fact that there has been little netting the past two springs due to lake ice out. Also when asked he said "YES" there is a claus in the treaty that the DNR has a right to stop nettting of the lake if they feel the fishery is in jeapordy, but then went on to say there is a claus within the claus which he couldnt quite explain. He would basically just murmur awhile until you couldnt understand him and go to the next question. I just hope this gets resolved in my lifetime. This is completely ridiculous. Just senseless in my opinion. How did these guys become such spineless puppets and how can they be replaced? Can they be voted out or once there in are they in for good? Common sense needs to replace political correctness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
delcecchi

You should note that a walleye on the ice outside a shanty also doesn't spawn.

It may be that the whole idea of harvest regulation by protected slot doesn't work in some situations or on some lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
laportian

Red Lake and Mille Lacs don't compare. I was there for the Red Lake deal. Mille Lacs gets netted by a few dozen crews for a couple weeks each spawn, each stringing out only 6 or 8 nets at a time. Red Lake was netted by 50 crews running 25 to 40 nets at a whack for 6 or 7 months out of each year. Big time difference there fish hunt guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FowlSki

If only the DNR could produce a large perch hatch, it would give the little walleyes a break and they wouldn't be the number one prey of the large walleyes...that would bring the walleye fishery back...oh wait, that happened!

Patience young Jedi. The fishery is on the rebound.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fish_hunt_guy

Your right I think Fowlski, and I cant wait. Getting the nets out of the lake during the spawn would be the cherry on top though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
laker1

O'kay where was this individual from? Office?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fish_hunt_guy

Yes he was definately an "office man." His name is Tom Jones. His title is Treaty Management Coordinator or something to that nature. What a joker, if it wasn't for netting he wouldnt have a job. No wonder he says netting during the spawn doesnt hurt the lake, but angling does. You cant even make this stuff up, comical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
willyfahey

No mention of the "blue ribbon panel?" I hope some day the DNR will opening say that harvesting walleye in any manner during the spawn puts an undue burden on the fishery.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
northender

My Jones is quoted in the today's StarTribune that water clarity has NOT changed since the zeebs showed up at Mille Lacs in 2005. Locals have always said it hasn't changed in many years as well. Yet for the past 4-5 years, this same Jones guy has blamed the clearer water on more smallmouths and more predation of young of the year walleyes due to clearer water. So now that clear water is not to blame for anything in the past 9 years at least, what is it? Why is there 70-80 ( or even less) percent less walleyes in the lake than before the treaty management era began? Can't blame water clarity now, right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
river rat316

The slots have more to do with it than anything

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
northender

The slots have more to do with it than anything

No doubt. And why were the slots put into play? Per the DNR, on the record, to accommodate the treaty harvest. On the record, the DNR says there were zero walleye numbers issues leading into the treaty harvest era and no need for a change in management. Court orders changed that. Not biology.

So--the nets were and are the main reason behind the crash of the lake walleye numbers. Indirectly as much or more as directly. And Mr. Jones of the DNR world won't come out and say that in these infomercials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bandersnatch

Hmmmmm

So what about all of the slots for different species on all of the other lakes in Minnesota?

As far as low numbers of Walleye in the lake........

A) I don't have any faith in the DNR's numbers.

B) Back in the 60's when there was maybe a tenth of the Sport Fishing pressure, the lake was known as The Dead Sea for several years. Not a net to be seen.

The above begs the question.........

If you don't trust that the DNR's data on netting is accurate, how do you then use their data on populations to make your argument? They are only correct when it supports you?

Personally I don't think that they have any data that is correct that doesn't come from the latest political polling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BrdHunter01

B) Back in the 60's when there was maybe a tenth of the Sport Fishing pressure, the lake was known as The Dead Sea for several years. Not a net to be seen.

That was due to an explosion in bait fish not lack of walleyes. I can't count how many times I've tried to explain this on here. If you actually believe the current demise of walleyes on Mille Lacs didn't start with Treaty Management, you need to open your eyes.

Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
northender

Hmmmmm

So what about all of the slots for different species on all of the other lakes in Minnesota?

As far as low numbers of Walleye in the lake........

A) I don't have any faith in the DNR's numbers.

B) Back in the 60's when there was maybe a tenth of the Sport Fishing pressure, the lake was known as The Dead Sea for several years. Not a net to be seen.

The above begs the question.........

If you don't trust that the DNR's data on netting is accurate, how do you then use their data on populations to make your argument? They are only correct when it supports you?

Personally I don't think that they have any data that is correct that doesn't come from the latest political polling.

Watch where slots on other lakes, for example Winnie and Leech and Rainy go in the next few years--or take those lake's walleye numbers. None of them have had them in place as Mille Lacs has for 15 years but everyone of them now are being closely studied behind the scenes regarding the negative impacts of the slot limits.

Slot limits, no doubt, can a play a very positive role in building a lake back such as Leech or building a more diverse year class balance in a predominately small fish lake but in the end , if in place for too long, slot limits ultimately kill off the very species that it originally grew. It is inevitable and very predictable--as it was by biologists early on at Mille Lacs.

The dead sea years were dead for the average angler but local guides thrived during those periods and walleye numbers were at all time highs with all year classes balanced.

Netting numbers are easily questioned when one watches how the DNR comes up with them, exclusively via Tribal reports and counts. You can easily question the DNR's take on the lack of impact the netting has on the lake because they do not say the Treaty era management was put into place only to accommodate the netting itself. They are on the record with that. Also, when the DNR says the netting has no effect because a dead fish is a dead fish is flawed. Random tagging studies of walleyes, taken by DNR nets, show that only about 5-10 percent of the tagged walleyes ever get caught by anglers and in the same year they are tagged, even a smaller percentage get caught by anglers. So, easily, the DNR take on the impact of netting is questioned. A gill netted fish is a dead fish but if not gill netted, it most likely would spawn several springs and would most likely, obviously, not be killed the same year by hook and line--or at least could be released by an angler if caught. Do the math...and justify some or all of the concerns and doubts of the info the DNR spews out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
northender

That was due to an explosion in bait fish not lack of walleyes. I can't count how many times I've tried to explain this on here. If you actually believe the current demise of walleyes on Mille Lacs didn't start with Treaty Management, you need to open your eyes.

Good luck!

EXACTLY!! It is not debatable if viewed and thought out with an open mind. "Treaty era management" (gill-netting during the spawn and slot limits etc.) caused the entire crash of the walleye numbers in the lake. No other reasoning and or source holds any factual on the record weight. None. It can't be found.

Over and out!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GravelBar

I was up on Mille Lacs this summer and saw a single tribe member bring in his daily limit. 10 Walleyes between 22 to 28 inches. I would guess the weight to be approximately 50 pounds. My question is where does the walleyes caught by the tribe during the summer count? Are these all free and above their netting limits? I also wonder how many thousands of pounds of Walleyes are taken this way. I believe both tribe and non-tribe walleye limits should be the same while Angling.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Red Miller

Ya...its pretty pitiful. What can I say that wont get censored. The lake is a disaster and there is perfect of example of why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
laportian

I was up on Mille Lacs this summer and saw a single tribe member bring in his daily limit. 10 Walleyes between 22 to 28 inches. I would guess the weight to be approximately 50 pounds. My question is where does the walleyes caught by the tribe during the summer count? Are these all free and above their netting limits? I also wonder how many thousands of pounds of Walleyes are taken this way. I believe both tribe and non-tribe walleye limits should be the same while Angling.

Im calling bull on this gravel. Every time there is a Mille Lacs netting thread you pipe in with this 10 fish thing. So now you witness Natives with 50 pound stringers? Uh-huh. Check his posts with anything concerning Mille Lacs and netting; there is a post by gravel crying about their 10 fish limit. Im so sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hockeybc69

Apparently the tribal members are very good anglers. I dont know anyone that has caught that many fish of that size in one day on the big pond this summer.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PurpleFloyd

I was up on Mille Lacs this summer and saw a single tribe member bring in his daily limit. 10 Walleyes between 22 to 28 inches. I would guess the weight to be approximately 50 pounds. My question is where does the walleyes caught by the tribe during the summer count? Are these all free and above their netting limits? I also wonder how many thousands of pounds of Walleyes are taken this way. I believe both tribe and non-tribe walleye limits should be the same while Angling.

I am not sure but if the fish are so depleted and yet he can catch that many fish that size in a day, as him if I can hire him as a guide next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GravelBar

Every guide on the lake could double or triple that amount. You just can't keep them because your not a member of the tribe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PurpleFloyd

So then you are saying there are plenty of fish in the lake?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GravelBar

No I am not saying there are a lot of fish in the lake. I simply want to know how the 20,000 lbs of walleye taking by the tribe via angling figure into the limits set for tribe and non-tribe members? Does the 20,000 lbs count against the tribes netting limits? If not where does it get counted?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gregg52

You should note that a walleye on the ice outside a shanty also doesn't spawn.

It may be that the whole idea of harvest regulation by protected slot doesn't work in some situations or on some lakes.

that statement about walleyes on the ice not spawning might be the silliest comment I've seen on the whole mille deal

that solved the problem right there ban ice fishing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

good lord !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PurpleFloyd

No I am not saying there are a lot of fish in the lake. I simply want to know how the 20,000 lbs of walleye taking by the tribe via angling figure into the limits set for tribe and non-tribe members? Does the 20,000 lbs count against the tribes netting limits? If not where does it get counted?

I am not sure but when you claim to see someone with a 50 lb stringer and claim every guide could do that it indicates to me that there is a pretty good fish population.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Huskie
      My 115 merc 4 stroke (2006) is acting up.  At about 2/3 throttle, 30 mph, 4000 rpm's the motor seems to cavitate or rev up and the tach pops way up, but we didn't speed up.  I quickly backed off and ran at a lower speed.  I have it trimmed up on plane but not overly so.  It did it once at a lower speed as well.  Most of the time at lower speeds it riund fine. Brought it in and they looked at it and pulled the prop and everything looked fine there etc.  The motors lower plate seems to be located correctly, right at the bottom of the boat.  Going on one last trip, and don't really have much time to bring it in for an extensive diagnosis, might need to baby it and stay close to the landing.  Any ideas?
    • MJ1657
      Not a lot of ducks flying this morning.   
    • tarpon6
      Samsung Note 10+.  It does have a great camera.  Had to use the digital zoom on that shot.  Wish I had my wildlife camera with me.  
    • delcecchi
      Works for me using chrome.
    • Bearfan1963
      Barbelboy, We have taken our 4 year old grandson camping on Namakan the last 2 years.  He loves it, its never too early !!!
    • Wanderer
      Ah, a couple walleyes just made it all better. 😁
    • Bigfatbert
    • Borch
      Try Darren Troseth at 3 rivers fishing adventures.  Fall is sturgeon  time.   He also specializes in catfish with a shot at a trophy.
    • Wanderer
      No doubt @papadarv!  They’re really good at it too.  The small family flocks have joined together where I’ve been seeing geese and now number 50+ typically.   We saw some geese and a few ducks today but didn’t shoot any.  We didn’t find anything worth setting up on.  Pretty amazing how slim the duck population is up here.  The biggest flock I’ve seen, including the drive up, numbered 5 birds.  It’s been mostly random singles and pairs.   The flooding up here has been amazing too.  Something like 10 inches in 25 hours.  Roads are flooded and the ditches are raging rivers.  The downstream sides of the bigger culverts look like power plant discharges.   We’re considering other options for tomorrow.
    • james1014
      $ 7800 $  O.B.O aluminum. 2008 20’ DreamShak Ice House/Camper, Model Namikan 202, very clean and in excellent condition. Bearings just repacked along with electric brake system inspection. Asking $7,800. Purchased new for $24,000. Camper style look with horizontal v-front. 4 Burner Cooktop range with full sized RV Oven – handles pizzas well. Sink, drain, and removable drain tank. AM/FM/CD/External Jack, 4 Speaker Stereo System. 12/120V TV with Power Boost Rooftop RV style HD Antenna. Easily sleeps 5 (King, XLong-Twin, Std-Twin) on fold out beds that are convertible to couches. Toy Hauler Backdoor 78” height, 61” width, folds down, w/ ATV type tie downs in floor. Easily holds 2 ATVs. Two 30lb propane tanks with auto switching regulator. Spare auto switching regulator and hose set. Floor mounted forced air Suburban heater. All windows with curtains. Carpeted floor. 8 Catch Covered Fish Holes. Double (parallel wired) deep cycle battery system with 12V charger in RV style power panel 12V/120V capable. Tandem axle, with remote control hydraulic up and down, torsion axles with removable wheel well covers. Makes fishing setup banking go quickly. RV Roof Vent. Numerous coat hooks, built in rod racks and holders. Lots of cabinets and storage. Brand new Tires and aluminum rins ¾” Treated Plywood Floor. Aluminum Tubing Walls & Roof Truss System. Aluminum Diamond Plate Stone Guards. 3 Thermal Pain Tinted Radius RV Windows with slide screens. 1 1/2" Foam Insulated Walls Natural cedar paneling and rough sawn cedar cabinet faces. 3 Interior Overhead & 2 Exterior 12 Volt Lights Aluminum siding. One piece rubber roof. Standard RV type entrance side door with removable bug screen for summer use. I HAVE PICTURES WHY this is SALVAGE TITLE. Please call or text 8013580144 or pictures