Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

deer density


nonteepical

Recommended Posts

There's no denying minnesotas deer herd has been shrinking the past decade. Deer harvest is down 120k since 2003. Next year will be even lower than this year and it's not the wind, it's by design, big ag, auto insurance companies and foresters are influencing the DNR, hunters who foot the bill to fund the DNR are being pushed to the side. There is a petition going around and if your concerned about deer numbers and want deer hunters voice heard in state deer density meetings, instead of hunters being the tool for the farm bureau and insurance companies reaping billions in profits by keeping the deer herd low, find a petition or start one yourself.

Zone 3 isn't the only zone in Mn other places in the state need the DNR's attention so we all can have good deer hunting, this isn't about APR it's about having enough deer per square mile throughout the state that makes sence for all. Hunters, farmers and business.

http://youtu.be/Mkq_LQwMVU8

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 246
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • smsmith

    75

  • PurpleFloyd

    22

  • mntatonka

    18

  • Getanet

    15

great post and link to youtube.

whats discussed is spot on to whats happening in the state with respect to deer numbers/deer densities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 100%,

I also wonder if the peak harvests are a goal. Much of that harvest in 2003 was off of previous years of good conservative management. We decided to harvest the older does and much more. Realistically I know we can have more deer,but how high can are harvest rate go without cutting into breeding stock etc..

There is a limit. I also think we can spread the harvest around to more individuals,instead of one person having 5 tags and shooting those and than shooting more by filling his buddies tags. There is some pretty high harvests by single individuals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brooks will be hosting another meeting in Mora on Jan 29th. Details coming on time and location.

So far he has held meetings in Isanti and Rice.

At the Rice meeting, he had Senator Brown, Rep Newberger and Rep Kresha in attendance.

Rep Newberger is sending out a legislative update this month and plans to include a deer hunters satisfaction survey in that, and provide the results to Brooks and his group working on this initiative.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Petitions also located at the following locations

Whitcombs Archery, Princeton MN

Archery Headquarters, Rochester MN

Blackdog Archery, Braham MN

Monticello Bait, Monticello MN

DJ's Sporting Goods, Montevideo MN

Beimert Outdoors Pillager

Midwest Archery St Michael

Lewiston Sportsmens Club

Bialka's Bar, Opole MN

Da Fishin' Hole, Little Falls MN

Archery Country Rogers MN

Upcoming meetings open to the public that Brooks is hosting and going over his presentations at:

*Monticello Gun Club Meeting Tuesday January 14th 7 pm at the Monticello Community Center

*January 29th, 2014, from 7-8pm - meet and greet at 6pm in Mora MN, at the "Pine Room", which is located in the Back of Freddies Cafe next to the Chevrolet Garage on HWY 65 as you enter the Town of Mora from the south. Address is 810 Hwy 65 south, Mora Mn 55051

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming off a deer population that was at record highs, it is no surprise that some think the numbers are "too low". Managing wildlife populations is like driving a bus with a lot of play in the steering on a winding road. You will swing from ditch to ditch and your passengers are only happy when you are crossing the center line.

Can anyone post stats showing information that we have habitat that can support 40 to 80 deer per square mile deer density desired by the person in the video? Especially without supplemental sources of nutrition? Winter habitat would never support anywhere near that around here. Especially this year. Winter is a major bottleneck.

The harvest last year was well above the average in the 1980's and just slightly below the average for the 1990's.

I will pass on the petition. Put the effort into habitat instead of this little swerve of the bus.

lakevet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info hockey. I'm sure you won't have a difficult time getting signitures.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Can anyone post stats showing information that we have habitat that can support 40 to 80 deer per square mile deer density desired by the person in the video?

His concerns are for areas being managed for 5-10 dpsm as an example. Areas that there is no reason to have numbers so low.

Example, Did you know area 221 is being managed for less than 10 dpsm and is currently considered above goal because the DNR estimates population levels at around 12 dpsm? for that reason its still an intensive harvest area. Which is absurd.

The reason the numbers are being managed at such low numbers is because of the 2005 stakeholders meetings where the goals were set. Its now 2014, and we are being managed by goals set nearly 10 years ago, with no plans to revisit goal setting for several more years in many areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...Can anyone post stats showing information that we have habitat that can support 40 to 80 deer per square mile deer density desired by the person in the video?...

I'm not the person in the video, but pretty sure he want 25 deer per square mile or half of the carrying capacity, which ever is less for the given area.

If the DNR thinks the carrying capacity is 30 dpsm, no one is arguing for anything more than 15 dpsm.

But maybe that stance has changed....and the goal is 20-25 dpsm statewide????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*January 29th, 2014, from 7-8pm - meet and greet at 6pm in Mora MN, at the "Pine Room", which is located in the Back of Freddies Cafe next to the Chevrolet Garage on HWY 65 as you enter the Town of Mora from the south. Address is 810 Hwy 65 south, Mora Mn 55051

I noticed this meeting was posted yesterday on he Facebook pages of at least three different organizations that support APR and/or QDM. They all seem to have been removed.

That has me scratching my head a little bit. I wonder if there was some concern about the specific date/location, or if something else is going on?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming off a deer population that was at record highs, it is no surprise that some think the numbers are "too low". Managing wildlife populations is like driving a bus with a lot of play in the steering on a winding road. You will swing from ditch to ditch and your passengers are only happy when you are crossing the center line.

Can anyone post stats showing information that we have habitat that can support 40 to 80 deer per square mile deer density desired by the person in the video? Especially without supplemental sources of nutrition? Winter habitat would never support anywhere near that around here. Especially this year. Winter is a major bottleneck.

The harvest last year was well above the average in the 1980's and just slightly below the average for the 1990's.

I will pass on the petition. Put the effort into habitat instead of this little swerve of the bus.

lakevet

Not sure where you are getting anyone saying they want 40-80 dpsm. Also, the current habitat can support far more deer than what is being managed for. What habitat improvements do you suggest?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mora lol, drove there and back yesterday and all fall and west and southwest of Mora in my view has about the highest density of deer I have seen this year in the state of Minnesota. There's a lot of deer right in Mora along the snake river be careful near those bridges have had a few too many near misses over the years especially the bridge NW of town. I hope whacking more timberwolves is also a part of how they plan to gain deer numbers in the state because as low as we are if winter don't kill em a wolf might or stress the animals they're chasing around, we need to up that wolf quota.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your not satisfied w/ deer hunting in MN and want your voice better represented at future stakeholder meetings, please sign the petition. This effort is gaining a lot of traction and the legislators are involved. If you can't make it to one of the above locations, I can PM you a copy of the petition or get in touch w/ Brooks. There is absolutely no reason some areas should be managed for 5-10 dpsm! Time to end the decimation of the MN deer herd and start some sound management.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coming off a deer population that was at record highs, it is no surprise that some think the numbers are "too low". Managing wildlife populations is like driving a bus with a lot of play in the steering on a winding road. You will swing from ditch to ditch and your passengers are only happy when you are crossing the center line.

Can anyone post stats showing information that we have habitat that can support 40 to 80 deer per square mile deer density desired by the person in the video? Especially without supplemental sources of nutrition? Winter habitat would never support anywhere near that around here. Especially this year. Winter is a major bottleneck.

The harvest last year was well above the average in the 1980's and just slightly below the average for the 1990's.

I will pass on the petition. Put the effort into habitat instead of this little swerve of the bus.

lakevet

Nobody is saying we want 40-80 deer per square mile. What we are saying is the biological carrying capacity of most of central MN would be in that range. Marrett Grund with the MN DNR stated as much to me in a phone conversation earlier this year. The problem is that the MN DNR doesn't use biology when determining pre-fawn densities per square mile. Social science is used to do that via a faulty public stakeholder process.

A deer kill over 46% lower in 2013 than in 2003. Absolutely zero biological reason for MN to have such a low deer herd. Lou Cornicelli is on record as saying the kill here should probably be in the neighborhood of 200-220K. We're a longggg ways from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Petitions also located at the following locations

Whitcombs Archery, Princeton MN

Archery Headquarters, Rochester MN

Blackdog Archery, Braham MN

Monticello Bait, Monticello MN

DJ's Sporting Goods, Montevideo MN

Beimert Outdoors Pillager

Midwest Archery St Michael

Lewiston Sportsmens Club

Bialka's Bar, Opole MN

Da Fishin' Hole, Little Falls MN

Archery Country Rogers MN

Upcoming meetings open to the public that Brooks is hosting and going over his presentations at:

*Monticello Gun Club Meeting Tuesday January 14th 7 pm at the Monticello Community Center

*January 29th, 2014, from 7-8pm - meet and greet at 6pm in Mora MN, at the "Pine Room", which is located in the Back of Freddies Cafe next to the Chevrolet Garage on HWY 65 as you enter the Town of Mora from the south. Address is 810 Hwy 65 south, Mora Mn 55051

Where did you find the list of places that have the petition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nobody is saying we want 40-80 deer per square mile. What we are saying is the biological carrying capacity of most of central MN would be in that range. Marrett Grund with the MN DNR stated as much to me in a phone conversation earlier this year. The problem is that the MN DNR doesn't use biology when determining pre-fawn densities per square mile. Social science is used to do that via a faulty public stakeholder process.

A deer kill over 46% lower in 2013 than in 2003. Absolutely zero biological reason for MN to have such a low deer herd. Lou Cornicelli is on record as saying the kill here should probably be in the neighborhood of 200-220K. We're a longggg ways from that.

What changes specifically are being proposed in order to increase the deer population?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Where did you find the list of places that have the petition?

QDMA forums have a LOT of activity on this initiative. I got the info there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Number one it is in motion to change deer density upward regardless of further action. Most deer hunters agree,which is unusual that deer density is way to low.

80 deer per square mile is way too high,you will be paying crop damage constantly and deer yard degradation would be long term damage. Even in 2003, 80 deer per square mile was unheard of,except maybe for some metro area.

Camp Ripley in some of its best years in the early 60's when multi-methods were used to determine population was in the 40-60 deer range.

Every area is different,but a goal of 30-40 would be very good.

Also we may be pushing CWD problems at certain levels.

Meetings are good,be rational and like all things you have pendulum swings.

A side note it seems like from Montana to Wisconsin the deer herds population swings go up and down together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What changes specifically are being proposed in order to increase the deer population? [/quote

The MDDI is asking for two things

1. a drastic reduction in anterless permits for a year, possibly two

2. most importantly...changes to the public stakeholder meeting process. The last time around stakeholders were essentially forced into agreeing to a minimum of a 25% reduction in the deer herd. We want a transparent process and hopefully one where deer groups like MDHA, MBI (MN Bowhunters Inc.), QDMA, and MWA (MN Whitetail Alliance) have the ability to appoint/suggest a least a percentage of the stakeholders. We also want the stakeholder meetings to be videotaped and available for folks to watch, and for the names of stakeholders to be publicly available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

my main concern with all this is the groups that are pushing this realize that more deer is a pre-requisite to their ultimate goal of apr's.

yep, i said it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya B.amish. I too find it interesting that the groups supporting APR have suddenly found this as their current cause du jour.

I'm not saying there's anything fishy going on, but it makes me leery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I too find it interesting that the groups supporting APR have suddenly found this as their current cause du jour.

Absolutely not true. MWA has dropped support of this initiative because it contradicts there stance on APR......

There is not one ounce of APR in any of the presentations, and its not some hidden agenda.

Think what you want I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not true. MWA has dropped support of this initiative because it contradicts there stance on APR......

There is not one ounce of APR in any of the presentations, and its not some hidden agenda.

Think what you want I guess.

Please elaborate on this Hockeybc69. Are you saying the WMA has dropped support of the Deer Density Initiative?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely not true. MWA has dropped support of this initiative because it contradicts there stance on APR......

There is not one ounce of APR in any of the presentations, and its not some hidden agenda.

Think what you want I guess.

Yep, this ^^^ There is absolutely nothing about APR's in the background of this Initiative. It was discussed by the folks who put it together and decided that APR's are a separate issue entirely and not something we wanted to address. MDHA, QDMA, MBI and MWA members (not leaders, MEMBERS) were responsible for putting this Initiative and petition together.

As pointed out above, MWA has decided to focus on APR's and not put their "corporate stamp of approval" on the Initiative and/or the petition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please elaborate on this Hockeybc69. Are you saying the WMA has dropped support of the Deer Density Initiative?

I'd say yes and no. I believe the MWA supports the MDDI and the petition, but have chosen to not make it part of their official/corporate "platform". They are worried about pi$$ing off the DNR and the implications thereof in regards to a future APR push.

The best way to find out MWA's stance would be to contact them through their facebook page I imagine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.