Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

APR's good for hunter recruitment but not for retention?


lakevet

Recommended Posts

Yeah John, your analogy holds zero water and you miss the point entirely. Think of it more in terms of muskie fishing, in which I do share your views more closely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 409
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Big Dave2

    29

  • 96trigger

    28

  • tfran123

    26

  • hockeybc69

    25

Minnesota deer hunting is for everyone, not just for hunters who want big bucks. To have a zone with APRs is wrong. If that was the only way to get big bucks, possibly you would have a reasonable reason for them. There are big bucks in Minnesota without the APRs. Don't deprive hunters so you can have what you want. Just like the slot limits that limit the size northerns you can keep, just so there are bigger ones for those who can't catch enough big ones. If a lake or hunting zone needs to be closed for a good reason, other than only to get bigger fish and deer, than close it until the proper goal is met. If the only way you will be happy is shooting a big deer or catching a big fish, I feel sorry for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can guaranty one thing spike.....you will be waaaay more pi&&ed off if you have to let a forky walk by then I will be if I don't shoot a big buck. Who's to be felt sorry for here now?? I'll have pepper sticks in my freezer this year one way or another whether that comes from a big buck....or a doe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rut is pretty much over here, fawns are back with the does now.

Since there's a lack of doe population around here, I doubt the bucks will be coming back through. As a matter of fact I know they won't.

The scrapes will get worked again if there were more does that havn't been bred during the first cycle. And I'll be checking them often just for grins.

I hope to see some monsters taken with muzzies soon.

But with the statewide doe harvest being down, I'd gamble

to say there's not going to be enough for a hand count that's going to fill a big buck dream this muzzie season.

If we really hold out for that buck who's score is going to be a record book deer, that may mean waiting years to achieve that goal. For what it means to wait for a mature deer, you just might want to wait about 6 years when bucks achieve maximum antler growth. Not really something I can hang my hat on to pass along for hunter retention.

Shooting more does over 6 years.. times the thousands of hunters over 6 years. The buck harvest was up this year. That gives apr hunters a fresh start all over again. 6 more years ain't to long to wait for the next big buck is it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 years? Hmmmm....not sure since my cameras are still full of 120-140" bucks....along with the 170" 10 pointer I've been chasing. But again I must just be the lucky one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone, figures they should be able to have a "shot" at a "big" deer every season...look at the record books, look at the dates....you all expect "someone else" to do it for you!

[Note from admin: Your post has been edited. Please read forum policy before posting again. Thank you.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The best part of this is fox is actually sitting at home laughing because he thinks he really sent out a zinger there.....lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox, Don't worry they are not going to put APR up north you can continue to shoot your spikes every year. So worried what is happening in zones where you don't hunt....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

James, I've let eight pointers walk by. I don't get mad because I chose to let it go. APRs should be voluntary only. If you're not a good enough hunter to get a big deer without the APRs, than go without. Don't deprive someone shooting any size buck he wants, so a few can shoot bigger ones, because of APRs. The D.N.R. has no business limiting deer, only to have more larger ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well spike the majority of zone 3 hunters were in favor of implementing APRs and the support for APRs has only grown since people have seen the results. So you can have your opinion....that's fine....but the majority of zone 3 hunters don't have a problem being told they can't shoot a forkhorn. So let's quit pretending that its just a "few" people who like the idea of seeing more mature bucks in the woods because that is a complete fallacy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am sure APR's help, but people forget that hunting for a lot is spending time with friends and family. The group my dad hunts with has 9 people, and they have lost almost all of their access over the last5 years. this year they shoot a 6pt, a doe and a fawn. they were all happy with them as they hunt for deer to eat. For all of those who say just shoot a doe, they didn't get a chance and without the 6pt would have had hardly any deer meat. Also what do you do if you do not have a doe tag? easy to say shoot a doe if you are in a two deer zone or hunter's choice area. Part of the problem is society is in the everybody has to win, you see in in schools all the time in sports for kids, everybody gets a trophy. They call big bucks trophy deer because not everyone gets one. It is what part of the allure of deer hunting is about. Leave it up to the person to decide what their idea of a trophy is. last time i checked you can't eat the antlers anyways!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's some flawed math, or thinking

it wer'nt me who said they shoot big mature bucks, or does only.

I guess to bring the discusion into reality we'd have to forgo what APR's really was intended for and not worry none about harvesting mature bucks.

In most cases even 4-1/2 year old mature bucks will be hard to find.

If we take a step back even further we're lookin at immature 3-1/2 year olds.

And then with social structure in the herd, there's not much a chance that the

2-1/2 year olds will be hanging around in just one spot during rut.

still waiting on the muzzie reports.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well spike the majority of zone 3 hunters were in favor of implementing APRs and the support for APRs has only grown since people have seen the results. So you can have your opinion....that's fine....but the majority of zone 3 hunters don't have a problem being told they can't shoot a forkhorn. So let's quit pretending that its just a "few" people who like the idea of seeing more mature bucks in the woods because that is a complete fallacy.

I wouldn't be so sure. All we know for sure is that the majority of those who chose to participate in a survey were in favor. My guess is that people in favor of APRs would have been more likely to participate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking about the survey sent out to 3,000 random zone 3 hunters. You are talking something totally different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking about the survey sent out to 3,000 random zone 3 hunters. You are talking something totally different.

I have family who have quit hunting due to too many regulations. It's just too much for them to fret over just to go shoot a deer. Shouldn't they be surveyed too? They would hunt again if there weren't so many regs. So, surveying current hunters isn't really surveying all hunters. In this case it was just the people they wanted to survey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm talking about the survey sent out to 3,000 random zone 3 hunters. You are talking something totally different.

The survey was sent to 3000 zone 3 hunters or 3000 zone 3 hunters participated in the survey? Either way I'm still guessing that the those who are in favor of APRs were more apt to participate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, but Pike, you cant ask your 4 kids that are under 8 years old either. laugh

My home survey just came back with 4 "for" APR, and zero against. smile

My 10 year old daughter and wife have no clue though. LOLLLL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Either way I'm still guessing that the those who are in favor of APRs were more apt to participate.

Now why would that be the case?? People strongly against it surely would take the time to voice their opinions.

Thats like saying people that are against a local issue that is being voted on, means the naysayers just stay away from the polls because they are against it??? I hardly think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now why would that be the case?? People strongly against it surely would take the time to voice their opinions.

Thats like saying people that are against a local issue that is being voted on, means the naysayers just stay away from the polls because they are against it??? I hardly think so.

Of course it is just my opinion but I believe it is human nature. At the time the survey was conducted APR's were not the law of the land so a lot of people either didn't understand fully what they were or just didn't care enough to get involved. Those who were in favor of APRs were trying to change an existing law so they are naturally going to be more vocal.

Those who are for APRs would probably be considered a bit more progressive and a bit more apt to complete a survey like this than those who are against which could also skew the numbers.

I had this experience a couple of years ago when I went to city hall to fight a proposed street improvement assessment in my neighborhood. Every effected property owner was notified and most I spoke to before the meeting were against the proposal. Much to my dismay when I attended the meeting there was about 4 or 5 property owners who were in favor of the project and they were all in attendance. I was in the minority at the meeting but when everyone in the neighborhood got their notification that the project had been approved all I heard was grumbling from the neighbors. If all of those that opposed the project would have been at the meeting we would have been the vast majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

O.K., I'm back home and just want to post my recap of my last day in zone 3 today. And God help me this will be my last comment on this thread. grin

Last night the 3 deer I finally did see didn't get up until the end of legal light. I could see them pretty easily through my scope at almost 100 yards through the woods but it was too late to take the shot.

This morning back in the same stand the wind was bad so I moved. I decided to take a walk down the hill on a tote road that skirts a great bedding area. I knew the wind would be shifting but planned to keep moving and hopefully get within sight of something before I got busted. Not long into the decent I see a scrape with fresh tracks and a wet spot between them. YES. I make sure I have my grunt tube handy and then hear a grunt from on the hillside just out of view. I grunt back and doe bleat a couple times while assuming the sitting position. A doe suddenly materializes but I don't have my gun shouldered. My ears let me down on that one. She picks me off but I stay frozen until she gets behind the tree. I shoulder and wait for her to reapper. Too long - the wind shifts and she bolts. I never saw the buck.

I get up and keep moving and find another deer. I shoulder and see through the scope that its a small buck (4 points total) below me. I sit down and watch him as he browses out of sight for a moment. Suddenly alot of commotion is going on near him and I see two other bucks sparring. I look closely and see one MAY be legal but don't have a clear enough view. Meanwhile the first buck comes back toward me and beds down no more than 50 yards away. After about 15 minutes of the other two pushing each other around, they break. The bigger one, a 6 point including brown tines comes over to the bedded buck and starts sparring him while he's laying there. He gets up and messes with the bigger guy for a little bit then starts walking away but the bigger one paces him. By this time the other buck, another 4 pointer joins them. Well the first 4 pointer suddenly looks right at me while I'm watching him through my scope. The 6 comes up to him and starts licking the 4s face all over! The 4 is trying to look at me and shake off the licking 6 pointer. Finally the 4 head butts him and gets a good enough view of me to make him take off with the others in tow.

Those were the last deer I saw for my trip on likely my second and last day of deer hunting in MN and possibly this year. We have no deer in the freezer but that little incident made the weekend for me. Who do I blame for me not having deer in my freezer? No one. Not the BWA, the DNR or the Legislature. Would this seemingly staunch APR supporter have shot one of those bucks if there were no APRs in effect? This year I would have. This year with limited time in the field I was again looking for any legal adult deer. BUT I'm confident my family will make it through the winter without the venison in the freezer. I can use all the gas money I've saved on hunting trips and buy beef, pork and chicken I guess. I'd like to meet that scrappy 6 pointer again some day though. I'm sure he'll grow another 2.

My conclusion about this debate and why I'm done with it is that BOTH sides are centered on greed. Neither side is better than the other in that regard. Think about it. And because greed is the driver, It won't be settled in this thread. Time will settle it someday but that's a ways out.

Good luck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

......there is actually a couple other surveys that can be referenced as well.....

I also read the report that said the total number of days hunted was 4 from Z3 hunters. Now that'd actually be about 12 to 16 hours stand time on average for the year.

...wow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you are fundamentally against APR, there is no amount of data or enough surveys that will satisfy you and get you to change your mind. Arguing about it will get nowhere. I've argued plenty on here, entertaining at first, but just plain old after awhile. There will be more meetings and surveys before the 2013 season. For or against APR, you will have a chance to voice your opinion and I suggest you do. I am going to, and I hope APRs stay. Most of the people I have talked to in this area hope they stay. My belief is that they will. If they do not, I will not quit hunting, neither will my party. In fact, I will not change a thing. I will still, like I have for 10 years, pass on forks and baskets. As will my party. The land owners we hunt with do not want to see immature bucks get shot anymore. As do most of the land owners around us. I will shoot a doe for meat. I will continue to work just as hard for those more mature bucks and does, hunting all 3 seasons if need be, eating tag after tag. If APR goes away, I think enough people have seen a benefit from it to continue the practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...If APR goes away, I think enough people have seen a benefit from it to continue the practice.

I think you are onto something here.

If enough folks voluntarily pass on young bucks then there will be no need for the APR rule. The tough part is going to be where the APR's have helped the most, the public lands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you are onto something here.

If enough folks voluntarily pass on young bucks then there will be no need for the APR rule. The tough part is going to be where the APR's have helped the most, the public lands.

Maybe APR's could go away on private lands, and the DNR, State, County (whoever owns a certain parcel of public land) could impose APR's on certain properties? This would allow individuals to "shoot what they want" on their own lands, but keep in place the APR's which the majority of the public appears to have liked.

I know people will talk about the inability to enforce such a rule; but I find that to be a minor speed bump. Most people are honest and lawabiding; and if one individual isn't, the chances are another person on the public land is. Also, there are a ton of laws in place that are difficult to enforce (think speeding), but we have those restrictions anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think we want to be establishing different regulations for hunting private and public land, especially as private land hunters already have many advantages over public land hunters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.