Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Federal Duck Stamp Increase


Recommended Posts

I don't know the statistics on the duck stamp prices, but been a long time since the stamp price increased. It's time for an increase to save more wetlands. I'm in favor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not in favor of the increase. Will I pay it...sure, I love to duck hunt but in all honesty geez get with it people that are saying they would gladly pay whatever. Hey if thats the way you feel make a private donation to DU or MWA. Just my 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I'm curious as to how you think they would go about enforcing it. It is pretty obvious when one is duck hunting. I would think it would be tough to classify who is a bird watcher and who is just enjoying the outdoors.

One possible way...In WA state, anyone using a state wildlife area has to have a decal. You get it free when you buy a hunting license. If it's not on your car and a CO sees you without it, you'll get a ticket (I think it's only like $60, if memory serves).

There could be an attachment to the actual duck stamp that hangs from the rear view mirror, with similar rules. Of course, it's only be enforceable on refuges.

I agree - I think bird watchers, hikers, ATVers, snowmobilers, and anyone using public lands should be pitching in to support them. If the law doesn't say you have to, you should be doing it on your own, anyway. Just my opinion.

As far as the price of the stamp, it hasn't changed since 1991, so an increase is way overdue. If $30 seems like too much, think of all the years we only had to pay $15 when it should have been more.

I think something like 95% of all stamp fees go towards buying more land specifically for waterfowl or upkeeping the lands already in the agency's possession. I don't know how DU or other private groups compare to that, but I'd be surprised if it was as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not in favor of the increase. Will I pay it...sure, I love to duck hunt but in all honesty geez get with it people that are saying they would gladly pay whatever. Hey if thats the way you feel make a private donation to DU or MWA. Just my 2c

I just don't get the argument that a $15 or $25 or $50 stamp is too expensive; yet nobody balks at dropping $40 for a meal with the wife, $60 to fill up the fishing boat, or spending $400 on a pair of packers/vikings tickets. The money you pay for a federal stamp = more ducks. Those who complain about license prices and stamp prices have the right to do so, but they should not have the right to complain about the lack of ducks or hunting opportunities then. Without the revenue from the stamps, there would be a lot less ducks and a lot less places to hunt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think an increase should be considered and I think that anyone using a WPA or National Wildlife refuge should have the stamp. I don't duck hunt much but buy the stamps every year. I use those lands a lot for pheasant hunting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

carpshooter your so right on the money (no pun intended)

I stated before that the increase is less than a box of shells.

Its like the guy that complains about the high gas prices and he speeds by you at 85 miles an hour.

This is something we will all have to deal with as the price of our sport will never decrease it will only increase that goes from the gas in our trucks to the shells in the blind bag. The times dictate the rise in stamp costs and what better way to fund the waterfowl than thru that.

Yes we can make donation to other entities but you will still end up having to pay to play.

I for one will pay to play Just my 2c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The money you pay for a federal stamp = more ducks. Those who complain about license prices and stamp prices have the right to do so, but they should not have the right to complain about the lack of ducks or hunting opportunities then. Without the revenue from the stamps, there would be a lot less ducks and a lot less places to hunt.

That is simply wrong in most years !!!

While 98% of the money is spent on land acquisition and easement leases, the amount of land is small compared to what remains in private ownership.

Vast majority of ducks hatched in the US are from private lands. Federal duck stamp money has no impact on the Canada ducks that are hatched.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is simply wrong in most years !!!

While 98% of the money is spent on land acquisition and easement leases, the amount of land is small compared to what remains in private ownership.

Vast majority of ducks hatched in the US are from private lands. Federal duck stamp money has no impact on the Canada ducks that are hatched.

Obviously more ducks are hatched on private land. I'm not ever going to argue to the contrary. But I've seen enough research and tromped around the eastern dakotas and western minnesota to know that the 3 million acres in the prairie pothole region that has had some sort of investment from federal duck stamp dollars is some of the best duck producing ground in the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carp,

Sorry, but again you seem misinformed.

I assume that the 3 million plus acres you are referring to is CRP. CRP and CREP are ag program that are run by the USDA. That federal money is from a different budget and NOT from Duck Stamp revenue.

No Fed Duck Stamp money has been used to purchase that land, the land is privately owned and farmers are paid by the USDA not to plant crops. The USF&WS has little if any involvement with CRP.

I guess it maybe possible that a few acres enrolled in CRP are also enrolled in a Federal easement, dont know the rules. We should make sure the Feds are not paying twice to conserve the same land.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carp,

Sorry, but again you seem misinformed.

I assume that the 3 million plus acres you are referring to is CRP. CRP and CREP are ag program that are run by the USDA. That federal money is from a different budget and NOT from Duck Stamp revenue.

No Fed Duck Stamp money has been used to purchase that land, the land is privately owned and farmers are paid by the USDA not to plant crops. The USF&WS has little if any involvement with CRP.

I guess it maybe possible that a few acres enrolled in CRP are also enrolled in a Federal easement, dont know the rules. We should make sure the Feds are not paying twice to conserve the same land.

http://www.fws.gov/duckstamps/

Your assumption is wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Help me Carpy. I have seen these pages and this link many times before.

Show me where Federal Duck stamps have secured 3 million acres in Dakotas and Western MN.

I see about 165,000 acres in Federal Refuges (combined MN and both Dakotas) secured with Duck Stamp dollars.

http://www.fws.gov/refuges/realty/pdf/MBCFacres2010.pdf

WPAs account for another 650,000 acres or so, but that is over the entire US.

Easements are another 2 million acres, but this again is across the entire US and it is not land owned, but "leased".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey thanks. Good report. And for the most part the numbers match my numbers above - should I pulled from another part of the same web site.

Really trying to determine whether the easement numbers are accumulative or net total. The easement information is not as clearly defined. Do they count the same acres over as leases are renewed or shifted from temporary to permanent?

Looks like my $15 is spent fine. Still cannot support an increase. It appears that they are still protecting less than 10 - 15% of the available habitat in the Dakota and Western MN. Changes in draintile rules and wetland loss are still key to longer term protection and out of scope for USFWS dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey thanks. Good report. And for the most part the numbers match my numbers above - should I pulled from another part of the same web site.

Really trying to determine whether the easement numbers are accumulative or net total. The easement information is not as clearly defined. Do they count the same acres over as leases are renewed or shifted from temporary to permanent?

Looks like my $15 is spent fine. Still cannot support an increase. It appears that they are still protecting less than 10 - 15% of the available habitat in the Dakota and Western MN. Changes in draintile rules and wetland loss are still key to longer term protection and out of scope for USFWS dollars.

I can't answer your easement question off the top of my head, but I will be hunting with a bunch of usfws staff towards the end of september; one of them should have some good insight.

I agree that there is only so much that the feds can do with the money they have, but unlike MN DNR for example, the feds try to obtain the best of the best, and then improve it as well. MN DNR seems to think that simply buying as much land as they can is the answer. Look at the quality difference on WMA's vs. WPA's in western MN. WPA's are being grazed for grass regeneration, trees are being cut down for less avian predator perches, etc.

My contention will always be that of all the federal programs out there, the duck stamp program is actually one that is done with little waste and seems to be managed properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree the quality of the WPAs are far superior to MN WMA in most all cases. The initial management and the continued management is often far superior.

Heck where we hunt prairie chickens the MN WMA land is beginning to have volunteer trees and cedars. If the DNR cannot prioritize and burn this land to keep it grass, what can they do.

Too often the MN WMA land is a swamp that is donated or acquired via tax forfeit. Federal land usually is more balanced in its habitats.

Too bad that more of the 2-3 million acres in easements in ND, MN and SD are generally not open to hunting by the general public. Guess in benefits those unafraid to ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree the quality of the WPAs are far superior to MN WMA in most all cases. The initial management and the continued management is often far superior.

Heck where we hunt prairie chickens the MN WMA land is beginning to have volunteer trees and cedars. If the DNR cannot prioritize and burn this land to keep it grass, what can they do.

Too often the MN WMA land is a swamp that is donated or acquired via tax forfeit. Federal land usually is more balanced in its habitats.

Too bad that more of the 2-3 million acres in easements in ND, MN and SD are generally not open to hunting by the general public. Guess in benefits those unafraid to ask.

I would venture to guess that hunting is a distant second place to duck production when it comes to those easements. Personally, don't have a problem with non-access to the easements. If you can't find a spot to shoot ducks or geese in the Dakota's right now, you should take up golf smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.