Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

.223 for deer?


HandGunner

Recommended Posts

.223 for deer? out of a kel tec plr16 pistol 9.5 inch barrel?

MV is said to be 2600 out of the pistol. were i hunt max yardage id be able to shoot from my stand is only 100 yards and less most being 30-50 yards. Im in my 4th year of hunting deer. Not to brag but im a good shot and perform shots even better under pressure at times. seeing most of the deer shot by students in my class almost all of them have 2-5 shots in them all being from butt to belly shots and of all my years of hunting all my shots were in the vitals and one i have shot was quartering away and i knew were to place the shot it was a gut shot that led into the heart which dropped the deer so i know what im doing.

so .223 for deer with my kind of shots. Yes? No?

if your wondering about accuracy the pistol is said to have sub 2MOA which is sureley enough for a 100 yard shot. I plan to buy a Kel Tec PLR16

Link to comment
Share on other sites

with the right bullet and good shot placement, yes a 223 will take a deer

the right bullet?

I would only use expanding bullets for deer FMJ's are a never in my book because it be like a arrow with a field point on a deer.

only expanders is what i use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, this has been discussed before here and I believe that Barnes makes a 65 or 63 grain TSX bullet that would be great in 223 on a deer. I would think that 65 grains is about the lightest I would use on a deer. for sure you want a quality bullet, a soft point would probably do better than a hollow point. I would shy away from the 68 grain target match bullets though, the jackets are too thin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. Why? You are an excellent you tell us shot so why not use an adequate cartridge/bullet and drop deer cleanly? All your students have " deer with two to five bullet holes in them..." I don't think they've learned very well if that's the best shooting they can do.

Pardon me but I am just puzzled by this insistence on moving toward lightweight, marginally capable cartridges to kill animals. How about the obligation we each have to make clean quick kills.

I'd be embarrassed to tears to admit I fired two to five shots into a deer!!

Sure.....you can DO all kinds of things with various weapons. But remember, we have an obligation to make quick clean kills. It's the least a true sportsman can do.

If you want a toy to play with fine but give the deer a break please and use something more humane.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay. Why? You are an excellent you tell us shot so why not use an adequate cartridge/bullet and drop deer cleanly? All your students have " deer with two to five bullet holes in them..." I don't think they've learned very well if that's the best shooting they can do.

Pardon me but I am just puzzled by this insistence on moving toward lightweight, marginally capable cartridges to kill animals. How about the obligation we each have to make clean quick kills.

I'd be embarrassed to tears to admit I fired two to five shots into a deer!!

Sure.....you can DO all kinds of things with various weapons. But remember, we have an obligation to make quick clean kills. It's the least a true sportsman can do.

If you want a toy to play with fine but give the deer a break please and use something more humane.

whoa so quick to judge... why do you think im asking then?

i do believe its true to get em down quickly but even still a 308 can still make a deer run for a good minute or 2. next time just give an opinion and sugestion rather than lash out

yes im a big caliber hunter some or most ppl i know blame me for going over kill but is it wrong for me to blame them for going under kill? or does it even matter as long as it will do its job?

Me 50ae desert eagle over kill? ive done it b4

now me .223? underkill?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well Gunner, keep in mind I was asking WHY do we want to play around with a small caliber only marginally capable of killing a deer.Why not use a cartridge that is ballistically designed to do the job? Why don't we ALL agree that it CAN, under ideal circumstances...and then move along to using something more realistic as a deer cartridge.

If I sound judgmental it is my dismay at seeing the increasing evidence of poor marksmanship, and lack of hunting ethics in the field today. I have many friends who have been shooting deer with handguns for the past thirty years. They shoot large bore long barreled handguns at relatively close range-under 100 yards-and they get in lots of PRACTICE. They are proud of one shot kills.

So okay?.....we ALL agree.....the .223 CAN kill a deer. BUT.... can we ALL agree it is not the BEST way to kill a deer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ufatz,

If you have many friends using handguns for deer for then I'm sure some use a .44mag, right??? If so do you have a problem with that?

The reason I ask is because that's obviously considered an acceptable cartridge for deer size game by most reasonable hunters and you're looking at roughly 1,200 ft-lbs (depending on particular load, of course) and roughly 1,300 ft-lbs of energy with a .223.

Seems adequate to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shot a big doe with a 53 grain barnes tsx out of a T/C pro hunter. It went 15 yards. Totally destroyed the lungs.

I also have a Kel-Tec .223 pistol. I have found it to be very accurate, even with factory ammo. I have thought about using it for deer hunting but have not yet and not sure if i will. I am going to take it prairie dog shooting this year to see how it really shoots

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your last sentence is accurate.....it is ADEQUATE. Not PROPER.....not IDEAL...not recommended....but ADEQUATE. So is the .223.

The big ol' slug out of a .44 mag packs a solid punch compared to the gnat tweak of a little bitty .223 bullet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sunny and Elwood: please go back and read my note again....the part where I suggest we can ALL agree that a .223 WILL kill a deer with proper shot placement.

In the immortal words of Robert Ruarks old book (for those of you who read).....Use Enough Gun.

Ha Ha.....carry on fella's Keep up the pot belly stove tradition of arguing ballastics. But every once in a while somebody's gotta come along and toss in a teaspoon of common sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A rifle in .223 can cleanly take a deer, I've seen it done. I don't have any idea whether a round fired from a pistol will generate enough energy to do it. But regardless of whether or not in CAN be done, why not just use a round that is much more suitable for the job? Reading your other posts, I know you've got pistols in much more suitable calibers for deer.

If you're just looking for an excuse to get something new, there's always paper that needs punching. Plus, you wouldn't want the people on the manufacturing line to be short of work, would you? Economic health and all that. grin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no real excuse... the DE is having accuracy problems right now we need to look into it. the shotty has taken 3 deer so far but the accuracy is also starting to be questioned... finaly the first gun we should be able to tell accuracy which is our TC encore in 308 15 inch barrel

like i said were big handgunners and the kel tec is said to have pretty impressive accuracy for its type. all other ar style handguns only come in 223 except for one i have seen its in a 308 but its a $1500 gun so....

also one post said a good old 44mag... so a 44 mag going in the 1500fps range vs a .223 going in the 2500 range, wouldnt it be close to the same ft/lbs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will you be getting 2500 fps with .223 out of a shorter barrel? I honestly don't know what the number is, but I'd be surprised if it's the same as from a rifle or carbine-length barrel.

Also, the .44 will be making a much bigger hole, and there will be no question of a bullet coming completely apart before reaching vitals. As one of the other posters mentioned, we have a responsibility to make a kill as quickly, cleanly, and RELIABLY as we can. To me, .223 seems like a marginal selection at best, and in this case there's really no reason to be working right on the margin.

It just seems to me that there are options that don't present any questions, and leave a little room for unforeseen circumstances, so those would be better options to pursue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not about the size of the projectile being launched, its about energy delivered to the target. The 223 is a very accurate round, low recoil, etc. thus making it a good choice because it will deliver nearly all its energy to the correct spot. The factor that stops game is the wound channel and disruption of the nervous system along with damage to vital organs, not just a big hole. The 223 is more than adequate to deliver a lethal blow. That said, a long gun or AR style will do the job, however before going after a deer with a 223 in a handgun I would check the velocities I was getting and make sure it is still packing that punch, the cartridges are designed with powders that burn a little longer and are matched to 16-24 inch barrels typically. I think we cap about put this to rest as everyone has posted that a 223 was used to hunt deer reports dropped in their tracks or went about 10-20 feet. Other states have allowed them for years without problems, and I'm sure there was research done before deciding to allow use in MN.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since you are talking about semantics now, I said adequate as in SUFFICIENT, or ACCEPTABLE. Not as in the opposite of proper. As in dead is dead.

As I previously mentioned, that "solid punch" you're talking about from the 44 mag measures almost exactly the same as the "gnat tweak" of the .223 in ft/lbs. Meaning the difference in bullet type will have more impact on the wound channel than caliber, if you're comparing those two calibers.

I believe attention to basic marksmanship, at least, including properly zeroing a weapon, has a much larger affect on a clean kill than caliber selection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
its not about the size of the projectile being launched, its about energy delivered to the target. The 223 is a very accurate round, low recoil, etc. thus making it a good choice because it will deliver nearly all its energy to the correct spot. The factor that stops game is the wound channel and disruption of the nervous system along with damage to vital organs, not just a big hole. The 223 is more than adequate to deliver a lethal blow. That said, a long gun or AR style will do the job, however before going after a deer with a 223 in a handgun I would check the velocities I was getting and make sure it is still packing that punch, the cartridges are designed with powders that burn a little longer and are matched to 16-24 inch barrels typically. I think we cap about put this to rest as everyone has posted that a 223 was used to hunt deer reports dropped in their tracks or went about 10-20 feet. Other states have allowed them for years without problems, and I'm sure there was research done before deciding to allow use in MN.

Yes sir, good points. I'll also add that controlled expansion bullets that'll stay together are a good choice for high velocity/smaller diameter calibers.

The Nosler partition, offered by Federal in their 60grn Vital Shock ammo and the Winchester 64grn Power Point are a couple examples as far as factory ammo goes!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If dead is dead is the goal, a fist-sized rock or a .22lr should do the trick. I don't go hunting because killing stuff is fun. I'm a meat hunter, and one of my goals is to maximize usable meat in the freezer. Read the wikipedia (I know, but it's a start) article on the 5.56 NATO round. If you only read one section, read the one titled "Performance". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5.56x45mm_NATO

I know that the round will get the job done with proper barrel-length and bullet selection, and good marksmanship. I think anatomy knowledge of your target is also particularly important for this round because the margin for error is so slim. To be honest, how many times, in a hunting situation, have you taken a shot that is less than totally ideal? I think most hunters have, and I don't want to run too close to any one margin if I can avoid it. Selection of a round is one way to avoid the margins, and I don't think .223 is far enough away from the margins.

Tom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As was stated a .223 is capeable of taking a deer and it is shot placement that is the key to this round as with any to make a clean ethical kill.

This is no differnt that useing a bow and arrow. By this I mean you need to have the perfct shot placement to ethicaly kill a deer.

There are better calibers to take deer but thi will get the job done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I shot a doe last season with my Colt SP1 AR-15 .223. She went 10 yards and dropped at 115 yards. As you all stated shot placement is key, but just as important is the bullet you choose. The 60gr nosler partition was an amazing round, but beware of what twist your barrel has. Pay attention to what the foot pounds are at what distances, the .223 is close to 1,000 foot pounds of energy at 100 yards, its drops to less then 700 at 200 yards. Shot much over 100 yards should not be taken.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The .223 is an irresposible way to take a deer...we owe them a better death than that.

a bullet uses shock and bullet exspantion to destroy the vtals to take em down... a arrow takes game by cutting of major arteries and veins in the vitals. so what it seems like your saying is that bowhunting is irresposible.

looking twards getting a RRA ar-15 pistol 10 inch barrel. Who knos this is all hapenng kinda fast right now. i think the RRA pisol shooting a .223 is good for deer out to 100 yards max. like i said were i hunt its not like i got time to shoot deer out at a distance otherwise id be carrying a bolt action rifle besides handguns and shottys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

223's have been killing 200lb men for years I would think a deer should be no problem.

This is actually not true. Most of our enemy kills come from very large caliber guns, artillery, tanks, aircraft, helo's. In my 3 deployments overseas, this bullet is a joke. Full metal jacket...to fast, not enough expansion. As a shooter/medic, I worked on many many gunshot wounds. Some very well placed shots did very little damage. Imagine a #2 pencil shaped hole through a body. If your off your mark just a little...nothing but a sore spot on the guy. If you decide to use this weapon to hunt, you better spend some serious time at the range and shooting many different types of bullets. Sub-sonic varmint rounds would be my choice. whistle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is why in vietnam they they were trying out heavier bullets, 70gr. This would cause the bullet to tumble with the 1:12 twist creating a bigger hole. Unfortunetly the sub-sonic varmit round would be your worst choice for deer, as the bullet will fragment to pieces on impact. You need controlled expansion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hevi...your probably right about deer. I just mean for killing factor, they are devasting and thru a suppressor..very very quiet!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.