Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

CWD in Minnesota


flipper

Recommended Posts

This just in:

Preliminary results indicate CWD detected in a deer near Pine Island north of Rochester.

More to come.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to me that it's awfully close to that big elk operation they closed a while back because of CWD. How much is it going to cost to work on this outbreak? IMO all those fenced in deer and elk operations ought to be closed. No way will they ever come close to covering the costs of things like this. What good are they?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tom, that was my first thought as well - right next to that large elk operation. certainly could be coincidental... but that would be my first culprit to check out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pine Island is 1/2 way between TC and Rochestor on 52. I think most of the Wisconsin CWD is more in the middle of the state by the Dells area.

Here's the deal. The elk producer probably is long gone, bankrupt, whatever. It has already cost nearly a million to secure the place (unsuccessfully from what I've read) and now it is going to cost huge dollars to deal with the problem. Wisconsin ended up trying to eliminate deer in their CWD area. Will that have to happen here?

What are those elk farms for? What benefit are they other than to provide some racks for some rich dude who's too lazy to go get his own?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not arguing for or against elk farms but they sell meat and velvet off of the racks to other countries for medicinal purposes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
Pine Island is 1/2 way between TC and Rochestor on 52. I think most of the Wisconsin CWD is more in the middle of the state by the Dells area.

Pine Island is 10 miles from Rochester and 70 miles from the twin cities, thats not quite half way.

I will be listening to what the DNR plans are. In the thousands of deer shot down here, one infected with CWD was going to happen sooner or later. There are couple of deer farms down here. Maybe the Elk Farm was the culprit, we won't know. The question now is, what is going to get done about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

a cattle farm gave wild deer in northern minnesota TB that cost all of us millions too. (and still costing us). we couldnt string up all the cattle producers for this and blame them could we? havn't heard anything about this yet, but if its true it is going to be a bad deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the DNR implaments a "TB Zone" in SE MN like the one in northern MN we're going to hear a LOT about it. Ouch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow. its very true. just read it off the dnr website. this is going to be a huge blow to all of us in the state of minnesota. we have to be together on this one gentleman and not do the blame game. this is going to hurt every hunting industry here as well as the ag related ones. its a sad day for us all in minnesota

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The elk farm and property around it (around 1000 acres) was sold to Tower Investments a few years back before the elk were found to have CWD.

They were required to maintain high fences and other barriers so that deer wouldn't be able to make it on the property. But I did read a couple months ago that there were fences that were were found to have fallen down and weren't maintained.

That deer was shot 3 miles sw of Pine Island which is Olmstead County...where we hunt. Great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

lol i was just about to post a thready about this... any whoo well im hunting south east MN about an hour or 2 further south from rochester... CWD is it any harm to us if we eat a deer with it? im not sure how any caged deer would get to the state land i hunt on but its possible they do travel far.

so wats the game plan the DNR is thinking of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from the Strib:

A deer killed by an archer in southeast Minnesota last fall is believed to have been infected by chronic wasting disease, the first wild whitetail in the state to be stricken.

Preliminary tests show that a doe felled Nov. 28 near Pine Island in Olmsted County carried the disease. Very little of the animal has been eaten by the hunter or his family, the Department of Natural Resources reported Friday morning, and authorities will pick up the butchered meat for further testing.

CWD is not believed to pose a danger to humans, though hunters and others who eat venison and elk meat are warned that an animal’s brains and spinal cord should be avoided.

The deer was killed about three miles from a captive elk farm near Pine Island that had been shut down recently after CWD was identified in its herd, which subsequently was “de-populated,’’ or killed in its entirety.

DNR big game coordinator Lou Cornicelli said Friday there is no way to determine how the wild deer became infected.

Before it was shot, the animal appeared thin, the archer recalled, but otherwise behaved normally. CWD can gestate in an infected animal for as long as four years before clinical signs of the disease are detected and the animal dies.

The archer has asked state authorities to remain anonymous.

First discovered in Minnesota in a captive elk herd near Aitkin in 2002, and since found in three other captive elk herds, the disease had not previously been found here in wild animals despite continual testing by the DNR.

The National Veterinary Services Laboratory in Ames, Iowa, is expected to confirm the initial diagnosis of the Minnesota deer next week.

“It’s possible but not likely,’’ the lab will find the deer wasn’t infected, Cornicelli said.

CWD has long been found in some wild deer in the southern half of Wisconsin, but Cornicelli said the approximate distance between the infected Minnesota animal and the nearest Wisconsin deer found to have CWD was about 150 miles.

DNR and state public health officials were in the Pine Island area Friday morning contacting landowners. Next week the DNR will begin aerial surveys over a region within about a 10-mile radius of where the animal was killed to estimate the number of deer there.

Fixed-winged aircraft will be used initially to find concentrations of deer. Then helicopters will be employed to finalize the population survey.

Researchers and deer managers will establish the area as a CWD-infected zone and finalize a plan that will include killing and sampling a portion of deer there to see if the disease has spread.

Recreational deer feeding within the infected zone will be banned by DNR rule, Cornicelli said.

It’s possible the public will be asked to help kill deer in the area, Cornicelli said. Or DNR sharpshooters will be employed.

Given the difficulty of culling a large enough sample of deer to test, Cornicelli said, it’s likely “as many deer as possible’’ will be killed for testing.

Landowners in the area will have the final determination whether to allow hunting or sharpshooting on their property, said Ed Boggess, acting DNR fish and wildlife division director.

“This is very unfortunate,” said Tom Landwehr, DNR commissioner. “Minnesotans have done much to prevent CWD from entering our wild deer population. The good news is that we are well prepared for an attempt to control the disease and to possibly eliminate it.”

Though all elk have been removed from the Pine Island farm, and the area remains encircled by a high fence, some white-tailed deer have been found within its confines.

But all of those deer are believed to have been killed, said Dr. Paul Anderson of the Minnesota state board of animal health.

“The fence is in good condition,’’ Anderson said. “If deer got in there it’s probably because a gate had been left open. To our knowledge, they’ve all been killed.’’

Cattle are kept inside the fences now, but cattle are not known to be susceptible to CWD.

In deer and elk, CWD can be transmitted by animal-to-animal contact, and can also be picked up from soil and the urine or feces of infected animals.

In Wisconsin, CWD appears to be endemic in some regions among its wild deer, and wildlife officials there have not been able to eliminate it, possibly because it was discovered after too many animals had been infected.

But in New York, after one animal was found with CWD, further testing has discovered no other infected deer, Cornicelli said.

“If I had to put my money on it, our situation would be closer to New York’s than Wisconsin’s,’’ Cornicelli said. “It wasn’t like we just found it. We’ve been doing extensive testing for years, and this is the only deer we’ve determined to be infected.’’

The DNR has been on the lookout for CWD since 2002, when it was first detected at a domestic elk farm in central Minnesota. In recent years it has put additional focus on southeastern Minnesota. The domestic elk herd at Pine Island was eliminated after a seven-year-old female was found to have CWD. Three other elk were found to have CWD during the removal effort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

depending on which direction from Pine Island where this deer was shot, it could be within 6 miles of where I hunt. If worst comes to worst, I will focus on putting the smack on the turkeys on this property and find somewhere else to deer hunt. frowncry

Link to comment
Share on other sites

someday,

So what does this potentially do to Resolution No.: 2010-225.

I dont think the farmers are gonna potentially be driving Hummers now. shocked

Good thing is, APR might be trumped for you as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Rochester Post-Bulletin article said the DNR would likely work with local land owners to reduce the herd. If they don't find any more positive deer say within 10 miles the rest of the area should be on a wait and see. It will take a few years but with the habitat in the Zumbro watershed deer should come back stronger than ever. Guess I won't have to worry about hitting them with cars just shooting a few dozen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr. Cornicelli was on Almanac tonight and said that he hoped they were finding the CWD early before it was very widespread, and since they have been testing deer in that area for (I think he said 5 years) that he expected they were on the early side of things. He said that WI was late in finding it and so the infected deer were in a wider geographic area. He said that you shouldn't eat the meat if the deer appeared ill such as frequent urination, lethargic, or ears down. I think he also said there was no known case of CWD being transmitted to humans through eating but I am not totally sure of that. He said that as long as you were cautious in dealing with the animals by using gloves etc. the risk was small.

I am sure there will be tons of info on this over the next days and weeks with specific advice on what to do with the meat if you got a deer from that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
I am sure there will be tons of info on this over the next days and weeks with specific advice on what to do with the meat if you got a deer from that area.

All I know is if this gets to our area, I wont be eating deer for a lonnnnggg time.

Some scary stuff. I dont care if "studies" show its not transferrable to humans through consumption.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anyone know why they think this deer has CWD? it said "preliminary tests" show that a doe carried the disease. All it really says in the article is the guy thought it "appeared thin" when he shot it, but wasn't acting with any type of unusual behavior. They were quoted in the article saying it's possible but not likely the lab will find the deer wasn't affected. The article said "very little" of the meat was eaten by the hunter and family, which means they ate some. So they obviously weren't deterred from eating it via the look of the meat or how the deer looked/acted prior to being killed.

So what exactly are these preliminary tests that indicate this doe carried CWD? All of the evidence laid before me in that article doesn't sound like they have any evidence to suggest the doe carried CWD.... Did the guy who shot it think the venison tasted bad and he thought the deer must have been diseased? Someone just fill me in, because I feel like I am missing something

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JWMiller...

November 28th was the day the animal was killed and I also believe that was the last day of the 3B shotgun season. If the archer registered the deer that day, I would bet $$$ the DNR was at the place of registration taking samples for testing.

Over the past 5-7 years I have had every one of my deer sampled by the DNR at registration sites...Chatfield to be exact. There is usually a crew present at these sites and they do a very good job asking if they can test your deer...I've always agreed.

I sure hope this is an isolated case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Keep a level head about this everyone. The DNR has a plan implemented. Its on their website. We as hunters need to spread the word and educate without creating panic. The worst thing that you can do is sit down with your hunting parties and speculate without knowing the facts. This can cause a frenzy of misinformation and panic. I believe that if you are on this forum and monitoring this thread you are a fairly intelligent and educated individual. Do what you can to get ALL the facts and know what they are. Stop rumors when you hear them. Stay in the loop as much as possible.

It is one deer of thousands, that was found close to an elk farm that was eradicated because of CWD. It is not surprising that one eventually turned up. Hunters and trail cams catch pictures of a lot of deer, I have not seen one yet that showed a deer in ill health.

Yes, this could be the start of something larger, or it could just be an isolated incident. I truly hope (and pray) that it is isolated.

I am hoping that I can continue to read and monitor this thread without hearing any snide comments about trophy hunters, meat hunters, APR or the like. There is no time for that now, or place for that on this thread, and if you want, start another thread on it. Thanks, I appreciate it, great comments so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting what they are saying now, as compared to this..

http://outdoornews.com/minnesota/news/article_3bcfb472-ecff-11df-815c-001cc4c03286.html

Excerpts:

""Posted: Thursday, November 11, 2010 12:00 pm

Elk ‘depopulation’ bill approaching $1 million By Tim Spielman Associate Editor Outdoor News, Inc | 0 comments

Groups still concerned about deer movement into contaminated former elk farm

Rochester, Minn. — A year after a herd of nearly 560 elk in southeastern Minnesota was euthanized because of chronic wasting disease concerns, reports indicate white-tailed deer continue to come and go from the still-fenced site near Pine Island, now considered contaminated by the cervid disease.

The responsibility to eliminate invading deer immediately falls to Tower Investments, LLC, the owner and developer of the property once owned and operated as Elk Country U.S.A., along Hwy. 52. But if company officials are unable to kill those deer, DNR personnel are called in to shoot the deer, according to Don Nelson, DNR area wildlife manager in nearby Rochester.

He said two deer were shot and killed within the fences around the property last winter; those animals tested negative for CWD at the state diagnostics lab in St. Paul, Nelson added.

Mark Johnson, executive director of the Minnesota Deer Hunters Association, said there have been other instances of the area’s security being compromised by deer. DNR veterinarians, too, have been told of similar incidents...

...Still, according to the MDHA’s Johnson, the existing fences, based on reports received by various government agencies, don’t appear adequate to keep deer from breaching the barrier.

“My understanding is they’re going over the fences, not through the gates,” he said last week.

He called the situation “unfortunate and dangerous, from a wildlife standpoint.”

Butler said DNR veterinarians, too, had received similar notifications. “We’ve had reports of fences down, and deer within the fences,” she said.""

Link to comment
Share on other sites

jwmiller33

The article says preliminary tests on the deer show it has the disease. The additional testing will more than likely confirm the initial tests. The article also says that it can take 4 years for deer to show signs of CWD. So a deer could be infected without showing obvious signs of the disease.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mitch, I know the article said the preliminary tests showed the dear carried the disease. My question was, what exactly these preliminary tests are, because as I said before, it sounded like there was nothing to show as if the deer was a carrier. The hunter and his family even ate some of the deer, which tells me they weren't deterred by how the meat looked or how the deer looked/acted prior to its death. Thankfully Zepman filled me in that the DNR was at the place of registration when the deer was registered and took a sample. Thats all I was asking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Preliminary testing for MN is done at the U of M labs in Mnpls/St. Paul. On something this important they always get a second opinion on the testing I suppose, and the labs in AMES are supposed to be the best in the country.

A little hysteria scaring hunters out of SE MN might not be a bad thing the way the hunting population has exploded down here in recent years, Might open up a few nice hunting spots for me smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is a verified case, I wonder if the venison donation program will see changes.

I know, I know, its apparently not able to transfer to humans, but it would seem to be something that might raise eyebrows.

Just thinking out loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good question HBC69. I would suspect it could put the kabosh on any donation programs if CWD is found in the area. Even though there are no verified cases of it having an effect on humans, I don't think they want to find out the hard way that it could.

In cases like CWD in MN, I think our DNR is doing what ever they can to be proactive vs. reactive. Either way, if the fencing at the elk farm in Pine Island is able to be breached that easily, the state needs to be putting the screws to Tower Investments to correct the issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DNR will probably attempt to kill every deer within a mile or two of that site. This cold snowy winter would allow them to be rather efficient if they move quickly in the next week or two.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The DNR will probably attempt to kill every deer within a mile or two of that site. This cold snowy winter would allow them to be rather efficient if they move quickly in the next week or two.

The deer in question was shot 3 miles from the elk farm...I would think the area of eradication would be much larger than a mile or two. In this area, we would have to be talking about the potential of thousands of deer...no small task.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • SkunkedAgain
      Hogs! Hogs!!!
    • MarkB
      My 2 cousins and myself just finished up a windy 4 day trip to our favorite lake. It was the last of the year and was eventful to say the least. When we arrived, water temperatures were 61 degrees and when we left yesterday morning the water temps had dropped to 54 degrees. The fishing was fantastic, once again, and we caught walleyes, bass, and northerns on minnows and crawlers(northerns only on minnows). We found the fish adjacent to shallow rock piles(14') in 20'-28' of water. Our best fishing hours of the day were ~5:30 -twilight in the evenings and until ~ 10:30 in the mornings. Although those two time periods were prime time, fish bit all day. For us, the bite was very light and we probably missed or lost as many fish as we caught. Some people think I'm nuts when I say bead color can make a difference and it certainly did this trip. My cousin's "go to" green/white bead combo did zilch on this trip. It was one translucent red bead and a plain size #2 gamakatsu hook with a 3' leader that produced the fish. We ended up with 137 walleyes and 19 bass for the 4 day outing. We caught far more 17"-19.999" walleyes on this trip than on our previous trips and our numerous slot fish measured from 21"-25". My younger cousin caught 4 slot fish in ~20 minutes one evening. We fish exclusively for walleyes and additional species are incidental. With that said, we caught some beautiful smallmouth bass on this trip and they were right down there with the walleyes, usually in the rocks. As usual, everything is catch and release except for the fish we eat while there and the 12 walleyes(3 individual limits) we take home to the wives. While cleaning some eaters we kept for supper, we always check the stomach contents. One of the walleyes had the jig that is pictured below loose in its stomach!  No attached line, no embedded hook, just the jig! It baffled us as to how in the world it could have gotten there . As you can see, the jig is in good shape so the fish must have swallowed it recently .   The boat traffic was minimal this trip and we had a couple days where it looked as if we had the lake to ourselves. Sunday was a brutal day with wind gusts to 50MPH!. We stayed in and ventured out finally at ~5:00. It turned out to be the best 2 hours of the entire trip. This time, the baby loons were around, the eagles were abundant, the changing leaves made the entire lake area look like a painting. If I could make only one short trip a year to the lake, now would be the time. What capped off the trip was the magnificent display of the Northern Lights. We can't wait for next spring to return, God willing, and, in the meantime, good fishing.  MarkB🙂 The jig found in the stomach of a walleye we ate.   My young cousin with his best of the trip.   a chunky 17" smallmouth   19.5" smallmouth
    • leech~~
      Well, since they both say Propane on them.  Not propane QT++ their probably both the same gender!  🤭
    • Wanderer
    • Brianf.
      What an amazing extended weekend. The fish were happy and cooperated nicely.   We also had the unique experience of fishing under Northern Lights each of the last three nights in pristine weather conditions.  I wish everyone could have that experience, even if just once.  The pics below don't do it justice, though you get the idea.  The walleyes are putting on the feedbag and some are getting rather plump.  We caught mostly slot fish with several 'overs' in our bag.  Our two biggest weighed 8lbs 5oz and 8lb 3oz.     The crappies were active at dusk and beyond.  Almost all of the ones we caught were 14" or bigger.  The biggest we caught was a bit over 15".  We lost two muskies at the boat and caught a 38" pike after dark - quite surprising.   Every fish we caught was immediately released btw.  Water temp 54/55 when we left.  All-in-all, another great fishing experience on Lake Vermilion - for which I'm so incredibly appreciative.        
    • JerkinLips
    • leech~~
      The price and the label.  It's that same exact gas.  
    • Finns
      I don't use gas anymore, what's the difference between them?
    • Fish Head
      Great to hear from you again Mark! I've always liked your posts over the years. 
    • leech~~
      Yep, it's just you know and I know every dad who takes his kids or family camping for the first time.  Is buying the camping gas no matter the cost, cuz it says "Camping" on it! 🤭🤭
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.