Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Recommended Posts

Hard to say if Jackson would have made the same reads and throws. Can't really make a comparison based on today's game. We'll see if/when he gets a chance if Favre gets hurt.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Scott K

    115

  • BrianLucky13

    94

  • LMITOUT

    86

  • Steve Foss

    82

I'll give it till the 3rd game for Favre to start saying he is limited by Child and rightfully so.

OOO! I didnt defend Favre did I.

Typical viking fan panicking at 130 pm opening day! grin

Yeah Chili really limited Favre today he should be fired by opening kick-off tonight of Packers vs Bears game!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

Bandit now you gone and done it. laugh

Originally Posted By: croix flats
I'll give it till the 3rd game for Favre to start saying he is limited by Child and rightfully so.

OOO! I didn't defend Favre did I.

Typical viking fan panicking at 130 pm opening day! grin

Yeah Chili really limited Favre today he should be fired by opening kick-off tonight of Packers vs Bears game!

We will see after this sunday. grin Typical vikings fan that realizes the vikes just possibly waisted $25,000,000 and the next 2 years of not building an offence or the future smile. And this fan will take any chance he gets to voice his opinion against Childress. smile

Or maybe Favre likes his job of getting sacked 3 0r 4 times a game and not have to through over 250 yards a game. Probibly the easyest $12,000,000 he will ever make playing football.

Link to post
Share on other sites
SpitnArgueDuckClub*

Just keep watching Favre and at the end of the season we will see if there are any doubter's left.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Harvin being ? for the game agst the 49's is make or break. The Vikes simply need someone other the AP to step up.

I don't like it. I see the 49's winning a def battle.

Hope I'am wrong.

San Fran 20

Vikes 17

without HArvin

with Harvin

Vikes 23

San Fran 17

Link to post
Share on other sites
james_walleye

I honestly don't see the 49ers scoring 2 offensive TD's. Even though the vikings have shown a bit of bend in the run defense i don't think you make a living doing it and the 49ers have shown zero ability to throw the ball. I'm making a call, Jared Allen has a big sack and strip causing a big TO in this game. If Harvin isnt on the field we should see more of Reynaud. He may not be Percy but i'd like to see a little bit more of what he can do. I'm taking vikings 20-13 and im leaving within 20 minutes to witness it firsthand.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, he couldn't have made that pass from the sidelines. But he HAS made that pass on the field before. Would I have counted on him making that throw? No way. It was a great throw! Favre has also MISSED on some throws today. So if we want to play arm chair QB, T-Jack could have very well made the plays that Brett missed on. Take the good with the bad. Bottom line, everyone should be glad that number 4 is behind center.

Aaron

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok, VERY FEW high profile QB's run full speed down field after a 20yd pass and throw a full on block to a linebacker like BF just did!

That was great!

Link to post
Share on other sites
gr8icefishinmind

So....4th quarter and we are down in the game, this is why we brought bert to minnesota......can he do it????

Link to post
Share on other sites

So....4th quarter and we are down in the game, this is why we brought bert to minnesota......can he do it????

I guess not laugh

Link to post
Share on other sites
gr8icefishinmind

Originally Posted By: gr8icefishinmind
So....4th quarter and we are down in the game, this is why we brought bert to minnesota......can he do it????

I guess not laugh

I guess so!!!!!! smile

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • JBMasterAngler
      The mouth of the creek is quite a ways downstream from the landing, and you’ll have to cross several peoples’ docks. Entire stream is surrounded by private property. Sure, you can technically legally access the stream, but why would you want to bother with the headache of dealing with landowners that DON’T want you there? Stream is small enough to step across in most places, it’s very weedy, and lot’s of overhanging brush. Not to mention, below average at best numbers of small trout!   You want easy access? Buy a Wisconsin license! Right across the river in Pierce County alone, there’s hundreds of miles of public easements on trout streams that are ten times better than anything Minnesota has to offer!
    • JerkinLips
      Pike suckers are about 3½ inches long.  Walleyes really like them in the fall and early winter.  Caught my fish in 13-15 FOW drifting slowly.  Good solid bites.
    • delcecchi
    • JN13
    • fishingMN4eyes
      Got up Thursday evening to rain and pretty heavy wind Friday morning had us holding off on putting the boat in the water. Fished briefly Friday evening at sunset and picked up an 18" and a couple smalls. Fishing was decent Saturday morning but no real size, everything was 12-15". I had one that looked to be 17"ish flop off as I was trying to flip it into the boat. All the fish we caught were in 17-22'. We were fishing around about a 6' top but never caught anything on top. They appeared to be relating to the structure but not actually on it. Tried again Saturday evening for a couple hours and continued to pick up small walleye just like the morning. Sunday was windy again but we decided to slug it out for awhile and caught one decent perch and one small walleye. We fished similar depths and spots as Saturday but they weren't there. Marked them out in 35'+ but didn't feel like fighting the wind out in the big water so we called it quits around noon and never went back out(the wind never really did lay down or we may have tried again). Jig/minnow way outfished bottom bouncers/crawlers. Wish bottom bouncers would have worked better because it was tough to keep a jig down as fast as we were drifting and we never found a school to spot lock on.
    • Mike89
      that last pic is great!!   Hazel is saying oppps!!!  
    • MikeG3Boat
      I am heading up there tomorrow.  Where do you guys get minnows up in the area?  Tower or Cook or down in Virginia?  I have never heard of pike suckers?  How large are they?  Are you guys fishing the East or West side of the lake?  Let me know.  I am thinking of fishing the East side tomorrow and then headed to the west side from Thursday thru Sunday.  Any help would be appreciated?  I am a newby to the area.  Any help would be appreciated.  Thanks!
    • monstermoose78
      Finn and Hazel are getting along poor Finn get the biggest chomps from the baby shark teeth. Finn and I just want a nap, but we can’t as we are puppy patrol. 
    • monstermoose78
      Crap I am feeling like an old man today. Hazel is not letting Finn and I take a nap, but it is getting Finn and I ready for duck season.
    • JN13
      Asking $1,100 contact me at jen at malcotools.com
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.