Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Who should make the rules?


DaveT

Recommended Posts

Please give the facts that we are ignoring?????

Probably the fact that now that everyone is a "professional" hunter because they watch the never ending stream of shows where "it's easy" to shoot a trophy... .

I don't think MN has ever been, or will ever be the "go too" state for the guy that wants to have 12 pointers walking by his stand, waiting for the "big one".

I would guess taking our weather, population, predation, the fact that there's a TON of people that hunt, a deer season that runs from mid-sept through the end of Jan, etc..., we aren't ever going to be just like the TV shows.

...There's too many deer, causing havoc on the roads.

...They let you shoot them down, then there's not enough deer.

Blaaahhhhh, blahhhhh, blah, blah, blah.

...I'm almost a biologist, I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express lastnight and saw this show about hunting in KS. ... .

... the DNR should listen to me, 'cause I've got all the latest cool gear and hunt 10x as much as my great uncle John... LMAO

If the majority of the public is fine with the way things are, and the paid professional biologists more or less fall in line with them, so be it. ...if the majority feel there should be some changes made and the paid professional biologists agree with it, so be it.

The entertainment value of reading these threads is second to none. Like watching a fight over a gumball rolling around on the wet floor of the short bus smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't disagree with you on many things, but I think the majority would like to try baby steps first, and see what happens. I think EAB and Antler restrictions are pretty drastic changes. Much more so that moving the season and getting rid of party hunting. Then, lets reaevealuate after a couple of years and see what we can do next if need be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Originally Posted By: BLACKJACK
Originally Posted By: Wanderer

I Just looked at yet another couple pages of big buck photos in the Outdoor News.

Always my favorite argument when people whine about the lack of big bucks. They're out there, the photos in the ODN and bait shops prove it, go hunt one down, don't expect the DNR to provide one for you.

.

Oh look my favorite argument, the bucks are there go get them. Guess what, many of us try and accomplish that every year, but there are so few of these bucks I would need to quit my job and let my family go into bankruptcy to get one. That or get lucky, now I have gotten luck a few times in the past but I also put in a lot of hard work and time. In 18 years of hunting I have seen 2 mature bucks on stand and I was fortunate enough to get both of them.

I'm not asking the DNR to change the rules so there is a "big buck behind every tree" as many here think. First of all that is a weak argument and really not possible, just because there are more bucks around does not mean they are going to be any easier to kill. All I'm asking for is maybe, just maybe the chance that if I put in a ton of time and hard work I might get the opportunity to see a mature buck once every season or two.

Thats why they call it HUNTING!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats why they call it HUNTING!!

Really? I never knew that. Like I said earlier I hunt mostly public land, I scout year round and hunt as much as possible every fall. I go places most hunters won't go via canoe and chest waders in search of big bucks. I see my fair share of 2-3 year old bucks every year but where are the truly big bucks? Let me tell you, most of the time they are not there. Or if I am lucky enough to locate a nice sized buck on public land he might spend most of his time on privaite ground a mile away. You can't hunt big bucks where most of the time they don't exist which is why you don't see many moose hunters down in Iowa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It scares me when a very vocal minority with special interests try and push regulations for the masses. If that vocal minority can somehow convert the majority, I think the DNR could make some more changes. I believe this is happening with the younger generations, but it will not happen over night.

This brings up a good question, is QDM the vocal minority? Our numbers are growing every year, maybe we don't represent the majority of hunters but the numbers could be closer than we think. Within the next 5-10 years we could easily become the majority.

I know I have never been questioned or surveyed by the DNR. Why not try and survey everyone. Setup some kind of online survey, we could all use our DNR #'s to verify we are who we say we are. Send everyone a letter in the mail to inform them of the survey, I'm sure most deer hunters would love to give their oponions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No party hunting for bucks, I agree, but how will that be enforced?

Is part of the reason Iowa has the number of bucks it has because there is no open firearm season during the rut? Minnesota has a lot of "tradtions" and they like to stick to those tradtions no matter what. Moving the firearm season to later in the year would/could help. But the uproar from something like that would be unbelievable. Population denstiy (human) also plays a big part as well.

If you drive north of the cities, most of the available farm land is what I call rock farms, they might have fields of crops, but they are better suited to growing rocks. In Iowa, there aren't a lot of rock farms. There are parts of NE IA, where I am from, where deer never see a human until they are shot. They have a lot of corn and beans to eat as well. Good luck trying to hunt the bluffs and ridges in Allamakee county.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

people who are against any sory of QDM style of management are like the little kid who abolutly knows he hates green beans eventhough he's never tried them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the people that whine about having to travel to a different state and environment to shoot a "trophy" animal, while people in St. Paul discuss banning lead bullets are kinda like the old Swede who still enjoys Lutefisk......out of touch with reality smile

It's a joke son...... smile

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pickle, you got it - more and bigger because the gun hunt is later. Allamakee is God's country. If they're eating beans and corn though, they can be seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
This brings up a good question, is QDM the vocal minority?

I still think that they are the vocal minority. I think that is because they throw out ideas like antler restrictions and earn a buck. Like I said before, I think if we started small, like with ending party hunting for bucks, I don't think we would be infringing on anybody's right to harvest any kind of deer, only making it illegal for those to harvest multiple bucks. Maybe we start with ending party hunting for bucks, then look at moving the firearm season back a week. Then lets wait a couple of years and reevaluate. I don't think we need to go overboard with restrictions. I think antler restrictions would be the quickest way to help increase the number of mature bucks, but I also think it will further divide hunters, at least at first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, I favor any kind of change no matter how large or small. I would be thrilled if they stopped party hunting for bucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
This brings up a good question, is QDM the vocal minority?

I still think that they are the vocal minority. I think that is because they throw out ideas like antler restrictions and earn a buck. Like I said before, I think if we started small, like with ending party hunting for bucks, I don't think we would be infringing on anybody's right to harvest any kind of deer, only making it illegal for those to harvest multiple bucks. Maybe we start with ending party hunting for bucks, then look at moving the firearm season back a week. Then lets wait a couple of years and reevaluate. I don't think we need to go overboard with restrictions. I think antler restrictions would be the quickest way to help increase the number of mature bucks, but I also think it will further divide hunters, at least at first.

But how much of a minority? Are we 10%, 25% or larger? If you were to ask people if they were for changing some of the regs to grow larger deer a large number would say yes, but then guys find out they might have to sacrifice a little bit and they get scared. I think there are a lot of hunters that could fall on either side of the fence but only get counted as the majority because they aren't hard core QDM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big believer in limited government. That is, its government job to make and enforce the limited amount of rules possible so everyone can enjoy the pursuit of "life, liberty and happiness." That's because when government sticks its nose into matters anything beyond that, it pretty much screws it up 100 percent of the time.

In the case of the DNR, I think they're pretty much doing what they should be doing right now. Give us a chance to get a deer, any deer, so we have the opportunity to deer hunt, period, and let us handle the rest. You want a big buck, make that happen yourself. Don't rely on the DNR to drop one onto your lap with strategies that may or may not work. And even if they do work, will not gaurentee you that big one. I was watching Jim Shockey the other night and he mentioned how it took him more than a month of sitting there every day in a blind, camera running, to get a buck he wanted in one area of Canada known for big bucks.

While I feel government's role should be limited, I also don't think you should just leave it up to the people to take a vote on issues like this. Our country is structured as a republic with representatives of the people so mob rule won't ever overtake common sense. It's our representatives job to represent us, but also to study the issues, debate them and act in our best interests, despite popular opinion. Now, that wouldn't help me in this case, because it means a vocal minority could influence the enactment of antler point restrictions, etc. And that's why those against such overreaching laws need to be vocal as well.

But the gate swings the other way. Take the recent crackdown on the all-season license and one deer period bag limit in the numerous lottery areas throughout the state. Ask hunters in those areas if they'd like to kill three deer again and I would wager a majority would say yes immediately with no other reason behind their decision than they want to kill more deer. Does that make sense? Is it based on sound reason? No, not at all. And that's why we have represtatives versus letting the people take a direct vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:
But how much of a minority? Are we 10%, 25% or larger? If you were to ask people if they were for changing some of the regs to grow larger deer a large number would say yes, but then guys find out they might have to sacrifice a little bit and they get scared. I think there are a lot of hunters that could fall on either side of the fence but only get counted as the majority because they aren't hard core QDM.

I think we are in 100% agreement on this. I also think many hunters would say yes, but do not want to sacrifice anything. I think EAB and antler restrictions really turn people off. Heck, I am one of those guys on the fence. I'd like to see something, but if they try and implement EAB, I will be opposed and become skeptical as to what the DNR is trying to do. I think think you hit the nail on the head, when you said alot of hunters are on the fence, but I think that the hard core QDM'rs really scare a lot of people off with the EAB and Antler Restriction talk, thus making the hard core QDM'rs, a very vocal minority. I think that they would get a lot farther if they would tone it down a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see why everyone gets teed off about EAB. I would love the opportunity to take two deer in my lottery area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deerminator, if you think EAB would be established in a lottery area, you are very wrong. Not to rain on your parade. The EAB would be used in areas with a high deer population, mainly intensive harvest areas. That is why SEMN gets brought up so frequently. In lottery areas, they are just looking at ways to increase the population.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

eab came about in buffalo county wisconsin because hunters didn't want to shoot does, they only wanted bucks, the population density was getting out of wack, the dnr proposed you have to earn your buck tag and shoot a doe first, so they could get the population back in check, it was kind of a last ditch effort to get people to shoot does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trigger. I was saying being in a lottery area, I am envious of those who can regularly hunt managed or intensive areas, not that I want to further decimate our population. I should have been more clear in my words. I'm just saying life would be great if I could go for a doe early and sit back and wait for a buck, like the old days. So those who gripe about having to shoot two deer get no sympathy from me. I don't care if the 14 pointer walks out on opening day and you haven't got your doe. Do some scouting and get on the does asap.

Also, I was thinking about all the antler point restriction and later season advocates out there and wondering if the solution isn't to have a later season statewide where you have to shoot a 10 point or bigger? Hmmm? Hmmm?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deerminator, I got yah. I hunt an intensive harvest area, and I can tell you this. In my area, we do not have the deer population for EAB. If we hunt hard, yes, we will get deer, maybe even more than one. We will more often than not see a deer on stand, but that doesn't mean that they will be in range. Getting a whitetail doe in my area isn't as easy as some in other areas of the state might think, especially with the split season. Many of the does go underground and find sanctuarys after the 3A season. Still plenty of deer, but harder to come by than before the firearm season .

Also, as for the late season, wouldn't bother me. I am already hunting the third week in November and also hunted Muzzleloader this year when it was below zero the last weekend. And, before anybody says it, no, I wasn't in a heated shack with windows, plain jane wooden stand and sometimes a ladder stand. It got cold, and I couldn't sit all day, but that was fine by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big believer in limited government. That is, its government job to make and enforce the limited amount of rules possible so everyone can enjoy the pursuit of "life, liberty and happiness." That's because when government sticks its nose into matters anything beyond that, it pretty much screws it up 100 percent of the time.

In the case of the DNR, I think they're pretty much doing what they should be doing right now. Give us a chance to get a deer, any deer, so we have the opportunity to deer hunt, period, and let us handle the rest. You want a big buck, make that happen yourself. Don't rely on the DNR to drop one onto your lap with strategies that may or may not work. And even if they do work, will not gaurentee you that big one. I was watching Jim Shockey the other night and he mentioned how it took him more than a month of sitting there every day in a blind, camera running, to get a buck he wanted in one area of Canada known for big bucks.

While I feel government's role should be limited, I also don't think you should just leave it up to the people to take a vote on issues like this. Our country is structured as a republic with representatives of the people so mob rule won't ever overtake common sense. It's our representatives job to represent us, but also to study the issues, debate them and act in our best interests, despite popular opinion. Now, that wouldn't help me in this case, because it means a vocal minority could influence the enactment of antler point restrictions, etc. And that's why those against such overreaching laws need to be vocal as well.

But the gate swings the other way. Take the recent crackdown on the all-season license and one deer period bag limit in the numerous lottery areas throughout the state. Ask hunters in those areas if they'd like to kill three deer again and I would wager a majority would say yes immediately with no other reason behind their decision than they want to kill more deer. Does that make sense? Is it based on sound reason? No, not at all. And that's why we have represtatives versus letting the people take a direct vote.

Good post deerminator. I catch he!! here for being the vocal voice against QDM, to the point where I don't bother to post anymore when the QDM guys rant, nice to read a reasonable, well written post.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No party hunting for bucks, I agree, but how will that be enforced?

Is part of the reason Iowa has the number of bucks it has because there is no open firearm season during the rut? Minnesota has a lot of "tradtions" and they like to stick to those tradtions no matter what. Moving the firearm season to later in the year would/could help. But the uproar from something like that would be unbelievable. Population denstiy (human) also plays a big part as well.

If you drive north of the cities, most of the available farm land is what I call rock farms, they might have fields of crops, but they are better suited to growing rocks. In Iowa, there aren't a lot of rock farms. There are parts of NE IA, where I am from, where deer never see a human until they are shot. They have a lot of corn and beans to eat as well. Good luck trying to hunt the bluffs and ridges in Allamakee county.

This is where I'm at. Habit factored with pressure affects things the most.

I've stated I've crossed tagged bucks before but would stop without complaint if the law changed.

And one last thought: A later season would likely keep your total hunter hours down, including kids'.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pickelfarmer, I am not a closet out of stater, nor am I coming out of the closet, I'm not even anywhere near a closet. However, I do love to deer hunt out of state because I have so much more fun! I apologize for enjoying hunting so much that I try to do as much of it as I can. I'm so sorry that I can go to Kansas or Iowa and see 25 or more bucks in a week of hunting, where I don't have to fear for my life while I hunt the peak of the rut with my bow. Will you ever forgive me for passing up little bucks in MN and elsewhere, because I feel that I've shot enough of them and choose to wait for a big one?

The question I'm asking is what I already asked: Who should make the rules?

The majority or the minority?

Should a guy who deer hunts 2 or 3 days a year have as much say in the regulations as a guy who hunts 30?

Who spends more money and buys more tags?

Would the 1 weekend a year guy quit if he had to hunt November 25th instead of November 8th?

Would he quit if he couldn't tag a buck for his wife?

Should we care if he quits?

Make the hunting what it could be and raise the cost of nonresident tags to make up the difference, that's what every state with good hunting does.

Right now the DNR pretends to listen to the hunters and then does what's best for their pocketbook. Then they back it up by saying they surveyed us and this is what we want. Nobody from the DNR has ever asked me what I want.

No need to apoligize Dave.. You do your thing, thats cool. I really don't think that because somebody hunts more days during the season that there entitled to more of a say in the rules. I mean, I pay just as much for my deer liences as you, don't I? Or is there some cheaper 3 day deer licence that I'm missing out on? It really doesn't matter how often I use it I pay the same. And just so you know I got a wife that has never hunted a day in her life nor has she ever tagged a deer that I or any one else has shot.

Last but not least, Who in your opinion Dave is the Minority in deer hunting in MN and who In your opinion is the Majority? I think guys like me that hunt because they enjoy the outdoors as well as a chance to put some food on the table are the majority. I could be wrong but if I'm not then I think that the MN regs are just fine. Of course I think there could be a few less bonus tags sold every year, and if your doing as you say you are passing up all these deer for the big one,than I think I spend alot more money in tags than you do.I don't pass up on much of anything.I buy alot of tags. So do I get to make the rules?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading all these posts is quite interesting, But in the big picture of things we have it pretty good here in minn. If I'm interested in multiple deer I can find state land in a management area, chase big bucks- I can make friends with land owners/ find state property, or chase the AMERICAN DREAM and control my circumstances and purchase my own hunting grounds. I'm not saying all you don't have good reasoning in your thinking, I just thank GOD I still have guns, hunt/fish, etc... and pray that my kids/grand kids will have that same right. I just hope all are as passionate at your local meetings as you are here because we need this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love the plethora of posts such as this one - clearly the management philosophy is starting to change here in Minnesota for the better. Never since I started hunting have I heard so much buzz for making some changes to our antiquated hunting regulations.

The problem with the idea of a democracy vs. a meritocracy is that the majority does not necessarily choose the best choice. The decisionmakers should not the the weekend warriors OR the trophy fanatics - it should be wildlife biologists and the sort of folk that are experienced in the management scenarios we are discussing. Populism is never a good way to make a decision.

There is little doubt that hunting is more exciting and productive in neighboring states.. one only needs to think for a few minutes about some of the reasons that might be.

Change is a-comin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
    • leech~~
      As I get older it's really not just about sending bullets down range.  Some of it's just the workmanship of the gun and the wow factor. The other two guns I have really wanted which I'll never have now because of their price, is a 8mm Jap Nambu and 9mm German Luger.   Just thought they always looked cool!  
    • jim curlee
      I had a guy hit me with a lightly used 1969 BAR, he wanted $1650 with an older Leupold scope. More than I think they are worth, I made an offer, he declined end of story.   You know if you look at the old brochures, a grade II BAR sold for $250 in the late 60s, $1650 would be a good return on your investment.    Why would anybody want a 50 year old gun, they are heavy, have wood stocks, and blued metal.  I guess mainly to keep their gun safes glued to the floor. lol   You can probably buy a stainless rifle that you never have to clean, with a synthetic stock you never have to refinish, is as light as a feather, and for half as much money, perfect.   I'm too old for a youth gun, although I've shrunk enough that it would probably fit. lol   No Ruger 10/44s.   Jim      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.