Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

What do you think?


surewood

Recommended Posts

With the rise in QDM which I think is a good idea but I know it's not for everyone and that makes sense. Some people only have a couple of days to hunt and some really can't wait to eat those deer. My suggestion to try to meet in the middle somewhere would be to only allow party hunting for does. That way you would get your one and only buck tag. I know some will disagree but do you really need to shoot two or three bucks a season. I personally know of people that would pass on smaller bucks if they knew it was there last for the year. I also know some people would just lie and say someone else shot it and shoot another buck, but I think those people are the minority. I think the majority of hunters are honest people. This way you have more people taking does vs small bucks and you can maintain a healthy heard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Thorn

    17

  • Powerstroke

    6

  • ANYFISH

    6

  • surewood

    5

I assume by party hunting you are really meaning cross tagging and if that's the restriction, you can only shoot and kill your own buck, even if you are hunting with several people, I'm all for it. Still allow cross tagging for antlerless because we can regulate those numbers by the number of tags allowed. I do think this would improve the age structure of our deer. Of course here in zone 4 I've been saying for years that nothing will matter unless the two day season is gone. Understand that's an option being considered now too and I think combining the two would do wonders...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: surewood
...try to meet in the middle somewhere would be to only allow party hunting for does...

Under current MN law party hunting for does is legal. I've never heard of a QDM plan that ever mentioned being against party hunting for does.

How is this meeting in the middle?????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is what i think of QDM!

BIG RACKS! I think they are whey to chewey for my taste. People hunt ducks to shoot ducks, they hunt pheasants to shoot pheasants, thay hunt grouse to shoot grouse and so on. I hunt deer to shoot deer. My family loves vension. I think shooting a trophy buck is supposed to be a once in a lifetime experience, otherwise shooting a 10 pointer every year would be no different then shooting a fork or a spike every year. Then we will have to stop shooting the 10 and 12 pointers so we can let them grow to 20 pointers. When will it stop, we have a great deer population and you see tons of trophy buck pictures in the outdoor news every week. We have a great season now IMO. Besides let em go, let em grow so the sharp shooters can shoot em or mother nature gets em. My 2 cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Originally Posted By: Jameson
 Originally Posted By: surewood
...try to meet in the middle somewhere would be to only allow party hunting for does...

Under current MN law party hunting for does is legal. I've never heard of a QDM plan that ever mentioned being against party hunting for does.

How is this meeting in the middle?????????

His statement is to limit party hunting to does only.

Currently party hunting is legal for all deer licenses except the multi-zone buck. Meaning one person in the party could shoot all the deer for everyone, buck or doe. His suggestion is to disallow party hunting for bucks and allow it for does only.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you like venison, shoot a doe. There's way more of them and they are easier to come by. It helps control the population and doens't affect the quality of the bucks as much.

Very few bucks would ever get bigger than 10pts even if allowed to live to a natural death. Thats why genetics are so important. A 10 ptr with mass is worth more than a 12ptr with smaller bases and less mass. Having more points sounds great at the bar but it isn't a gauge of the quality of the animal. I've seen 10pt 2 yr olds that don't score as well as a 5yr old 7 pointer.

Trophy deer are trophies. A 160" deer is amazing. A 130" deer is pretty darn nice, but if you want meat then why shoot a spike or forkhorn? You can't create trophy deer is you shoot them when they are little.

I realize the law allows you to shoot a buck of any size. If you choose that, thats your choice. Thats my .02

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amen Powerstroke, good post. If you like venison and antlers are too chewy for your taste, then why even bother to shoot bucks. Lots of does out there to harvest! Sharp shooters are killing deer because of they have come into contct with disease. It could be linked to over-population. Or it could be just circumstance. Whatever the case, if it is over-population, it sure is not from an over-population of bucks!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think hunters are fairly honest but I do think that this idea would be very difficult to enforce. If party hunting for does is allowed someone will still cross tag a buck. It might help some but I don't think it is the answer. good question though.

"Very few bucks would ever get bigger than 10pts even if allowed to live to a natural death. Thats why genetics are so important. A 10 ptr with mass is worth more than a 12ptr with smaller bases and less mass. Having more points sounds great at the bar but it isn't a gauge of the quality of the animal. I've seen 10pt 2 yr olds that don't score as well as a 5yr old 7 pointer."

Powerstroke, although I agree with your thinking, I do believe this statment is why non-trophy hunters and some non-hunters dislike The "Trophy guys", No deer is "worth more" than any other unless your on a farm and the size of the rack will never be the judge of the "quality of the animal" all of our deer are quality in most eyes. Maybe just too early in the morning so don't take offense, I agree what you are trying to say but the majority of hunters in minnesota just want to be able to say they shot a deer this season, and even better if they can say that they shot a buck of any size. We still have a long road ahead before that changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the bucks not party hunting thing & the does party hunting would be an enforcement nightmare that the DNR wouldn't mess with. I'm all for bigger bucks too, but the fact of the matter is, shooting a lot of the small bucks doesn't hurt the population at all, so from that standpoint it's a mute point in regards to management.

It seems obvious from the different posters & conversations in the past that a lot of people think only in terms of their core deer area & assume every other one in the state is the same or very similar, they're not. Some parts of the state are still very overpopulated, others have very low numbers, while others are right where they should be, & it even varies a lot within a permit area. Generally I think the DNR's doing a pretty good job with deer management. Like someone said, there are still plenty of trophy bucks here, they're just harder to find. I believe we have a lot more hunters than IA, overall far less agriculture, & generally people are hunting closer together on small properties, that may just be my misconception/perception.

On a side note whoever posted that you can't party hunt with the Multi-Zone buck license I think is behind on their regs. I know that used to be true, but believe it changed about three years ago. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is why I hunt. To shoot a deer, any deer is a trophy to me, spike, fork, or antlerless. Where I hunt the majority of the deer I see in my stand are bucks and most of the time there are little scraggly horns. Now this year we will be lucky to even see a deer since the sharpshooters are trying to eradicate the whole herd in the TB zone and we are smack dabb in the middle of it. Also the TB in the deer had nothing to do with over population, they contracted it from the cattle in that area and it is a Mexican strain of TB from prize cattle that were imported from Mexico. I still think the majority of people like it the way it is, it is the minority that is pushing for QDM. I know the majority, not all of the hunters in NW MN hunt to shoot a deer no matter what size the rack is. Also a young buck taste just as good as a doe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know some people would not like this suggestion. I also know QDM is on the rise. Jameson what I mean by meeting in the middle is if you like meat a person can still go out and party hunt does, shoot two or three if you're that hungry. But no one is allowed more than one buck. This way everybody still gets to shoot there "trophy" but why do you have to shoot three "trophy's". I'm just saying it's somewhere closer to the middle because the more extreme is earn a buck, and antler restrictions. With interest in trophy deer I think sometime in the future there will be some sort of change. There is interest to. When was the last time you saw the local bar empty out for a forkhorn, but put a 10pt out there, and just the few that are afraid to lose their spot are left. Now I'm not saying that it's not an acomplishment to be proud of any deer, it is. For deer management and QDM it might just have some impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel deer hunting should be for the meat and not the rack!! I am thankful to shoot deer in the fall to feed the family. I know some big buck hunters that shoot big bucks every year and they say their wife and kids won't eat it so why wait to shoot a big deer when you can shoot a small one and the meat won't go to waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know of one party that will not shoot bucks period. They don't care how big it is, they think the meat's no good. Having eaten plenty of bucks, I can't say I agree with them, but that's what they do. I would tend to agree that a big mature buck, especially at rut time isn't going to taste as good as a nice yearling doe or fawn, but a yearling buck would still tasted mighty fine as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I want to clear up that I am not a trophy hunter. In fact, to be completely honest, I've never even shot a legal buck and I've been deer hunting over 10 years.

I could care less about counting inches. What is usually mentioned and the position I agree with, is "wouldn't it be nice to see more and bigger bucks?"

Heck, I would like to see a couple. The areas I hunt get hammered by gun hunters who just want to tag out on a buck. I've been razzed many times cause I tagged 2 does and someone else shot a spike, but guess what....I shot a doe. In their eyes I'm less of a hunter.

I let the little ones walk knowing full well they might get shot just down the road. If I don't practice what I preach than I have nothing to stand on.

I don't make the rules, its just my opinion. I don't judge anyone to taking an animal within the law. The post is titled "what do you think?" so thats my opinion on the subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I let the little bucks walk unless its very late in the firearm season and I haven't gotten any venison with the bow. At that point I really don't care, people can get mad at me if they want, but during the seasons I continually pass on small bucks.

I would also like to throw this out. I worked in Buffalo county for years. My Brother lives in Trempeleau county. It is getting darn hard to find any place to hunt. Do you want to know why? They have done such a great job with QDM, that almost all of the land is leased up, if you want a buck, its going to cost you bucks. The same guys wanting strict QDM will soon be crying about how an outfitter leased up the land. Don't think it could happen? one outfitter was already asking numerous farmers in the county I live in.

In my area, the deer population is too big, we get to see big bucks every year, but we don't always get to shoot one. I really don't want this to become a state that is known for big bucks. This is just a snapshot of one area of Minnesota, I think it may be different for some areas, my areas seems pretty well established, we have a nice amount of bucks. The lottery doe tag for 3A has really helped. We don't see the number of deer during 3B, but the quality has really improved. I think more people are taking does right away if they have the tag, giving more bucks a chance to live.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree 96. We need to look at the effect of MN becoming known for big bucks. If I remember right one of the columnists in Outdoor news said in Pike County IL. a lease on 700 acres went for $47,000 and the landowner could still hunt. I am sure few if none of his family or friends could. Money talks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my eyes anyway that would ruin hunting a whole lot more than guys shooting small bucks. If that was the choice I was given I'd shoot small bucks the rest of my life over that. Some of my "friends" might argue that's the only buck I'll ever shoot anyway...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In order for someone to make that money they have to sell or give out lease rights. If your family member blocked you from hunting on his land, is that the guy who leased the lands fault or the family member who caved in to the pressures of $$$?

There are some downsides to the debate for sure. It will never please everyone.

As long as this stays open-minded its a great discussion of ideas. Many times we've heard about how certain DNR higher-ups read these forums. This is easier and cheaper than trying to organize input meetings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Powerstroke, your right, someone would have to cave in, but why wouldn't they. Why wouldn't a farmer lease his recreation land to someone, especially if they want to give him a large amount of money. It might be enough to fuel his tractor or combine for a month, which is more than I would ever be willing, or able to pay. I would never blame the landowner for doing what was right for their family,even if they were related to me. It would sure suck though.

I like to shoot big bucks as much as the rest of the guys, but in my little world down here, I see land getting leased, and these guys don't just want 40 acres, they want 400 acres. That would also include your neighbors land. Now take all 20 people that hunted that private land and put them on the remaining public. It doesn't sound like fun to me. I'll take a nice buck when it comes along, I'll let the little ones walk, but I absolutely do not want Minnesota to become one of the trophy hotspots. I like to think of it as our little secret. Big bucks get taken every year in Minnesota, just read the outdoor news. There are more big bucks now than ever before. Things are working, but too many people want to shoot there trophy now, it took me 10 years of bowhunting to finally get one. I still have never had a shot at one with a firearm. But you know, I am OK with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a really good read, Money talks thats for sure. If I had land to lease or sell Im not sure what I'd do it certainly depends on my financial situation, I'd like to think I'd keep it for my kids's future. I'd like to shoot a big buck now an then but its not what keeps me in the feild year after year, I fish for walleye mostly durring peak periods durring spring an fall an have caught alot of nice walleyes but no wall hangers yet. but the big pigs is not what keeps me on the water. When I put enough time in on the water I'll connect with that 32" I have my sights on, If I put in the time an effort into trophy hunting a big buck I'm sure sooner or later I'll connect there too. I feel pretty privilaged to be able to do the hunting an fishing that I do an am content with most of the laws set forth. I just whish adjacent land owners around us would let some of the smaller bucks walk. boar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think every hunters dream is to shoot large bucks. But at what cost? My problem with leases are not with the landowner most of the time. My problem is with the hunters whom ask about leasing land instead of just asking permission and offering assistance to the landowner. These are the people that are taking away access. In my eye's it is thre greed to have it all to yourself. If you want land buy it. I know that is difficult with land prices now-a-days as I know I can't afford it, but then offer yourself as help and gain permission. It helps your fellow hunters keep their access. I do know some landowners that have looked into leasing because so and so get X amount for hunting rights on his land, the problem is just getting bigger and more wide spread. That's a high cost for a nice rack on the wall!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great discussion on this subject, looking at a program from all sides can only help the hunting public. I like the thought of being able to see and shoot big bucks every year but as stated earlier that would reduce them to the same social standing as a spike is now. Everything has a price and if seeing a big buck comes with a price tag reduced hunting opportunities because of land being leased, special regulations, or the problem associated with over population I would have to think on that. Just remember it was a couple of bad winters that got us into thinking of bucks only, before that any deer was a trophy and good conversation at the sport shop. There are more points to this and hopefully the discussion will continue and line not drawn because as we all know once the govt. steps in not much good happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't beleive it would reduce their social standing to a spike. The reason is a spike is a year and a half old and a bigger deer will be around three and a half thats the way I look at it. The average buck shot is a year and a half old, seems pretty young to me. If a deer reaches a older age it will still be harder to hunt then a spike. Would'nt it be nice for everyone to have more oppurtunity to atleast see older deer. On the leased land, those spots are leased because they are hot spots that practice some sort of QDM. If more areas put out larger deer in a widespread area maybe people would say why do I pay an outfitter thousands of dollars to have a chance at a large deer when I can hunt my back forty or drive a couple of hours for the same oppurtunity. Then just maybe it would help reverse the trend of people gobbling up hundreds of acres and doing QDM on their own to sell what every hunter can have for the price of a tag. Yes we still have big deer killed every year, but I'll bet if it they had a survey in the states of a older bucks per hunter, Minnesota would be one of the lowest. Exspecially if we were just compared to the midwest. With all this being said though I think in the next 3 to 5 years with the doe population the way it is you'll see the earn a buck parcticed in MN. It's just that I hear about that more than any other practice and it will help to maintain a healthy heard. I think it's accepted by the big wigs more than the other options. Just my opinion though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree the doe herd is way to high!! Lets face it alot of hunters don't hunt for the meat they hunt for the rack, and they are not shooting does. By having a earn a buck would force people to shoot does and help maintain a healthy herd. I feel it would only take a year or two to get back to where we should be. So get out there and shoot some deer and you will also be helping the moose grin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hear ya, it might only take a couple of years. It would definately be worth it for the moose heard alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I totally agree with your statement anyfish.

A huge problem with gaining private land access is that many people with money whether from out of state or from the metro or whatever, will offer a landowner money right off the bat. I've asked more than one owner if I can have permission to hunt and they asked what I was willing to pay. THey told me that people are offering them money and if I wanted to hunt there I should name a price.

I won't reduce myself to that. I went in on a private Potlatch lease last year, but at least the land is exclusive. Some of these owners are seeing $$$$$ and they've forgotten about just granting permission.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

Just moved here from TX. 2 years ago. Don't get me started on land leasing.....HA!

I've enjoyed hunting for the past 10 years with my son who

only happend to see a giant 12 point the first time hunting here in MN. That was 5 years ago, He'll be 21 soon.

It was his first deer he ever saw after not seeing a single deer of the first 5 years hunting in Tx. He was so boogered up with buck fever he just watched it till it meandered off. We were hunting in the Chippewa NF.

----------------

Is it legal to take a buck with your tag and another buck while party hunting?

And what is this QDM you're talking about? Is it trophy deer management, or some type of practice that ensures a helthy population of deer. I'm guessing it's the type of management that isn't oriented towards a complete concern for herd health.

Maybe it's a lack of research. Myself, I would not pass on a deer. Nor do I want to teach any of my family to inherit such poor management practice. And it's not really a sportsman like issue when you tell people

{I only shoot big bucks}

Is it ethical to only shoot big bucks, sure it is. To each their own. My son bagged two last year. One off of someone else's tag during a deer drive party hunting.

That's another aspect too. The season is so short that I highly recomend a good safe deer drive.

Throw in a earn a buck program and you would be insaine not to have a longer season.

in 2007 MN had 500,000 deer hunters and bagged only 260,000 deer.

As it stands today, as is same rules per season '07 throw in an earn a buck program would the harvest decline? Sure it would, that's what gets the QDM ball rolling. Shoot less smaller bucks and get the herd to produce Quality Mature Deer....er, bigger racks I mean.

What would the consequences be?

Shooting as many does and knocking the population down..priceless

Literally out of reach pricless. Soon it ends up going into very ill territory.

The things I saw in Tx. were, shooting clubs going into public land to erdicate doe populations ruining a good population just to keep their agenda based QDM [PoorWordUsage] leases as high priced as possible.

I mean in other words, who would want to pay a high price for a lease when they can tag a deer on public land?

Which brings up another problem. The MN deer tags in 2008 will be offerd a little different, so I gather. No all season tag, cool huh. Not really. The State Lands will be loosing thousands of dollars. How will they make back the loss of funds generated by license sales?

Do what Tx did, close some state lands and offer draw only in those particular parks which all applicants [win or loose] must pay application fees.

Oh the list keeps going......

I'm a sportsman, If it's brown it's down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've actually been thinking alot about this thread. It always makes me nervous to think about land leases etc.. I want my son to be able to hunt just like I did. We hunt primarily private land but keeping that is getting soooo expensive (but that might change with the economy). Certain luxeries like having recrational land might come to an end. However, it could open the door to more leasing, especially if it gets tight for everyone.

I did't think a whole lot differently than many of you. I wanted a trophy buck. I hadn't see anything of any size in ten years of hunting, however, I oten saw other people shooting nice bucks. I'd see then at the local bars and in outdoor publications. The question I asked myself is what are they doing differently than me. Why are they getting the big deer and I am not, not "we should all let little bucks go so I can continue to be an average sportsman and stumble across one". Instead, I got serious about it. I read publications and books on whitetail hunting. I did all I could to eliminate scent. I pay attention to the wind, I move stands regularly, and I put in time, time, time. I don't walk out on opening day, climb into the same old tree stand and hope I see a deer anymore. I scout, scout again, and scout some more. My early season bowhunting is almost always just scouting with a weapon. Since starting this 5 years ago I first started seeing an increase in the number of deer I saw. In the last three years, I have had at least one shot at Pope and Young deer (all on private land bordering public). Only one shot, I connected on 1 out of 3. To me, thats what its all about. Spending the time, putting in the work, and waiting for that one shot, the payoff of all the scouting, time, sweat, and practice. I know that my area has big bucks and that some do not, but if you see or know of big bucks taken in your area, ask yourself, what are they doing that you aren't? In fact, ask them, most of the time, they are more than willing to help.

I didn't wait for the DNR to enforce QDM so I could go out and shoot one. I decided that I was going to work for it. I think that alot of hunters have a sense of entitlement. Some don't have the time, but they shouldn't complain either, they should be happy with what they get. There were times that I started wondering if it was worth it, but after that one shot, all those questions get answered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MN may not have the size of bucks like we see on TV all the time. Maybe we should be thankful for what we have and that is: hunting that we don't have to open our wallets for every time we turn around, accessible land, still requires a little knowledge and skill, and good populations (at least in some areas). I believe keeping the baiting laws on the books and enforced also helps keep hunting from becoming more of just a "money sport". I was talking to a friend of mine (we are both about 40ish) and we both have now shot more deer than our fathers have. Sometimes we need to reflect on how good we really have it. If we need to shoot more does in some areas how about a mid-December anterless only hunt in those areas?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far as reducing the social standing of bucks if QDM happens isn't so far off in some circles. I already know some people that will not shoot a buck until 150 class. I'm sorry but my biggest is 120 inches and that is more than a respectable buck and would never look at it as small.

96trigger, you absolutely right best way to nice bucks is thru work, work,and more work. If people want to see more big bucks and they believe that is important they need to control what they shoot themselves. We shouldn't rely on the government to control us and take opportunities from those not interested in size. Besides contrary to popular belief if you let a deer pass it opportunity of survival is very good. We only shoot a 1/4 of our states deer population every year, that only 1 out of 4, pretty good odd's for the deer.

I do believe we should continue to shoot more does than bucks, but I not will to take opportunities away those whom only go out a couple of times each season. I send enough time in the woods where I can pass and still have opportunities.

THORN, as for as eliminating the all-season, I don't think that's a big deal. It will be now as it should have been before you can just buy a tag for each season and it will only cost like $3 more than the all season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • JerkinLips
      41.6°F in Stuntz Bay Thursday morning.  Left my boat in the water to hopefully fish more before the lake freezes.  Caught four 9-11" walleyes in 2½ hours before I gave up due to the strong west wind.  Water level has not gone up more than a couple of inches at the most.  May be a good winter to jack my boathouse out of the water on the deep end.
    • Troy Smutka
      The calendar migrators from the Dakotas have been passing through central MN in trickles the past few weeks, and the recent cooler weather has some Canada ducks starting to show up. We have been harvesting mallards, pintails, gadwalls, wigeon, shovelers, greenwing teal, canvasbacks, redheads, bluebills, and ringnecks in decent numbers.
    • SkunkedAgain
      It doesn't look like the lake level has gone up at all. I was up a week ago and struggled to get my boat in and out of the public landing on the west end of Head O Lakes. I used my paddle to push the boat further out to deeper water. I could hear the hull moving over the sandy/muddy bottom near the launch.
    • JerkinLips
      Pretty tough.  Was catching about 2 walleyes per hour and the biggest was only 13".  Back up Thursday so I hope I have better success.
    • smurfy
      the kid and I always check our stands prior.......i'll go back to check the conditions of said stands before he gets there to see what we need. while i'm at it if i can i shoot at grouse with shells that appear to not have bb,s in them!!!!🙄
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the South Shore...  With unseasonably warm weather, there are still some anglers hitting the water and most have been rewarded.  Limits of walleyes and saugers being caught, and the forecast looking ahead is favorable. The best bite on the south end of LOW has been in 22-28 feet of water. Water temperatures are dropping and as the temps cool further, the bite has been excellent.     Vertical jigging with frozen emerald shiners has been the program for most anglers.  Bring plenty of bait, as you’ll need to sort through some smaller fish and short biters.  Plenty of eater fish to be had, just have to do a bit of sorting.  Anglers are also reporting very good numbers of jumbo perch and occasional pike mixed in with the walleyes.     For those fishing structure, if you slide up on top of a rock pile, don't be surprised to catch a big smallmouth bass, there are plenty around.   This week’s hot colors have been gold, gold/glow white, gold/chartreuse, gold/orange, and gold/glow white/pink.     One tip, a stinger hook on your jig will catch you more fish if you start missing too many fish. On the Rainy River...  Bait dealers are reporting good numbers of shiners in the river this past week.  Interesting, each night is different.  Some areas have the small shiners called pinheads.  Other areas have the larger minnows.     The river is producing some nice walleyes in various spots from Four Mile Bay to Wheeler's Point, to Baudette all the way to Birchdale.  There are 42 miles of navigable Rainy River from the mouth to Birchdale with plenty of public boat ramps along the way.     Walleyes are being caught in various depths, but 15-25 feet of water has been good.   Jigging with live or frozen emerald shiners has been highly effective. Some anglers are also trolling crankbaits to cover more ground and find fish. Both methods are producing solid results. Sturgeon fishing has been strong.  The catch-and-release sturgeon fishing is open into the spring when it changes to the "keep season" on April 24th. Up at the NW Angle...  Fall fishing continues to be excellent. Points, neck-down areas with current, shoreline breaks, and transition zones from rock to mud are all productive locations for walleye right now.   It is traditionally a mixed bag up around the many islands in this part of the lake and this fall is no different.  In addition to walleyes, pike, jumbo perch, and crappies are in the mix.  A jig and minnow has been the most effective presentation. Good muskie fishing is the norm during the fall of the year and area reports have been good.  In addition to casting, trolling shorelines, points and neckdown areas has been effective.  Muskies are often targeting schooling tullibees this time of year. The weather forecast for the next couple of weeks is conducive for fall fishing.  If you don't deer hunt, or if you have harvested your deer, consider some bonus walleye action before the ice forms.  The bite continues to be excellent.    
    • leech~~
    • gimruis
      I'm not one to leave that to chance the day I need it.  I always check on my stands prior to the season.  Just like I always shoot my rifle before the season and I always run my outboard motor before fishing opener.  Too many things to go wrong without confirming it ahead of time.   I guess it could have been beavers but the house itself didn't appear nearly big enough along one ditch.  It was about the size of chair.  I've seen beavers houses many times before and they appear much bigger than that.
    • leech~~
      Good thing you made a check run.  That would have really suked walking into opening day.  Why do you think muskrats and not beavers?  
    • gimruis
      Well I checked on stands over the weekend.  Kind of a disaster.   All the ditches are plum full and twice as wide becauase muskrats have clogged an area.  I spent an hour unclogging it and the water is slowly moving again, but our bridges and planks were underwater.  The back portion of the land where the best stand is was inaccessible.  Hopefully that changes by Saturday.  I have a feeling the muskrats are just going to clog it back up again.   Tons of standing corn still too.  They've started on it, but being so wet now with more rain coming, whatever's there will remain there for the foreseeable future.   All the grassland is completely flattened like a pancake due to 3-4 inches of heavy wet snow.  That eliminates about 75% of the pheasant habitat in this spot.  Total buzz kill.  And this specific spot was one of my better producers last season because the grass was intact and lush through December last year.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.