• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
hoggs222

Running deep cycle batteries in parallel?

Question

hoggs222

I know this has been covered, but there's no search function at the current time.

I have 2 Interstate group 27's that are the same age. I am looking to run them in parallel.

I believe that I need to run + to + and - to -? Am I missing anything?

The TV that I am running draws 42 watts. How much more will I get out of the battery life? The interstate group 27s say 20.4 hrs at 5 amp load and 5.7 hrs at 15 amp load. I will also be running a few lights off of it that are 12 volt lights.

Also, what guage wire should I use? What works better to run in parallel, the screw down posts or the aligator clips on the wider posts to make a better connection, or doesn't it matter?

Thanks,

Hoggs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
federline

Those group 27's are 100 amp-hour units if I remember right. Yes, you would hook them + to + and - to -. So you'd get 200 amp-hours under optimal conditions, but in the real world, you can only count on what the manufacturer rates a battery at for DOD, Depth of Discharge. Most recommend not discharging more than 50% of capacity. Regularly discharging to 80% of capacity will shorten battery life. 100% discharges wreck deep cycles, they're never the same. 60% to 70% is a good rule of thumb.

Lets take 60% DOD. That means that if you like to keep your your batteries healthy, you can eek out 120 amp hours (60% of 100 amp hours, times two).

Now we need to calculate amperage draw to find out how much runtime you will get.

You have a TV and 2 12v lights. We can get the TV amps draw since watts = amps x volts, or 42w divided by 12v = 3.5 amps.

But your lights, you don't give watts or amps - a single incandescent lightbulb can draw 1 or 2 amps, while an LED might only be 0.2 amps. We'll guess you are drawing 2 amps with a couple small incandescent bulbs.

So total amp draw is 5.5amps. With two group 27s at 60% DOD and the lights above and the TV on together non-stop, you would get 120 amp-hours divided by 5.5 amps, or about 22 hours. I've be frugal with the TV if I were you. grin.gif

If your batts are cold you will get less. If the draw is higher, you may get less, deep cycles have less DOD capacity under higher amperage loads, but you're probably not what most would call "high load".

For the wire for just running your house, you don't need anything fat to parallel them, your amperages are not outlandish. But, don't try to charge both batteries in place with thin parallel wires in place, charge them using their posts. I would also use the screw down terminals and not alligators - alligators sometimes get positioned so they spark a bit, and connections aren't that good sometimes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
hoggs222

Sweet! Sorry, I forgot to add that the lights are NOT LED. Screw down it is and the Wild game will be on tomorrow night!

We usually only use the batteries for a night or so, so the battery life won't be as big of a deal. Plus, that's what cribbage is for!

Federline, I see you're from Buffalo. I'll be out on Beebe tomorrow night in a green with a tan stripe wheelhouse. If you're in the neighborhood, stop on in for a cold one.

Thanks,

Hoggs

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
federline

Quote:

Federline, I see you're from Buffalo. I'll be out on Beebe tomorrow night in a green with a tan stripe wheelhouse. If you're in the neighborhood, stop on in for a cold one.


I may take you up on that, keep one on ice. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 0
hoggs222

Jim,

I saw a few days ago, you posted your email. With the last few days posts missing....what is it again?

Anyway, it was great to meet you. There's more hospitality where that came from! ;\)

My email is hoggs22@yahoo.com

Later,

Hoggs aka Jon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • IronDioPriest
      Hi folks... I wanna specifically address fishermen and women, boaters, outdoorsmen and women, and their spouses and significant others. Also, anyone who believes that our right to access public waterways supported by our tax dollars, and managed for our benefit by the DNR, should not be infringed upon by special interests... listen up... You may or may not know about a new program in Wright County to limit access to three lakes in the Annandale area where wealthy lake-home associations have coerced the County Board into implementing a pre-launch "AIS Inspection Station" in the city of Annandale. Anyone wishing to launch a watercraft on Lakes Sylvia, Pleasant, and John, must first travel to the city of Annandale (miles away from any boat landing), go through an inspection process, and be given permission to launch their boat in the form of a zip-tie on the trailer. There are MANY problems with this inspection regime. One problem is its hours of operation. It is open from sunup to sundown. This means that if you wish to go fishing in the evening, or at night, or early in the morning, you must first travel to Annandale THE DAY BEFORE you wish to access the lake, and get your zip-tie. Needless to say, this will undoubtedly prove to be a big enough burden on boaters and anglers that many will simply choose to go elsewhere, which, we contend, is the unstated goal of the Lake Associations who have funded this effort to lobby the County Board. They want non-residents off "their" lake. Another problem is the fact that these lakes are already unfortunately infested with AIS, which means inspecting boats on the way IN to the lake makes no logical sense. Only inspecting boats in their way OUT of an infested lake will have any chance of slowing or halting the spread of AIS. Another problem is that local businesses in Annandale, Southhaven, and to a lesser extent Clearwater and Maple Lake, will be adversely affected by the reduction in commerce that WILL occur as people from outside these fine communities decide to take their watercraft elsewhere. Another problem is the scope of this program, and the stated goals of those who are promoting it. They have said point-blank that they hope to have every county in MN look to Wright County as an example of what can be pushed through, as Lake Associations state-wide are organizing their resources and their political clout in an effort to see similar County ordinances implemented throughout Minnesota. This could, in the future, lead to a scenario where every boater who does not own lake property will first be required to travel to a central County Inspection Station in whatever county they wish to launch their boat, before they will be given permission to launch at a lake that may be many miles away from the station. We believe this is an infringement on the rights of Minnesota boaters and sportsmen to freely and responsibly access our public waterways. Even the DNR is skeptical of this program, but since it is a county matter, they are accepting it for now. Sorry for the lengthy statement. Now I'd like to ask you to take action. We have organized a social media page, over 600-strong now.... Our goal is to gather as many concerned people as we can in this group - and then appeal to the Chambers of Commerce in these fine cities, to organize themselves and appeal to the County Board for a reversal of this misguided policy, on the grounds that it will harm them economically as people take their dollars elsewhere to avoid the infringement of the inspection regime. If you haven't already, and you are concerned about liberty to access public waterways without undue burdens placed upon your access, would you consider lending your voice to ours, and joining our group? Thank you! Join Us!
    • delcecchi
      Actually, merc has Verado and "four strokes" . I have seen a fair number of mercs on west end but very few verado which have a distinct silhouette.
    • Rick G
      Not as easy to find bullheads in the chain as it was in the 80s-90s.... but you will still get a few here and there. The cats took care of most of the bullies over the yrs😉
    • Horseshoe_Don
      All sizes.  no bullheads in the chain.
    • ducksnbucks
      Thanks guys for the info. I think we will head out tomorrow and give it a shot. Will report what we find, thanks again! 
    • Mike89
      that's a monster ya mean!!!!!
    • monstermoose78
      The Tom turkeys are not playing well the hens are around and have come into the decoys. No Toms to be seen or heard. Lots of ticks today. 
    • CigarGuy
      My wife, son and I we're on Crystal Lake in Burnsville several years ago. My son was 14-1/2 yrs. old at the time, I use to let him drive the gravel roads up at deer camp all the time and let him back the trailer into the spot, he got pretty good at it. Anyway, back to the boat ramp at Crystal Lake. I dropped the wife and son off on the dock and waited my turn to load up...a local cop was at the ramp and my wife asked if it was ok if he backed in, he didn't mind.. vehicles were waiting and my son drops it in on the first try! Proud dad moment 👍👍
    • Jim Almquist
      The bog appears to be winning this little tug of war 😄
    • FishinCT
      That's how my dad taught me Tom! Got practice almost every night with the atv trailer when I turned 16 and could ice fish by myself. Once the summer rolled around a boat was a piece of cake!