• RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE

    You know what we all love...

    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
sodajerk

Flasher Advice - Vexilar? Marcum? What's the best model/value for the money?

Recommended Posts

sodajerk

I'm looking at getting a Vexilar hopefully sometime soon, but with laying out cash for Christmas ya never know. Gander in Roch has Vex models ranging from $280 (FL-8SE) to $460 for the FL-20.

On the Vexilar website, I saw a "Genz model" FL18 for about $380, the FL12 for a bit less, etc. I don't know much about Marcums, but I see from some brief research that their prices are in the same ball park.

I'm wondering what you guys think about the high end vs low end models. Are the cheaper ones good enough, or will I wish I had sprung a few more bucks and got the higher end model?

I don't know much about them, other than that they have some knobs and some pretty-colored flashy lights. wink.gif I'm thinking about things like ease of charging, hours of use on a charge, durability, warranty, features...

I'll use it mostly for ice fishing, as I'm pretty much a trout/fly fisherman in the summer (unless someone wants to give me a ride in their boat some summer Saturday...hint...hint.) tongue.gif

Any advice is much appreciated!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
smallieobsession

Look at the Lowrance X67c Ice Machine and plan on using it in a graph mode. It is awesome and is now even cheaper than anything you listed. You can find'em for $249 or maybe even less at times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crazyice

I have an FL-8 which is pretty much the basic Vexilar unit. It has served me quite well in the past years. What you get by going to the more expensive units is usually a little bit more target definition, and ofcourse the zoom feature. If you aren't set on buying one this year, I am considering selling mine after this season and upgrading for next year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tyler Holm

I've got an Vexilar FL-18 and a Marcum LX-5. Both these models have the zoom feature. This is a very nice deal when fish are tight to the bottom in deeper water.

Personally I think my marcum is easier to charge than my vex. It has a digital readout with the % charged. The vexilars you have to unhook the battery and hookup alligator clips to charge the unit. This might be changed in the FL-12/20 models thou.

Both units are durable and both can be used for a surprisingly long time. If forget how long, but something like 20+ hours (basically an entire weekend of fishing)

Your probably going to want to do more research than this forum can provide. One of our Pro Staffers has spent alot of time on an article that should really help with some of your questions.

http://mattjohnsonoutdoors.com/ChoosingtheRightFlasherUnit.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack

Anyone know why people are selling their LX5? I know both Rick and Surfacetention sold theirs.

Well, I was a die hard fan of Vexilar for many years, but if I got a deal on LX3, I would strike fast. I have only heard good things about these units. But, if I get a good deal on a FL-8, I would not pass it either.

I have been using an Eagle flasher for some time. I had it tuned up at local fish elec. store in Anoka and the thing works great. Basically as good as an FL-8, with out color (all amber lines). Also have been using a Humming bird Matrix 10 graph that has worked well on the ice. When set correct, I can see jig and minnow come up and down. Also I can see fish follow jig and minnow up from bottom.

All in all, this year I am sold on the Marcum line. A lot of good guys on this site swear by them and that’s good enough for me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icemac33

Soda - I started with an FL-8 and went to an LX-2 ( which I don't think Marcum makes anymore). I haven't fished the higher end Marcum's yet.I have to say that my FL-8 was just as good as the marcum. They each have their own advantages. I do believe that the marcum seems to run a little longer on one charge and the gain is more sensitive.I would also say to go with a used unit for your first one. I bought both my units used and have had no troubles.Both units are pretty tough stuff. You can save a bunch of cash buying here on the classifieds or some of the other sites. There are always a few around. It is a good way to see what you like, and an FL-8 that you buy this year for $150 can be sold next year for $150, if you decide to upgrade. Net cost to you = $0. Buy a new FL-8 or Marcum for $300 and sell for $250 or less next year.See where I'm going here? I have also had very positive experiences with each customer service department.One down side for Marcum is they don't have near the presence in retail stores as Vexilar does. If you're like me and need to have your hands on something in order to fork over the cash, you will not be satisfied with the amount of Marcum products you find on the shelf at your local store.That aspect of Marcum actually seems to be getting worse as time goes on.There is my humble, honest opinion. Good luck and don't forget the spud.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bugman

My first and only flasher I have ever owned is th Marcum LX-3 and I would reccommend it to anyone. After one trip to LOTW with my wife I might have to go buy another one because she used it most of the time, they are that easy to use and read. One feature the Marcum offers that Vexilars do not is you can use your zoom anywhere in the water table. However some people like vexilars because the can fit in a 5 gal. bucket unlike the Marcums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Down to Earth

Marcum also came out with a new model this year the Marcum VX1, which seems to be more of an entry level flasher with a price point of $250. Not sure what the features are on it and how it compares to the higher models. I'm not much of an ice fisherman and mostly have to rely on luck to get fish out of the hole. Maybe someday that will change for me.

Andy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wetaline

Last year I bought a Marcum and don't have any complaints about it. Can't believe I fished so many years with out one, money well spent. The one reason I picked the Marcum over the Vexilar is the Marcum's generally have more watts which is suppose to translate to better detection (at least that's what the sales person sold me on). Though with the higher wattage I think you tend to use more battery power. I never had a problem with the battery draining on me. After a long day of fishing I would automatically charge it when I got home as a precaution.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sodajerk

Thanks for all the advice guys! I've been doing a lot of reading about flashers for the past several days. There's a thread on the ice fishing forum on this site on this topic and some discussions (wars? smile.gif) about it on other sites as well.

I think I'm going with the MarCum LX-5, and the main reasons I'm going for that one over the FL-20 are 1) the LX-5's adjustable zoom, allowing you to focus on any part of the water column, and 2)the MarCums seem to have Vexilar beat in the interference rejection department. I also like the MarCum soft case included and the big wattage output.

I've done some wheeling and dealing, some shuckin' and jivin', and I think I'll have one before next weekend. Can't wait to try one out on the water. I see Gander has a bunch in stock, so no paying for shipping, and no waiting for UPS to show up. (I never buy anything used, except cars and houses.) wink.gif

Thanks again for the help, everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
crazyice

Good luck out there with it, I know you won't regret it!! And you are right about the interference thing, I can be fishing just feet away from an lx-5 with my fl-8 and I have all kinds of problems, and the guy using the marcum doesn't have any to speak of, just a couple of quick adjustments and he is off and fishing while I am still trying to get mine set.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tyler Holm

I've got an FL-18 and the LX-5. I like'em both very much. Both are great units and both are effective.

Personally for me, if I'm going to be fishing shallow water (5' or less), or the fish are just under the ice, I prefer my FL-18 as it seems to do a better job of reading fish in the top 4' of the water column.

My LX-5 goes with me about 95% of the time except as noted above. The unit is awesome and does a much better job of allowing you to put the bait right on the nose of the fish. The adjustable zoom and target separation are awesome! I also use the narrow beam alot when fishing deeper water, so I don't mark other lines/baits in the shack.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
sodajerk

The narrow beam is another reason I chose the LX-5. It's nice to have that capability if needed. Kinda strange that MarCum only offers that on one model, where Vexilar has it on several of them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mike Walerak

You can't go wrong with either. I have been running Marcums for the last few years and there is no turning back. I feel they give you the best bang for you buck and have some advantages such as the adjustable zoom to top it off. I never hit the ice without my LX-5!

mw

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • smurfy
      so eyeguy.......you keep them? picklin material???????? to many bones for anything else!!!!   nice pictures.!!!!! how many line tangles already!!!😄
    • eyeguy 54
      Hello thursday
    • Smoker2
    • maxpower117
      No wake is in effect currently and will be for the weekend opener.  Spread the word. 
    • Pat McGraw
      I wouldn't read too much into the open water in Oak Narrows. There's been open water there for more than a month. There's clearly forces other than air temps or sunshine at work there. With that said, considering the data shared by delcecchi, and the current 15-day forecast I am not without hope.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Enforcement Division has promoted four officers – Chelsie Leuthardt, Brandon McGaw, Jen Mueller and Brett Oberg – to the position of regional training officer. They’ve been in their new positions since April 18.  The Enforcement Division’s six regional training officers are responsible for training the state’s conservation officers on topics such as defensive tactics, firearms and use of force. In addition, they train and work closely with the 6,000 volunteers who are integral to delivering the division’s education and safety training program. (The largest number of volunteers, about 4,000, are firearms safety instructors.) Regional training officers also spend a portion of their time performing the traditional field duties of a conservation officer. Following are brief bios of the newly promoted officers: Chelsie Leuthardt has been a conservation officer for four years and most recently patrolled the White Bear Lake area. “I’ve made strong connections with many instructor groups and look forward to working with them more closely,” said Leuthardt, whose area includes the southeastern part of the state. “I enjoy working with our user groups and helping to form how we train our next generations of outdoor enthusiasts.” Brandon McGaw has been a conservation officer since 2007. For most of that time, he’s been stationed in the Mora area. He’s also been a Conservation Officer Academy instructor, field training officer, firearms instructor and use of force instructor. “I really love teaching,” said McGaw, whose area includes 10 counties north of the metro. “I enjoy connecting with the students as well as the older adults who take safety training courses.” Jen Mueller began her career as a conservation officer in the Hutchinson-West station in 2012. Mueller, who was promoted after serving as an acting regional training officer, said she learned quickly that participating in the Enforcement Division’s youth safety programs was one of her favorite parts of the job. “I’m amazed by our volunteer instructor groups and how passionate they are about what they’re teaching,” said Mueller, whose area includes the southwestern part of the state. “I also enjoy teaching our officers and helping them become better equipped to deal with situations they may face in the field.” Brett Oberg has been a conservation officer for 13 years and spent much of that time in the Hutchinson-East station. He’s also been an armorer, field training officer and use of force instructor. “I really enjoy training others and seeing youth get excited about the outdoors, especially firearms and hunting,” said Oberg, whose area includes the south metro and south-central part of the state. “I also enjoy teaching at the Conservation Officer Academy and helping the new recruits become conservation officers.” The four officers join Regional Training Officer Mike Lee, who covers the northeastern part of the state, and Acting Regional Training Officer Greg Oldakowski, who is responsible for the northwestern part of the state. Bruce Lawrence is the Enforcement Division’s statewide recreational vehicle coordinator. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Calves mark successful introduction of Theodore Roosevelt National Park herd genetics With new bison calves expected at Minneopa State Park in the coming weeks and months, managers with the Department of Natural Resources Parks and Trails division are reminding visitors to keep calves’ safety in mind by remaining in their vehicles along the park’s popular bison range road.  “The bison cows are incredibly protective of their calves, and it’s tempting for park visitors to get out of their vehicles to take photos,” said Parks and Trails area supervisor Craig Beckman. “However, it’s important for people to remember to stay in their vehicles for the safety of these calves, their mothers and other park visitors.” The new additions are offspring of the bison bull that was introduced in December 2016. That’s significant, Beckman said, because the bison bull comes from Theodore Roosevelt National Park and possesses a genetic line that’s not well represented in the Minnesota Bison Conservation Herd. That genetic line will contribute to the herd’s overall genetic health and diversity. While Minneopa State Park is seeing its first successful additions to the herd, the bison herds at Blue Mounds State Park and the Minnesota Zoo are also seeing new calves this year. For visitors viewing the bison at state parks, patience can be rewarded. “Newborns need time for maternal bonding, and may be hard to see from the road for a while, but as they grow and mature, they become more visible,” Beckman said. “We tell visitors that they will be more likely to see the bison if they are patient and take it slow as they drive through the range.” Bison viewing tips: The bison drive begins near the campground off state Highway 68. A vehicle permit ($7/one-day or $35/year-round) is required to enter the park. Bison may be difficult to spot at times. Drive slowly and keep a watchful eye through the range. Remain inside vehicle while driving through the bison range. Bison should be given clearance of at least 75 feet from people and vehicles at all times. Dogs can make bison nervous, so pets must be kept on a leash while in the park and hiking around the bison range. Bison get nervous around loud noises or lots of activity, so keep voices down and movements to a minimum to help keep the bison within easy viewing. Hiking is not allowed inside the range, but there are hiking trails all the way around the outside of the range that can provide some fantastic views of the bison. The bison are part of the Minnesota Bison Conservation Herd, managed through a formal agreement between the DNR and Minnesota Zoo. The partners are working together to preserve American plains bison and plan to grow the herd at several locations, including Blue Mounds and Minneopa state parks and the Minnesota Zoo. The goal is a 500-animal herd at multiple locations. Genetic testing of the herd from 2011 to 2014 found them largely free of any genetic material that would have come from cross-breeding with cattle. Less than 1 percent of all American plains bison tested so far have been found free of cattle genes. Visitors at Minneopa can check the park website for updates on the bison herd and its new calves at mndnr.gov/Minneopa. The site also provides more information about the park, including a virtual tour. Minneopa State Park is located off U.S. Highway 169 and state Highway 68, 5 miles west of Mankato. The bison range road is open Thursday through Tuesday each week from 9am to 3:30pm. For more information about the Minnesota Bison Conservation Herd on the Minnesota Zoo website or visit mndnr.gov/bison. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has scheduled an auction of confiscated hunting and fishing equipment for Saturday, Aug. 4. The auction, which is open to the public, will include items from people who forfeited their equipment after committing serious game and fish violations. More than 200 firearms, over 40 bows, and a variety of other hunting and fishing-related equipment will be available.  The auction will be at Hiller Auction Service in Zimmerman. Public inspection of the items will be available in advance of the auction. All equipment will be sold as-is, including all defects or faults, known or unknown. Once they’ve been purchased, items cannot be returned. Background checks are required of anyone who purchases a firearm. Revenue from confiscated equipment auctions goes into the Game and Fish Fund, which is the DNR’s primary fund for delivering fish, wildlife and law enforcement programs. Details about the auction will be available as the date draws closer. For more information, see mndnr.gov/enforcement/auctions/index.html. A list of equipment to be auctioned will be posted online approximately one month in advance of the auction at www.hillerauction.com. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Some anglers go above and beyond to make fishing better in Minnesota by purchasing walleye stamps that help the Department of Natural Resources add walleye to lakes where there otherwise would be none.  “Buying a walleye stamp is a concrete way to help maintain fishing opportunities in Minnesota,” said Neil Vanderbosch, DNR fisheries program consultant. Funds from walleye stamps go toward the cost of purchasing 4- to 6-inch walleye called fingerlings from private fish farms for stocking into lakes. A walleye stamp is not required to fish for or keep walleye. Anglers with a fishing license can purchase the walleye stamp validation for $5, and for an extra 75 cents can have the pictorial stamp mailed to them. Walleye stamps can be purchased anywhere Minnesota fishing licenses are sold, online at mndnr.gov/buyalicense or by phone by calling 888-665-4236. Alternatively, anglers can download a form found at mndnr.gov/stamps and return it to the DNR to have the stamp mailed. The DNR raises and stocks walleye, but also buys walleye fingerlings from private producers to be stocked into lakes – walleye stamp sales help pay for these fish. Since 2009, funds from the walleye stamp have purchased over 40,000 pounds of walleye fingerlings that have been stocked in the fall, all over the state. Walleye fingerlings generally are stocked in lakes that do not have naturally reproducing walleye populations. A vast majority of the walleye Minnesota anglers catch come from waters where the fish reproduce naturally – about 260 larger walleye lakes and in large rivers. But because of stocking, walleye can be found in an additional 1,050 Minnesota lakes spread throughout the state. More information about habitat stamps can be found at mndnr.gov/stamps. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      New carbon monoxide law aimed at saving boaters In advance of the 2018 boating season, Minnesota will be the first state in the nation to require carbon monoxide detectors and warning stickers on certain boats. Sophia’s Law, named after 7-year-old Sophia Baechler, who died tragically from carbon monoxide poisoning while on her family’s boat, takes effect May 1.  “Carbon monoxide is a hidden danger,” said Adam Block, boating law administrator for the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. “The deadly gas is odorless, invisible and closely mimics signs of intoxication or seasickness. Even at low levels, carbon monoxide can be lethal.” Under the new law, functioning, marine-grade carbon monoxide detectors must be installed in recreational motorboats with a designated sleeping accommodation, a galley area with a sink, and a toilet compartment. For all gasoline-powered motorboats with an enclosed occupancy compartment, three carbon monoxide warning stickers are required. The stickers must be attached at the helm, the enclosed occupancy space and the stern. Warning stickers and information about the dangers of carbon monoxide while boating were mailed to registered boat owners in the spring of 2017. Stickers also can be found at all Minnesota deputy registrars and many marinas and marine dealers. “As the land of 10,000 lakes, it makes good sense for Minnesota to lead the charge in boating safety,” Block said. “Sophia’s Law was designed to protect boaters from the dangers of carbon monoxide and prevent future tragedies from happening.” More details on Sophia’s Law are at www.mndnr.gov/boatingsafety. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.