Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Trap in open Field - Was this Right?


tealitup

Recommended Posts

On Saturday, my lil puppy and I enjoyed a walk in a local WMA (outside the city of Crown). The snow coming down (her first snow) along an open field was great.

I noticed a small orange flag in the field. We so did my puppy. As she started running over to it I had her stop and sit. As she turned she must have thrown up some dirt because a trap went off (a leg hold trap).

This was in an open field - and I looked at the trap but there was no information on it; no name or phone number. Just by itself; no tracks to or from it. The flag was not weather worn so it had to be placed within the past 2 weeks.

What kind of bothered me - this is an area which many people hunt pheasants with their dogs. The trap was large enough to hold my dogs leg and many others. Was this right or a trapper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

no trap tag on the trap then the trapper was illegal.

If there was a trap tag on it, then the trapper would be in the right, unless there are restrictions in WMA's in Minnesota. Did you leave the trap? Did you contact a CO because there was no trap tag?

Lastly, leg hold traps are not designed to harm the animal, and I am sure your puppy was not injured at all correct? If pheasant hunters are with their dogs and they get in a set they will not be harmed, the owner will just have to go over and release them. Remember that foothold traps are not designed to injure or maim the animal that steps in it, just designed to hold the animal. In the case of a domestic animal, as long as the owner is with, the dog will just be "held" until they go over and release it.

Anyway sorry for the rant, Contact the CO if the trap did not have a trap tag on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that a leg hold trap does not hurt the animal. I did call the TIP line to let them know.

Also, the trap was hand cut to have "V" shapes in the trap part. Kind of hard to explain. Like both sides were cut to have wedges that came together. I thought a leg trap was just flat on the trap part.

Nope, my dog was not injured - just was wondering if this trap was in the right to be in a WMA. I am not mad at all - I want there to be more trappers out there to get the coyotes and fox (more ducks). And I, infact, would someday like to try trapping.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Also, the trap was hand cut to have "V" shapes in the trap part. Kind of hard to explain. Like both sides were cut to have wedges that came together. I thought a leg trap was just flat on the trap part.


I am a bit confused on yoru description here. There are many parts to the trap, levers, pan, dog, jaws, springs, base. Think you can be a little more specific?

If the V shape was cut into the pan then it was a Victor brand of trap. Any chance that i named the parts now that you can explain it a little further?

Glad you called tip if there were no trap tags present.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Also, the trap was hand cut to have "V" shapes in the trap part. Kind of hard to explain. Like both sides were cut to have wedges that came together. I thought a leg trap was just flat on the trap.


Are you thinking of the jaws? The actual pieces of metal that would hold an animals foot? Unless I am mistaken, traps with teeth on the jaws are not legal.

If this is the case, my guess is that somebody found an old trap and decided to set it and see what would happen. I can't imagine it was a serious trapper.

Wh1stler

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, if the trap is on your own land...you don't have to have a tag on the trap...isn't that right?

The "V" cutting you talk about, was the trap made to have teeth? That is not legal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

he has every right to trap in an open feild whether or not people pheasant hunt it with dogs or not but, the trap no tagged is unlawful and the DNR should be contacted and shown where the trap is, DO NOT PULL THE TRAP LET THE DNR DO THAT PART!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, the DNR laws state "A person many not set or place a trap, other than on property owned or occupied by ther person, unless the following information is affixed to the trap..."

From that, I understand that if the trap is on your own land, you do not have to have a tag on the trap. Am I correct?

People hunt on this land...is it public or privately owned? If privately owned, does someone give permission to hunt there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not trying to start a battle of words here.

The part that holds the animals foot had "v" notches cut. So the part which snaps closed onto the animals foot had teeth if you will.

Not on private land - it was on a Wildlife Management Area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep they are called teeth, and they are no longer legal in minnesota. Was TIP going to send someone out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not trying to start a battle either...just trying to get all the facts.

The trap was illegal then, both the teeth and the set. That is probably why it wasn't properly tagged...for the trap is illegal (teeth).

Kind of strange he marked it with a flag....

If privately owned and your dog was actually tresspassing, he was legal...except for the teeth on the traps. You were lucky your dog didn't get caught, that trap is not just make to "hold" an animal...but hurt it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK STOP! We were not tresspassing. I do not TRESSPASS!

If anyone knows the area - it is about 10 miles east of Zimmerman and 3-4 Miles north of Crown. Its called Crown WMA. Backside of the swamp about 200 yards from the parking area.

I left a message on the TIP phone line and no-one has called me back

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I was NOT accusing you of tresspassing.

Take it easy....

I was just explaining the rules for all to see.

It is definately an illegal set...and those added "teeth" scare me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hammerhandle the teeth are not meant to hurt the animal either, they are meant to keep the animal from struggling at all. To the point where if they start to strugle, they the points dig in and they no longer struggle. It was a good idea that has been banned in many places because it is viewed as cruel.

It was not designed TO be cruel, just a side effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes but it was a WMA (public land) there fore the following info was needed(one of these)

full name

license #

so on and so forth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Trap sounds Illegal. As far as where it was set is legal. Did you look closely down by the stake for the persons tag. I once got accused for not having my traps tagged. But they were. The tags were wrapped around the chain next to the stake. Partially underground. Also, Remember you are not the only one enjoying the great outdoors, Some just enjoy it in different ways than others.

Just my 2 cents.

Fishermann222, How are you man? Lets see some pictures buddy.

Randy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey rainman I am off to a slow start we had a bad thaw and lost all the snow and everything opened up. WE are froze up again, but just barely, got about 2 inches of snow today with 6 more to come tonight and tomorrow, if it wasn't for the 40mph winds coming i would get out and set after school today. WIth those winds though, no way am i going to set, I will be digging for weeks.

I had some "issues" with the first spot I was trapping this year, someone thought that this area 3 miles out of town was their personal space to walk their dogs. The State troopers have been involved and told me i need to reset the area and if more problems arise they will handle them.

Might be an interesting year up here. Heck I am 3 miles out of town, people trap IN TOWN up here.

We wont' make it up to the Yukon for wolves, wolverine, marten, and lynx until probably January with the ice conditions this year, just not safe, and a mistake up here WILL cost you your life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Weren't the teeth banned for they hold the animal better by digging into the skin/meat? That is why they were banned...and it does hurt the animal more than a trap with no teeth.

They can stop the animal from struggled for it hurts them more...but most old traps I saw with teeth go right through the skin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok after reading your reply and having many things to say, I withheld my comments until i met with the local ADFG (alaska dept of fish and game) bio's today who are also trappers. This is what they had to say

They were designed to keep the foot from sliding sideways in the jaws and thus cutting the critter. they were an attempt to be more humane. They ARE still legal in Alaska.

The teeth are offset so they do not "meet" but rather are seperated leaving room for hte foot of the animal so the teeth do not push against it unless there is a struggle, and then it stops it from sliding.

Hope that helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am just going by past experience.

My family has trapped for many years, and I recently started again. We have some very old traps with teeth in them (which I don't use).

I just remember a huge difference on traps with teeth and without. As a kid, the animals caught with teeth had a lot more damage done to the leg.

This year, I happened to catch a Tom Turkey in my trap (happened to step in the wrong place). I was able to let the turkey go and he was fine. I suspect that if my trap had teeth in it, his foot would have been more damaged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The location of the trap in an open season for furbearers seams ok. The ethics and of course illegality of a trap with teath and without a tag would have had me pulling this trap so the person who set it illegally could not have done so again.(If I could clearly see there was no tag)(sometimes tages are wrapped on the chain, the trap ring, swivel or frame of the trap.) I then would have called tip or a warden and let them know what and where I found it. I think TIP is great, but I also know they have often not responded to several legitimate calls of a friend of mine. If this trap did not have teeth and you could clearly see the whole trap and chain without disturbing the set, and it had no tag, then it was also illegal, but I would not have pulled it, just reported it.

You should not disturb someone elses legally set traps just to see who the trap belongs to. (just wish them luck and hope they respect the animals they are after) Like someone else said, often the trap and much of the chain is burried and just a trap snapping does not unearth all that is burried. Good trappers go to great care to eliminate scent on their equipment and at the trap site. Unless your animal is accidentally caught, don't ruine his hard work.

I am supprised someone flagged this trap when it was set impropperly, but from a dog hunters perspective, would be gratefull he did so I could keep my pet free of the jaws. Even so, he has a responsibility to know the laws, rules and ethics of trapping. I used to trap and know what happens good and bad when a trap snapps on a foot. I also know that depending on the size of the trap and the size of the dog in question, the outcomes vary.

Good luck to all trapping and hunting in the areas of trappers. Public lands are open to a large group of people and we all need to respect each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well the trap may have been set by a uninformed youth. To me reading it was marked with a flag tells me that there may have been some consideration.Im sure you checked this trap over real good and didnt find a tag.. My self I roll my tags up tight around either the last link or if small enough on the ring.Your name is no longer required your DL# or MNDNR # covers it.

Ground in teeth are far different than the opposing teeth on the #14 jumpers. Foot holds and improper use have given trapping a bad name.

Most damage happens on dry ground sets from a long chain to a stake or a over sized trap in use which is exactly why the BMP guidelines are in place now. To bad it took so long for people to figured out that once a foot is crushed thats when the chewing and wring offs happen. Even worse is to short of a drowner when wet trapping...

My bet is some kid has found some old steel,asked grandpa ect what to do.

I used to hunt roosters around mine and others trap sets. Common sense would tell me that If I saw a flag to stay away and "control my dogs" even if I have the right to hunt whatever..

Ive pulled my lab out of several foot sets and one 220. Its not pretty and its mighty scary..I just accept the fact and move on.

When I did contact the guy trapping with 220's I informed him what happened, he did find a cubbie set messed with.. Considering that I didnt take his trap but only gathered intell from the tag that if would either flag mark them or let me know where to expect I could avoid a repeat..Of course he was hesitant but was obliging..

Personally I think that a bucket set is one of the finest coon sets ever devised and should be the only way a 220 should be allowed on dry ground and with a marker flag .. BUT thanks to Thieves and clowns messing with sets generally a trapper has to take more time in hiding his sets than needed. Too bad to considering the need for predator control..

Just got home from the cities and saw more mink tracks in every ditch along 35w,any waterfowl and upland hunter should be greatfull for anyone out there controlling the main killers of all game birds.....

I called the warden several times on people messing with sets its mighty irritating to see how a personal opinion becomes vindication for action.

With Trapr on that respect..

Tealitup has a good attitude and appreciates trappers, Sounds to me like a learning experience that went better than it could have and that he has control over a puppy which is excellent. Maybe teal should get into to trapping?? Its a good time and $$$ to be made. Just another good reason to be outdoors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tealitup,

Pita would have a blast with the answers everyone has come up with.

You are right! I have been trapping since the late 70's. Leave the law out of this. (even if the trap was not legal)

Trappers need to think before they place a trap. The hand book doesn't say that. If on public land, they need to understand that they are not the only ones there!

If there is sign that hunters and dogs are in the area, don't set a trap that may catch a dog. (flag or not). If a trapper is actually trapping for a living, they aren't paying enough taxes to claim any steak on public land anyway.

Here is the real deal, If you need to look it up in the trapping manual to see if it is legal, it more than likely isn't. But if it is legal, it is more than likely not ethical. Those that fight this are the ones we can blame when they take our rights away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

tc is right. There are plenty of places where it is legal to set a trap where only a fool would set one. Unfortunately there are more than enough fools as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
    • leech~~
      As I get older it's really not just about sending bullets down range.  Some of it's just the workmanship of the gun and the wow factor. The other two guns I have really wanted which I'll never have now because of their price, is a 8mm Jap Nambu and 9mm German Luger.   Just thought they always looked cool!  
    • jim curlee
      I had a guy hit me with a lightly used 1969 BAR, he wanted $1650 with an older Leupold scope. More than I think they are worth, I made an offer, he declined end of story.   You know if you look at the old brochures, a grade II BAR sold for $250 in the late 60s, $1650 would be a good return on your investment.    Why would anybody want a 50 year old gun, they are heavy, have wood stocks, and blued metal.  I guess mainly to keep their gun safes glued to the floor. lol   You can probably buy a stainless rifle that you never have to clean, with a synthetic stock you never have to refinish, is as light as a feather, and for half as much money, perfect.   I'm too old for a youth gun, although I've shrunk enough that it would probably fit. lol   No Ruger 10/44s.   Jim      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.