• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Tadpoletodd

To Bait...or Not to Bait ???

Recommended Posts

Tadpoletodd

Quote from 2007 MN Hunting Regulations, pg 72...

Bait

• Liquid scents, salt, and minerals are not considered bait, unless they contain other foods defined below as bait.

• “Bait” is grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay, or other food that is capable of attracting or enticing deer and that has been transported and placed by a person.

• This restriction does not apply to foods resulting from normal or accepted farming, forest management, wildlife food plantings, orchard management, or similar land management activities.

• The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.

• Hunters are not allowed to use bait or hunt in the vicinity of bait that the hunter knows about or has reason to know about or hunt in the vicinity where bait has been placed within the previous ten days.

Bullet point #4 clearly states that the restriction to use bait does not apply to someone hunting on their own property as long as certain stipulations (...involvement...agreement...with neighbor...) are met. Could this not be interpreted that if you are hunting on your own property, and you have no direct or indirect involvement with a neighbor regarding baiting, you can hunt over bait yourself. Is that interpretation incorrect?!?

I've always thought baiting was prohibited across the board. But then I read that, do a double take, read it again and then ask myself "does this mean I can hunt over an apple pile on my own property as long as I'm not in cahoots with my neighbors, etc, etc?" It just got me thinking.

I'm new to the hunting portion of this forum and did a search on this subject but came up with nothing. I apologize if it's been covered already. I'm interested in any feedback.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack

Quote:


when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.


This part pertains to the property owner/hunter!

If you do not participate in the baiting going on next door, you can not get in trouble.

Last year, you could get in trouble even if you did not know about your neighbors bait pile. Last year, as long as the deer you shot, eat from you neighbors bail pile, you could get fined.

The was changed to protect a hunter from getting in trouble from this occurring. Also to protect a hunter from hunter harassment by a neighbors purposely baiting deer to make a hunter not able to hunt that land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tadpoletodd

Thanks for the link to the other thread. I figured this had been hashed out in depth already.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack

Now, this rule does not apply to public lands, only private lands! That still is a grey area.

Scenario:

I hunt state forest land, that buts up against private property. The owner of the private property has a bait pile for deer pictures, habitat or hunter harassment. The private land owner could even be hunting illegally him self over bait pile. In theory, even if you do not know about bait pile, it is illegal for you as the hunter to hunt over a trail or deer that comes from that pile.

Now your chances of getting into trouble are going to be slim, if you did not know about the bait pile. But, there is that lingering doubt that something could happen. I wonder how many times CO’s and Game wardens hear “I am not involved” or “I did not know” and that person was lying and found to be lying. I think CO’s and Wardens might rather have a court of law decide if you are lying or not. Thus a ticket or fines are issued and bla, bla, bla! That’s the way I think my luck would be!

I think we will see a law change next year to include the hunter on public lands as well. Or maybe not!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gspman

This point was brought up either on the radio or on KFAN outdoors lately and the DNR rep made it clear that it's not okay. The rule on bullet #4 is being misinterpreted that it's okay to bait on your own land when it still is not. You will see this rule change to be made more clear next year.

I'd follow bullet #5 to be on the safe side.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Tadpoletodd

Oh, I have, and will, continue to follow #5. I read the other post and some people implied I'm "insane" for interpreting it the way I did. I wasn't looking for a loop-hole. It truly was just the honest interpretation I made after simply reading it through several times. I don't think I'm "insane". tongue.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Bryan P
      Awesome Eyeguy! That is a good run of smallies there. I like your spot, that was my favorite fishing stretch for them when I lived in St cloud. Mississippi is such a great smallie fishery. Im blessed to live right next to it too. Now lets get the current to go down some! 
    • eyeguy 54
      I LOVE SMALLIES !  LOL  I am blessed to live close to so much fun. 
    • pikeandchester
      Spent a couple hours on Elysian this afternoon.  Drove around some shallow areas on the south east end of the lake with the trolling motor and only saw carp. Water is still unusually clear for this lake, at any time of the year, and 79 degrees near shore. May be a great opportunity for a bow fisherman, even in the daylight. Tried soaking minnows in a hole on the north end with no luck.
    • Fully Kraeusened
      My choice would be Namakan, but honestly that’s mostly based on emotion. It’s where my dad and I fished the most while up there. I also think it’s prettier than Kab.  I’ve never been on Sand Point or Crane. Just my two cents. I’ll be up there one week from today. Staying on the Ash River if anyone would care to enjoy a cold one first round is on my buddy. 😁
    • ANYFISH2
      Sounds like a heck of an evening! Alot of fun also.
    • eyeguy 54
      Hit the water at 5 and back to shore at 7. 21 smallies smacked the stick bait.   Biggest went 18.  Had one that did a great jump and landed in the yak by my foot. LOL 
    • ANYFISH2
      Happy Memorial Day Weekend to all! I would like Thank all, that have made the ultimate sacrifice for us all, as well as thier families.  THANK YOU! My blessings to you, who use this weekend in remembrance of you passed loved ones.  God bless.   Hope those that get out on our lakes have a safe and successful weekend.   Remember to let us know how your weekend went, and please give us a report in our Area forums!  
    • ANYFISH2
      Happy Memorial Day Weekend to all! I would like Thank all, that have made the ultimate sacrifice for us all, as well as thier families.  THANK YOU! My blessings to you, who use this weekend in remembrance of you passed loved ones.  God bless.   Hope those that get out on our lakes have a safe and successful weekend.   Remember to let us know how your weekend went, and give us a report here in the Brainerd Lakes area!
    • Rick
      The Great Lakes Compact Council and the Great Lakes Regional Body are seeking public feedback on draft updates to the procedures for reviewing requests to divert water from the Great Lakes Basin. The compact is federal law that governs the use of water in the Great Lakes watershed. The compact council and regional body are accepting comments through June 21, at 4:30 p.m.  Under the compact, diversions of water out of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin are generally prohibited. However, the compact identifies limited circumstances under which diversion may be allowed. In some instances, before a diversion proposal can be approved, it must undergo review by the regional body and may require approval by the compact council. The draft updates are strictly procedural and would not modify the compact’s basic terms. The compact council is composed of the governors of the eight states that border the Great Lakes. The regional body includes the eight governors on the council plus the premiers of Ontario and Quebec. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is Gov. Mark Dayton’s delegate to both groups and provides data and water management expertise to assist implementing the compact. The effort to refine the procedures under the compact follows the states’ and provinces’ first experience reviewing a diversion request under the agreement. Reflecting on that experience and feedback from stakeholder groups, the states and provinces concluded that some aspects of the procedures should be clarified or refined. Following discussions with key stakeholders and tribal interests, the states and provinces developed the draft updates that were released for public review May 22. The updates include these changes: Expands opportunities for the public to participate at hearings and public meetings. Acknowledges the special status of First Nations and federally recognized Tribes through separate meetings with them and granting standing to contest compact council decisions. Identifies circumstances under which an additional public comment period would be offered between issuance of the regional body’s declaration of finding and the compact council’s final decision. Essentially, if the compact council views the regional body’s modifications to the applicant’s diversion proposal as substantial, the council would take public comment prior to making its final decision. The existing public comment opportunity prior to the regional body’s deliberations would remain. After considering public input received by June 21, the regional body will revise the draft procedural updates this summer. The compact council will then consider the updates and decide whether some or all of them should be adopted through rulemaking. The draft updates are available at www.glslcompactcouncil.org/PUT-DraftUpdates.aspx. This website includes instructions for sharing feedback. The public input process includes an in-person opportunity to share feedback in Duluth on June 21 at Fitger’s Inn at 10:30 a.m. Documents are also available on the regional body website. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Spss
      I'm camping out on echo lake next week. Any tips or fishing info would be great.