• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
tealitup

Baiting

Recommended Posts

tealitup

When I was bear hunting this weekend - I had the chance to read the laws booklet - cover to cover (what else to do in a bear stand). Please read the following about bait (general) and tell me what you think.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hunting Method Restrictions

Bait

• Liquid scents, salt, and minerals are not considered bait, unless they contain other foods defined below as bait.

• “Bait” is grain, fruit, vegetables, nuts, hay, or other food that is capable of attracting or enticing deer and that has been transported and placed by a person.

• This restriction does not apply to foods resulting from normal or accepted farming, forest management, wildlife food plantings, orchard management,or similar land management

activities.

• The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.

• Hunters are not allowed to use bait or hunt in the vicinity of bait that the hunter knows about or has reason to know about or hunt in the vicinity where bait has been placed within the previous ten days.

___________________________

• The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person.

THis section seems to say that the section as a whole does not apply to landowners who do not conspire to feed animals on adjacent land. AM I WRONG IN READING THIS?

Maybe I am just stupid today, but... I looked in the 2005 rules/policy book and this written section was not there. (I could not find a 2006 book).

Also, emailed DNR today.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I think its saying that I could legally bowhunt behind my house, even though my neighbors may have feeders out for deer that I know about.

Basically its saying that if you conspire with someone else to feed deer on their property to benefit you, you are in the wrong. If you know somebody is feeding deer, and its all on their terms, you are fine to hunt the area. BUT, I'll use caution to not sit directly on a trail going to those feeders.

Definitely some gray in all this.

Thats a very high level analysis on my part.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chucker34

It sure looks like that but remember the "smell test." If it smells wrong, even though you're following the letter of the law, the DNR can warn you and make an example of you in a gray area such as this. I'm not saying you, in particular, or that you would do it. Just saying people in general should consider this.

Consider the following. What if my neighbor has a farm where the deer visit the corn crib every night and I set up 100 yards from it on my own property that adjoins. Legal, perhaps, maybe not. He's not baiting for me, but I know that its pretty much smells like baiting. I don't want to find out the hard way that what I'm doing is going to get my hunting priveleges revoked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I am not justifying the grayness of the issue, just stating thats what it pretty much means though.

Tealitup wanted to know what it meant, and basically thats what it means.

I completely agree with you chuck.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

I think its saying that I could legally bowhunt behind my house, even though my neighbors may have feeders out for deer that I know about.

Basically its saying that if you conspire with someone else to feed deer on their property to benefit you, you are in the wrong. If you know somebody is feeding deer, and its all on their terms, you are fine to hunt the area. BUT, I'll use caution to not sit directly on a trail going to those feeders.

Definitely some gray in all this.

Thats a very high level analysis on my part.


That's exactly why it was changed by the legislature. There were a few situations around the state where people couldn't hunt their own property because a neighor was feeding and they'd be hunting over bait. So, it was changed to exempt people IF they weren't involved in the feeding on the neighbors property.

It can definitely be gray (what isn't these days) but I did like the comment about passing the 'sniff test'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hossienda

Maybe you can also help me with this part of it:

• "The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person."

Would this mean that if I am hunting private property and I have no ownership stake in it that I could get a ticket?

Thanks,

-Hossienda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

Maybe you can also help me with this part of it:

• "The restriction does not apply to a person hunting on their own property, when the person has not participated in, been involved with, or agreed to feeding wildlife on adjacent land owned by another person."

Would this mean that if I am hunting private property and I have no ownership stake in it that I could get a ticket?

Thanks,

-Hossienda


The statute was specific to a landowner exemption. As indicated, unless you own the property, you are not protected by the exemption.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ufatz

Just a cautionary note fellas: remember that it does not matter what people in here "think" or "guess" the law means. It is the interpretation used by the COURT that will prevail. The "smell test" admonition was on point. wink.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

I have firm belief that what lcorn says, is about as good as it gets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Harv
      Saturday opener was great on Basswood for 3 of us.  Well, bitter sweet.  We brought 10 fish home; but due to the slot of only 1 over 20 inches we had to let 10 fish go.  Some  big eyes that afternoon
    • TheEyesofanAngler
      it definitely is a good area! i appreciate the advice i''ll definitely get out there a couple times to give it a try. Yes, i do have a kayak. My friend is always talking about st johns.   Side note: Has anyone ever had a chance to get out to Calhoun or Lake of isles?  I heard the bass are there in fairly large size.. 
    • DLD24
      I bet a lot of people fishing the big tourney wish you would have posted this before the tournament haha. What size jerkbaits were you guys using 10s? Great video.
    • delcecchi
      Best   I could do.  If you get deperate, Big Bay of Vermilion is only like 25 miles down the road.   
    • Rick G
      Great video, thanks for sharing, Mitch😉
    • Rick G
      Those are some nice fat bass😉. Avon area is fun, lots of good water out there. Spunk chain has nice green bass and a bonus walleye now and then.  . Pelican and Pine are both worth a try a couple times a yr as well, have done very goid on Pine when its been too windy to get on the bigger lakes. You mentioned a kayak? St Johns lakes are awsome, though I haven't been out there in couple yrs
    • Rick
      Nice outing and very nice pics.
    • Wheres_Walter
      Headed up tomorrow for Memorial weekend.  Any tips on walleye patterns?  Deep?  Shallow?  Still chubs/rainbows?  Not looking for spots or secrets, just a little info to get started.   Smallies move up yet with the water temp rising?
    • Borch
      Thanks for checking. 
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources urges property owners in the southern part of the state to wait one month before removing evergreens that are showing stress after a harsh winter and late spring. Some will recover.  DNR forest health specialists have received reports of spruce, white cedar, and white pine that appeared to die suddenly in Fillmore, Houston, Freeborn, Goodhue, and Hennepin counties. In some cases, up to 90 percent of needles in the upper canopy of spruce trees have fallen off, while the bottom branches remained green. “In most instances, this extensive needle loss is the result of severe winter drying,” said Brian Schwingle, DNR forest health specialist. “Warm, windy days with low humidity in late April caused evergreen needles to lose moisture, and the frozen soil in the root zone prevented water from moving back into the needles to replace that moisture.” Recently planted evergreens and smaller trees were hardest hit. Schwingle recommends that people keep an eye on their evergreens and wait to see if they regain their canopy with new growth. Trees with 50 percent or more of their needle canopy remaining could recover. For more information, see hort.uwex.edu/articles/winter-burn. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.