• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
SkunkedAgain

River boating - gas usage?

Recommended Posts

SkunkedAgain

Hey,

I have never put into the Mississippi, but plan to take a nice cruise up and down the river next weekend - just for sightseeing. My big question is: How much more fuel can I expect to use going upstream versus downstream?

I don't want to get stuck without enough fuel to get back. I know that each boat/motor is different, but I'm just looking for a ratio. Will I use twice as much fuel? Three times as much? If it really matters, I've got a 1985 Fisher 16.5ft with a '79 Evinrude 35hp.

I know that the best solution is to drive downstream and then boat upstream first, but I don't really want to drive that far.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hanson

I guess I wouldn't really worry about it right now. You will use a tad more going upstream but with the low water level and low flow right now, it will be marginal at best.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rivernut

I agree. I run the rivers about half of my fifhing time, and with the low water and slower current, you"ll be fine. You will use a little more, but it will be fine. How many miles were you planning on running, round trip?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkunkedAgain

Probably from Mpls down to St. Paul and back...depending on how far I can get on my two 6 gallon tanks. So essentially I can use most of a tank on the way down, save a little, and use the rest to get back. That's great to know.

Thanks all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shack

I would always head up stream!

I would turn back when you hit half tank (starting on a full tank)!

You will make it then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dps

Quote:

I would always head up stream!


Wise words!

There is hardly no current on the river right now... wind might effect your milage more crazy.gif

Your 35hp motor doesnt eat much gas if your not at WOT. Cruising on plane somewhere around 2/3 throttle is usually best for fuel economy.

If your crising around the cities, I would launch around 494 and head upstream into pool 1(through the locks) if your just out for a long cruise. Stay between the channel marker buoys! There is a gas pump at watergate marina if your questioning your fuel level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lotsofish

If you run at "cruising speed" (like 1/2 - 2/3 throttle) you should be able to get at least 20-25 miles on one 6 gallon tank, maybe a little more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
chickeywing

My experience is pushing the 3:1 ratio. This spring, on the GPS, there was about a 4-5 MPH difference between upstream and downstream on the Crow River. From the looks of the picts on the TV, the Miss is flowing faster than the Crow was. It's always a good idea to motor upstream first. Bite the bullet and drive farther so you can run out of gas and drift back to the launch. It's a long way to New Orleans!

TC

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dave B

The river is now closed upriver of the Ford Dam, so I would hold off you your trip.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkunkedAgain

That's what I was worried about. Thanks for the notice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wastewaterguru

Pretty easy to figure the exact number if you know the current speed.

Drive WOT upstream and record speed.

Then drive WOT down and record speed.

Difference divided by two is approximately the current speed.

So the equation for the fuel usage difference is simple.....

If you are getting speed from a paddlewheel or pressure type unit that is measuring water speed then the equation is the following......

(Speed + Current Speed) divided by (Speed - Current Speed) = Fuel use ratio.

Let's say the boat does 30 mph indicated.

Current speed is 4 mph.

Then (30 + 4) / (30 - 4) = 1.307

It takes 1.3 times the amount of fuel going upriver then downriver.....or 30% more.

If using GPS for speed determination, then fuel use ratio is simply the downstream speed divided by the upstream speed.

GPS indicates 34 mph downstream and 26 upstream.....

This means there is a 4 mph current.

34/26 = 1.3 (same result - 30% more fuel going upstream.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Jmnhunter
      i cant narrow it down, just ordered a new regulator  and hose assembly instead; cant find replacement hoses locally anyhow that i could test out
    • SkolVikingsGuy
      Wondering if this coming Memorial Day weekend would be a good weekend to come up or if the fishing is slow?  Would love to have the kids catch some easy walleye if possible.  
    • BobT
      Got a reply from the DNR to my last question, which included a reference to tournaments. She forwarded my question to another and I'm still waiting for that reply. 
    • PSU
      In case anyone is interested. The link says 2017, but inside the link says 2018 https://www.cityautoglasswalleyeclassic.com/copy-of-2017-winners  
    • Rick
      A region-wide effort to better understand West Nile virus in ruffed grouse is getting underway in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.  “In the Great Lakes region, West Nile virus has been found in a small number of grouse with no known population-level effects at this point,” said Charlotte Roy, grouse project leader with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. “Still, we want to let hunters know we’re in the first steps of monitoring the virus, and we’re planning to do some limited testing of birds this fall.” In 2017, West Nile virus was identified in more ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states than in the past. The virus has been present in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for about 17 years. West Nile virus has been documented in more than 250 species of birds; however, not all birds develop clinical disease from the virus. Corvids (including blue jays and crows) are very prone to illness and death from the virus, while other species may be less so or may not develop symptoms at all. Last year, Michigan had 12 positive cases of West Nile virus in ruffed grouse. Prior to 2017, only one positive ruffed grouse had been found in Michigan, and that was in 2002. The virus was confirmed in one ruffed grouse in the early 2000s in Minnesota, and is yet to have been detected in a Wisconsin ruffed grouse. West Nile virus in ruffed grouse has become a topic of concern because of a recent study in Pennsylvania reporting that the virus may have contributed to population declines in areas of lower-quality habitat or where habitat was scarce. Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin are in the early stages of planning to test samples from grouse this fall but at this point there is no evidence that the virus is having a population-level impact in the Great Lakes region. “By monitoring birds at a regional level, we will be able to gain a better understanding of this disease in ruffed grouse,” said Kelly Straka, state wildlife veterinarian with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Ruffed grouse are hunted annually by around 300,000 hunters across the three states. Preliminary reports from 2017 hunters were mixed across the Great Lakes region. While the virus could impact brood survival of grouse, other factors such as cold, wet springs during nesting and hatching; drought conditions; or habitat decline can also affect birds seen and harvested. Biologists in the region are optimistic that the great habitat for ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states will help populations thrive despite the virus. “We are looking to hunters and outdoor enthusiasts to help us in this endeavor,” said Mark Witecha, upland wildlife ecologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. “This is an excellent example of agencies and organizations taking a proactive approach and working together to expand our knowledge about WNV and ruffed grouse.” Recently, the Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Health Committee held its annual meeting in Traverse City, Michigan. West Nile virus was one of the topics for state wildlife health leaders. More than 25 wildlife health professionals from 13 Midwestern states and Canada were in attendance. Individual agencies are currently reviewing ways they will be monitoring their grouse populations for West Nile virus, and additional information will be shared when more details are determined. Like humans, wild animals can be exposed to West Nile virus and survive the exposure. Currently, there is no evidence of humans becoming infected by consuming properly cooked birds or by handling birds. Research has shown dogs can be infected but are very resistant to developing clinical signs of the disease and are considered an end host. Ruffed grouse hunting is open in the fall and Minnesota hunting information can be found at mndnr.gov/hunting/grouse. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • TheEyesofanAngler
      what temp is between 55-60 degrees in central minnesota 
    • gimruis
      Isn't that something how they don't recognize the blind as a problem?  I've had turkeys walk literally right next to it too.  Nice bird FishandFowl, hope you didn't pulverize it too bad.
    • Rick
      An angler from Stillwater has set a new record for lake sturgeon in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ catch-and-release category.  Jack Burke and fishing buddy Michael Orgas were recently on a lake sturgeon fishing trip to remember. Fishing on the Rainy River in Koochiching County, the duo was having a lot of success fishing for Minnesota’s biggest fish, landing 20 fish in three days including six lake sturgeon over 60 inches before hooking into the new state record – a 73-inch long lake sturgeon. “We had been having some great action and knew there were big fish in the Rainy River,” Burke said. “This particular fish took about 45 minutes to reel in. When we got it closer to the boat it blew some bubbles and came to the top; I knew it was a huge fish!” Burke caught the fish on May 4, around 11 a.m. using a muskie rod supplied by his fishing partner Orgas, with 80-pound braided line rigged with a circle hook and crawlers. The fish measures 73 inches in length and 30 inches in girth. This beats the previous record by 3 inches that was set by two separate anglers who both boated 70-inch fish on the same day in April 2017. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish in each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • gimruis
      I went out on Saturday for about 5 hours and my friend and I caught a lot of crappies but they were mostly all dinks (8-10 inchers).  We only caught 4 of them over 10 inches.  Plus a few small bass and one pike.  We released all of them.  Water temp was right around 60, a little warmer up shallow in a bay.
    • Rick
      Avid angler Dustin Stone caught a new state record silver redhorse in the certified weight category of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ record fish program.  Stone caught the 10-pound, 6-ounce silver redhorse while fishing for lake sturgeon on the Rainy River in Koochiching County on April 28. He was fishing with 80-pound braided line tipped with a night crawler. “We had been doing very well fishing for sturgeon, landing seven fish over the 60-inch mark,” Stone said. “We started catching a bunch of suckers and redhorse before this fish, so this fish felt quite a bit bigger than the others.” Fortunately for Stone, his fishing buddy had extensive knowledge about fish like silver redhorse, and Stone almost released the fish until his partner advised him to check the weight and current record on that species of fish. The new state record silver redhorse was weighed on a certified scale at a meat shop in Granite Falls, where two observers witnessed the weighing. Two DNR fisheries experts in the Ortonville office confirmed the species identification of silver redhorse. The official weight is 10-pounds, 6-ounces with a length of 26-3/4 inches and a girth of 17-1/2 inches, beating the previous state record of 9-pounds, 15-ounces held since 2004. “I’m glad the DNR does this record fish program. It’s fun to see the records. I’m kind of addicted to this now and I’m going to try and break a couple more!” Stone said. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish of each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.