• GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

  • WE CREATE LONG TERM, MEANINGFUL RELATIONSHIPS IN HERE ... PLEASE JOIN US.

    You know what we all love...

    RECEIVE THE GIFTS MEMBERS SHARE WITH YOU HERE...THEN...CREATE SOMETHING TO ENCHANT OTHERS THAT YOU WANT TO SHARE
    When you enchant people, you fill them with delight and yourself in return. Have Fun!!!

Sign in to follow this  
Double A

GPS Calibration

Recommended Posts

Double A

I just installed a Lowrance 522C. When I tried it out this weekend I noticed that the maps were 100-200 feet off. I have the Navionics Hot Spots Map to give more definition but the map is not even close to being on.

Is there some calibration required for a new GPS?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RK

Hiya -

Look in your GPS data menu for the Position Error reading. That can tell you how close the margin of error in your position fix is. Some days are better than others for getting a good fix. How close your GPS module is to your head unit can affect your PE too. The closer your receiver is to the head unit, the greater the PE usually.

Likely as not though, it's the map itself that's the issue. A lot of the chips use the basic DNR map unless you're on a lake the company itself has re-surveyed. Some of the DNR maps are wildly inaccurate (consider that many of them were made years and years ago with not much more than dead reckoning and visual triangulation). Where you are in relation to the actual structure vs where the structure is shown to be on the map is only as accurate as the map is, satellites notwithstanding.

Sometimes too even if it's a more recent lake survey the map chip might be off a tiny bit here and there - just a little distortion in the plot can put you off my well over 200 feet. When the first Lake of the Woods chips came out, they were almost comical they were so erratic. In one place they'd be spot on. In another they'd show you 200 yards up on shore... We sent a lot of emails to Navionics showing them the trouble spots, and they gradually re-adjusted the maps to correct the distortions... Although they still show one island that just flat isn't there...

Hope this helps...

Cheers,

Rob Kimm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fishin' Addict

No map will ever be accurate enough for navigation without preset safe routes you can run. Don't think for a second that you could navigate off of them - especially the navionics maps. The maps are essentially just "ball park estimates" that get you near, in some cases, or right on top of structure, in other cases. As the previous poster said the location of structure is based on the DNR long/lat legend on every hard copy map - heck you can scan them in and do the same thing if you know how to use the software.

The most accurate maps that I would say are "dead accurate" are the "high resolution" maps made by Lakemaster for Otter Tail, Winnibigoshish, Cass, Lake of the Woods, and Vermillion as well as a bunch in the Brainerd area. But still I wouldn't navigate off of them.

Just remember the maps are a ball park estimate and getting you to withing a 100-200' of certain structure is better than having to search for a small hump in the middle of a 4000 acre lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Double A

RK, FA:

Thanks for the posts. the 522C has a built-in GPS so I'll check the accuracy. I will have to do some "fast surveying" on my own to find the humps.

Even though the map shows I'm running my boat across an Island I'll just have to be sure that when I fish the hard water I don't drill my hole into the dirt.

A friend of mine has the Lakemaster Minnesota maps and is very pleased with that set. Are they better than my Navionics Hot Spots North Maps?

Thanks again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

Announcements



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • TheEyesofanAngler
      Hey there, i'm new to the forum and very passionate about bass fishing! I'm from the saint cloud, MN area and i'm looking for good bass fishing locations? I prefer to fish ponds and lakes and im definitely willing to travel. Anyone willing to share a few spots? 
    • FishandFowl
      Thanks guy's. Good to be back. Sometimes life just keeps you busy. Didn't pulverize it just not ideal connection. Nothing a little Hickory smoke and some Cajun Spices won't cure. Here is a pair a friend of mine and I got a few years back. Lucky day to score 2 Toms in the same morning! Heading out tomorrow for some Walleye's hoping it goes well.   Thanks, Greg
    • Jmnhunter
      i cant narrow it down, just ordered a new regulator  and hose assembly instead; cant find replacement hoses locally anyhow that i could test out
    • SkolVikingsGuy
      Wondering if this coming Memorial Day weekend would be a good weekend to come up or if the fishing is slow?  Would love to have the kids catch some easy walleye if possible.  
    • BobT
      Got a reply from the DNR to my last question, which included a reference to tournaments. She forwarded my question to another and I'm still waiting for that reply. 
    • PSU
      In case anyone is interested. The link says 2017, but inside the link says 2018 https://www.cityautoglasswalleyeclassic.com/copy-of-2017-winners  
    • Rick
      A region-wide effort to better understand West Nile virus in ruffed grouse is getting underway in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.  “In the Great Lakes region, West Nile virus has been found in a small number of grouse with no known population-level effects at this point,” said Charlotte Roy, grouse project leader with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. “Still, we want to let hunters know we’re in the first steps of monitoring the virus, and we’re planning to do some limited testing of birds this fall.” In 2017, West Nile virus was identified in more ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states than in the past. The virus has been present in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin for about 17 years. West Nile virus has been documented in more than 250 species of birds; however, not all birds develop clinical disease from the virus. Corvids (including blue jays and crows) are very prone to illness and death from the virus, while other species may be less so or may not develop symptoms at all. Last year, Michigan had 12 positive cases of West Nile virus in ruffed grouse. Prior to 2017, only one positive ruffed grouse had been found in Michigan, and that was in 2002. The virus was confirmed in one ruffed grouse in the early 2000s in Minnesota, and is yet to have been detected in a Wisconsin ruffed grouse. West Nile virus in ruffed grouse has become a topic of concern because of a recent study in Pennsylvania reporting that the virus may have contributed to population declines in areas of lower-quality habitat or where habitat was scarce. Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin are in the early stages of planning to test samples from grouse this fall but at this point there is no evidence that the virus is having a population-level impact in the Great Lakes region. “By monitoring birds at a regional level, we will be able to gain a better understanding of this disease in ruffed grouse,” said Kelly Straka, state wildlife veterinarian with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. Ruffed grouse are hunted annually by around 300,000 hunters across the three states. Preliminary reports from 2017 hunters were mixed across the Great Lakes region. While the virus could impact brood survival of grouse, other factors such as cold, wet springs during nesting and hatching; drought conditions; or habitat decline can also affect birds seen and harvested. Biologists in the region are optimistic that the great habitat for ruffed grouse in the Great Lakes states will help populations thrive despite the virus. “We are looking to hunters and outdoor enthusiasts to help us in this endeavor,” said Mark Witecha, upland wildlife ecologist with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. “This is an excellent example of agencies and organizations taking a proactive approach and working together to expand our knowledge about WNV and ruffed grouse.” Recently, the Midwest Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies Health Committee held its annual meeting in Traverse City, Michigan. West Nile virus was one of the topics for state wildlife health leaders. More than 25 wildlife health professionals from 13 Midwestern states and Canada were in attendance. Individual agencies are currently reviewing ways they will be monitoring their grouse populations for West Nile virus, and additional information will be shared when more details are determined. Like humans, wild animals can be exposed to West Nile virus and survive the exposure. Currently, there is no evidence of humans becoming infected by consuming properly cooked birds or by handling birds. Research has shown dogs can be infected but are very resistant to developing clinical signs of the disease and are considered an end host. Ruffed grouse hunting is open in the fall and Minnesota hunting information can be found at mndnr.gov/hunting/grouse. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • TheEyesofanAngler
      what temp is between 55-60 degrees in central minnesota 
    • gimruis
      Isn't that something how they don't recognize the blind as a problem?  I've had turkeys walk literally right next to it too.  Nice bird FishandFowl, hope you didn't pulverize it too bad.
    • Rick
      An angler from Stillwater has set a new record for lake sturgeon in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ catch-and-release category.  Jack Burke and fishing buddy Michael Orgas were recently on a lake sturgeon fishing trip to remember. Fishing on the Rainy River in Koochiching County, the duo was having a lot of success fishing for Minnesota’s biggest fish, landing 20 fish in three days including six lake sturgeon over 60 inches before hooking into the new state record – a 73-inch long lake sturgeon. “We had been having some great action and knew there were big fish in the Rainy River,” Burke said. “This particular fish took about 45 minutes to reel in. When we got it closer to the boat it blew some bubbles and came to the top; I knew it was a huge fish!” Burke caught the fish on May 4, around 11 a.m. using a muskie rod supplied by his fishing partner Orgas, with 80-pound braided line rigged with a circle hook and crawlers. The fish measures 73 inches in length and 30 inches in girth. This beats the previous record by 3 inches that was set by two separate anglers who both boated 70-inch fish on the same day in April 2017. There are two kinds of Minnesota state records: one for catching and keeping the biggest fish in each species based on certified weight; and the other for the length of a caught and released muskellunge, northern pike, lake sturgeon or flathead catfish. The DNR announces new state records in news releases, on social media and on the DNR website. Find current records and guidelines for each type of state record at mndnr.gov/recordfish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.