Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
macgruber

stocked trout lakes

6 posts in this topic

tried this on the B-dub forum and trout forum..... thought i'd see if anyone had any info here......

was in the bwca over memorial day and tried our hand at a brook trout lake in the area and only managed one strike all afternoon...... i was just wondering about tactics in the area for these hidden gems......

what water temp do the fish usually sit in-- and thus does depth matter, or do the fish relate more to a certain temp in the lakes?

also what techniques do people use-- we threw every artificial we had at 'em, from flies, to small spoons, to small spinners......

i thought they'd still be shallow this time of year, but we didn't see any fish spooking and we could see down around 10-12 ft. in the water, which makes me think they were perhaps deeper?

thanks for any tips.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It can be tough finding trout in the BWCA in the deeper lakes, at least without a depth finder. I recommend bringing in a depth finder next time if it isnt too much hassle. It seems that once you find that majic depth, most of the fish will be near that same level.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks..... sad thing was, i had a depth finder on the trip, but i didn't bring it on the day trip to the lake-- figured the brookies would be up top..... next time i'll learn my lesson......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The worst is locating lake trout in some of those deeeeep deeeep lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i've never had a problem with lakers, as i generally come prepared to troll deeep..... if you've got enough weight on a heavy line, you can control the depth well enough to troll down to 80 ft. or so, and like you said, once you find 'em they are in that depth everywhere.....

i just made the mistake of assuming the brookies would be shallow and didn't have the necessary equipment along on the day trip to try deeper......

i just don't get up there enough to hone my skills on the stocker lakes.... one of these days i'll figure 'em out......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just got back from a trip to the Gunflint. We caught many trout in water less than 15' deep.

Stream trout lakes can be totally hit or miss. A lot of them are marginal habitat, and it's possible for a stocking to completely fail any given year or series of years. Plus, if there is a connection to other lakes, even just a few pike getting in there can wreak havok. Bottom line is the DNR surveys from 3 or 4 years ago might not reflect what's in there right now.

Trout in lakes tend to roam, though it seems like they sometimes bunch up. If it's a lake I've never been to, I usually troll around for a while, trying different presentations. It can take some time to figure out what the fish are doing on a particular day. One other thing: dropoffs.

My wife got this one on Friday, casting a bugger into the shadow of a bush. The fish was probably sitting in about a foot of water, maybe six feet off shore. We had seen him in that spot, rising to something falling off the bush (beetles?). It took the bugger the instant it hit the water.

BrownTrout.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • ZachD
      Well I ended up picking up the Cabelas zone specialist on sale for $160 plus I had a coupon in the mail for 20 off A $150 purchase
      Picked up a new chair and a power owl call ( Im pretty sure I can call better with no call than that thing) I had a 200 gift card so I walked out of there with 17.00 credit
      Not bad I say I really liked the blind I sat in them all that were set up with my chair and I grabbed a bow from the archery department. I know people will probably disagree but dare I say from what I seen I like it better than the bullpen even.
      It seems to me to be made of a good material too and I can see it lasting awhile as I will take care of it and I am not going to leave it out for days on end. We will see how it is to hunt out of soon.
    • mrpike1973
      I love my 6 inch K Drill however the blades seem to dull faster to me once I figured it out. Happy as a clam. I do regret selling my power auger. I bought a 8 Eskimo power auger for when I go to Mille lacs. the K drill will work just fine but I liked having the 8 inch hole for eyes up there harder to turn there head in a six inch hole. I know you can drill 2 holes together but for me it just worked. Short story Rick G is right on I love my K drill. Would recommend to any one and it's so much lighter when runnin and gunnin.
    • northspear
      tipupsonly it was very hard to just sit and not fish. Yeah it was very very warm up there. I'll walk out if I have to!!!! It'll be my 3rd weekend up in a row.  Love this time of year. 
    • Tony S
        Just wanted to share info on what I know about how those USGS stream gages work.  The stream gaging station will not reflect accurate readings of stage and discharge while ice cover is present.  If you are looking at USGS stream gages you will see a little note in the data table that says "Ice Cover" if this is the case.  They won't be useful until the ice is gone and "Ice Cover" is not showing up next to the readings.  They work on water pressure to estimate the height of water above the gage.  More water flowing under the ice creates more water pressure, so makes the estimated gage height and corresponding estimated discharge go up.  The USGS gage at Manitou should be accurate (no ice cover).  The higher flow will draw the fish in better than low flow.  Another good one to check is the LWCB gages for Rainy Lake and the tailrace below the dam(s).  That will help determine if it's the Forks affecting water levels or just more water coming out of Rainy, which is nice and clear.  Hopefully it won't get muddy!  Maybe see you out there DucksnBucks.  T-Rock-1.
    • Wanderer
      I saw teal for the first time this morning.  I've had 8 drake mergs hanging around the house for at least a week.  Ringnecks have taken their place for about the past week.  The goldeneyes came and went pretty quick.   I heard snows last night.  Other guys reported the same this morning.  One person reported a flock of Ross' geese last night.  Too bad they don't show a hint of setting down around these parts.   Ive heard woodies but can't say I've actually seen one.  And my wood duck house appears to still be empty.  There was a No Vacancy sign on it by this time last year.   In all, I'm seeing the usual suspects but I have to say the numbers are less than last year.  I hope that's just due to there being more open water all around than last year.