Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .

Recommended Posts

SkunkedAgain

So now that we're into another year with the slot (which I will admit that I am a fan of), I'd like to hear what some of the regulars think about it so far. Since I don't fish Vermilion every week of the year, my occasional strike-out or giant walleye doesn't give me a good feel for how the lake is really doing. So without further ado...

Do the folks living on the lake feel that the slot has helped to produce: More walleye? Bigger walleye? Less? Smaller? Has it helped the Vermilion mermaid population? grin.gif (the only non-native species I'm in favor of)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
muskieswen

Skunked,

I think the slot is good also but it may be to early for an assesment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bassboy1645

Skunk...Its too early to tell for sure. Its a qaulity fishiery and It will only get better!! But to start noticing reults will take a few years yet. They slot limit yr classes will mature and then well go from there. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
slick814

I don't mind it. Still too early to see major results, but I do know that the keepers I caught so far this year have averaged 1-2" over last year, and a little chunkier too... hopefully that'll continue and we get a few strong year classes in a row to make things really go great!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jparrucci

I haven't noticed much of a change yet with the new slot (which I am not a huge fan of-I still think it needs tweaking) This year we did catch a number of much larger fish than in previous years, with 3 or 4 fish released OVER the slot (26+ inches). In most places we fished we did catch less of the smaller fish-which I believe is due to a very poor year class of walleyes in 2004 (I think). We had TONS of fish in the 12 1/2 to 14 1/2 range, but fewer than in previous years in the 15-17 range. Fishing was well enough for everyone to get their fill of 14-15 inch fish though. Oddly, we all seemed to notice a difference in weight/thickness of some of the 13 inch fish. Depending on the fishing conditions, I typically keep fish from 13-16 inches. But some of the 13 inch fish seemed much thicker than others, even caught from the same location at the same time. Not sure if this is a m/f issue or what, but I think there was a noticable difference in some of these fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shamrock7

Well, I would have to agree that it's probably to early to tell but if you are a regular here, you have seen that we have have had extremely good fishing here since July of last year. I have caught and released more fish over 3 # in the last 10 months than I have done in the last 26 years on this lake. As most of you know that know me, I don't fish that much during the summer, but I still have seen much better fishing both in size and quantity. Slot, maybe.

Maybe not, Guess we will have to wait and see. But I'm sure not complaining and am a pure fan of the regulations. If nothing else, it should help others develop a higher respect for our resource.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cliff Wagenbach

I agree with Randy!

I too have caught and released many more slot size fish then normal since lact year.

I believe that this absolutely has to be a result of the slot!

Can't you imangine how many slot size fish have had to be released already instead of being eaten! shocked.gif

I am fully in favor of the current regulations at this time!

Cliff

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkunkedAgain

So what does everyone think about the state-wide possession limit for walleye?

1) I should be allowed to possess/eat more than 6 walleye per day.

2) The regs are just fine as they are.

3) 6 walleye per day is too many / I can't eat'em that fast.

I personally think that 6 walleye per day is a little much, but doubt there are that many people out there taking the max on a daily basis. I don't think that reducing the possession limit to four would really make as much of a difference as the slot limit has/will. However, I don't see the harm in a reduction to four or five per day either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Johnny_Namakan

As a family member of a resort owner and resort employee I get the chance to hear about and see the fish being caught each and every day. I agree it's too early to tell completely, but it's definitely headed in the right direction. Our guests are catching a lot of fish and are throwing quite a few 19"-23" fish back. They don't like doing that, but I tell them that that is a good thing for all of us. Those fish would have been kept two years ago and taken away from the following years spawn. Plus how great is it to catch some nice size walleye like that whether to keep them or not. Because isn't half the fun just reeling those fish in? That's the best part for me. Not hoarsing them, just letting the fish tug and working it in nice and slowly with light weight tackle, never really knowing how big it is until it gets to the boat. It's amazing how many 1lb walleye I thought were wall mounters that fought their little butts off and then getting the 8lb walleye that came in like it was just some weeds on your line. You never know sometimes. But all-in-all I've seen more happy fishermen and women lately than I've seen in awhile. One thing I'm asking our guests is, are they catching many small ones, 11"-13". Most of my guests are saying no they aren't catching many of those at all. So that's got me thinking a little bit, but it's still early and those little guys may not be in the same areas as the slot fish.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
upnorth

It used to be that I would rarely see walleyes over 20 inches, this year only getting out once I haver released 2 over twenty inches. I only see this getting better with more spawners in the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Jim Almquist
      Someone let the cat out of the bag on my favorite reels. I love just how light they are but I only go down to two pound test. I thumb the reel to act as my drag. Only use when it is shallow enough to hand over hand.
    • LBerquist
      What got me hooked on musky fishing when I was a kid was topwater. Nothing more exciting than watching the water explode. My first musky came on a rubber frog while bass fishing, my little brother casted over my line and as I lectured him and reeled my line up as quick as I could, WHAM. Since then I have had some of my best memories from topwater. Poe's giant jackpot, prop baits, creepers, klack/buzz bait. He's going to spend a lot of time casting, giving him something to watch helps pass the time and when he gets follows they will normally be shallow so he will be able to see them. 
    • leech~~
      Yes, she just doesn't want to have a bad Christmas every year!   Shes not a Big New Years partier! 
    • eyeguy 54
      did she ok it for after that?? lol   stay dry! 
    • leech~~
      Thanks for the reports guys. It will be after New years before I get up in the area to try some fishing. I made a deal with my wife that I can't die ice fishing, before Christmas! 
    • OhioVike
      I have $50 to spend on Musky lures for a 14 year old boy.  Last fall he caught a nice musky, from my kayak, and was unable to land it to get a picture.  He did get it up to the kayak several times so he got a good look at it and has been bit by the Musky Fishing Bug.  I am looking for suggestions for the young man and was hoping to get some help here.  
    • titelines
      Last year I rented a house through Hunter Winfield's Resort in Isle.  I looked around at many options and they seemed to have what I was looking for.  Their wheel-houses are very nice and have everything you list above.  Bathroom, TV/DVD, electricity (didn't have to fill the generator once), stove/oven.  I reserved an 8' x 16', but they upgraded me to an 8x20' - nice surprise.  Real nice, and plenty of room for two adults and 2 kids.   I had so much fun I'm going back in January.
    • Chill62
      Buddy had a camera down on Saturday and he said he'd get a mixture of panfish to come in then they'd fly out of the hole and in comes a pike or two.  He said that when the gills would leave it was because a pike would be around the hole and he knew it was safe again when he'd see his first panfish.  That was in 18-22 fow.
    • redneckdan
      Just pulled two out of st Mary's in eveleth. It was close. Please make good choices out there.   That said, I'm off to find a cup of hot chocolate and a long finlander hot shower....
    • Rick
      No chronic wasting disease was detected in more than 11,000 precautionary samples from deer that hunters harvested this fall in north-central, central and southeastern Minnesota, according to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.  “This is good news for Minnesota,” said Lou Cornicelli, wildlife research manager for the DNR. “The results lend confidence that the disease is not spread across the landscape.” In all, 7,813 deer were tested in the north-central area, 2,529 in the central area and 1,149 in the southeastern area outside deer permit area 603, the CWD management zone. Researchers still are submitting samples from cooperating taxidermists so final results will updated online at mndnr.gov/cwdcheck as they become available. Given no deer with CWD were found in north-central and central Minnesota, the DNR will narrow surveillance next fall to areas closer to the farms where CWD was detected. A fourth precautionary surveillance area will be added in fall 2018 in Winona County because CWD recently was detected in captive deer there. Precautionary testing in north-central and central Minnesota became necessary after CWD was found in multiple captive deer on farms near Merrifield in Crow Wing County and Litchfield in Meeker County. It also was conducted in the deer permit areas directly adjacent to southeast Minnesota’s deer permit area 603, the only place in Minnesota where CWD is known to exist in wild deer. Minnesota’s CWD response plan calls for testing of wild deer after the disease is detected in either domestic or wild deer. All results from three consecutive years of testing must report CWD as not detected before DNR stops looking for the disease. Three years of testing are necessary because CWD incubates in deer slowly. They can be exposed for as long as 18 months before laboratory tests of lymph node samples can detect the disease. Proactive surveillance and precautionary testing for CWD is a proven strategy that allows the DNR to manage the disease by finding it early and reacting quickly and aggressively to control it. These actions, which were taken in 2005 to successfully combat bovine tuberculosis in northwestern Minnesota deer and in 2010 to eliminate a CWD infection in wild deer near Pine Island, provide the best opportunity to eliminate disease spread. Precautionary testing is necessary to detect the disease early. Without early detection, there’s nothing to stop CWD from becoming established at a relatively high prevalence and across a large geographic area. At that point, there is no known way to control the disease. “Overall, hunter cooperation and public support has been tremendous,” Cornicelli said. “While there are always challenges when you conduct this type of surveillance effort, it really couldn’t have been successful without the cooperation of hunters, taxidermists, landowners and the businesses that allowed us to operate check stations.” Complete information about CWD and DNR efforts to keep Minnesota deer healthy are available on the DNR website at mndnr.gov/cwd. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.