Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
eyepatrol

NEED QUICK HELP! (WHICH TV TO GET?)

Recommended Posts

eyepatrol

Which type of tv would be better to get, plasma or LCD? (or other?) Also, what brand would you recommend? We're looking at getting some sort of flat screen in the 50" - 60" range.

Thanks!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

50/50...

If you are going to be gaming or may have problems with glare, probably lean toward LCD.

If no (or minimal) gaming and glare is not much of an issue, probably lean towards plasma.

Overall, I think the plasmas have a more 3D-like image and better blacks/shadow detail, but I'm a bit biased since I have a plasma set.

LCD sets more commonly have 1080p resolution at reasonable cost although 1080p plasmas are around. In either case, IMO, 1080p is really only a big deal if you plan to get a HD-DVD or Blu-Ray player because there are no 1080p signals broadcast or on cable and regular DVDs are only 480p at best. But then you get into upconversion and all that stuff...

Also, the viewing distance to the set matters in the resolution you get. The closer you sit to the TV, the higher resolution you need to avoid the "screen door effect" - in other words seeing the coarseness of the pixels.

Here is a chart that gives seating distance versus beneficial resolution - it's really the opposite of how many people think about it.

resolution_chart_s.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ufatz

Well Bass, I've done a lot of research on this subject and talked to a great many folks in the business. I will always reccomend SONY as a brand name. But I would also reccomend that you do a LOT of research before you drop your credit card down. There are a multitude of pros/cons about all of them and some interesting detail. I would counsel you to proceed with caution and you'll end up with what you want, can afford, and something that might last a while. cool.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fisherdog19

LCD over Plasma, and Sony as well. Find a 1080p because come 2009 you will see a lot more HD broadcasting available, and mandatory per FCC. LCD will have no glare, where as the plasma screen has a lot of glare if you have anything giving off light in front of the screen. The average life of the plasma is less than the LCD, and once the plasma goes you cannot fix it. I would argue that the LCD's have the best picture available.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
montanagriz

Like anything, depends how much $$ you want to spend. I just went through this process a month ago, and was ready to go all out, 1080p, Plasma, 60" and I just couldn't pull the trigger. Here's why:

1) There is no TV programming in 1080p right now, and from what I've read, nobody (dish or cable) is close to having it anytime soon. If you want to actually leverage your 1080p, you are going to have to buy a $700+ Blue-Ray or HD-DVD player, and then the movies are 30 bucks a piece. Unless you are watching tons of movies, in my opinion, it's not worth it.

2) Plasma's are nice, but then you have to buy the mounting bracket and pick a permanent location you want to put the thing. Go to Best Buy, Circuit City, or wherever and tell me that a Plasma's picture is worth 1,000 bucks more than a Rear-Project LCD or DLP. Personally, I didn't think so and couldn't rationalize the extra grand.

3) 1080p is amazing, can't deny that..check out the demo disk they have at Best Buy which shows the watchmaker..incredible, you can see every pore and hair on his hand. But honestly, how much detail do you really need? Remember, no current tv programming in 1080p. Watch HD on a 720p, compare it to your current set, and you'll be blown away.

Here's what I ended up doing after sleeping on it a night:

Ended up getting a 50" Samsung 720p DLP for $1,100 on sale. Absolutely love it! It's a lot lighter than my old 36" TV and I can move it to any room in my house. I am a sports nut, so I'm usually stuck on ESPN/ESPN2 HD. I've been watching all the college basketball conference tournaments this week and I'm in heaven, the picture is amazing!! Keep in mind, you'll need to order the HD programming package through your cable or satellite provider. It's totally worth it, you'll get roughly 10 channels in HD. I find myself watching programs on the Discovery Channel I'm not even interested in, but because the scenery is so incredible in HD, I can't bring myself to turn the channel. If you don't want to spend the extra for the package, all you need is an HD antenna (only 20 bucks) and you'll pick up all the local channels - WCCO, FOX, KSTP, KARE11 in HD (when HD programming is available). I used the extra money I saved to buy a TV stand and receiver for surround sound. I know it's tempting to go all out, so if you have the cash and it's not going to hurt you financially then go for it! For me, the 720p rear projection was the way to go, and I couldn't be happier. Good luck in your search, let us know what you end up getting, and make sure you have it ready to rock before March Madness starts next Thursday grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eyepatrol

Awesome info guys!!! Our TV broke down this evening and we nearly went out on a whim and bought a plasma, but then we reeled each other back in and decided to do more research, get comments from you good folks, etc. before making ANY decision.

I appreciate the feedback!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hondavxr

No matter what you buy a plasma or LCD get a Samsung, they have been kicking butt in the tv technology lately. If you research more into this, you will see that Samsung has been in the rated in top.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jweitgen

I can't say what you should buy but here is what I have

Sony 50" LCD (older style)

I love it and would recommend any of the SOny LCD to anyone.

How is that for a quick answer?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LMITOUT

Don't worry about the 1080p thing....a 1080p TV will upconvert the 1080i or 720p signal to 1080p. I'm aware that the signal isn't 1080p to begin with and it isn't true 1080p blah blah blah......there are pages upon pages of discussion about this single issue on other TV forums but don't sweat it. In fact, it'll probably be hard to find a 720p TV soon and if you don't care about the difference a deal could be had on last year's TV's as more of the new 1080p models are starting to roll out. 720's are becoming antiques.

Check out the Mitsubishi's too....I have a DLP and it's sweet. In a year or two the laser pictures will be out and we'll go through this all over again. BTW, I'd go LCD over plasma regardless of brand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DTro

Quote:

Find a 1080p because come 2009 you will see a lot more HD broadcasting available, and mandatory per FCC.


I wouldn't spend the extra on a 1080p. The major broadcasters infrastructure is set now and they are broadcasting in 720p and or 1080i. In fact I'm almost sure you cannot currently get any type of programming in 1080p.

If you watch a lot of DVD's and plan on getting an HD-DVD player or Blu Ray, then 1080p might be something to think about.

One thing to remember is that regular programming (SD) will have marginal (at best) quality with these large screens.

I would guess in the next few years, most programming will have made the transition to HD.

Also, the pricing in the 50-60" range will vary greatly between a true flatscreen LCD and an LCD projection. When you get over 40" on a flatscreen your looking at approx 2k and then up with size.

For the same size projection you'll save about 1k.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Quote:

LCD over Plasma, and Sony as well. Find a 1080p because come 2009 you will see a lot more HD broadcasting available, and mandatory per FCC. LCD will have no glare, where as the plasma screen has a lot of glare if you have anything giving off light in front of the screen. The average life of the plasma is less than the LCD, and once the plasma goes you cannot fix it. I would argue that the LCD's have the best picture available.


1) Maybe more HD content, but still not 1080p.

2) LCD lasts longer than plasma? Not sure that's true. The current generation of plasma sets are claiming 30,000-50,000 hours. Dunno about you, but I'll want a TV with updated technology before 15 to 20 years goes by. A "normal" TV has an estimated life of 25,000 hours for comparison.

3) Plasma "glass" is not repairable. But neither is a LCD panel. They can't fix the picture tube of normal TV either. In all cases it's replacement if that part is bad.

LCD panels are more suceptable to motion artifacts/delay. If fast-action sports are your deal it can/will be distracting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Quote:

2) Plasma's are nice, but then you have to buy the mounting bracket and pick a permanent location you want to put the thing. Go to Best Buy, Circuit City, or wherever and tell me that a Plasma's picture is worth 1,000 bucks more than a Rear-Project LCD or DLP. Personally, I didn't think so and couldn't rationalize the extra grand.


My plasma came with a stand - they don't have to be wall mounted. Further, it weighs only 85lbs. Sure, heavier than a LCD, but not anywhere near the +200lbs of my old 36" TV. So, it's somewhat misleading to say you have to pick a permanent spot and that's it.

Also, don't buy (or prehaps don't NOT buy) based on what you see at Best Buy, et al. Some sets are fed better signals or are further down the signal line. Also, who knows what settings they have dialed in. So, unless you take the time to ensure they are receiving the same signal quality and are properly adjusted, you can't be sure it's an apples-to-apples comparison.

After all, do you think Best Buy et al has much incentive to make that $1999 Panasonic plasma look comparable to that $3600 Sony 1080p XBR LCD?

Also, the viewing distance is important. Where do you stand when you are looking at sets at Best Buy? Like 3-6 feet away. Then sure, 1080p is going to look like a smoother picture. Look at the chart I posted. If you get a 50" or 60" set and sit more than 10-12 feet from the TV, there is no visual benefit to 1080p. If you sit closer than 8 to 10ft to your 50" or 60" TV, then there is a better/real case for 1080p.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DTro

Quote:

If you sit closer than 8 to 10ft to your 50" or 60" TV, then there is a better/real case for 1080p.


again, this is only if the signal coming in is 1080p, which right now is extremely limited.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Yes. The full advantage of a 1080p set can't be utilized with out a true 1080p source such as HD-DVD or Blu-ray. But, since the pixel is smaller on a 1080 vs 720 set (of same screen size), you can sit closer with less screen door effect.

But again, if you sit further away from the set, the benefits of 1080 are not what one is often led to believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Some additional info for your reading pleasure...

Be sure you get a set with the right tuners built in. Most have the right ones, but just be sure...

ATSC tuner = OTA (over-the-air) HD channels using an antenna. Many say OTA reception of (local) HD channels is still the best TV picture quality.

QAM tuner = digital tuner for receiving unscrambled/unencrypted digital (including HD) channels from cable. Typically, one will receive 3 to 5 HD channels at no additional cost if you have a QAM tuner. Just hook the cable to the tv (be sure to scan the digital channels) and there you have it.

Another benefit of QAM tuner is that you can also watch (for free) the Video On Demand movies that your neighbors are watching. Just be careful with the kiddies around because this often includes soft and hard porn. You might be surprised what your neighbors are watching... The only problem with is when you are getting into a movie and the neighbor decides to change channels or stop watching, you loose the feed too.

NTSC tuner = the "normal" tuner used to receive standard analog TV signals.

As I said earlier, many have all three, but not all. Just check to be sure.

If you want the premium digital/analog channels (typically encrypted) you will need a set with CableCard slot + CableCard or will need a STB (set top box = "cable box") from the cable company to do the decoding.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bgmny

I'll toss my vote in for the Sony LCD, I have two of them and love them. I got Sony's based on other sets I have owned and the zero problems I have had with them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mnteacher

Bought a 50 inch Samsung about 8 months ago. I too, researched for 6months before I pulled the pin on this TV. We originally wanted a Sony 50 inch LCD. Thought the color was a little better. Got a heck of a buy on this Samsung and we are still in Awe when we turn it on. The clarity is just fabulous. I don't watch regular tv anymore. Spoils a guy that is for sure. Good luck shopping.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mamohr686

There is some good info that has been posted earlier but I'll through in my opinion. Panasonic LCD's are rated the highest in consumer reports and put out an awesome picture. I currently own a samsung 50" plasma that I really like. I don't have any glare problems mentioned earlier, and it was actually a selling point used by some sales people when I was looking. My parents recently bought a new sony 1080P LCD that is really great. They actually had the picture screen go out (a black line dead spot through the middle) that was replaced under warranty. Any TV can have problems and it usually comes down to overheating issues or how the TV was handled during transport. Plasma have the best picture depth, the most colors, and have less ghosting and blurring with a fast moving picture but the major downside is screen burn if you leave a still picture for a long time. Although this is becoming less of an issue with new technology. If you like to watch pictures in the actual format they are shot in then you might want to consider LCD. If you watch a dvd that is shot in standard format you should stretch out/or zoom the picture so it fits your screen with a plasma otherwise over time the colors will appear darker on the sides. If you want to play video games a LCD screen will be the better choice to avoid screen burn. I've found the best comparison between the TV's is in standard definition programming. If you watch a rear projection, LCD, and plasma side by side you won't notice a huge difference in HD but when you watch standard definition then it is night and day. I would spend the extra money on 1080p set because it won't get outdated as fast, offers better sound quality options, and finally the technology is there to use it already. Many people don't know it but the new sony playstation 3 has a built in Blue-ray player! You can have a gaming unit with the exact same picture quality and parts as a $1000 sony blue-ray player for $400. Blue ray/HD DVD have unreal sound options like THX2 and 7.1 surround sound that is better quality than most movie theaters.

If your in the market I wouldn't consider a new HD tv that didn't have at least 2 HDMI inputs (one for your tuner/or dish and one for HD DVD or Blue-ray player). I highly recommend you get a TV with a built in tuner if you plan on using your old DVD player or watching some standard definition programing so the picture will be upconverted and higher quality. I wouldn't buy a TV again unless it was 1080p compatable and has a very high resolution. If you plan on using cable, call your cable company and see if they use Cable card technology so you can avoid another box and you might want to find out different programming packages.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hookmaster

We went with a plasma instead of the LCD because this tv is in the basement where the kids play. The plasma has a glass screen which will stand up to impacts better than the LCD screen. It's already taken a few hits. The brand is Panasonic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?
    • Hoey
      I am noodling this same concept over.  I am thinking either a dedicated (portable) battery, since I may be pulling on shore to the ice with the 4-wheeler or a hand, boat-type winch, not always hooked up to the truck.  
    • Hoey