Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Smokeless Powder Ban - DNR - Savage Muzzleloader


herdog

Recommended Posts

lawdog: Biggest point I was trying to get accross was that the use of the powder was not a problem with over 8 years of use and now it can not be used. When the ban was passed no one seems to know where it came from. We were able to use it before. Why not now? Oh and to who has the REAL addvantage in performance, wouldn't you have to say it would be an OLD smoke-pole? You must admit that the modern muzzle-loader takes all the FUN out of hunting? Nuts and Bolts wise you get what you pay for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bill in the House has been passed by the committee and is now included in the omnibus Fish and Game bill.

The bill in the Senate is still in committee. The committee is scheduled to meet tomorrow. Since the Chair and Vice-Chair of the committee are two of the four sponsors, I would say it is likely to be approved and added into the Senate's Fish and Game bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Maybe I missed the hoopla, or perhaps there wasn't any; regardless, I see the smokeless ban has been repealed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hoping the legislators have bigger fish to fry for a while, use of smokeless powder in a quality muzzleloader, at the small charges levels the manufacturers recommended, should never have been an issue. Pretty much the same ballistics as as the new blackpowder substitutes are operating at, without the need to clean the rifle at the end of every day. Use of the noncorrosive powder will extend the life of the firearm without giving the user any advantage over the blackpowder user when it comes to ballistics.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

...without the need to clean the rifle at the end of every day. Use of the noncorrosive powder will extend the life of the firearm without giving the user any advantage over the blackpowder user when it comes to ballistics.


What about 2nd shots in the field? Do the clean burning smokeless powder guns produce a ballistically more accurate 2nd shot than an old dirty burning smoke-filled powder's 2nd shot? I have no experience with the smokeless powder, but my dirty powder sure does leave my barrel dirty. I would think that the 2nd shot on the smokeless powder guns is more accurate than my dirty barrel's 2nd shot. Is their blackpowder that will burn as clean as smokeless-powder?

And before anyone says it never happens, last year was my first year MLing, and I had a chance for a 2nd shot at a 2nd deer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doing a spit patch between shots gets the bullet down the barrel easier. Do be careful and do not reload too soon after first shot as the powder residue from your first shot may contain a glowing ember. Possible powder flash when you dump in the next powder charge. Otherwise barrel fouling from the sabot's plastic is about the same. The smokeless powder residue is non-corrosive, so cleaning at the end of the day is not necessary, if you want to spend the time processing your deer, and clean your rifle the next day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.