Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Comments for the DNR


BLACKJACK

Recommended Posts

I have brought this up before, why dont some of you that are well knowledged enlighten those of us who arent knowledgable on trapping. Instead of pointing fingers back and forth, why not educate us of good practices. And teach some folks on here that may trap, but dont know the best ways, or safest ways to go about it. I have learned some from following this post from the beggining, but lets here form the pros some good ethics of trapping. Just my .02. I think this post would be better off if it was to inform the less informed! Then to b!*ch back and forth, that isnt going to get any where!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • walleye101

    30

  • gorrilla

    24

  • poutpro

    14

  • BLACKJACK

    10

4 wandering eyes, while I debate a lot on this topic weekly, I don't ever claim to be a pro...

If your a beginner though, I like your way of thinking. I do think it would be best suited for another post. I suggest you pose some questions when ever you like in the Trapping Forum. Just to let you know lots of things are best learned from eyewitness and hands on experience. I would recommend you sign up for some educational courses and attend trapping conventions. They are advertised in FurFish&Game if nothing else. One of the best ways is to network at these places and find an experience trapper in your area and ask if he'll show a greenhorn what he needs to know. You'll be surprised how much you can learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Its a shame because its one of the few spots I've seen lately where trappers could enlighten a few people that the "public" woods is for everybody not just bird hunters with dogs. If someone has a dog and knows how to properly hunt and supervise it, no problem. Likewise, if a trapper owns a body grip trap and uses common sense in placing it, no problem.

It seems this website if filled with many avid smart fishermen, but often I think the lack of woodmanship and arrogance of some makes it hard to talk about hunting or trapping on here...


Here is your chance gorrila to do some educating to those of us with a lack of woodsmanship. Appearantly I have spent too much time fishing, so please enlighten me.

So for example: I have a pack of 2-3 rabbit hounds that I wish to hunt on "public woods" during open rabbit season. Bobcat season is also open so there can be baited 220 cubbies set most anywhere that I chose to hunt since cats and rabbits frequent the same habitats. Please enlighten me on the "proper way to hunt and supervise my pack of beagles" in this situation so we have "no problem".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is another example. There is a nice piece of riverbottom along the Blue Earth River. A couple hundred acres of mixed hardwoods and small patches of corn. All private land and full of coon. I've done the groundwork securing permission from the various landowners and confirming no one has permission to trap thier property. Only problem is a township road snakes though the middle of the property, a real magnet for bridge trappers setting off the road right-of-way. Enlighten me on how I "properly hunt and control" a couple of valuable coonhounds to be able to hunt the private land I have permission to hunt without risking a lethal encounter in a baited cubbie legally set right off the road?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

walleye 101, I'll fall for your baiting taunt and waste my time typing a response.

I'm guessing your close minded enough that any effort to get along would be wasted on you anyway, but here it goes...

As far as the rabbit hounds go. Believe it or not, I'd have a suggestion I'm sure your not going to like, but maybe during the relatively short duration on bobcat season (in comparison to rabbit season) you would be wise to hunt only private land or public land you know intimately and are able to observe any comings or goings of potential trappers such as landlocked, etc. As any hound guy will tell you, these breeds often have higher risks of injury due to the distance between handler and dog.

By the way, I never claimed sharing public land meant any one person could be totally happy letting everyone do what they feel they have a right to do on it. Just ask many of us bowhunters who get this feeling of public land seemingly "ruined" on a yearly basis when all the gun hunters show up(don't worry, I gun hunt too).

Doesn't a rabbit hunter on public land need a little bit of smarts, responsibility, and calendar sense too since he can't predict what he is going to encounter if he doesn't exclusively own a property.

As far as the Blue Earth River example goes, maybe you only understand sarcasm judging from your post, but I'm sure most guys know according to the websight rules, that won't get me anywhere... So here it goes. I'm not saying if you hunt coonhounds on private land where there are not supposed to be traps you should have to worry about them. As far as road and bridge trappers go, I'm not sure exactly on how each situation pans out legally on this road. Is there public water, public right of way, ???, or what. If you don't trust being able to keep your dogs onto the "safe" private ground then maybe you never thought of finding a more remote setting where this isn't as likely to happen??? I know in this day and age it hard to find more properties like that, but why do most hound guys buy the dog first and worry about the property later? I don't buy turkey or deer equipment without first having good property to hunt...

Personally road trapping wasn't my cup of tea back when I did trap. I didn't like the thought of my expensive traps(especially 220 body grips) being set within close proximity to potentially prying eyes where my vehicle could be spotted, sets harrassed, or traps and catch stolen. I certainly took the effort to secure permission on the land I set my trap if it was private.

Once again, if a person isn't getting permission to set on private land and they do it anyway, they are not a trapper. DON'T DO TRAPPERS A DISSERVICE BY LABELING THEM AS SUCH (not directed at you walley101). They're more like a tresspasser or a poacher.

Back to the coonhound scenario though, IMO its getting more and more difficult to find a good and dare I say legal situation to run coon hounds nowadays. Most hound guys don't talk about it except amongst themselves, but how do you keep your dogs from crossing borders where permission isn't granted??? Like my deer woods where the local deer herd has had enough stresses dodging anything from snowstorms, to poachers, to wolves. And now a bunch of hounds comes barreling through because their owner can't keep them on the two forties he's got permission on in "his" section. Most hound guys don't get much grief over that though since it happens after dark and nobody knows right? It used to be in the old days in rural areas landowners would look the other way since it was the local kid or neighbor, but now its the hound clubs having unofficial contests and 6 pickups surrounding sections and running their hounds on land "accidentally" to get the coons or coyotes going onto the land they can harvest them on.

For the record, I previously stated I thought trappers could get by with MORE EDUCATION, but I guess you don't need any.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simply trying to provide a little education of my own to point out that this is not just an issue between bird hunters and trappers that can be fixed by "properly hunting and superising your dog".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trappers could post topics all day to try to make people come to a compromise on the subject of 220's. Well folks it aint gonna happen. I have been to the DNR meetings, I am teaching a trappers education class right know. Whenever a trapper catches a dog or cat it is gonna ALWAYS be the trappers fault because he killed the animal. Legal set or not. Ten feet from the house or ten miles in the woods. The simple solution is commonsense on both sides of the fence. Debating on this forum gets nothing done for either side but make things worse. Most people don't read the posts correctly and take them totally out of context.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

protrapper, I appreciate your help in educating trappers by conducting the courses. I really think that is the way to go if you really want to learn about trapping, whether your a trapper or not.

Your probably right, I'm just getting my self more frustrated with the way accusations are thrown around on the web and being anonomous doesn't allow for better learning. Its probably more conducive for people to take shots than to really be open minded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

walleye 101, I'll fall for your baiting taunt and waste my time typing a response.
Quote:

Don't be so negative, I was about to compliment you on a thoughtful post.


I'm guessing your close minded enough that any effort to get along would be wasted on you anyway, but here it goes...

Quote:

Not wasted at all. Your suggestions are actually some movement in the direction of some reasonable solutions.


As far as the rabbit hounds go. Believe it or not, I'd have a suggestion I'm sure your not going to like, but maybe during the relatively short duration on bobcat season (in comparison to rabbit season) you would be wise to hunt only private land or public land you know intimately and are able to observe any comings or goings of potential trappers such as landlocked, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

w 101,

I hear your pain, its tough running hounds at all on public land I bet, and very tough to find enough private either. I guess I personally think its tough for either side of the fence to budge. It you restrict trapping the already short prime furbearer seasons suffer, and the alternative makes hound guys mad. I'm not claiming to have all the answers, but I hope if nothing more, some young or inexerienced trapper or dog owner goes into a woods a little wiser after reading all our biyatchin'...

Just for the record, coons do now have a closed season and I believe most trappers wouldn't mind if they couldn't trap skunks on public land with 220's after that one closed. Maybe one minor solution would be to tie up bobcat and coon in the northwoods public land about the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To get off this subject and on to a different one. I have hunted the same river bottoms for many years, all private land! It was an awsome place to hunt, nice and quiet, I could listen to the deer walking into me. Sounds like a good spot huh? Well a few years back, we have geese season on the same time as deer opener. Now my nice quiet spot turns into 10 people sitting on the river banks blasting 100s of shells at geese, yelling back and forth to each other. I went down there one time and told them that I was hunting up here and this is private land, and asked if they could stop yelling! I think that only made it worse, because I think they bring down a couple extra cases of shells with them just to shoot at nothing, my old stand was about 25 yds from the river. I could see there were no geese that they were shooting at. I never had this problem before5-7 years ago, but it just keeps getting worse. Could the dnr have the 2 openers on different weekends. I know they are on public water, and they arent doing anything unlawfull, but they could be a little more considerate!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is hunter harassment!! I dont care where or what they are doing. you should talk to your local CO before next season and get his take. If they are shooting at nothing, and decresing your chance of success, then what they are doing is wrong.

joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we're talking possible solutions, and a hint of compromise. I do understand the resistance to give in even a little because that can become a slippery slope. However the stakes are high on this and I am certain that if trappers don't suggest some reasonable solutions there will ultimately be unreasonable ones forced on us.

It is obvious there is no one size fits all solution to this. Northern MN with coniferous/aspen forest, tons of public land, and very different fur bearers and game species presents totaly different situations than southern MN, dominantly agriculture, limited public land and it's own unique mix of fur/game species.

Lets focus on N MN first, solve one problem at a time. There is a diverse variety of furbearers up north. Lets look at what would be reasonable and applicable by species. This requires some broad generalization, and there certainly will be exceptions, but lets focus on basics. Forget the aquatic species, beaver, muskrat, otter. There is little danger in properly made water sets.

Land animals include primarly fox, coyote, fisher, martin, bobcat, (some day maybe T wolves). Toss in the raccoon as a land/water species though this is not a primary furbearer in the coniferous zone.

The canines are not really an issue. They are a rare catch in a baited cubbie, most are far too wary to stick their head in. Totally opposite of domestic canines, having been fed in containers have no fear at all. Any serious canine trapper in N MN is using dirthole and flat sets(footholds)or snares. Both pose very little danger to domestic dogs.

The real primary application for baited 220 cubbie sets is for fisher and martin. Those species are where this set originated. Recent figures from DNR registration indicates 85% of these animals were taken in body grip cubbie sets. It would pose a tremedous hardship for tappers to loose the 220 for these species. But given the relatively short season it is not a tremdous hardship for hunters to avoid this time period completely or depending on breed keep a very close watch on dog. (that would mean no rabbit hounds, coon hunting is rare in coniferous zone, late season bird dogs that handle well could be hunted close).

Bobcat presents another issue. This is an issue that needs to be fixed regardless of dog issues. Ending F/M seasons on Dec 10, but leaving the F/M sets out for another month for bobcat is a joke, and all the trappers doing it know it. Any set designed to kill F/M in early Dec is just as effective and just as leathal for the rest of Dec and early Jan. There is no logic to defend this.

I suggest two possible solutions:

1) Make the two seasons concurrent so they end at the same time. That may mean shortening the bobcat season since the shorter F/M season is probably intended to reduce harvest on those species. That may not be acceptable to cat trappers since homeranges are large and it takes cats some time to come around to a trap location.

2) The other option is to continue bobcat season but limit the 220 cubbie to only F/M season. Some cats will be taken in 220 cubbies during F/M season, no problem, both are fair game. But after F/M season replace 220's with footholds. Sure it is some extra effort for the trapper who chooses to continue, but the set now becomes selective so non-target species (F/M in closed season) an be released. This only seems logical and ethical to reduce illegal harvest during closed season, while still being able to selectively harvest some cats during the extended season.

Either of these solutions are not perfect but allow the use of the baited cubbie for it's primary function and purpose, and does not pose unreasonable hardship on trappers. Both also require some restraint on dog hunters part to avoid the peak periods of primary furbearer harvest, but provides some releaf during the periods the 220 cubbies are restricted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walleye 101, that was one of your bests posts yet, short of misspelling relief, nearly a work of art... grin.gif

Hopefully we aren't only talking to each other.?.?

Personally, that line of thinking wouldn't bother me much other than what you were saying about not giving an inch. In this day and age, giving an inch on restricting trap use usually ends up in the wrong hands and a mile gets taken away. If I totally trusted lawmakers, and it was worded and posed as eloquently as your post, I probably wouldn't loose sleep over your proposal.

Its just my sceptical side that thinks if we start depending on laws to educate trappers, we just see more and more laws as a result of neglect to true trapper education. IMO that only leads to the demise of trapping, a great conservation tool (for harvesting coon and other predators in the entire state), and one of north america's longest traditions.

Just being a devil's advocate here for arguments sake, but like most bobcat trappers know, in the tail end of the season when cats are most prime and cold and snow is common, nothing can compare to a baited cubby.

Sometimes wary, old bobcats are best fooled with a MB 750 coilspring leghold anyway, but 220's rarely sieze up in freeze/thaw conditions. By the way, your right, with the large home range and less dense population of bobcats, as well as tougher in general to get to commit to a set, its hard enough to get your 5 allowed bobcats in the limited season already. Shortening it wouldn't likely be welcomed into the trapper's convention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Spelin has nver ben mi storng piont. Surprised you only found one.

Even if we are just talking to each other I appreciate a good constructive debate.

There are times when you have to stand your ground on principle, but there are also times to objectively assess the firmness of the ground you are defending. You have to admit that unrestricted 220's anywhere anytime is a tough position to defend.

As far as bobcat go you are obviously no greenhorn. The better cat trappers around here understand the size selectivity of the conibear sets. They note the visits and refusals of big cats during F/M season by the tracks. They are quick to pull the 220 and replace it with a leghold after F/M season to increase their chances on his next trip around.

My choice would not be the shorter season either, but prefer the second option. But I'm sure that would not be very popular with those who only know the conibear cubbie set.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walleye 101, on that note, don't you maybe agree that a wise trapper would not intentionally place a 220 where he thinks a trap might likely endanger a dog or for that matter even be seen by other people. Bad case scenario his trap get stolen, worse case it injures a dog and the trapper's image.

Don't you think if we make more trappers wise to this problem we can reduce the odds of this happening without taking anyones rights away.

Its simply a choice to trap the right way.

The benifit of this route:

- We don't give anti's a figurative leghold on restrictions

- Trapper's aren't "forced" to do something - they simply make the correct choice

- Legislators aren't given the option to screw it up and over tighten the regulations to the point of phasing out the 7" bodygrip land set forever, like in several current states...

- Lands like private or very remote public lands that never see someones precious beagles or labs or coonhounds can still be trapped at the descretion of the now much wiser, ultra educated trapper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Walleye 101, on that note, don't you maybe agree that a wise trapper would not intentionally place a 220 where he thinks a trap might likely endanger a dog or for that matter even be seen by other people. Bad case scenario his trap get stolen, worse case it injures a dog and the trapper's image.

Don't you think if we make more trappers wise to this problem we can reduce the odds of this happening without taking anyones rights away.

Its simply a choice to trap the right way.

The benifit of this route:

- We don't give anti's a figurative leghold on restrictions

- Trapper's aren't "forced" to do something - they simply make the correct choice

- Legislators aren't given the option to screw it up and over tighten the regulations to the point of phasing out the 7" bodygrip land set forever, like in several current states...

- Lands like private or very remote public lands that never see someones precious beagles or labs or coonhounds can still be trapped at the descretion of the now much wiser, ultra educated trapper.


Agreed totally. A wise trapper would not, for all the reasons you listed. Yet it continues to happen. I certainly support eduction, but I am a bit more sceptical about the effectiveness of simply and eduction campaign to address this problem.

A few of the comments earlier on this topic did little to increase my optimisum.

As you stated "Its simply a choice to trap the right way." Many know the risks now, but simply choose to make irresponsible sets because they can.

As far as providing a foothold for the anti-trapping folks, you and I will just have to disagree.

You fear if we give an inch we make ourselves more vulnerable to further restrictions.

I fear that if we don't recognize our own problems and take steps to resolve them we play right into their hands.

Which really provides the most verbal rhetoric for the antis? When we support and propose some comon sense regulations ourselves to reduce non-target catches? Or, when we condone and defend irresposible trappers making lethal sets in poor locations just becuase it is legal?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • leech~~
      Nope not me.  May want to go nextdoor and ask around?  
    • smurfy
      Looks to me like Leech brought his chair home!!😅😆
    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.