Jump to content
  • GUESTS

    If You  want access  to member only forums on FM, You will need to Sign-in or  Sign-Up now .

    This box will disappear once you are signed in as a member.

Comments for the DNR


BLACKJACK

Recommended Posts

The Strib was saying that the DNR is going to have some informational/comment sessions around the state on some issues. Heres what I sent to the DNR, I was wondering what others thoughts were on issues facing the DNR.

-------------

I probably won’t make it to one of your info meetings but here are my comments:

1) Pheasant limits – 2 to 3.

- I say no. As an avid pheasant hunter, I like to see more roosters around later in the season, why get more of them slaughtered in the first two ‘easy’ weeks of the season?

2) Pheasant possession – Yes raise the possession limit. If you’re an avid pheasant hunter and go out 4-5 times a week and have some success, you have to ‘work’ at cooking some up in order to stay legal. I’d like to be able to enjoy my pheasants at my leisure, taking them out of the freezer when I have time and enjoying them.

3) Conibear traps – restrict them, especially the big ones!!! As a guy who almost had his dog caught in a big conibear trap, I don’t want to see my dog – or anyones dog – caught in one. Restrict the big ones to water sets and nothing on land, even up north in the grouse woods, that a dog can get there head in.

4) Bows cut from 40 to 30 pounds. As a bow hunter, I want to cut down any bad publicity and I think that 30 pounds would cut down your margin of error; it would have to be a perfect heart/lung shot. I say no.

5) One dollar surcharge on deer license to pay for food shelf donation. I say yes, it would be good publicity. But only for deer processing, not any other deer management/predation costs.

6) Deer regulations, especially point restrictions. I’m against point restrictions, in the farm lands where I slug hunt, that four point might be the only deer you see. Don’t let a vocal minority, the trophy rack hunters, dictate our deer hunting regs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 137
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • walleye101

    30

  • gorrilla

    24

  • poutpro

    14

  • BLACKJACK

    10

Quote:

4) Bows cut from 40 to 30 pounds. As a bow hunter, I want to cut down any bad publicity and I think that 30 pounds would cut down your margin of error; it would have to be a perfect heart/lung shot. I say no.


I can agree with all of your statements accept I wonder about this one. I don't necessarily disagree but I have a question.

The regulation setting the minimum draw weight was set when arrow speed was considerably less than it is today. With the advances in bow technology arrow speeds have increase considerably over the years not to mention the improvements made in arrow and broadhead designs as well. I don't know the typical specifics but I would guess that a 30# bow today probably sends an arrow faster than a 40# bow of just 20 years ago. That does seem to support lessening the draw weight.

Secondly, lower draw weight would mean less to hold and I'm thinking, improved shot placement. Coupled with the improved arrow speeds and better broadhead designs this may compensate for any lack of impact energy.

Third, lower draw weight might mean more hunters able to participate. I realize that 40# is not a tremendous weight to hold but it might be for some.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The consideration for a 30lb weight limit comes from trying to get more "youth" size bows to qualify for hunting. What is known now about kinetic energy proves that a properly equipped 30 lb bow can hunt deer.

We all know that you can wound a deer shooting 80lbs if you make a bad shot, so proper shot placement is always important. More energy doesn't mean more kills if you shoot poorly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would sure hate to see 220 connibear traps made illegal on land. They are the main way that I catch raccoon, and I have never had a dog caught in a trap. I beleive that it is a very rare occurence, and that there are many other things that kill more dogs that 220 traps. I think that a lot of trappers would be upset if they were banned, they aren't really the right size for water sets. Too small for beaver, too big for mink.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how people say they have to shoot that fork horn, becuse if they had a point restriction they wouldnt shot a buck. Well next year that fork would be leagal and would be bigger horns and bigger body(more meat). Just shoot a doe if you can't stand not getting meat!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A 220 is 7" X 7". It is possible that your dog got caught in a 330, which currently is illegal to have set on land. I think that the trapper education requirement will help a lot to teach trappers how to avoid these accidental catches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate the idea of antler point restrictions. Even though in recent years we have been passing up a lot of smaller 8 or 10 pt. racks, I still think each hunter should be able to make their own decision about what is big enough for him or her to shoot. Some hunters don't have as much time to spend in the woods as others and shooting a smaller buck might be a success for them.

I also think that a lot of hunters are using the perceived lack of big deer as an excuse for their lack of success. The truth is there are good numbers of big deer in the woods. Just don't expect it to be as easy as it looks on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

3) Conibear traps – restrict them, especially the big ones!!! As a guy who almost had his dog caught in a big conibear trap, I don’t want to see my dog – or anyones dog – caught in one. Restrict the big ones to water sets and nothing on land, even up north in the grouse woods, that a dog can get there head in.


Another issue that boils down to people not knowing anything about the topic and using the dreaded R-word. 220's are a great tool for the trapper and a lot of pheasant egg seeking predators are trapped in them every year. There are many other options to reduce the unwanted animal catches in the 220. On public land they could be flagged with a certain color ribbon to indicate a trap has been set there or there are ways a trapper can "dog proof" there traps. Personally I trap on my own land and I think I should be able to us 220's because they really are a useful tool to the trapper. I am not telling pheasant hunters what kind of gun they have to use or what kind of dog they have to hunt with.

Just my 2 cents

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a good point about the eggs. Think how many pheasant and duck eggs will be saved by all of the raccoon and skunks that were caught with 220 traps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. That will make the guy carrying his dead pheasant dog back to his truck feel a whole lot better!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sure hope they dont put a point restriction on. THat would suck in my mind. Alot of people dont have the time to scout and hunt alot and any buck to them is a trophy so i am dead set against it. I know one land owner who told me "the day the tell me i cant shoot any buck is when i start gun hunting in October" I would aslo like to see the pheasant limit stay right where it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

...trapper. I am not telling pheasant hunters what kind of gun they have to use...


Very old law. No hunting anything with shotgun larger than ten gage. Hard to find one these days, but don't go shooting pheasants with a cannon loaded with shot please. shocked.gifgrin.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote:

Good point. That will make the guy carrying his dead pheasant dog back to his truck feel a whole lot better!


Like I said, I support some sort of flagging or marking of traps on PUBLIC land, Any dog worth anything will listen to you when you call it back away from the marked trap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To simplefy things why doesnt dnr just close buck for a year, and have a doe only. That would make all bucks bigger, and thin out this so called over populated deer population. Im sure there are several reasons not to do this, but it would work. Maybe do it once every 10 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To ban an effective way of controlling predators just doesnt make any sense to me, a dog would have to try pretty hard to crawl into a 220. I havent trapped for a long while but i support it in every way. More traps out there = less predators = more pheasants.

As far as not allowing anyone to take a buck for an entire year. That would cost the dnr tons of money in lost license sales. Where I hunt many people go hunting for a set of antlers, i dont think they would even buy a license for a doe. I shoot at the first deer I have a decent shot at and if it were a very nice buck, I would be fairly pissed if I had to let him walk by.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it that pheasant hunters think that their sport and their dogs are more important than any other sport? A lot of people trap for a seasonal income, and by taking away the 220, it would cut down on their income. If something is bad for the pheasant hunters, well I guess it should just be banned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would actually like to see how many dogs actually get caught in 220s each year. I have talked to quite a few trappers, and all that use 220's have said that they have never had a dog in one. Maybe we should not allow vehicles to drive down gravel roads when they see someone hunting pheasants in the adjacent section because their dog could get hit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Poutpro,

By your logic, trappers should have the right to make any type of set anywhere if it is effective at taking predators and provides the trapper a source of income. If it is indiscriminant set that kills non-target animals as well, I guess that is just part of the business. Heck, trappers loose a few traps every season, hunters should just expect that they may loose a dog now and then, just part of the business.

I am a trapper myself and member of the MN trappers association. It is just your type of narrow minded logic that will likely mean the end of the sport for the rest of us responsible trappers.

No one is suggesting that 220's be outlawed. They are a safe and efficient tool if used correctly. That is not setting them in baited cubbies where hunters with dogs have every right to be. If that is the only set you can catch racoon in you should invest in some trapping lessons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you read any of the posts? Obvoisly not, people ARE saying that they want to outlaw the 220. Also, did I ever say that I think traps should be set in any manner? The only thing that I am saying is that the pheasant hunters think that all game laws should be formed to be best for only pheasant hunters. Also, did I ever say that the 220 was the only way that I catch raccoons? I don't know how you are coming to all of these false conclusions. The few dogs that get caught in traps are being caught by those that set traps irresponsibly or illegally. Why do you think a law is going to change this? I beleive that trapper education is the answer to the problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes I have been reading the posts. I just went back and re-read all the posts on this topic and only the first post mentioned restrictions on the use of conibers. I did not see any post advocating for outlawing them.

If we cannot have a civil conversation about some reasonable restrictions on where they should be allowed and what type of set is more of less dangerous, that is when you end up with laws proposed to outlaw them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am with poutpro, I would still like to see actually stats on dogs getting caught in 220's. And I don’t want to hear any sob stories about someone’s dog getting trapped in a 220. A 220 is only 7x7 but I am sure it won’t be long till it follows the path of the 330 and is banned on land. There is just more pheasant hunters then there is trappers and unfortunately politics is all about numbers and money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im not a bow hunter so not sure the impact a lesser draw weight would have like stated arrow speed has increased alot since the 40lb draw weight was introduced and i agree that for some they may be a little more stable for a cleaner shot and if lowering it to 30 lbs will enable more youth to hunt THAT WOULD BE EXCELLENT .

point limit : lets see that deer is blazing by you at 30 mph can you count how many points it has? with proper deer management there is no need for this law. a bigger rack doesnt mean the deer has more meat

banning the 220 im not a trapper but i have experienced running a trap line with a friend some years back i really enjoyed it peta has been beating down on the trapper for years and now sounds almost same with pheasant hunters yeah i agree if my dog stepped in a trap id be pissed off i dont think this happens alot with hunting dogs that are actually out hunting pheasants with their owners as much as it does to dogs that have been dumped off on side of the road because theya re no longer wanted heres an idea for pheasant hunters if your hunting private land ask the owner if he traps and if so ask if he has sets in the area you are planning on hunting with your dog. for public land no real good solution there other than most trappers like sets near culverts or on fence lines so maybe be cautious in these areas. trappers trap alot of racoons and skunks along with fox and coyotes all of which love pheasants and pheasant eggs. take away trapper and soon the pheasants will follow. BTW i enjoy hunting pheasants more so than any other game outside of deer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

point limit--not needed. Big bucks are taken on public land every year in MN. Get out there and scout and hunt harder.

My comment to the DNR:

I just finished guessing my 2007 license fees for hunting and fishing. $233.50 Thanks for the bargain! I think thats really cheap for all the time I spend doing those things. Oh, and the full freezer of venison. laugh.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I think the only reason for a point limit is to force everyone to adhere to the preferences of those that hunt more for the rack than anything else. I think this is unfair and does nothing for the health of the herd. The buck only seasons have proved to be beneficial for the herd and that is the intent.

I for one enjoy hunting for the sport as well as for the meat. I only have opportunity to hunt deer for four days every year. The area I hunt is too far for me to prescout and no I do not want to find an area closer to home because part of my hunt is for the comaraderie with my brother and other hunting partners. In those four days my hope is to spend some time enjoying friendships, nature, wildlife and eventually put a little meat in the freezer. Happening upon a nice racked buck is a side benefit but not the goal. Point restrictions/limits force me to participate in trophy hunting of which I have no desire and should not be required to do.

Sure, I could take a doe instead but when the population requires no antlerless permit I will be forced to trophy hunt and leaving smaller bucks does nothing for the herd. Actually, leaving the smarter, bigger, and more advanced bucks is far more beneficial in terms of gene pool.

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So most of you must just hate going to fish lakes with a slot limit if you don't like point restriction. I'm just saying in a few years with a restriction everyone would have better odds to get a buck of a lifetime, even the people that don't make time to scout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With multiple topics going on this is a hard thread to follow.

Back to the 220 issue. I don't know how this turned into a pheasant hunter/trapper debate. Or how it came to banning the 220 or not. I was the one suggeting earlier that maybe folks that have some understanding of trapping look at some reasonable restrictions on the use of 220's (the type of set not the trap) so we do not end up loosing the tool.

Then folks suggested that few dogs get killed anyway, so it is no big deal. The hunters should be more careful, etc.

My question:

In your opinion just how many dogs (pheasant dogs, coon hounds, beagles, grouse dogs, whatever) would need to be killed in baited cubby sets before it is a big deal?

I am a trapper. I own at least 4-5 dozen 220's that I use responsibly in dry land sets. I have no interest in seeing the 220 banned.

Kas2611 said he would be P...ed if his dog stepped in a trap. Understand that animals don't step in 220's, they stick their heads in! If that happens to your best hunting dog you are more than a little p...ed.

The answer to the earlier question is that it does not take many dead dogs to make this a big deal. It is huge for the one who lost the dog. Just a few incidents like this across the state each year is too many.

As mentioned earlier, the 220 has a 7x7 jaw opening. Set these things responsibly at ground level on coon trails and this is an extremely effective and very selective coon set. I have taken 100's of coon in this set with the only non-target species a very occasional skunk or opossum. I have hunted my own hounds in the same areas I have traps set and dogs will go right over the top and never know they are there.

A dog would have to try to stick his head into a 220 with the 7x7 opening. But that is the priciple behing the baited cubby. The bait is in the cubbie, only accessible through the opening. A dog can and will not hesitate to reach in for an enticing piece of bait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sorry i guess i shouldve done my homework had it in my head a 220 was a leghold trap silly me like i said im not a trapper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Banning the 220 came about because that is one of the topics that these DNR meetings are discussing. There are people, even if not on here, that want to ban not only 220's but trapping all together. One trap at a time would be fine with them. The problem I have with you is that you are coming off as this high and mighty trapper, and portraying me as a slob trapper. Did I ever say anything about how I set traps in an unethical way? I was just saying that pheasant hunters think that the laws she be there to simply improve their sport, without regards to trapping. How many ppl here have actually had a dog in a 220? Some people on here don't even know what a 220 is and the seem to be chiming in on the topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Your Responses - Share & Have Fun :)

    • Brianf.
      I'm not there, so I can't tell exactly what's going on but it looks like a large area of open water developed in the last day with all of the heavy snow on the east side of wake em up Narrows. These two photos are from my Ring Camera facing north towards Niles Point.  You can see what happened with all of snow that fell in the last three days, though the open water could have been wind driven. Hard to say. .  
    • SkunkedAgain
      Black Bay had great ice before but a few spots near rockpiles where there were spots of open water. It looks like the weight of the snow has created a little lake in the middle of the bay.  
    • LakeofthewoodsMN
      On the south end...   Thanks to some cold spring weather, ice fishing continues strong for those still ice fishing.  The bite remains very good.  Most resorts have pulled their fish houses off for the year, however, some still have fish houses out and others are allowing ATV and side by sides.  Check social media or call ahead to your favorite resort for specifics. Reports this week for walleyes and saugers remain excellent.   A nice mix of jumbo perch, pike, eelpout, and an occasional crappie, tullibee or sturgeon being reported by anglers. Jigging one line and using a live minnow on the second line is the way to go.  Green, glow red, pink and gold were good colors this week.     Monster pike are on a tear!  Good number of pike, some reaching over 45 inches long, being caught using tip ups with live suckers or dead bait such as smelt and herring in 8 - 14' of water.   As always, work through a resort or outfitter for ice road conditions.  Safety first always. Fish houses are allowed on the ice through March 31st, the walleye / sauger season goes through April 14th and the pike season never ends. On the Rainy River...  The river is opened up along the Nelson Park boat ramp in Birchdale, the Frontier boat ramp and Vidas boat ramp.  This past week, much of the open water skimmed over with the single digit overnight temps.   Areas of the river have popped open again and with temps getting warmer, things are shaping up for the last stretch through the rest of the spring season, which continues through April 14th.   Very good numbers of walleyes are in the river.  Reports this week, even with fewer anglers, have been good.  When temps warm up and the sun shines, things will fire up again.   Jigs with brightly colored plastics or jigs with a frozen emerald shiner have been the desired bait on the river.  Don't overlook slow trolling crankbaits upstream as well.   Good reports of sturgeon being caught on the river as well.  Sturgeon put the feed bag on in the spring.  The bite has been very good.  Most are using a sturgeon rig with a circle hook loaded with crawlers or crawlers / frozen emerald shiners. Up at the NW Angle...  Ice fishing is winding down up at the Angle.  Walleyes, saugers, and a number of various species in the mix again this week.  The bite is still very good with good numbers of fish.  The one two punch of jigging one line and deadsticking the second line is working well.   Check with Angle resorts on transport options from Young's Bay.  Call ahead for ice road guidelines.  
    • CigarGuy
      With the drifting, kind of hard to tell for sure, but I'm guessing about a foot and still lightly snowing. Cook end!
    • PSU
      How much snow did you get on Vermilion? 
    • Mike89
      lake here refroze too...  started opening again yesterday with the wet snow and wind...  very little ice left today...
    • Hookmaster
      A friend who has a cabin between Alex and Fergus said the lake he's on refroze. He texted me a pic from March 12th when it was open and one from 23rd when it wasn't. 🤯
    • SkunkedAgain
      I don't think that there has been any ice melt in the past few weeks on Vermilion. Things looked like a record and then Mother Nature swept in again.   I'll give my revised guess of April 21st
    • leech~~
      As I get older it's really not just about sending bullets down range.  Some of it's just the workmanship of the gun and the wow factor. The other two guns I have really wanted which I'll never have now because of their price, is a 8mm Jap Nambu and 9mm German Luger.   Just thought they always looked cool!  
    • jim curlee
      I had a guy hit me with a lightly used 1969 BAR, he wanted $1650 with an older Leupold scope. More than I think they are worth, I made an offer, he declined end of story.   You know if you look at the old brochures, a grade II BAR sold for $250 in the late 60s, $1650 would be a good return on your investment.    Why would anybody want a 50 year old gun, they are heavy, have wood stocks, and blued metal.  I guess mainly to keep their gun safes glued to the floor. lol   You can probably buy a stainless rifle that you never have to clean, with a synthetic stock you never have to refinish, is as light as a feather, and for half as much money, perfect.   I'm too old for a youth gun, although I've shrunk enough that it would probably fit. lol   No Ruger 10/44s.   Jim      
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.