Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
fish2live

5w20 oil?

Recommended Posts

fish2live

i brought my truck into the local ford dealer for a free oil change i had a coupon for.they put 5w20 in my 03 chevy p/u, in the manual it states to use 5w30 only. should i be concerned?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TravisC

should be fine probably start better in the cold. just put the 30w in next time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeremy airjer W

Well theres your problem, Leave those ford guys alone!

5w20 is the viscosity rating that the oil has. It has all of the lubricating characteristics and additives needed for proper lubrication. Its just a little thinner. I would be more concerned if the used 5W30 in your 5w20 system.

The only thing I could possible think of is if the mains are a little worn you may start to hear them make noise just because the oil can more readily move through the parts that they are trying to lubricate and if anything is leaking you may notice it leaking a little bit more.

If your really concerned about it bring it back and tell them you want 5W30. There should be no problems from them as they should have filled it with 5W30 to begin with! The big yellow print on the oil cap should have been a big clue!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
schweady

Been doing the exact opposite in our 2002 Taurus for 94,000 miles now, no problem. Cap says 5W20, been using 5W30. Mostly because 4-5 years ago, nobody had 5W20 and when you did find it, it was double the price. My family Ford dealer said it's really no difference... He said Ford was just able to advertise a slightly better gas mileage on the window sticker when 5W20 was the recommended weight oil. ??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Capt. Don*

When we change oil, the oil we put in the engine isn't necessarily what shows on the invoice. Our computers generate an invoice based on what labor operation was keyed in. For a light truck w/gas engine our system is built to print 5/20 on the invoice as that is what Fords use. Most likely they put 5/30 in but the invoice shows what it was programmed to read for the menu price. You could check with them to be sure, but even if it is 5/20 this time of year shouldn't be a concern.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
fish2live

thanks for the replies. i am not to concearned about it, i figured they know what they are doing. just wanted to double check just incase

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dragonsm

I have an easy solution to the problem......just go trade the Chevy in for a Ford PU and the 5/20 will be correct. grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

My understanding is that engine tolerance has been tightened and using heavy oil may pose problems, especially before the oil gets up to running temperature.

I also believe that using lighter oil may improve fuel economy slightly. With the improvements in lubricants today from what they were in the past, lighter oils are now possible because they can handle the heat much better and so don't break down as quickly.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeremy airjer W

Your are spot on BobT.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mjhowe

and speaking of oil...why is it that my daughters 1987 Honda civic with 230,000 miles on it, which specified a 7,500 mile oil change, runs better and uses less oil, than my 1998 suburu with 150k that gets oil changed at 3000 miles?

How were we all duped into thinking 3,000 miles was the magic number....Oils are better, maunufacturing tolerances are better, yet we change it more often...

Just makes a guy wonder....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
theoilman

If your Chevy has been run on 5W-30 and you switch to a lighter oil, 5W-20, it may start burning/using oil. Just change back to the 5W-30.

A little history on viscosities (Viscosity is resistance to flow, a lighter viscosity means less resistance to flow.)

Back in the 1970s and well into the 1980s almost all American cars used 10W-40 and Asian used 20W-50. In the late 1980s to around 1990, everything switched mostly to 10W-30. Around that time there were a number of large improvements in manufacturing tolerances and consistency. Bearing to shaft clearances got closer, piston to cylinder wall clearances got closer, and cylinder honing improved to 'micro-honing. With these tighter clearances you got the same protection using a lighter viscosity oil.

A few years later, many started changing from 10W-30 to 5W-30 primarily for improved cold performance, with little change in overall protection (The _W is the cold viscosity and the -30 is the hot protection. For a warmed up engine a 5W-30 and 10W-30 should be the same.)

Around 2000 most Fords and Hondas changed to 5W-20 while making no further improvements to engineering internal in the engine. If you drop the viscosity of an oil while holding everything else about it the same you will increase fuel economy - maybe 0.01 mpg - not enough that you or I could ever measure it, but when you are Ford and making millions of vehicles, improving their CAFE (government test Corporate Average Fuel Economy) even a tiny amount means big bucks to them. To provide adequate protection Ford at the same time changed from a minimum spec 5W-30 petroleum lube to 5W-20 partial synthetic required to try to hold protection at about the same level.

What do the vehicles actually require?

The GMs gasoline engine vehicles I have checked out are now under-hood stickered 5W-30 while the owners manual says 5W-30, 10W-30 or 0W-30 (must be synthetic) are all approved. Then it goes on to say 'Don't Use 20W-50.'

Fords however leave a lot of doubt: under-hood stickered 5W-20 while the owners manual simple says '5W-20 preferred.' In my dictionary 'preferred' doesn't mean I have to use it. But Ford gives you no further guidelines.

If you want the best protection switch to AMSOIL. E-mail me direct and I will mail you a copy of the test data that proves it. Yes, AMSOIL is some of the highest priced oil you can buy, but it is the Lowest Cost. With better fuel economy (3% to 5% for most), reduced wear (50% lower) and longer oil change interval (up to 25,000 miles/1-year normal driving; 15,000 miles/1-year severe driving, gasoline or diesel), it will cost you less in the long term.

Sorry about the 'ad' for those who are sensitive about it, but it just continues from the technical questions here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vitalshot5

Everybodies a salesman......all oil brands are not the same but have to go by a government standard.....pick an oil and stick with it no matter what brand is your best bet....if it calls for 5-30 stick with 5-30 and also try and use the same brand throughout a vehicles life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeremy airjer W

Quote:

and speaking of oil...why is it that my daughters 1987 Honda civic with 230,000 miles on it, which specified a 7,500 mile oil change, runs better and uses less oil, than my 1998 suburu with 150k that gets oil changed at 3000 miles?


Thats an unfair comparison. Two different manufacturers, completely different cars, completely different engineering, completely different standards.

7,500 miles between oil changes is under "ideal conditions". These conditions exhist in a lab and no where else. Granted the better the engine is engineered, the better the efficiency. The better the efficiency the less contaminated the oil gets. Pair that with better refined oils with better additives and you may be able to drive a little longer.

7,500 miles, not this guy. Toyota tried it with there 3.0 in the camry. Guess what, things went terribly wrong. Excessive amounts of sludge built up in the pan and they starved for oil. Toyota forked out a lot of cash to take care of that problem. Was it the oils fault, was it poor engineering, or a momentary lapse of reasoning. Maybe a combonation of all three.

My new vehicle requires an oil change every 5,000 miles. They use regular mobile one at the dealer. Its one of the top oils in my opinion, but I still change it every 3,000 miles, for nothing else than a little peace of mind.

As far as synthetics go, in my opinion, they are better lubricants. Do they last longer? Yes and no. If the engine is at 100% than yes, it will probably last a little longer. If the engine is worn out with a ton of blow-by, than no its not going to last any longer. All that fuel and carbon and whatever else ends up in the oil. The oil may be fine but its all the debris and acids that build up that will do the damage.

Its $20 to change the oil to possible prevent thousands in repairs. Why not have it done every 3,000 miles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99

Again, yes and no.

The filters should be catching the particulates large enough to do damage, and synthetic oils tend to have higher TBN numbers and stronger/more durable additive packages. That's why they claim (and often recommend) longer service intervals.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

I don't agree that we change it more often. I do agree that quite often we probably change it more often than needed, depending on driving habits. The 3,000 mi interval is the norm today for heavy duty use, such as lots of stop-and-go traffic like you have in city driving or quite a bit of heavy hauling as when pulling a big boat, camper, etc.

For the person who primarily uses their vehicle for highway and pleasure use a 5,000 mi interval is probably adequate. Probably the most significant advances have come in the design and quality of the engine lubricants. They aren't near a subject to thermal breakdown as they once were. Tighter engine tolerance, cleaner engine performance, and better filtering, both air and oil, have also contributed.

30 years ago the normal interval was 2,000 mi. It is now more than double that amount.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
mjhowe

Almost every oil maunufacturer (non-Syn) and oil change outfit tells you to change your oil every 3,000 miles. Manufacturers may put different frequencies in the manuals, but the MARKETERS have evryone convinced its 3k.

.

It may be apples to oranges, the point was, how did 3k become the norm, when engine tolerances and oils got better?

Tuneups are now 100,000 miles or more on many vehicles, so obviously they are engineering stuff to last longer...except oil?

I have used synthetics on several vehicles, and agree, on a worn engine, they are no cureall. I started using Mobil one in my 1998 Suburu at 145k and now I have 70lbs of compression in #3 cylinder...but thats a whole nuther story!

I agree, 7500 miles is probably pushing it...My point was that in 1987, Honda spec'd 7500 miles for thier little civic...and I doubt that the folks who owned the car before me changed it at 3k...and its lasted over a quarter million miles. NO smoke and still runs like a rocket

Its a good topic of conversation, obviously, cause thiers lots of opinions! grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • TheTuna
      The wind today has eliminated the little ice we had.  
    • MUSKY18
      Thanks much Huntnfish and ZachD!!!  Had the wife pick me up some CCI 209 Magnum primers and seems to have fixed the issue.  Went out the other night and put 7 rounds through the ole CVA and didn't have a single hangfire.  I'm ready for the weekend.
    • JerkinLips
      Is Big Bay completely frozen over yet?
    • Rick
      Anglers and others interested in Department of Natural Resources strategies for managing Grand Marias area lakes and streams are invited to review and comment on management plans scheduled for review this fall. This annual process includes several waters located within the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW). Comments on lakes within the BWCAW will be accepted until Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW, will extend through Feb. 15. A management plan identifies specific management activities planned for a lake or stream over the next five to 20 years, including any proposed stocking or special regulations. “Management plans are our best single sources of information on past, present and desired future conditions in our lakes and streams,” said Steve Persons, Grand Marais area fisheries supervisor. “Comments and suggestions from those most interested in these waters are crucial when it comes to making plans and determining management success. For anglers this is the best opportunity to influence how these lakes and streams are managed.” In the Grand Marais area, plans for the following lakes and streams will reviewed this winter. Lake plans under review: The status and preservation of native lake trout populations will be the primary concern in plans being revised for Blue Snow and Gabimichigami Lakes. Both are located inside the BWCAW. Stream trout stocking and management strategies will be reviewed in Thompson, Thrush, Turnip, Olson, Kraut, Little Portage, Olga, Mavis (BWCAW), Missing Link (BWCAW), Meditation (BWCAW), Talus, Trout, Pine (near Two Island Lake), Unnamed (near Tom Lake), Chester, Extortion, and North Shady Lakes. Options to consider include changes in species, reductions in stocking frequency, and changes in the number or size of fish stocked. In Mine, Peanut, Weasel (Sled), Tomato, Trip, and Rog (BWCAW) Lakes, fisheries managers are considering eliminating trout stocking, due to the high cost of stocking remote lakes by air, poor survival of stocked fish, or use that appears to have been too low to justify the cost of continued stocking.  Angler feedback on fisheries in these lakes is critically needed for these important decisions. Plans for Devilfish, Gust, Hand, and Tom Lakes will be reviewed with attention to the status and needs of walleye fisheries in those lakes. Moore Lake will be reviewed to determine whether it offers any potential for panfish management. Plans for several lightly-used BWCAW lakes in the area, including Caribou (by Clearwater), Clove, Kiskadinna, Long, Mora, Morgan, Skipper, and Tepee Lakes will be reviewed. Those plans will be revised primarily to incorporate any new survey data that may have been obtained, and to establish survey schedules for the next few years. Streams plans under review: Plans for Beaverdam Creek and the Swamp River will be reviewed.  Both are marginal trout streams, and may be considered for removal from the State’s list of designated trout streams. Plans for the Cascade River, Elbow Creek, and the Onion River will also be reviewed. All three support thriving brook trout populations, with the Cascade and Onion Rivers also supporting steelhead and salmon in their lower reaches. Plans will focus on habitat and water quality, hydrology and watershed issues. The DNR is considering removing the portion of Elbow Creek above Elbow Lake from the State’s list of designated trout streams, since no trout have been found in that part of the stream in recent surveys. Current plans for lakes and streams in the area as well as recent fish population assessment information are available for review at the DNR’s Grand Marais area fisheries office, at 1356 E. Highway 61, Grand Marais, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. For more information, call or email Steve Persons at 218-387-6022 or steve.persons@state.mn.us. Public comments on management of BWCAW waters are due by Dec. 20. The comment period for lakes and streams outside the BWCAW will extend through Feb. 15. Comments, suggestions and other feedback on the management of these, and all other streams and lakes in the area are welcomed at any time and will be considered when those plans are next due for review. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Hookmaster
      The first set of replacements I bought from a dealership but they are spendy. I bought some Ancos at Fleet Farm like I have in the past for all my vehicles, but there is no adapter that fits the end of the  blade arm. What are others using?
    • Rick
      The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city of Willow River will host a public open house on Wednesday, December 6, 2017 to discuss options for the Willow River dam which was severely damaged during a July 2016 rain storm. The open house will be held from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. at the Willow River School located at 8142 Pine Street, Willow River, Minn. Participants can visit displays during the first hour of the open house to learn more about three options currently being considered.  At 7:30 p.m. DNR staff will make a presentation about the features, benefits and cost of each option and answer questions about next steps. The meeting purpose is to receive public input about the options and to answer questions about the state’s process. The dam was built in 1940 as a cooperative venture between the Works Progress Administration and the then Department of Conservation. Heavy rains from a July 2016 thunderstorm overwhelmed the capacity of the dam and caused a significant breach of the north embankment. Options include replacement of the dam to meet current safety standards, removal of the dam, or restoration of the river channel with a series of rock weirs, or rock rapids, to retain water levels but to allow passage of small craft as well as the movement of fish. “We have a rare opportunity to reimagine how this stretch of river might function and look like in the future,” said project manager Jason Boyle. “We look forward to hearing from area residents and moving the project forward.” Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • opsirc
      Any new ice reports?  Looking For s something about Nicholas or strand
    • rundrave
      what if you pull a wheel house to Mn from out of state or are a non resident?
    • Hoey
      I am noodling this same concept over.  I am thinking either a dedicated (portable) battery, since I may be pulling on shore to the ice with the 4-wheeler or a hand, boat-type winch, not always hooked up to the truck.  
    • Hoey