Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
grizzald

Deer Numbers

Recommended Posts

grizzald

Another year of slug hunting has gone by and yet another year of not being checked by a DNR, or seeing a DNR for that matter. This was my tenth year of hunting and I'm starting to wonder whats going on. I wouldnt mind being checked or even see a DNR driving around. Also, there are a lot of other threads on here saying that people had real poor hunting because the deer numbers are low. I'm in the same boat. Real, REAL poor hunting this year. Not to rip on the DNR, but maybe they should start taking more counts on deer rather than taking counts on the different type of turtles, and tearing down groves and tree lines for prairie chicken habitat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

Grizz-

The DNR is made up of many different divisions. Conservation(COs), Wildlife Game (deer, turkey, grouse, etc...) Wildlife non-game (turtles, moles, mice, wolves and other rare non-game animals etc...), Trails and Waterways, Parks, Forestry etc... and the list goes on.

Saying that the DNR should take more counts of one species of animal you find in higher esteem than another animal is only your opinion, I am sure there are others out there who feel just the opposite.

Traditionally the western part of the state had very few trees and prairie chicken flourished because of the native prairies that were once there. Now because of those trees and groves in many areas the chickens populations are dwindling. Dothe chickens not have the same "rights" as the deer to be there?

I work in SE MN and cut cedars off of bluffs with contract from the DNR, I supposed you can cry bias on my behalf, but I do it to restore traditional bluff prairies that were present 50-70 yrs ago. This work is done mainly to improve rattlesnake habitat. I bet you think that this is a waste of tax dollars, but who is to say that snake habitat or prairie chicken habitat is less important than whitetail habitat.

Deer numbers are very high in most areas around the state and can vary greatly due to aging habitat, habitat destruction/construction, farming practices (crop rotations), developments, hunting preassure, scouting etc... just because you are not seeing those deer does not mean they are not there. That also goes for the COs. They are around but they do not want to bother individuals hunting as much as most individuals do not want to be bothered by them. So many times they just sit back, wait and watch.

I am an avid whitetail hunter and each year I do my scouting and homework, not that you don't. Some years are better than others. I put in the time to make sure I am sucessful at least seeing deer when I am bow-hunting and shotgun hunting. I don't just go up any tree I see, I find the perfect tree. It is all part of the game sometimes you win sometimes you lose. Not everyone has the time to scout etc... but at least realize hunting isn't a garunteed thing other wise it would be called killing.

I am not here to defend the DNR but I do believe they are doing a great job with the resources in the state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson

You are upset that you didnt get checked by the DNR???

We have nearly half a million people deer hunting in MN and less than 200 conservation officers statewide. (I am pulling that number out of a hat. I could be off by a few)

I guess I dont even begin to understand the point of this statement.

As far as lack of deer in your area, I remember last year it was an issue with you too. Out of curiosity, what permit area are you hunting in? It would be interesting to see what past harvest levels have been I guess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

I may be wrong but I believe that there is on average one CO per county.With all the complaint issues they have there is probably not much time to check alot of hunters.In 40 years of hunting and fishing I may have been checked 10 times,maybe.

They are busy guys.I have no problem with the DNR in regards to deer populations as 25 years ago it was really something to even see a deer in the southern 30% of the state.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lcornice

Quote:

You are upset that you didnt get checked by the DNR???

We have nearly half a million people deer hunting in MN and less than 200 conservation officers statewide. (I am pulling that number out of a hat. I could be off by a few)


Good hat! Number of hunters is right on, number of CO's is 170. Actually, there was a pretty good DNR presence around Appleton this year. They were working registration stations all around the area during 4A/4B sampling deer for chronic wasting disease. I believe around 400 samples were taken from 6-8 registration stations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich

I may be alone here.. but I take my hat off to the DNR. I think they do a pretty darn good job here in MN. We have some of the best fishing in the world in my opinion, and the deer herd seems to be healthy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

Ditto Dietz. smile.gifI wouldnt want to think what it would be like without them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
96trigger

I agree Deitz, some people might forget that it wasn't long ago when seeing a whitetail was a BIG deal. There was a time when we used to have to apply for doe permits. If you don't think the deer population is on the rise. Ask the insurance companies about the increase in accident claims due to auto/deer collisions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog

I wish they could afford a lot more CO's for enforcement, but otherwise I don't have any major gripes about the DNR's hunting and fishing programs, I think they do a fine job. Some of their other areas of work leave some things to be desired, but as far as hunting/fishing stuff, I'd say good job!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ddp

That is why they call it Hunting... I guess I am confused on the posting.

I hunt in a party of 5 in the superior nat'l forest and haven't seen a CO in 10 years. We manage to at least get a deer out of the deal. I personally think it's about the experience and if I get a deer, it's a bonus. Amen for Zone 1. Another excuse to get out of town this weekend. Hopefully the deer will be moving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGurk

It's not really "they" can't afford more CO's, It's "WE" can't afford more CO's with the budget they are working with. I'm happy to pay the existing license fees and donate more for the conservation plates, and would gladly pay up more to keep the programs going and add more where needed. There are signs of their hard work everywhere. I'm not pro-tax, but definately pro-fee for good services and results.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
harvey lee

Well said McGurk. smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eagle_3464

I believe the MN DNR does an outstanding job with the resources they have to work with. There just aren't enough funds available to solve every issue 100%. I would say that most areas of the state have a higher than average deer herd. I don't know how much truth is in it but I have heard that the insurance companies put pressure on the DNR to reduce the deer herd in those areas of high collision rates. I was a victim just this morning on my way into work.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
doubleUcubed

Saw the CO both weekends SE of Willmar. He was very busy stopping/checking hunters and also wrote several warnings/tickets for burning violations (garbage,etc.) around the lakes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Black_Bay

Hey Deitz does the C.O. still live down the road from you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BobT

That's a good point, McGurk. License fees are not really a tax by definition. They are user fees so those that don't want to pay, don't participate in the activity.

Taxes on the other hand we pay whether we use the funds or not.

Bob

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Deitz Dittrich

Yes the CO from Chisago CO is one of my neighbors.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stratosman

We have been checked every year for the last 5 years or more....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gforce

I agree on how the dnr works with deer. they dont do the best job. we had pretty poor hunting this year to. They could be doin a lot more than they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Knute78

Yeah it would sure be nice if the DNR could garuntee everyone in your individual parties could shoot a deer but they can't. I know, maybe they should start raising deer in pens and then release them in your areas just before the season opens.

Come on, what is the DNR suppose to do? They cannot improve habitat in every region of the state specifically for deer. Traditionally deer didn't even roam much of this state. Deer population started to flourish, as they are now, when farming and timber harvest started taking hold in this state and created more food and brows in the NE and around the state.

The deer population in the NE is actually what is hurting the moose population in MN, and that may be why that is only a once in a lifetime hunt.

The DNR is doing a fine job. I am sorry you had such a bad hunt this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icehole10

Just wondering if any of you happen to catch the article in the sunday forum about the 96 year old deer hunter from the galesburg area I believe. He had some good advice for everone that hunts. It's not always about killing a deer.

I know for me it's about teaching my kids about the outdoors and right from wrong. If I get a dear great if I don't great. It could probably be alot worse than what it is. One good winter like 97' and we'll all be scrathing are heads.

I think the dnr does what the can to control the population and I'm guessing that just like everything else the deer population goes in cycles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BigTen

Guys,

I hunt very near to Grizz, and I think his point is that all we hear from the powers that be is how the deer herd is in such great shape, but in reality if you were to ask any farmer in our general area (say maybe 20 mile radius) they would tell you the deer numbers are as low as they've ever seen them since when seeing a deer was a "big deal". Its not the end of the world, its just the way it is right now. Nature seems to have its way of evening out over time. I think one issue some people like grizz and myself have is that now that the herd is in rough shape, everyone goes out and buys the all season license and gets 3 tags. I don't blame people for buying them, if they're offered. It's just frustrating to a certain extent to know that there are very few deer right now in that area, yet we are in the midst of a period of about 6 weekends where there are orange coats everywhere, and some of those will not be happy until they shoot every buck, doe and fawn they see.

No big deal, I've just decided to trust in nature that things will improve, although everyone having 3 tags as opposed to one is not a good sign for this particular situation. Just wish there was a way they could better identify problem areas and deal with them accordingly. That is unrealistic though because of the sheer size of the state and the vast range of scenarios you can find in MN.

I enjoy deer hunting, but it isn't the most important thing to me, I'm just trying to bring some light to grizzald's viewpoint. Later.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGurk

The DNR site has pretty extensive records over recent years of tags purchased and deer harvested. The overall picture is that recent winters have been mild, and there are deer for people to hunt. It's too bad that most people have 2-4 days out of 365 to get their fill of such an awesome experience, and that small window can be a real disappointment if hunting is poor after such a great buildup.

I think the timing of the rut, the moon's phases, and the mild season were limiting factors in the number of deer seen during shooting hours for most peoples' hunts this year. To instantly blame the DNR is pretty rash, in my opinion. Last I checked, they had no influence on the 3 factors I mentioned. If they did, do you think a permit would only be $27.00? Talk about technology!

In addition, did we have a free, public forum like this to get this amount of reporting from across the state in years past? I had a good year, and didn't feel the need to create a new post about how I saw and harvested deer. I have to think others who saw and harvested are happy to just read and not brag, so the complaints are going to stand out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BigTen

Agreed that the overall herd may be in good shape. An example would be how I was just talking with a friend the other day who hunts in the Brainerd area and he said there's deer everywhere, literally.

As far as those factors you listed leading us to believe there's no deer, I'm sorry, but when people combine 2-3000 acres of corn and see 10-15 deer total, that's not good. If anyone knows whats around its farmers. they are there every day and they have years of past experiences to use as a benchmark. There just isn't many deer there right now, no biggie. Hopefully some day they'll rebound.

Don't take it that I'm complaining either. Heck I didn't even buy a license this year because I didn't see the point. I'm not going to shoot a doe when there's no does and fawns to start with, we need every one of them in my opinion. Screw QDM, we need deer first. And I didn't really see the point in shooting a basket rack either so I just didn't hunt. Once again, no biggie.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Swill

The MN DNR has done a horrible job in MN. Yeah they are nice guys who may be our neighbors, but if you compare MN Quality Deer Management to WI, Iowa, IL or Kansas, we don't match up.

The MN DNR has pushed the task of quality deer management management on the shoulders of private land owners. It is up the the private land owner to talk to their neighbors about passing on immature bucks, it is up the the private land owner to plant a food plot or harvest timber stands of monoculture trees to improve forest diversity...

And CO officers? They have nothing to do with QDM, and I agree we need more CO officers in the field. I hunt public land and there is too many selfish hunters out there staking out there own piece of public land for the whole deer season.

Check out some other state links to see why mature bucks are being harvested in their states and we are stuck being happy with 4 pointers....

WI DNR link

http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/wildlife/HUNT/DEER/maps.htm

Iowa DNR

http://www.iowadnr.com/wildlife/files/drindex.html

IL DNR

http://dnr.state.il.us/admin/systems/index.htm#deer

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Chill62
      It wasn't scott that warned me about the ice conditions another guy warned me about it.  It'll be interesting here shortly when snow starts hitting and people start hitting lakes with snowmobiles.  See how many find thin ice.  Kinda sucks but it is what it is can only take precautions while  going out.
    • bbfenatic
      Chill: I heard you guys had a good outing up North for the Trout..good job!  As fas as Melissa goes there is plenty of ice over on the crappie hole 9-11" but that area Scott was targeting Pike is always the last to freeze over on Melissa and it was not long ago that it did freeze out there...these larger bodies of water with rivers going through them or springs or that opened back up with those warmer temps and high winds are going to be suspect for quite a while unfortunately. Stay Safe Everyone!
    • Living_The_Dream
      Oh I miss the days of getting lost on the lake because of Kelly's horrible directions .  Thank God Jonny drives us out there now, haven't been lost since (only arrived a day early ).
    • wallyeye
      Thanks Hoey! Hopefully someone comes forward.   
    • Hoey
      Wow sorry to hear that.  It must of been busy there for it to be picked up so quickly.  I hope you get it back.  
    • Hoey
      Seasons Greetings to all.  It is ice fishing season!!!  Hurrah. I fished Friday and Saturday.  I arrived on Thursday evening and found a lot of opinions on the safety aspect of the ice.  The resort is ultra conservative in their assessments, and this should be expected as they have a lot at risk.  First ice explorers always push the limits.  For example one sled is on the bottom after breaking through 2 inches of unexpected weak ice, a week ago Sunday.   I found 11 inches were I traveled and fished, only going out a couple miles.  There is a lot of eight inch thick broken ice chunks to work around and through.  The bite Friday was very good.  Catching numbers were high, but size kept it from being great to excellent.  I ended up one fish short of my walleye/sauger limit.  My four sauger were 15 to 16 inchers - nice.  My three walleye were 15 to 17 inchers.  I had two for dinner.  So on Saturday I was looking for three nice walleye.  The bite was much slower.  We had an east wind with rising temps.  I was anticipating another Friday type bite.  It was generally zero to eight degrees every morning.  I finally ended the Saturday with two 17 inch walleye, one short of my limit again.   I plan to be back during the week following Christmas through New Years with family and friends.   Good Luck and practice safety!!!  
    • monstermoose78
      Yeah Borden Can be good.
    • Rick
      By Kristi Coughlon, DNR information officer Minnesotans are a generous lot. For the past 40 years, they’ve made it possible for the Minnesota Nongame Wildlife Program to help thousands of native species survive and thrive – including animals that are threatened, endangered and rare.  The program is now wrapping up its 40th anniversary with hopes that supporters will wrap up an end-of-year donation to put under the holiday tree in celebration of the many wildlife success stories it’s helped create, like the comeback of bald eagles and trumpeter swans. Success comes with a price tag, and rare species don’t collect a paycheck. They rely on our help. Unlike other DNR programs, the Nongame Wildlife Program doesn’t get general tax money; it receives no fees from hunting or fishing licenses. It’s funded almost entirely by voluntary donations made by people who want to ensure that Minnesota continues to have healthy natural systems that support a wide diversity of wildlife. Many of those donations are made when Minnesotans file their state income taxes, designating an amount on the line with the loon to go to the Nongame Wildlife Program. But people can donate anytime, online or by mail. Donations fund critical habitat restoration work, research projects, surveys to assess the status of threatened and endangered species, and outreach and education such as the popular eaglecam that reaches into millions of homes and classrooms in all 50 states and at least 160 countries around the world. Donations are tax deductible and matched dollar for dollar by the Reinvest in Minnesota (RIM) license plate fund. Donations also are used as match to federal grants and other outside funding sources, leveraging additional money to support nongame species conservation, research and habitat protection projects Looking for other reasons to donate? Here’s forty – one for each year of the program’s efforts: Monarch butterfly, bald eagle, forcipate emerald dragonfly, northern barrens tiger beetle, moneyface native mussel, Roger’s snaggletooth snail, tiger salamander, timber rattlesnake, jumping spider, common loon, red-tailed prairie leafhopper, wood frog, great plains toad, Blanding’s turtle, skipjack herring, tricolored bat, trumpeter swan, eastern bluebird, osprey, mudpuppy, golden-winged warbler, eastern hog-nose snake, pileated woodpecker, smoky shrew, wood turtle, American white pelican, piping plover, headwaters caddisfly, black tern, peregrine falcon, northern goshawk, slender madtom fish, boreal owl, rusty-patched bumble bee, red-shouldered hawk, yellow rail, plains pocket mouse, Juanita sphinx moth, northern bog lemming. And many more. During this season of giving, consider giving $40 for forty years to help Minnesota’s Nongame Wildlife Program continue its critical work to conserve wildlife species that aren’t hunted, from songbirds to salamanders, from butterflies to bats. Learn more at mndnr.gov/nongame. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Special fishing regulations will change March 1 on a number of Minnesota waters following an annual public input and review process, according to the Department of Natural Resources.  “Anglers need to know special regulations because they take precedence over statewide regulations,” said Al Stevens, fisheries program consultant with the DNR. “We have special regulations to improve fish populations and make fishing better or more sustainable.” Special regulations for individual waters are listed in a separate section of the Minnesota Fishing Regulations booklet and at mndnr.gov/fishmn, and are posted at public accesses. For this spring, new statewide northern pike zone regulations that take effect on inland waters will make it possible to do away with several previously existing special regulations that apply to individual waters and aim for similar outcomes as the zone regulations. The new statewide pike regulations go into effect in time for the fishing opener on Saturday, May 12. On waters that have a special fishing regulation, anglers are required to follow the special regulation and unless otherwise mentioned, all other regulations apply. Public process for special regulations
      Special regulations are put in place after fisheries managers write plans for the lakes they oversee and each provides objectives for achieving management goals. Before changes are made to special regulations, the DNR evaluates each regulation, shares what’s found in the evaluations and angler surveys, hosts public input meetings in the fall and reviews comments from the public about the regulations. Goals of individual lake management plans also are considered. “We need the public to tell us what they want for the process to work well, and we do value the input,” Stevens said. For this spring, 29 lakes and connected waters were reviewed. Changes detailed
      Pelican Lake in St. Louis County: A special regulation on bass will be made permanent, while a regulation on northern pike will be dropped. An evaluation of the regulations showed that the 14-20 inch protected slot limit with one over 20 inches in possession on bass maintained a quality bass fishery, while allowing for an opportunity to harvest smaller bass. The regulation was generally popular with anglers and will continue. The 24-36 inch protected slot limit on northern pike provided some benefit to the pike population; however, the benefits of the regulation are similar to the new statewide zone regulation, which provides the opportunity to drop the regulation and simplify regulations complexity for anglers. Sand Lake and connected waters (Little Sand, Portage, and Birds Eye lakes) in Itasca County: A special regulation for northern pike will be dropped, and the lakes will change to the statewide limits. The new statewide zone regulation for northern pike will likely be just as effective as the special regulation in encouraging harvest of abundant small pike while improving sizes of pike. Big Swan Lake in Todd County: A 24-36 inch protected slot limit with only one fish over 36 inches will be made permanent after the review showed sizes of pike have improved. Also, the regulation’s expanded possession limit of six, with only one fish over 36 inches, will remain in effect as the number of small pike has continued to remain higher than desired. Balm, Big Bass, South Twin and Deer lakes in Beltrami County; Portage Lake in Cass County; and Flour, Hungry Jack and Two Island lakes in Cook County: These eight lakes with restrictive size regulations (either a 12-20 inch protected slot or catch-and-release only regulation) on bass will be modified to a less restrictive, 14-20 inch protected slot with one over 20 inches to allow additional harvest of small bass while still protecting quality sized fish. Although the existing regulations were shown to be effective, the new protected slot is expected to provide a similar protection to quality fish and with the added benefit of allowing additional harvest of abundant smaller bass. Itasca, Ozawindib and Mary lakes in Itasca State Park: Special regulations on sunfish, black crappie and bass for three lakes in the park will be standardized among the lakes. While the existing regulations largely have been effective and have been generally popular with park visitors, the DNR will standardize sunfish and crappie possession limits to five, drop a minimum size restriction on crappie for Ozawindib Lake and modify the current restrictive bass regulations (catch-and-release on Mary Lake and the 12-20 inch protected slot on Ozawindib Lake) to a 14-20 inch protected slot with one over 20 inches for both lakes. The goal is to simplify regulations for park visitors while maintaining fishing quality. Sissabagamah and Long lakes in Aitkin County: Special regulations on northern pike will be dropped in favor of the new statewide zone pike regulation. Some benefits to the sizes of pike have been seen since a protected slot regulation was enacted; however, the north-central zone pike regulations may provide a similar or even better outcome and also serve to reduce regulation complexity. Bass Lake in Todd County and Cedar Lake in Morrison County: Trophy regulations (40 inch minimum length requirement, possession limit of one) on northern pike will be modified to a 26 inch maximum with a possession limit of three. While trophy northern pike still exist, growth rates of smaller pike in these lakes have declined. Allowing harvest opportunity on pike under 26 inches may help the population while still protecting medium to large pike. Kraut, Peanut, North Shady, Squash and Tomato lakes in Cook County: Catch-and-release regulations on trout in these five lakes will be dropped this spring. Additionally, the ban on winter fishing and special tackle restrictions for these lakes will go away. The catch-and-release with tackle restrictions and the winter fishing closure did not meet management goals for these stocked trout fisheries. They are remotely located and special regulations and the closed winter season did not provide quality fishing in these lakes. But the same special regulations will continue on three other lakes – Thompson, Thrush and Turnip lakes – that were reviewed at the same time. Moody Lake in Crow Wing County: This lake will reopen to fishing after having been closed to fishing since 2001. Entirely located within an aquatic management area, the lake has been used as a fisheries research lake and at times was used for rearing walleye. It no longer is needed for that purpose and plans are to reclaim the lake by using rotenone to remove undesirable fish and then restock with walleye, yellow perch and bass, and implement a catch-and-release regulation to maintain quality sized fish for anglers to enjoy. Little Boy and Wabedo lakes in Cass County: These lakes will have an 18-26 inch protected slot, with one over 26 inches, in a possession limit of four walleye – which will be in effect for 10 years and then re-evaluated. The regulation was proposed in response to local requests to improve and protect the walleye population, which will likely benefit from restrictions on harvesting walleye longer than 18 inches. Visit mndnr.gov/fishmn for more information on special fishing regulations. Special regulations that change March 1 will be listed in the 2018 Minnesota Fishing Regulations booklet. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Chill62
      We made our annual trip up to Red Lake Indian Reservation on Saturday.  Fished the whole day chasing rainbow and brook trout.  Before anyone tries to call me out it's legal to fish trout on the reservation during the winter and it's actually the only thing you can legally keep on the tribal waters during the winter.  We did have a guide and he was amazing and was cheap!  14 adults and 2 kids and we ended up keeping 65 trout out of 76 possible.  We left the ice by 2 so could have finished out the day and easily "Limited out" but we had enough to make us happy.  Its so weird being in 8' of water catching trout when you think they should be in 30-60'.  I'm done working for the year so its time to drill some holes locally and try to have some fun.  Local reports are hit and  miss but seeing friends catching stuff and a mixed bag.  Its awesome to see guys with 3-4 different species that they are catching.  Buddy was on Melissa last night and found 3" of ice.  So please be careful and I read an article today that someone went through on Mud Lake by Big Floyd and someone went through on Little Cormorant.  FYI those that fish Big Floyd a buddy reported to me that the deep hole just froze over end of last week and he was saying there was a 75 x 75 opening that wouldn't freeze up. Hopefully with cold air coming in over Christmas we can get lakes to be drive-able shortly.