Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Whoaru99

Need help with muzzleloader sights.

Recommended Posts

Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

I have a CVA Hunterbolt and I have replaced the barrel-mounted rear sight with a Williams WGRS peep sight that is mounted to the rear most factory drilled/tapped scope mount holes.

I set the rear sight to mid-height on the ramp and fired off three shots at 10 yards. 10 yards should be my first line of sight crossing according to a ballistics program so I usually make first zero at that point then fine tune in at a longer distance from there.

The problem is that with the sight at mid-way up the ramp, I'm shooting 3.25" low at 10yd. I can get almost zeroed by moving the ramp way to the top, but then I have no more adjustments for other possible loads.

So, can anyone tell me how much I have to change the front sight (will require replacement I'm thinking) to put the gun close to zeroed at 10yds?

The front sight is approximately 0.98" above the bore center, and the rear at mid-ramp is about 1.09" above bore center. The distance between the sights is about 27.75".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

I have found my answer here

But I am still scratching my head how it could be off that far at only 10 yards.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gordie    0
Gordie

Whoaru99 could you possibly tell me where you picked up the peeps for your gun? and what the cost was? are you running a hooded sight on the front of your barrel? And thats a great link on how sights work I've got a traditions smoke pole that needs a taller front sight. thanks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

The rear peep was purchased at Cabela's in Rogers. The new front sight ramp, blade, and different peep apertures were ordered from Midway.

There were some places that better prices than Midway, but they had it all in stock vs. ordering bits and pieces from a couple different places.

You might just want to check the Williams Sights website. They might have a rear peep, front Firesight kit for yours.

If you have to piece it together (rear peep, different front firesight), it'll probably be in the $50-$75 range.

My front sight is not hooded. It's a red Firesight.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lunker651    0
lunker651

I think you need to have it zero in at 50yards. All my gun when I sight/zero at 50yards will shoot 1-2" low at 10 yards even with a scope. I don't think it's your sight that has a problem, you just need to zero it at a longer distance. Once zero at 50 yards then you can make the adjustments you need.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

Quote:

I think you need to have it zero in at 50yards. All my gun when I sight/zero at 50yards will shoot 1-2" low at 10 yards even with a scope. I don't think it's your sight that has a problem, you just need to zero it at a longer distance. Once zero at 50 yards then you can make the adjustments you need.


I understand what you're saying, but with a scope I can understand being 1-2" low at 10yd because your scope is typically 1.5", give or take a bit, above the bore centerline. At 10yd there is just a tiny bit of drop, and the bullet trajectory is on it's way up, so that makes sense to me to be about that low.

My open sights are only an inch, give or take, above the bore C/L. So, an inch would be the most I'd expect to be low at 10yd considering the bullet trajectory should be going up at that range.

Also, I've used the first line of sight crossing method to sight in several rifles and it's always worked pretty good. Sight for dead on at the first line of sight crossing then you are at least close on paper further down range.

I'll give it (sighting at further distance) a try this weekend, but geometrically/mathematically, that much correction is a full 1/3" at the sights and there just isn't that much adjustment left.

I'll post a trajectory graph if I can figure out how to do that.

D:\My Documents\JoesDelay.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

Quote:

Quote:

I think you need to have it zero in at 50yards. All my gun when I sight/zero at 50yards will shoot 1-2" low at 10 yards even with a scope. I don't think it's your sight that has a problem, you just need to zero it at a longer distance. Once zero at 50 yards then you can make the adjustments you need.


I understand what you're saying, but with a scope I can understand being 1-2" low at 10yd because your scope is typically 1.5", give or take a bit, above the bore centerline. At 10yd there is just a tiny bit of drop, and the bullet trajectory is on it's way up, so that makes sense to me to be about that low.

My open sights are only an inch, give or take, above the bore C/L. So, an inch would be the most I'd expect to be low at 10yd considering the bullet trajectory should be going up at that range.

Also, I've used the first line of sight crossing method to sight in several rifles and it's always worked pretty good. Sight for dead on at the first line of sight crossing then you are at least close on paper further down range.

I'll give it (sighting at further distance) a try this weekend, but geometrically/mathematically, that much correction is a full 1/3" at the sights and there just isn't that much adjustment left.

I'll post a trajectory graph if I can figure out how to do that.


Here's the chart that shows the trajectory being 1st zero at 10yd. The flatter trace is my scoped .223 for reference.

Zeroed1.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • rundrave
      dont worry moose we all need a little of aromatherapy to cure that up about this time of the year:
    • BigVwalters
      How's the bite been recently.   Coming up for the weekend and curious at what depths to start at. 
    • RuddyDuck
      On the lighter side, I am 'SpoonBillSlayer' on that other site. For whatever reason years ago when I joined these sites I used two different userids. Both odd duck names that fit an odd duck! I just wanted to get the new updates out on this mess, it just seems like the only people being notified of it are those in  lake assoc's.  We'll see what happens.   
    • Wanderer
      I've massaged the trigger finger this summer by shooting the sporting clays league at Rice Creek.  Good way to make sure I got out! Started a little rough as to be expected but got back the groove toward the end.  Finished the summer at a charity shoot with 39/40.  That felt good. 
    • mrpike1973
      Same here saw on another site I will be taking off work and letting them know my opinion.
    • Rick
      Through a federal grant from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources’ has awarded more than $450,000 in local grants to protect and enhance inland coastal resources. The annual grant program is managed by the Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, which is a voluntary federal-state partnership distributing federal dollars to projects along the inland coast of Lake Superior. This year, grant funding is being awarded to nine projects in the coastal area: Researchers at the University of Minnesota will monitor and analyze measures designed to reduce erosion of bluffs adjacent to North Shore streams. Results will inform guidance on design criteria for future projects. $35,900. The Arrowhead Regional Development Commission will conduct an economic impact assessment of paved trails within the coastal area; determine the number of users of four popular trails (Duluth Lakewalk, Willard Munger State Trail, Gitchi-Gami State Trail, and St. Louis River Trail), and simultaneously conduct large-scale survey of trail-user habits and impacts on coastal economy. $11,500. Laurentian Resource Conservation and Development is planning to host a two-day conference for academia and coastal managers to bridge a gap between research results and practices of watershed assessment, protection and stream restoration. $23,000. Researchers at the University of Minnesota will increase scientific understanding of success rates of coastal forest seeds. Results will inform coastal managers for improved adaptive management and help determination whether coastal trees should be protected and treated as a unique seed collection zone. $98,875. Duluth Children’s Museum in collaboration with Positive Energy Outdoors will create a year round, innovative outdoor science, technology, engineering, and math active learning experience for children, particularly those in low-income households with limited access. $33,100. University of Minnesota Duluth – Natural Resources Research Institute and several partners will develop protocols for assessing the biomass of periphyton (algae attached to rocks) in Duluth area trout streams for use by professional aquatic and citizen scientists. $77,440. City of Duluth will improve public safety and access to the St. Louis River estuary through upgraded wayfinding signage and amenities on the Western Waterfront Trail.  $89,080. Lake County will develop engineering designs and construct trailhead for Lake County Mountain Bike Trail System, a planned 100-plus mile mountain bike trail system. connecting both beginner and advanced cyclists to nature and physical activity in the coastal area. $70,000. City of Carlton will replace an outdoor restroom facility at the Willard Munger trailhead in city of Carlton. The updated structure will meet current sewer requirements and meet compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act. $11,225. For 18 years, the DNR and NOAA have worked together to better Minnesota’s inland coast. Together, the agencies have granted $12.6 million in pass-through funding to more than 550 local projects and provided thousands of hours of technical assistance. Projects are selected for funding through an annual competitive grants process. For more information about Minnesota’s Lake Superior Coastal Program, visit www.mndnr.gov/mlscp. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • delcecchi
      Second the guide.  Fishing a lake in the north is totally different from fishing Mississippi or lake Zumbro or other lakes in the southern half of the state.  Otherwise you should look at the best place to launch your boat to be close to good fishing.  Rainy is a very big lake.. Ask in http://fishingminnesota.com/forums/forum/98-rainy-lake-fishing-reports-hunting-events/ the rainy lake forum. 
    • leech~~
      Unless they find a way to stop all the kinds of waterfowl from swimming, diving, eating and pooping from lake to lake. It's never going away.
    • RuddyDuck
      I saw this on the Wright County website today: http://www.wrightswcd.org/Water_Mana...e_species.html
      There's a link in Blue on the home page.


      Sounds like they are having a meeting about it on AUG 23. From talking to the DNR, I believe they didn't allow the initial dates for this to happen. Mostly because there was really no comment period on it. Sounds like they are gonna have it now. Guess if your against it, now's your chance to speak up. You can also send in written comments. Not sure exactly to who, at least I didn't see that part clearly. Maybe to Alicia O'Hare.


      Like others have said, I believe their ultimate goal is to have this implemented county wide at some point. When you look at the committee info, most groups are lake associations. Hopefully it still can be stopped. Here is the DNR person I called on this, she was helpful: Heidi Wolf - 651-259-5152

      Anyone else have new info on this?
    • guitpic
      Tx all