Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
wild bill

Walleye Limit On the URL

Recommended Posts

wild bill

I know the limit is 2 fish, however if you eat the fish on the lake, does the carcus count towards the limit???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
kelly-p

As I understand the law when there is a slot limit you can not fillet or eat those fish on the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pikester

I think that is what I read also. You may want to check with the DNR to see what you can and cannot do. Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookie129

I have been telling my customers to plan on taking there fish to westwind and having them for dinner there. Kind of a hassle but if you can not cook them on the lake and your in a sleeper what other options are there other then shore lunch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
R_B

From what I understand the carcus counts as your limit but I am not DNR and I would not trust what other people say. Find out for yourself from the DNR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pikester

Thats the perfect answer R_B! Then you get it right from the source.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xplorer

No fileting/eating walleye while on the water/ice. There is no way for a warden to measure the length of a carcass to make sure it is under the 17" limit. You may gut out the fish but that is all. If you want to eat walleyes on Red (or any other lake that has a walleye "slot" like LOTW, Rainy, ML, Rainy, Kab etc), then you have to be on shore to fillet and eat them. I would guess the same would be true for northern on Red if you were going to keep a smaller one to eat, no filleting on the lake. Your fishhouse/sleeper is treated the same as a boat. This was explained to me by the warden on Kabetogama, Lloyd Steen, but should apply equally to Red as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pikester

I wonder if there are any DNR agents that read this website? It would be great if each forum had some way to contact the DNR agent in that area. Just a thought for this wonderful website!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
O2BFSHN

Just a second part to this question. Is it legal to clean & cook crappies on the ice. There is no slot limit on those? Thank you in advance.

O2BFSHN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookie129

I beleave if you can catch any crappies you can eat them but they do count as part of your daily limit in case you hit the mother load

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
icemac33

This is the answer I got from Jim Abernathy, the DNR Information Consultant:

Hello,

On lakes which have a slot limit. Then those type of fish which there

is a slot limit can not be eaten on the lake. They must be left in the

whole(so they can be measured if checked by a conservation officer).

Other fish that don't have a slot limit maybe cleaned and eaten. They

are still part of the daily limit until midnight.

good luck

jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
T-Rock 1

Daily and possession limits are the same for crappies and everything else except perch. You can't acquire a limit each day unless you consume all those fish in your possession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roscoe16

Does anyone know the answer to this question: can you keep 2 walleyes at Red lake, then take them back to your cabin, then go back the next day and keep 2 more, take them to the cabin, go back the next day and keep 2 more. You would be at the statewide 6 walleye limit at that point. Could I then drive home with those 6 walleyes?

Roscoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cookie129

No you can not. You could eat two, go the next day eat 2 more, go the next day and take two home. You may only possess two red lale walleyes at any time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Roscoe, some guy tried that earlier this year. He got busted by the DNR. Most all the 'keeper' walleye on Red were from the stocked fingerlings and they were treated with tetracycline. The DNR can determine which fish are from Red Lake by the tetracycline stain from the inner bone of the fish. It was the 1st such case successfully prosecuted in the state based on this evidence. Your possession limit of RED LAKE walleyes is two. It is all spelled out clearly in the fishing regs booklet.

My fear is a lot of guys and their greed will try to round-about the law instead of following it and letting the lake fully recover.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Blaze

Not sure I follow you on this one, Labs? In Roscoe's example, there are only 2 fish being harvested each day, so it's not affecting the 'recoverability' of the lake.

I don't understand why you can only possess 2 URL eyes at once - as long as you're within legal daily harvest limits and within MN possession limits, why are URL fish dealt with differently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LABS4ME

Why are Red Lake walleyes different? Just because they are. It's in the regs. The DNR is being very cautious with harvest... remember we've been given two gifts, 1) a recovered(ing) lake and 2) the opportunity to harvest walleye 3 years in advance to the original timeline.

If you eat them each day, no problem, you are within the guidelines of the law. Your Red Lake possession limit is two... your daily limit and possession limit are the same, that goes for all lakes and species except perch. If you go back to the cabin and 'stack' your daily limits to make 6 for a regular possession limit on other inland water lakes, you are illegal and can be cited. Page 24 of the regs. pertaining to special Red Lake regs... "Possession limit 2 with only one over 26". Statewide bag limits may include 2 Red Lake walleye."

I don't make the laws, just report 'em! grin.gif

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Roscoe16

Thanks for the clarification guys. I had emailed the DNR this past spring about the various limits and situations, but I forgot to ask about that particular one.

Here is an interesting situation that I bet many anglers will not realize this winter:

If you keep 2 walleyes at Red Lake and then go to Lake of the Woods you are bound by the statewide walleye/sauger limit of 6. So you could only keep 4 more walleye/sauger at LOW. I bet a lot of guys are gonna think they can have a separate 8 fish limit from LOW to go along with their 2 from Red, or that they can keep 6 at LOW, as long as only 4 are walleyes. They will think then that they are within the statewide limit of 6 walleyes, where only 2 can be from Red, but the statewide limit is walleye/sauger together, not separate.

The bottom line is if you've got fish from any lake other than Lake of the Woods, you must abide by the state wide limit of 6 walleye/sauger. If you've got fish ONLY from LOW, then you can have 8 walleye/sauger, no more than 4 walleyes. I bet there will be a lot of tickets written to confused anglers this winter for this one.

Roscoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jigginjim

Going from red lake to lotw for walleyes would be a waste. Why keep 2 walleyes less than 17" when you could have 4 walleyes 17-19.5" it is only 2inches but seems like a waste of time. If I want crappies hit red then go to lotw for the eyes and sauger. Max your options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
halad

That is a good idea Jim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Random guy

Man walleye fishing is confusing. confused.giflaugh.gif

I'm gonna stick to pike, they all go back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • nofishfisherman
      Thanks for the reply, I'll check them out.
    • Reel_Magic
      I went out on Horseshoe on Sunday and where the ice remained from the first freeze it is a solid 6 in.  Where it recently froze over last week its was 3 inches at best.  Now that we have snow cover it will be hard to find that line.  I was out with the wheeler on sunday but stayed on the "old" ice that I knew was "safe".  I wouldn't use a wheeler from the access or go exploring quite yet.  Plan on heading back out Thursday and will try and give an update
    • Rancid Crabtree
      went out last night. 2.5-3" of solid clear ice. Single digits last night and still pretty cold today...wouldn't be surprised to find another inch when i head out this evening.  Forecast temps have been lowered a few degrees so we shouldnt be losing any ice through the week/weekend. Hopefully making a bit more each night. Breaking out the popup this weekend!
    • icepike 1
      So there's a guy that wants to trade his Frabill 3 man side door entry flip over ice house for my one man clam Legend thermal Ice House. Thinking I might go for it but was wondering if I should stay away from Frabill for any reason? Wondering if I could get any input and if this is a good deal or not. Thanks in advance.
    • TomWehler
      Total agree Topwater mix rules for a kid learning to muskie fish.  Kayak ~~~ At 14 years can by now control the craft & cast pretty well so mix of small to medium size bucktails and a glider or two kick it any time.  Host of things to purchase out there but really no need. Keep it simple, have fun, learn the lake, the fish, the food....he will enjoy it an be hooked for long long time.  And will he succeed ~ YES indeed ~ 96 & 3/4 percent ~  guaranteed.   : )     Keep on rocken!    T
    • gimruis
      I used to fish Lake Shakopee regularly.  I did awesome catching largemouth bass there with good average size, and never had any competition.  A couple years ago, they did some construction upstream by the start of the river at the base of Vineland Bay for road construction and they had to drop water levels to do it.  The flow rate never came back to normal.  Then they took out Buckmore Dam in the state park at the base of Lake Ogechie which also altered the flow through that area.  I tried it once each the past two years and only caught 1 bass each time, in addition to about 40 pike.  Every single pike was the same size, about 20-22 inches.  Just snake after snake.  Slime city.  I think the alteration of the river flow through that area has permanently ruined the bass fishing there.
    • crappie king 42
      Just goes to show that if you put the time in to eplore new places just to see if there is anything in said body of water..... it can have very good payouts. The body of water that we got the eyes out of i have never fished before. Grew up next to it basically its only 10 min from the house. When they started hitting all fish were caught one after another i have never had walleyes through the ice bite like they did. A new experiance and i was able to share it with friends. Hope everyone is being safe out there. 
    • gimruis
      There's no reason to go on the frozen lake when you are catching fish like that in the open water of a river.
    • crappie king 42
      No this is not red lake. This was a local spot in the cambridge princeton milaca area.  Nice solid 14-17 inch walleyes nice and healthy and they tasted delicious 
    • crappie king 42
      8Went out locally here thanksgiving mornin on three inches of solid ice hot into the eyes really well. A week later whole place was open water again so we went out in the kayaks got 14 eyes than went out again now that ice is back went to same lake and had a rough weekend we only managed to get three all weekend. Went out on all local lakes they are all sketchy at best. Few more days to solidify that bad ice and should be good to go. Went to shakopee in onamia and there was a solid 10 inches out there.