Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
wild bill

Walleye Limit On the URL

21 posts in this topic

I know the limit is 2 fish, however if you eat the fish on the lake, does the carcus count towards the limit???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As I understand the law when there is a slot limit you can not fillet or eat those fish on the lake.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is what I read also. You may want to check with the DNR to see what you can and cannot do. Good luck!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been telling my customers to plan on taking there fish to westwind and having them for dinner there. Kind of a hassle but if you can not cook them on the lake and your in a sleeper what other options are there other then shore lunch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I understand the carcus counts as your limit but I am not DNR and I would not trust what other people say. Find out for yourself from the DNR.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats the perfect answer R_B! Then you get it right from the source.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No fileting/eating walleye while on the water/ice. There is no way for a warden to measure the length of a carcass to make sure it is under the 17" limit. You may gut out the fish but that is all. If you want to eat walleyes on Red (or any other lake that has a walleye "slot" like LOTW, Rainy, ML, Rainy, Kab etc), then you have to be on shore to fillet and eat them. I would guess the same would be true for northern on Red if you were going to keep a smaller one to eat, no filleting on the lake. Your fishhouse/sleeper is treated the same as a boat. This was explained to me by the warden on Kabetogama, Lloyd Steen, but should apply equally to Red as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder if there are any DNR agents that read this website? It would be great if each forum had some way to contact the DNR agent in that area. Just a thought for this wonderful website!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a second part to this question. Is it legal to clean & cook crappies on the ice. There is no slot limit on those? Thank you in advance.

O2BFSHN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I beleave if you can catch any crappies you can eat them but they do count as part of your daily limit in case you hit the mother load

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the answer I got from Jim Abernathy, the DNR Information Consultant:

Hello,

On lakes which have a slot limit. Then those type of fish which there

is a slot limit can not be eaten on the lake. They must be left in the

whole(so they can be measured if checked by a conservation officer).

Other fish that don't have a slot limit maybe cleaned and eaten. They

are still part of the daily limit until midnight.

good luck

jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Daily and possession limits are the same for crappies and everything else except perch. You can't acquire a limit each day unless you consume all those fish in your possession.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Does anyone know the answer to this question: can you keep 2 walleyes at Red lake, then take them back to your cabin, then go back the next day and keep 2 more, take them to the cabin, go back the next day and keep 2 more. You would be at the statewide 6 walleye limit at that point. Could I then drive home with those 6 walleyes?

Roscoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you can not. You could eat two, go the next day eat 2 more, go the next day and take two home. You may only possess two red lale walleyes at any time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Roscoe, some guy tried that earlier this year. He got busted by the DNR. Most all the 'keeper' walleye on Red were from the stocked fingerlings and they were treated with tetracycline. The DNR can determine which fish are from Red Lake by the tetracycline stain from the inner bone of the fish. It was the 1st such case successfully prosecuted in the state based on this evidence. Your possession limit of RED LAKE walleyes is two. It is all spelled out clearly in the fishing regs booklet.

My fear is a lot of guys and their greed will try to round-about the law instead of following it and letting the lake fully recover.

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure I follow you on this one, Labs? In Roscoe's example, there are only 2 fish being harvested each day, so it's not affecting the 'recoverability' of the lake.

I don't understand why you can only possess 2 URL eyes at once - as long as you're within legal daily harvest limits and within MN possession limits, why are URL fish dealt with differently?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why are Red Lake walleyes different? Just because they are. It's in the regs. The DNR is being very cautious with harvest... remember we've been given two gifts, 1) a recovered(ing) lake and 2) the opportunity to harvest walleye 3 years in advance to the original timeline.

If you eat them each day, no problem, you are within the guidelines of the law. Your Red Lake possession limit is two... your daily limit and possession limit are the same, that goes for all lakes and species except perch. If you go back to the cabin and 'stack' your daily limits to make 6 for a regular possession limit on other inland water lakes, you are illegal and can be cited. Page 24 of the regs. pertaining to special Red Lake regs... "Possession limit 2 with only one over 26". Statewide bag limits may include 2 Red Lake walleye."

I don't make the laws, just report 'em! grin.gif

Good Luck!

Ken

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the clarification guys. I had emailed the DNR this past spring about the various limits and situations, but I forgot to ask about that particular one.

Here is an interesting situation that I bet many anglers will not realize this winter:

If you keep 2 walleyes at Red Lake and then go to Lake of the Woods you are bound by the statewide walleye/sauger limit of 6. So you could only keep 4 more walleye/sauger at LOW. I bet a lot of guys are gonna think they can have a separate 8 fish limit from LOW to go along with their 2 from Red, or that they can keep 6 at LOW, as long as only 4 are walleyes. They will think then that they are within the statewide limit of 6 walleyes, where only 2 can be from Red, but the statewide limit is walleye/sauger together, not separate.

The bottom line is if you've got fish from any lake other than Lake of the Woods, you must abide by the state wide limit of 6 walleye/sauger. If you've got fish ONLY from LOW, then you can have 8 walleye/sauger, no more than 4 walleyes. I bet there will be a lot of tickets written to confused anglers this winter for this one.

Roscoe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Going from red lake to lotw for walleyes would be a waste. Why keep 2 walleyes less than 17" when you could have 4 walleyes 17-19.5" it is only 2inches but seems like a waste of time. If I want crappies hit red then go to lotw for the eyes and sauger. Max your options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a good idea Jim.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Man walleye fishing is confusing. confused.giflaugh.gif

I'm gonna stick to pike, they all go back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • LoisBrowder
      So, funny pictures!
    • ZachD
      In my eyes anywhere on the Rum is great for smallies. So far this year everytime I have been out the levels have been great even after all the rain we had just had to wait a couple days and the water was great. I put in at the Anoka fair grounds and travel up river
    • ZachD
      (Too much mercury may affect a child’s behavior and lead to learning problems later in life.) That would explain some of the backwoods people     All jokes aside I would limit it to one serving a month for being pregnant or breast feeding for Bass, Catfish, Trout, Walleye, northern like they say   "Young children (under 15 years old) and fetuses are more sensitive to mercury. Too much mercury can cause lasting problems with understanding and learning. But studies show children benefit developmentally when moms eat fish low in mercury during pregnancy. "   Just because you are not glowing doesn't mean its necessarily healthy for a fetus it takes awhile for it to build up in a healthy adult that's just my           Methylmercury exposure in Wisconsin: A case study series” (2005)
      This articles describes exposure of 14 people who at fish two times a week or more and one person who ate no fish. "Three of the individuals reported vague subclinical symptoms such as mental confusion, sleep difficulty, balance problems, or visual disturbances, which improved after their mercury levels returned to  
    • trumy
      I belive you need to pick up permit day before you enter when getting a motor day use permit that's how it works on snowbank 
    • Smythe
      I'm heading up to Blackduck for the long July 4th weekend and we are hoping on maybe getting out on Red for a day.  I've only ice fished it twice,  so I'm wondering about the best places to launch the boat.  It looks like there is only the one public launch in Waskish.  The 2 times I ice fished up there we went out of JR's Corner resort.  Would it be best to just launch from one of the resorts.  Any advice would be appreciated,  thanks in advance.      
    • waterspaniel
      6/17-24 at LaBelle's Birch Point lodge in NW Bay.   walleyes seemed scattered--trolled crankbaits and lindy-rigged leaches.  cool, wet, windy weather half the week.  no bass.
    • monstermoose78
      Juan that is great area for smallies. The water looks clear for the rum it's time. It's a long way to the next landing so you might want put in in Princeton and fish to that access You can get out at highway 47 so that is not to bad. I forgot about that I was thinking you had get almost to Cambridge.
    • gus004
      Thanks for the update.  Keep this updated.  Heading up on Saturday for the week and need to dial in the bait for the week or if we are going to be spending all day looking for active fish.  
    • Satchmo
      Been a decent year on Kab, but the variable weather has fishing in an unpredictable pattern too. Much like last year, saugers have made up a big chunk of the catch, but walleyes are coming around. LOTS of small 9"-11" 'eyes around mixed with some 15"-16" 'eyes and sauger. Some folks are still picking up some of the jumbo perch too. Little pike are everywhere and quite the nuisance.
    • fivebucks
      You kind of hit the weather bad this past weekend.  Wind, rain, and more wind not to mention cold fronts moving thru.  I was on the lake my cabin is on in the general area of Red and I had a tough time scrapping together a meal - and I've fished the lake for 15+ years.  Sometimes mother nature throws you a curve and no matter how good the lake is sometimes it doesn't matter.