Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
jerkin'm

Gissert, BLB?

24 posts in this topic

How did your rifle seasons go? Haven't talked to the answer man ChuckieN to see what happened....Looking forward to the ML season up there for the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Argh!!!!

Horrible for us.

We went 0 for 4. I have already placed an order for 10 fawns that I am going to release next spring to boost the herd a bit. ooo.gif

We saw just a few baldies opening morning, and one tiny forky. After that, nobody saw a dang thing on our property.

Quite simply, I am at a loss. If anyone tells you food plots are the magic magnet, they are lying... confused.gifgrin.gif

I know there are deer. Dang it. I have upteen hundreds of pics of deer. No less than 10 different bucks on film!!!

I saw deer bow hunting. There are tracks everywhere.

Where they went, I have no idea. Probably all in peoples freezers now. Argh.

I am not sure what to expect for muzzy season. crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We fared well.

I got one of my camera bucks about an hour into opening morning. He was a 10 all summer long, but scrubbed off one of his brow tines after he shed the velvet.

I had does come out that afternoon, but they were skylighted on a hill and the shot was not safe. Same thing happened the next morning with some does and fawns. A while later, a decent buck was about 5 yards from my shooting lane, but he turned back into the woods and bedded down. My brother jumped him about an hour later. Saw a spike later that day.

We did not hunt Monday, and I saw Mr. Spike again on Tuesday evening coming into a food plot. He came out again the next morning and I had my marching orders to get another deer, so I let him have it. Too bad he did not step out in front of the wife. I relly wanted her to get a deer this year. I was hoping for a doe, but they were just not showing up.

Odd year, really. Movement was kind of spotty. From what I could tell from my cameras, there were eight different bucks working this 50 acre piece, but only two doe groups. The spike made for a ninth buck.

Father in law got a great looking 8 pointer over on his farm. First deer he had shot in a long time. He went old school with a 30/30 and a peep sight that belonged to his father. The nice modern bolt guns stayed in the cabinet.

I will go ML hunting, but probably wont shoot any more. I am still making sausage, and don't feel like butchering another deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have no answers this year. Throw everything out the window for this season. Worst ever in the northwoods. I don't chase deer around OT area, but I wish I would have. Reports were good for some, and bad for others like BLB. At least there's hope around here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Curious to hear opinions about the increase of permits a person can buy and how it affects local populations of deer. I've talked to many folks who each year have bought as many permits as they can and fill out as many as they can. I know there are areas that maybe need that amount of herd thinning but I wonder if it hurts some areas.

Kinda reminds me of a comparison to ice fishing. Let it out of the bag that a certain small lake or honey hole is producing and the next thing you know you have a army of people taking limits of fish resulting in a "dead" lake for a few years.

Infinite numbers of wildlife don't exist. Ottertail County is a different ecosystem than say, vast forests of Northern areas. I guess my question is: can a rural, farmland ecosystem such as ours handle a 10 day season with multiple permits available without harming the size of the herd at some point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I for one agree with your thoughts on our local hunting area. We have talked to a couple groups neighboring us since we became an Intensive Harvest area, and we all seem to wonder how we got to be that. I have hunted the same farm since I was 12 years old. This is year number 25 there for me. In all those years, I can honestly say that I have never personally seen a season where deer were like flies out there. Surely not like reports of other areas I hear about. Most tracts of land around us average 80 to 120 acres roughly. The DNR says there are 20 deer per square mile in areas, with up to 40 deer per square mile in spots around Park Rapids.

Lets assume we have 25 deer per square mile. A square mile is 640 acres. That means that if someone owns an 80, they have on average only 3 deer living on the property. Heck, we have a group that had 8 people on 40 acres next to us this year. Averages say that 1.5 deer live on 40 acres....

Sheesh. 8 guys on 40 acres. They can shoot 5 deer each. They could harvest 40 deer on that property with legal licenses.

Lots of assumptions, I know, but I often wonder if the generalization of "too many deer everywhere" is a bit too general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Only my second year hunting Ottertail County after growing up hunting zone 1 but here is what I saw.

Last year I was amazed at the number of deer I saw mid day. This year I hardly saw a deer mid day but saw a good number in the first and last 40 minutes of light each day. I'm sure the moon and clear skies had a lot to do with that this year. The first weekend, the bucks I saw were not chasing. Just wandering. I didn't see a lot of doe action and when I did, nothing was chasing them.

The second weekend we saw a lot more does and fewer bucks. Couldn't peg what status the rut was in either weekend.

Ended up getting a decent 8 pointer with a 16" spread on the first Saturday morning. Saw a monster 10 or 12 the second weekend and had a good bead on him as he ran in front of my stand through the woods. Wouldn't you know that tree was right there as I pulled the trigger! He had just winded my nephew who was bowhunting just down the ridge from my stand and was moving at a good clip.

When I retire (in 20 years crazy.gif) I will definitely be looking at a move over to your area. I really like it over there.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I hunt with you??

We never saw a deer after Saturday morning(opening day). We hunted sun up to sun down Saturday. Most of the day Sunday.

Dad hunted 2 evenings during the week. 3 of us hunted second weekend.

We never saw a single deer after opening morning on our land. It was crazy. I had to have ticked off the deer gods for something, cuz I know there are deer. Or at least there were deer.. smirk.gif

PS - even though we have no deer I need to retire up there too. Hopefully in 20 years there isnt a retirement home on every 10 acres of land though. ooo.gif

Amazing how many new places are showing up out in the middle of Gods Country over the last few years......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too have a long history (20+ years) of hunting the same piece of property. I spend a lot of time in this woods scouting and hiking. I've lived in the same area for 54 years. In talking to neighbors and friends the past few years it would seem to appear we are experiencing a much smaller deer herd each year. Most in my area hunt acreage averaging 80-200 acres. I'm not a wildlife biologist but common sense tells me that if each of these areas take multiple deer each season, something has to give.

I've talked with multiple parties this year who stated they have seen fewer deer this year than they have in many years. This in spite of mild winters.

It's an interesting topic for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ccarlson,

Talking with Gissert Sunday evening he drove down a road in the vicinity of the property you hunt and he saw a big buck standing in front of a deer stand along a field...during the later afternoon and nobody was on the stand. crazy.gif

Thought I would share... grin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whatta guy!

Now if you could just post directions to this said property, that would be great. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cc would hunt me down. lol blush.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to hijack, but to add. We hunted NW of Parkers Prairie on private land that we have hunted for 25 years, and had a relatively good 2nd weekend. 7/8 on 240 acres: 5 does, 1 male fawn, 1 LARGE buck. 4 years ago I remember seeing 17 deer on opening morning, and now have dropped some but still saw about 12 deer on the last 4 days w/ no food plots. Funny how since I started hunting 16 years ago we have moved from applying early for doe permits and picking 1 weekend to practically being begged to take 5 deer during 9 straight days. Good Luck Muzzleloading!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, leave my deer alone. I saved him for next year. Besides, after listening to you guys, it might be the only deer left in the county wink.gif

I do think the bright moon and clear skies had a lot to do with the deer getting done what they wanted to get done at night and then hiding and holding tight during the daylight.

ccarlson

One more thing: quit making fun of me for being the guy that has to head back to reality on a Sunday afternoon! I've been making fun of that guy my entire life. I can't help it that the Brainerd area has turned into St. Cloud or Maple Grove! Has it been 20 years yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not good BLB....For us it was pretty good as far as seeing deer but no real monsters down. We all saw bucks hot on the trails of does the first weekend..Even while doing drives, they seemed oblivious to us. We shot one nice wide 8 the first weekend and another the second weekend. We did fairly well at holding off on the basket rackers this year with only two of them going down..(as compared to 8-10 normally)The amount of deer seen seemed a little down for us this year as well. We got rid of the goofballs that were hunting the property the second weekend for years so there is hope for some to survive and get big. Looking forward to ML season as I personally haven't whacked one yet..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cc -

That buck I saw was a real good one. Could not tell how big the rack was really, but the back and belly were sagging. I've seen one in that area a couple times this summer and fall and it was a beaut!

One issue that hast not been brought up has been the coyote issue. I hunt about 3 miles from you, and on opening Saturday morning I had coyotes running all over.

Sunday morning, they were singing all around the lake, and every local dog seemed to join in. 'Yotes, plus the full moon = odd deer movements.

I saw good numbers of deer, but a lot got shot too. I had two doe/fawn groups on the 50 acre piece I hunt this year, and one old single doe. I picked up 8 different bucks on my trail camera. One buck, and a doe and fawn were killed on the highway as well in the last few months in a 400 yard section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gissert sounds like we need to have a yote blast....Never done it before. Maybe ChuckieN could work a little yote fur collar onto some of his stylin' duds...We didn't see any sign of yotes, tons of red fox... Last year they were howling it up behind my grandparents place during rifle season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yotes were cheering it up over the gut piles for us near staples this year. another month, with some snow and the yotes will be fun hunting till March!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, for those of you who read the Battle Lake Review, I understand there is going to be quite a picture in there this week. It's a picture of a group of hunters that shot 11 bucks second weekend - supposedly off of the same 240 acres. This woods is connected to the 44 acres that I hunt in which I took 2 respectable 8 pointers off of. So that's 13 bucks in 280+ acres. Seems unrealistic but I guess it happened. Never saw a doe where I hunt and I hunted all 9 days. Not sure if that other group took any does or not. I'm looking forward to seeing the picture to see if any of the bucks they took are the ones I had on my trail cam. I never saw any of the bucks I had on film during the season.

What do you guys think - is it typical for 240 acres to hold 11+ bucks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

typical, maybe not

but very possible, thats for sure

this time of year i really wonder how far some of these bucks will travel in 24 hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Geez!!!!!!!!!!

I don't even know what to say about that.

My guess would be that if its true, they probably all didnt call that 240 acres home all year. Certainly bucks move very long distances during the rut.

I'll be looking for that pic for sure. Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposedly there are 2 BIG 10 pointers, but other than that I'm not sure what the "Other 9" are like. Their property does border the only 2 corn fields that are in the area - next nearest are a few miles away. Funny how those fields seemed to get picked after the first weekend of the season shocked.gif!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

From what I saw on my trail cameras, it think it is quite possible.

I have my cameras on a 50 acre patch with two small food plots and mineral stations. Over the course of the summer and fall, I had six different bucks show up repeatedly on camera. Two others were more intermittent. One other one got shot on the propertey that I had not yet seen. That makes for 9 bucks transitioning a small parcel on a regular basis. Two doe/fawn groups used this area as a home base, and one solitary older doe without a fawn showed up at times.

This piece of ground has some fairly heavy cover, and has a ton of ag land in the vicinity. The bucks far outnumbered the does in this localized area this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gissert,

Like I said before, I am relatively new to hunting this area so I don't know what is normal with coyote numbers, but, we also had coyotes yipping all around us at night at very close range. My nephew saw two off his stand and didn't know if he should shoot the first time he saw one and the second time he saw one, he went to draw back his bow and the coyote spotted him and bolted. I know that the gut pile to my deer dissapeared pretty quickly. Not a drop left.

I plan to get over there and do some predator hunting this winter if it works out.

I'll be thinking about that buck you mentioned until next fall! I know the one I missed the second weekend had a huge neck and heavy body also. He stopped in just the wrong spot. All I could see was his breath against the sunrise between two trees. When he started moving again and came out from behind a clump of trees, it was at a run and I thought I had a good bead on him but I hit another tree just as he passed behind it.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • Hoey
      Here is a photo of the foot.  Looks like a toothy gator.  
    • BringAnExtension
      http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/07/21/fish-injury-island-lake/   DULUTH, Minn. (AP) — An 11-year-old girl has undergone surgery to repair damage to her foot which might have been caused by a fish in a northeastern Minnesota lake. Maren Kesselhon suffered nine deep lacerations and tendon damage when she was injured while sitting on a paddleboard on Island Lake north of Duluth Wednesday. Maren’s dad, Ryan Kesselhorn, says his daughter told him she could feel her foot in the mouth of a fish and kicked at it with her other foot to free herself. The Dickinson Press reports doctors at Essentia Health, where Maren had surgery, say the razor-sharp cuts, some down to the bone, probably were caused by a fish. Island Lake is home to large muskies and northern pike. A Duluth fisherman caught and released a 47-inch long muskie Wednesday.
    • RoosterMan
      Captain Acorn, I fish Jiggin Raps quite a bit on Vermilion, have for several years now.  I Cast em, fish them vertical and move around and cover ground at a good pace with them.  I am not sure there is any key to getting snagged less, other than knowing your spots. They are certainly an effective and a great way to catch fish.  I personally do not remove either the front or the back hook.  Believe me if you fish these your going to donate a few to the depths, just part of the game.    Good luck! - Roosterman
    • Rick
      Walleye fishing on Mille Lacs Lake will remain closed until Aug. 11 to protect the walleye fishery, and ensure its long-term health and sustainability into the future To extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest on Mille Lacs New solutions are being sought to rebuild and sustain a healthy Mille Lacs walleye fishery New fisheries data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources show the total safe harvest allocation for walleyes on Mille Lacs Lake (44,800 pounds) has already been exceeded this season. To protect the fishery and ensure the long-term sustainability of Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye population, the DNR announced today that walleye fishing will remain closed until Friday, Aug. 11. In order to extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest. Catch-and-release walleye fishing will run from Friday, Aug. 11, through Monday, Sept. 4, for the Labor Day weekend. Walleye fishing will then be closed from Tuesday, Sept. 5, through Thursday, Nov. 30. As these regulation changes were announced, Minnesota DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr reiterated the state’s commitment to rebuilding and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery in Mille Lacs Lake. “Improving the walleye population in Mille Lacs is a top priority for the DNR,” Landwehr said. “We deeply regret the hardships these new regulations will cause for anglers and business owners. But they are essential to protect and enhance the future of walleye fishing in the lake for future generations. We will continue doing everything we can to understand the challenges facing the walleye fishery, and take whatever actions we can to resolve this very difficult situation.” Landwehr and DNR fisheries chief Don Pereira noted that allowing for additional catch-and-release fishing in August is essential for area anglers, businesses, and Mille Lacs area communities. The decision to allow for this additional harvest was made with input from the Mille Lacs Fisheries Advisory Committee. “We want to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible,” Pereira said. “So even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR will dip into the allowed conservation overage to reopen the season on Aug. 11.” Through the closure, anglers on Mille Lacs Lake may fish for all other species in the lake including bass, muskellunge and northern pike. When fishing for other species, only artificial baits and lures will be allowed in possession, except for anglers targeting northern pike or muskie, who may fish with sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. A prohibition on night fishing will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. However, anglers may fish for muskie and northern pike at night, but may only use artificial lures longer than 8 inches or sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Bowfishing for rough fish also is allowed at night but possession of angling equipment is not allowed and only rough fish may be in possession. Understanding walleye fishing quotas on Mille Lacs this year, and why that quota was reached earlier than predicted
      The DNR and the Chippewa bands that cooperatively manage Mille Lacs Lake agreed this year to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017. That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the 75,000 pounds conservation cap and the 64,000 pounds combined harvest quotas – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. Bi-weekly creel surveys show that state anglers already have reached their quota. “The DNR is using its full allotment to maximize opportunities to fish for walleye on Mille Lacs without violating our agreement,” Pereira said. “The DNR, just like area businesses, would greatly prefer to not have fishing restrictions in place. But sustaining and stabilizing Mille Lacs’ walleye population is our primary obligation and public responsibility.” Continuing the walleye fishing closure will reduce the number of fish that die after being caught and released, a condition known as hooking mortality. The likelihood of fish suffering hooking mortality increases as water temperatures warm. High walleye catch rates on Mille Lacs have increased DNR fishing projections. A hot walleye bite attracted more anglers to the lake, resulting in angler effort that is about double what it was in 2016. “Cooler than normal temperatures kept hooking mortality rates low, but more anglers fished Mille Lacs, particularly catching walleye longer than 20 inches,” Pereira said. “That increased the poundage of fish caught and put us over our walleye quota.” According to the DNR, bigger fish are biting, in part, because there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Mille Lacs’ hot bite also reflects the findings of studies done in many other fisheries that show catchability actually increases when fish population drops. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there is more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, creating a situation where a larger percentage of the population is in position to be caught rather than gathering in a less preferred but less fished area. More information about Mille Lacs Lake, the regulation adjustments and management of the fishery is available on the DNR website at www.mndnr.gov/millelacslake. New solutions are being sought to improve and sustain a healthy walleye fishery
      The DNR announced in June that a new external review team of scientists will take a fresh look at Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye fishery, using all of the best science available to gain a better understanding of the lake. This new review, led by walleye expert Dr. Chris Vandergoot of the U.S. Geological Survey, will provide additional recommendations to improve fisheries management of the lake, and contribute to a long-term solution to improving and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery for future generations. The group’s report is expected in time to help guide and inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. DNR encourages Minnesotans to fish for other abundant species on Mille Lacs Lake
      As today’s walleye fishing regulation changes were announced, the DNR encouraged all Minnesotans to visit Mille Lacs Lake to fish the other abundant species that the lake has to offer. Mille Lacs Lake’s other opportunities for top-notch fishing will not be affected by the regulation adjustment. Bassmaster Magazine named Mille Lacs the nation’s best bass lake in June and will send 50 of the country’s best anglers to the lake In September for its Angler of the Year tournament. Northern pike abound in Mille Lacs, along with muskellunge. In early July, a woman from southern Minnesota caught and released in Mille Lacs what may have been Minnesota’s largest-ever muskellunge. To learn more about Mille Lacs Lake and its many great fishing opportunities, visit the DNR website. To plan visit to the Mille Lacs area, visit the Mille Lacs Area Tourism Council website. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Q: What is happening with the walleye season this summer on Mille Lacs Lake? A: The closure that began July 8 and was set to end July 28 is being extended by two weeks. That means walleye fishing will reopen at 6:01 a.m. on Aug. 11 for catch-and-release only through Labor Day. A night fishing closure also will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. Q: How does this affect fishing for other species? A: Fishing regulations for other species such as smallmouth bass, muskie and northern pike remain the same. During the night closure, there is an exception for muskie and northern pike anglers using artificial lures and sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Q: Why did the DNR extend the closure? A: While the DNR wants to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible, the state is also required to abide by cooperative agreements made with eight American Indian Chippewa bands. The two weeks of additional closure allows the state to abide by a harvest quota set earlier this year with the bands. The DNR and the bands agreed to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be sustainably harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017 in order to conserve the population That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the conservation cap of 75,000 pounds and the combined harvest quota of 64,000 pounds – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. The latest creel survey data shows that state anglers reached their quota of 44,800 pounds of walleye caught from Mille Lacs in early July. Even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR is dipping into the allowed conservation reserve in order to reopen the season on Aug. 11. Q: Why has the walleye population in Mille Lacs declined? What is the DNR doing in the long-term to try to conserve the population? A: The vast majority of walleye that hatch do not survive to their third autumn in the lake. Walleye numbers have declined to the point that it has become important to protect spawning-sized walleye, particularly the class of walleye that hatched in 2013. It is important to protect the large 2013 year class to replenish aging spawning stock. Most males from the 2013 class are now mature, but females will not start to contribute in large numbers until next spring. The state is committed to conserving the population of walleyes born in 2013 to improve and rebuild a sustainable population for the future. Q: Why do we count hooking mortality during a closed walleye season? A: The amount that state anglers can kill (as spelled out in state-bands agreements) also must include fish that die as a result of hooking mortality, the fish that die after being caught and then released back into the water. During the closure, some anglers still catch walleye incidentally and some of those fish die after being released. Under the state-band agreements, those dead fish must be calculated and counted against the state’s allocation. Q: How did this cooperative management between the state and the bands of Mille Lacs Lake come to be? A: Recall that in 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld lower-court decisions that allowed the Mille Lacs band and seven other Chippewa bands to exercise off-reservation fishing and hunting rights. The lower federal court also set up guidelines, known as stipulations and protocols, for both sides to follow. These stipulations and protocols provide a framework for how the bands and the state must work cooperatively to manage shared natural resources, including Mille Lacs fish. In their agreements, the DNR and the bands are required to annually establish the number of walleye that can safely be harvested from Mille Lacs while ensuring sufficient remaining walleye in the lake for a healthy fishery. Q: If the walleye population is in decline, why are anglers catching so many? A: Fish are biting for two reasons. First, there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Second, studies in many fisheries show that catchability actually increases when fish population decline. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there’s more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, and anglers find these spots where they can catch a larger portion of fish. Finally, while the walleye population has decreased considerably (by half or more), the amount of fishing pressure has declined by a lot more. This means that there are more walleye per angler fishing Mille Lacs today. Q: How is the DNR using science and research to help the walleye population? A: Mille Lacs Lake is the most studied lake in Minnesota. It is also a complex and changing system. The agency conducts a large number of surveys on the lake annually. These surveys include assessing the abundance of young walleye; setting 52 nets to assess adult abundance; using fine-mesh nets each summer to determine abundance of food (prey fish) for walleye; and using interviews with anglers around the lake (called creel surveys) to estimate the number of fish anglers are catching. The DNR also periodically tags walleye and other species to provide actual population estimates. We are tagging bass this year in cooperation with angling groups, and will be tagging walleye in 2018 and 2019 when the 2013 year class will be reaching full maturity. Q: What is the purpose of the external review the DNR has initiated? A: The DNR has asked Dr. Chris Vandergoot to lead an independent review of the DNR’s scientific approaches to manage Mille Lacs Lake. Vandergoot is a key member of the international team that co-manages a very significant walleye fishery in Lake Erie. He works for the U.S. Geological Survey in the Sandusky Lake Erie Biological station in Ohio. His review report will be available to the public in early 2018 and will help inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. Q: What does the future look like for Mille Lacs walleye? A: It is unlikely that Mille Lacs walleye production will return to the levels that state anglers enjoyed over 20 years ago. The ecosystem of Mille Lacs is going through extreme change, starting with increased water clarity in the mid-1990s, to impacts today from aquatic invasive species such as spiny water flea and zebra mussels. Longer growing seasons are also helping some species such as smallmouth bass but may be hurting others. While walleye will still be abundant, the future fishery will be more diverse, offering angling opportunities for a greater variety of fish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • bucketmouth64
      Thanks for the suggestions. I believe I'll be going with the 150 hp. My next question is trolling motor, 24/36 volt? I have a 24 volt now with a MK maxxum. I would like to get the MK Ultrex, but that has a 80lb thrust and the 36 volt comes at 112 lb. Is there a noticeable difference between the two? I noticed they come in ipilot and ipilot link. What's the difference? Not sure if I would utilize ipilot since I don't walleye fish. I use the trolling motor a lot while fishing.
    • guideman
      Maybe you need some new spots. Raised 9 fish last night in 3 hours. Hooked two boated one.   "Ace" "It's just fishing man"
    • ANYFISH2
      7/19 Day 5   Day 5 was spent celebrating my Isaacs 11th birthday!  Lots of cake and catering to him.  The exciting typical swimmimg and paddling ruled the day.  Grandma and grandpa DeZurik came up to celebrate his birthday as well.  Always nice to get both sets of grandparents together at the same time.   Fishing continued slow even more.  Still a successful night though. The birthday boy conceded his seat in the boat so grandma and grandpa cpuld join me for the evening fish trip.  My folks in all truth haven't been fishing for 2 years or more.  It was just nice to get them in the boat.   I struggled as the acting to put them on a consistent bite.  Mom as able to scratch out the biggest walleye at 17".  Dad brought home the honors of most fish caught landing a 14" and 15" walleye, 8.5" bluegill, and 2 perch as big aa his leech! I mustered up 1 small pumpkinseed.
    • ANYFISH2
      no doubt aboit the hooks, they are lottle stickers.
    • DLD24
      I like drifting with them and snap jigging them with a controlled fall...Almost every time you'll feel that tick just as it's hitting bottom... Last time I was on mille lacs that's all I could get them to go on. As far as colors I'd just match the forage Tullies in the lake use blue,purples,silvers....Perch use perch colors.. I think the jiggin rap is my new favorite way to fish, but it gets scary with them little hooks when you got a big eye on lol.