Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  

Recommended Posts

jerkin'm    3
jerkin'm

How did your rifle seasons go? Haven't talked to the answer man ChuckieN to see what happened....Looking forward to the ML season up there for the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

Argh!!!!

Horrible for us.

We went 0 for 4. I have already placed an order for 10 fawns that I am going to release next spring to boost the herd a bit. ooo.gif

We saw just a few baldies opening morning, and one tiny forky. After that, nobody saw a dang thing on our property.

Quite simply, I am at a loss. If anyone tells you food plots are the magic magnet, they are lying... confused.gifgrin.gif

I know there are deer. Dang it. I have upteen hundreds of pics of deer. No less than 10 different bucks on film!!!

I saw deer bow hunting. There are tracks everywhere.

Where they went, I have no idea. Probably all in peoples freezers now. Argh.

I am not sure what to expect for muzzy season. crazy.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert    17
Gissert

We fared well.

I got one of my camera bucks about an hour into opening morning. He was a 10 all summer long, but scrubbed off one of his brow tines after he shed the velvet.

I had does come out that afternoon, but they were skylighted on a hill and the shot was not safe. Same thing happened the next morning with some does and fawns. A while later, a decent buck was about 5 yards from my shooting lane, but he turned back into the woods and bedded down. My brother jumped him about an hour later. Saw a spike later that day.

We did not hunt Monday, and I saw Mr. Spike again on Tuesday evening coming into a food plot. He came out again the next morning and I had my marching orders to get another deer, so I let him have it. Too bad he did not step out in front of the wife. I relly wanted her to get a deer this year. I was hoping for a doe, but they were just not showing up.

Odd year, really. Movement was kind of spotty. From what I could tell from my cameras, there were eight different bucks working this 50 acre piece, but only two doe groups. The spike made for a ninth buck.

Father in law got a great looking 8 pointer over on his farm. First deer he had shot in a long time. He went old school with a 30/30 and a peep sight that belonged to his father. The nice modern bolt guns stayed in the cabinet.

I will go ML hunting, but probably wont shoot any more. I am still making sausage, and don't feel like butchering another deer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChuckN    0
ChuckN

I have no answers this year. Throw everything out the window for this season. Worst ever in the northwoods. I don't chase deer around OT area, but I wish I would have. Reports were good for some, and bad for others like BLB. At least there's hope around here...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
island guy    0
island guy

Curious to hear opinions about the increase of permits a person can buy and how it affects local populations of deer. I've talked to many folks who each year have bought as many permits as they can and fill out as many as they can. I know there are areas that maybe need that amount of herd thinning but I wonder if it hurts some areas.

Kinda reminds me of a comparison to ice fishing. Let it out of the bag that a certain small lake or honey hole is producing and the next thing you know you have a army of people taking limits of fish resulting in a "dead" lake for a few years.

Infinite numbers of wildlife don't exist. Ottertail County is a different ecosystem than say, vast forests of Northern areas. I guess my question is: can a rural, farmland ecosystem such as ours handle a 10 day season with multiple permits available without harming the size of the herd at some point?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

I for one agree with your thoughts on our local hunting area. We have talked to a couple groups neighboring us since we became an Intensive Harvest area, and we all seem to wonder how we got to be that. I have hunted the same farm since I was 12 years old. This is year number 25 there for me. In all those years, I can honestly say that I have never personally seen a season where deer were like flies out there. Surely not like reports of other areas I hear about. Most tracts of land around us average 80 to 120 acres roughly. The DNR says there are 20 deer per square mile in areas, with up to 40 deer per square mile in spots around Park Rapids.

Lets assume we have 25 deer per square mile. A square mile is 640 acres. That means that if someone owns an 80, they have on average only 3 deer living on the property. Heck, we have a group that had 8 people on 40 acres next to us this year. Averages say that 1.5 deer live on 40 acres....

Sheesh. 8 guys on 40 acres. They can shoot 5 deer each. They could harvest 40 deer on that property with legal licenses.

Lots of assumptions, I know, but I often wonder if the generalization of "too many deer everywhere" is a bit too general.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ccarlson    0
ccarlson

Only my second year hunting Ottertail County after growing up hunting zone 1 but here is what I saw.

Last year I was amazed at the number of deer I saw mid day. This year I hardly saw a deer mid day but saw a good number in the first and last 40 minutes of light each day. I'm sure the moon and clear skies had a lot to do with that this year. The first weekend, the bucks I saw were not chasing. Just wandering. I didn't see a lot of doe action and when I did, nothing was chasing them.

The second weekend we saw a lot more does and fewer bucks. Couldn't peg what status the rut was in either weekend.

Ended up getting a decent 8 pointer with a 16" spread on the first Saturday morning. Saw a monster 10 or 12 the second weekend and had a good bead on him as he ran in front of my stand through the woods. Wouldn't you know that tree was right there as I pulled the trigger! He had just winded my nephew who was bowhunting just down the ridge from my stand and was moving at a good clip.

When I retire (in 20 years crazy.gif) I will definitely be looking at a move over to your area. I really like it over there.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

Can I hunt with you??

We never saw a deer after Saturday morning(opening day). We hunted sun up to sun down Saturday. Most of the day Sunday.

Dad hunted 2 evenings during the week. 3 of us hunted second weekend.

We never saw a single deer after opening morning on our land. It was crazy. I had to have ticked off the deer gods for something, cuz I know there are deer. Or at least there were deer.. smirk.gif

PS - even though we have no deer I need to retire up there too. Hopefully in 20 years there isnt a retirement home on every 10 acres of land though. ooo.gif

Amazing how many new places are showing up out in the middle of Gods Country over the last few years......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
island guy    0
island guy

I too have a long history (20+ years) of hunting the same piece of property. I spend a lot of time in this woods scouting and hiking. I've lived in the same area for 54 years. In talking to neighbors and friends the past few years it would seem to appear we are experiencing a much smaller deer herd each year. Most in my area hunt acreage averaging 80-200 acres. I'm not a wildlife biologist but common sense tells me that if each of these areas take multiple deer each season, something has to give.

I've talked with multiple parties this year who stated they have seen fewer deer this year than they have in many years. This in spite of mild winters.

It's an interesting topic for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChuckN    0
ChuckN

ccarlson,

Talking with Gissert Sunday evening he drove down a road in the vicinity of the property you hunt and he saw a big buck standing in front of a deer stand along a field...during the later afternoon and nobody was on the stand. crazy.gif

Thought I would share... grin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

Whatta guy!

Now if you could just post directions to this said property, that would be great. grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ChuckN    0
ChuckN

cc would hunt me down. lol blush.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
McGurk    1
McGurk

Not to hijack, but to add. We hunted NW of Parkers Prairie on private land that we have hunted for 25 years, and had a relatively good 2nd weekend. 7/8 on 240 acres: 5 does, 1 male fawn, 1 LARGE buck. 4 years ago I remember seeing 17 deer on opening morning, and now have dropped some but still saw about 12 deer on the last 4 days w/ no food plots. Funny how since I started hunting 16 years ago we have moved from applying early for doe permits and picking 1 weekend to practically being begged to take 5 deer during 9 straight days. Good Luck Muzzleloading!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ccarlson    0
ccarlson

Hey, leave my deer alone. I saved him for next year. Besides, after listening to you guys, it might be the only deer left in the county wink.gif

I do think the bright moon and clear skies had a lot to do with the deer getting done what they wanted to get done at night and then hiding and holding tight during the daylight.

ccarlson

One more thing: quit making fun of me for being the guy that has to head back to reality on a Sunday afternoon! I've been making fun of that guy my entire life. I can't help it that the Brainerd area has turned into St. Cloud or Maple Grove! Has it been 20 years yet?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jerkin'm    3
jerkin'm

Not good BLB....For us it was pretty good as far as seeing deer but no real monsters down. We all saw bucks hot on the trails of does the first weekend..Even while doing drives, they seemed oblivious to us. We shot one nice wide 8 the first weekend and another the second weekend. We did fairly well at holding off on the basket rackers this year with only two of them going down..(as compared to 8-10 normally)The amount of deer seen seemed a little down for us this year as well. We got rid of the goofballs that were hunting the property the second weekend for years so there is hope for some to survive and get big. Looking forward to ML season as I personally haven't whacked one yet..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert    17
Gissert

cc -

That buck I saw was a real good one. Could not tell how big the rack was really, but the back and belly were sagging. I've seen one in that area a couple times this summer and fall and it was a beaut!

One issue that hast not been brought up has been the coyote issue. I hunt about 3 miles from you, and on opening Saturday morning I had coyotes running all over.

Sunday morning, they were singing all around the lake, and every local dog seemed to join in. 'Yotes, plus the full moon = odd deer movements.

I saw good numbers of deer, but a lot got shot too. I had two doe/fawn groups on the 50 acre piece I hunt this year, and one old single doe. I picked up 8 different bucks on my trail camera. One buck, and a doe and fawn were killed on the highway as well in the last few months in a 400 yard section.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jerkin'm    3
jerkin'm

Gissert sounds like we need to have a yote blast....Never done it before. Maybe ChuckieN could work a little yote fur collar onto some of his stylin' duds...We didn't see any sign of yotes, tons of red fox... Last year they were howling it up behind my grandparents place during rifle season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
roosterslayer    0
roosterslayer

yotes were cheering it up over the gut piles for us near staples this year. another month, with some snow and the yotes will be fun hunting till March!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CabinBoy    0
CabinBoy

Well, for those of you who read the Battle Lake Review, I understand there is going to be quite a picture in there this week. It's a picture of a group of hunters that shot 11 bucks second weekend - supposedly off of the same 240 acres. This woods is connected to the 44 acres that I hunt in which I took 2 respectable 8 pointers off of. So that's 13 bucks in 280+ acres. Seems unrealistic but I guess it happened. Never saw a doe where I hunt and I hunted all 9 days. Not sure if that other group took any does or not. I'm looking forward to seeing the picture to see if any of the bucks they took are the ones I had on my trail cam. I never saw any of the bucks I had on film during the season.

What do you guys think - is it typical for 240 acres to hold 11+ bucks?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B. Amish    0
B. Amish

typical, maybe not

but very possible, thats for sure

this time of year i really wonder how far some of these bucks will travel in 24 hours

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mark Christianson    0
Mark Christianson

Geez!!!!!!!!!!

I don't even know what to say about that.

My guess would be that if its true, they probably all didnt call that 240 acres home all year. Certainly bucks move very long distances during the rut.

I'll be looking for that pic for sure. Wow.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CabinBoy    0
CabinBoy

Supposedly there are 2 BIG 10 pointers, but other than that I'm not sure what the "Other 9" are like. Their property does border the only 2 corn fields that are in the area - next nearest are a few miles away. Funny how those fields seemed to get picked after the first weekend of the season shocked.gif!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert    17
Gissert

From what I saw on my trail cameras, it think it is quite possible.

I have my cameras on a 50 acre patch with two small food plots and mineral stations. Over the course of the summer and fall, I had six different bucks show up repeatedly on camera. Two others were more intermittent. One other one got shot on the propertey that I had not yet seen. That makes for 9 bucks transitioning a small parcel on a regular basis. Two doe/fawn groups used this area as a home base, and one solitary older doe without a fawn showed up at times.

This piece of ground has some fairly heavy cover, and has a ton of ag land in the vicinity. The bucks far outnumbered the does in this localized area this year.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ccarlson    0
ccarlson

Gissert,

Like I said before, I am relatively new to hunting this area so I don't know what is normal with coyote numbers, but, we also had coyotes yipping all around us at night at very close range. My nephew saw two off his stand and didn't know if he should shoot the first time he saw one and the second time he saw one, he went to draw back his bow and the coyote spotted him and bolted. I know that the gut pile to my deer dissapeared pretty quickly. Not a drop left.

I plan to get over there and do some predator hunting this winter if it works out.

I'll be thinking about that buck you mentioned until next fall! I know the one I missed the second weekend had a huge neck and heavy body also. He stopped in just the wrong spot. All I could see was his breath against the sunrise between two trees. When he started moving again and came out from behind a clump of trees, it was at a run and I thought I had a good bead on him but I hit another tree just as he passed behind it.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • Wanderer
      That's understandable given how you use the back reel technique.  I haven't used it the same way. Most of my trolling is done with baitcasters or levelwinds with counters.  The jigging part I hadn't considered before. "David, have you ever parred with a 7 iron?" "Well, Roy, it never occurred to me to even try." 
    • Rick
      An independent laboratory has confirmed zebra mussel larvae in Garfield Lake in Hubbard County. The lab provided photos of two zebra mussel larvae, called veligers, found in a water sample taken from the lake. Property owners on Garfield Lake hired the lab as part of their own monitoring. Invasive species specialists from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources found no zebra mussels in the lake during a six-hour dive survey. Garfield Lake will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species, Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      City may apply for DNR pilot project treatment The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed zebra mussels in Lake Marion, in the city of Lakeville, in Dakota County. Five adult zebra mussels were found at the public access by a lake consulting business, as part of an early detection monitoring program conducted for the city of Lakeville. The city may apply for a pilot project treatment after a more thorough search of the lake is completed. As boat owners begin taking boats and equipment out of the water for the season, the DNR reminds them to carefully check for aquatic invasive species and contact the DNR with any suspected new infestations. Look on the posts, wheels and underwater support bars of docks and lifts, as well as any parts of boats, pontoons and rafts that may have been submerged in water for an extended period. Minnesota law requires that docks and lifts be allowed to dry for at least 21 days before being placed in another body of water, whether aquatic invasive species are present or not. Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Extensive multi-agency search showed no other zebra mussels The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has confirmed that a single zebra mussel was removed from Lake Harriet in Minneapolis. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (MPRB) staff reported one adult zebra mussel on a boat cover recovered from the bottom of the lake. No additional zebra mussels were found during 67 hours of diving, snorkeling and wading searches involving the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, MPRB, two MPRB contractors and the DNR. Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List for zebra mussels, with the provision that it may be removed from the list if future surveys continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake. “We’re grateful that no zebra mussels were found during the extensive dive, snorkel and wading search of Lake Harriet,” said Heidi Wolf, DNR invasive species unit supervisor. “Strong partnerships and interagency cooperation are key, and we thank the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their ongoing efforts. “While we regret that Lake Harriet will be added to the Infested Waters List because one zebra mussel was confirmed, we’re hopeful that the lake may be removed from the list if future searches continue to show no zebra mussels in the lake,” Wolf said. DNR invasive species specialist Keegan Lund said Lake Harriet will be carefully monitored the rest of this season and next year, but no treatment is necessary at this time. Lund said individual zebra mussels sometimes die after they are brought into a new lake, before they become established. “There is a common misperception that zebra mussels are everywhere and that their spread is inevitable. The reality is, of Minnesota’s 11,842 lakes, fewer than 250, about 1.8 percent, are listed as infested with zebra mussels. More Minnesotans than ever before are following our state’s invasive species laws,” Lund said. “People spread zebra mussels, and people can prevent their spread.” Whether or not a lake is listed as infested, Minnesota law requires boaters and anglers to: Clean watercraft of aquatic plants and prohibited invasive species. Drain all water by removing drain plugs and keeping them out during transport, and Dispose of unwanted bait in the trash. Some invasive species are small and difficult to see at the access. To remove or kill them, take one or more of the following precautions before moving to another waterbody, especially after leaving infested waters: Spray with high-pressure water. Rinse with very hot water (120 degrees Fahrenheit for at least two minutes or 140 degrees Fahrenheit for at least 10 seconds). Dry for at least five days. People should contact an area DNR aquatic invasive species specialist if they think they have found zebra mussels or any other invasive species that has not already been confirmed in a lake. More information is available at www.mndnr.gov/AIS. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Meterman
      I fish the big water of Minnesota side of Lake of the Woods almost exclusively and purchased my boat with what I will call "truck suspension" shock absorbing seats at the helm (first row).   In the waves of LOW, these will bottom out and your back still takes a pounding.   I am planning to replace the helm seats (will need seats, pedestal and base) with one of the above mentioned shock absorbing pedestals next spring.   My boat does have high sides so will need a taller pedestal. Looking for others to comment on their experiences with these.   Thanks.
    • Meterman
      I have typically used the back reeling feature more for letting out line when trolling or jigging.   When fighting a fish, I let the drag take care of business.   I guess it is just a pain to now get used to no back reeling on a new reel . . . may have to switch to another brand?
    • JBMasterAngler
      Well, fishing wasn't very good. But the weather certainly didn't help. Fished caribou the first day, marked lots of cisco and lakers, but no bites. Planned on bluewater on Monday, but because of the wind, we took the channel to trout instead. Caught several nice bluegills and a 30 inch pike. No lakers, but I did get stuck in weeds in 35 ft of water, never had that happen before. Was going to launch at same access on wabana on Tuesday, and go to bluewater, but wind was even worse. We took a drive and went up to Larson lake. Lost a nice pike, but nothing else. Thought for sure I'd at least catch 1 splake! Survived the storm that night. Stopped at pokegama on way home and fished for a couple hours. Lost a muskie, and had a big pike break my line. My son was really excited to catch his first rock bass. It would be nice to come back someday, but it might be awhile. Caribou could be good in the winter, maybe. Oh well. Final camping trip of the year is in the books!
    • BSLNORTH
    • BSLNORTH
      Hi, I am selling my 2012 Polaris Ranger 800 XP camo. Very low miles, 1200. Full hard cab, flip out glass windshield, windshield wiper, almost like new still. Great for ice fishing, hunting and work around the house.  I also have this ad on C.L.  10,000 b/0 text me for pics, thanks.  I am located in west metro 763-two34-0837
    • partyonpine
      Any bass reports?  Have the walleyes been moving in shallow at night?  South wind I am guessing their is fish on the south side of pine? 24-32 feet sounds like right in front of the cabin.  Any in crawlers or have they transitioned to minnows.  Did well in 18 feet last weekend.  No matter what cannot wait for 3 solid days of fishing!!!