Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
hill7410

Intentional Trespassers

36 posts in this topic

Saturday morning me and my dad did not see much deer so i decided to do a drive to him, i started walking our trail and i kick up a doe (Good sign i thought) i get further down and i see a guy in a orange suit, Thinking what is my dad doing, i get up there and it is not him and the person is with somebody else too. I immediatly ask them who they are and they start to pull some BS excuse out and say they are looking for there uncle's land, these guys are in there upper 40's and just flat out lying to me. They then have the audasity(spelling) to ask if they can walk through my land. I tell them they need to turn around and get off my land before the police get involved. I just dont understand why these guys would do this, there is posted signs everywhere and not to mention it just stirred up all of my land to hunt, in hines sight i wish i would have called the cops.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

still should

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I honestly think people should get prosecuted more and then this BS will stop. Only problem with that is there just aren't enough CO's to handle the enforcement and the sheriff's office is usually too busy to want to, although they will if you call them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ANYONE that I catch tresspassing on the ranch I take care of in North Dakota is charged with trespassing.I will not allow it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If I owned land and caught somebody tresspassing they would be turned in immediately. It's basically an attempt to steal from the land owners who pay for the property and the yearly taxes on that property.... not acceptable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We have land near Spring Lake...it borders federal land and has the only road access. We have gated the road at the edge of the property and will report and prosecute anyone who trespasses.

It sounds harsh...but we need to protect our investment as well.

Warnings do nothing...call the authorities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have your land very well posted and its obvious they tresspassed, then prosecute. Sometimes though it IS hard to tell the boundary between public and private land. I know that more than once I've been hunting public land wondering where the next boundary sign is. The Feds will spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to acquire land and then get chincy on the signs and put them at +1/4 mile intervals. Then over the years they disapear, get run over etc. Make sure you land is WELL marked and then prosecute.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like these guys were trying to pull a fast one, taking a risk on walking on an unknown property.

There is no excuse for the "do you mind if we walk through" They should have apologized and turned around.(at least ask for the most direct route back to the road...if really lost)

I think in your case you should have called, and, still should. It sounds as though this is their plan, to make it look like they have mistakenly walked onto someones land and play stupid. Hoping that there may be a guy that is not home to kick them out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Blackjack I have to disagree with you (AGAIN).

You shouldn't be telling people to really post their land well, you should be telling the other clowns out there to make themselves really aware of property boundaries before they set foot on the ground in the first place. More people use the "lost in the woods excuse" and hope for the best. I say people are responsible for knowing the boundaries, and " I couldn't see any signs" is a lame excuse...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Gorilla,

People do get lost or turned around in the woods. No one knows the boundaries of private land more than the land owner; even with the help of plat books, it is still sometimes hard to know exactly where the boundary land is. However, if a land owner puts up signs, it will prevent law abiding citizens from knowingly entering private land. Further, it is not illegal to enter unposted, non-aggrecultured land.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

Blackjack I have to disagree with you (AGAIN).

You shouldn't be telling people to really post their land well, you should be telling the other clowns out there to make themselves really aware of property boundaries before they set foot on the ground in the first place. More people use the "lost in the woods excuse" and hope for the best. I say people are responsible for knowing the boundaries, and " I couldn't see any signs" is a lame excuse...


You must have a lot better sense of direction than me and I am pretty good. People do get turned around and unless they run into a fence line or trail they generally don't know where they are at is they are lost. Most of the lost hunters I have run into are usually on my camp trails. I am more than willing to help them find there way out. I know my woods and camp that I hunt and most of the state ground around me better than most but I still get turned around. Yes some people will use the excuse they are lost but most probably are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

have you guys with all the answers ever owned land next to public land??

Good luck if you ever do, I believe you could have signs every ten feet and you'd still have people using the "I'm lost excuse"

On rare occasions, I'll admit it honestly happens, but tons of yutz's every year use the lame exuse to explore a little across the line on purpose. If any of you who think my opion is off the wall a little, I have to question you on the laws and what is a LEGAL posting distance apart. Also things such as ag land (which includes CRP, CREP, RIM, and newly popular tree farms in central MN) that doesn't have to be posted at all. And yes you can be prosecuted, dumb or not when you cross the line...

The responsibility is on the hunter not the adjoining land owner to know the lines. I've been literally on both sides of this fence and I think you guys who play dumb are giving us all a bad name. In this day and age of GPS, mapping, cell phones, and compasses some guys still make a habit of not quite wanting to know where the line is...

Another thought is go before season and try to locate the owner and have him show/explain where his boundary is. If you don't know, then you shouldn't just guess and hope...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes,the ranch that I take care of is surrounded by a National Grassland.For years we have posted and called the local CO and we have very little problem anymore.You must be firm and the word will get out.

The neighbor said we were crazy for all the posting that we do as it will not help.Just two weeks ago he stated that ever since he started to post heavy and have some charged by the Co,that his problems are starting to go away.

It does help for sure.We post 2 miles of fence along public land.

As far as what is legal posting,that depends on what state you are in.I put up three times more signs than needed to be legally posted.If someone walks on this land they do know what they are doing and will find out how much it will cost for sure.No excuses for me.

I would say a general rule to follow is that if you dont know who owns the land you are walking on,you best find out and ask.People going where they want just ruin it for all the others.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

After reading all of these and thinking on it some, I have came to this conclusion. Almost all people who do this are lazy and irresponsible. Ask yourself a few questions. If they are truly lost and dont know where they are, why is their gun loaded??? I think the prudent thing to do would be to unload your gun. that to me would go a long way in believing they were truly lost and had no intention of hunting that land. Another question, why didnt they come up before the season and learn the lay of the land? People have plenty of time and money to sit in a bar on friday nite, but all of a sudden they are too broke to properly scout?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

On our land we post very heavy as well, I just think that its a shame we feel we have to. Legally we wouldn't need one fourth the signs we put out. I agree with Cody, in my earlier post I said something similar. It all comes down to wanting to do the right thing versus not caring too much about boundaries...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I reported this on another post as well about road hunters, but every year I see truck with orange occupants cruising the neighbors driveways through the woods looking for deer. I doubt its deer they shot and that ran into the woods from neighboring fields because its several people that do it. They only pick the neighbors who own cabins and they know aren't there.

So I posted my own driveway this year, in part because of the road - no wait, driveway hunters - and the neighbors who like to cruise up and down everyone's driveways on their four wheelers. They really ramp it up at dusk during the late fall and summer. I guess I'd like to keep my own small patch of woods relatively quiet for the resident deer.

Still, my wife thinks I am kind of a jerk for posting our land since the four wheelers are our neighbors that we know fairly well. She doesn't think they're hurting anything and I'd agree - at least not in terms of deer movement. But its our land and we should be able to post it if we want, regardless of any hurt feelings.

And its not soley intended for the fourwheelers. It's the driveway hunters and hikers/walkers that think a dirt driveway with a mailbox next to it that leads into the woods must be okay to trespass on. After all, it's the woods. I wonder if people in the city would raise a fit if I walked up and down their driveway with my firearm or bow?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

After reading all of these and thinking on it some, I have came to this conclusion. Almost all people who do this are lazy and irresponsible. Ask yourself a few questions. If they are truly lost and dont know where they are, why is their gun loaded??? I think the prudent thing to do would be to unload your gun. that to me would go a long way in believing they were truly lost and had no intention of hunting that land. Another question, why didnt they come up before the season and learn the lay of the land? People have plenty of time and money to sit in a bar on friday nite, but all of a sudden they are too broke to properly scout?


When a person is lost, the last thing he will think about is unloading his gun.

No matter how many times I venture into familiar territories, I still get turn around every once in a while. I know some of you guys who follows the well beaten paths to your treestands do not have understand the concept of being turned around, but the guys who ventures off the beaten paths has been turned around at least once in their life time.

Anyways, the land owner is suppose to post their forested boundaries. If you do not post, people will venture.

If I am lost and see your nice beaten path on your side of the property, guess what, I will be heading down that beaten path and hopefully you will not be a jerk and point me to the road.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

almostthere, if your lost and you see my beaten path on my land and decide you should walk down it with your loaded gun. YOUR GOING TO GET A TICKET...

Land can be legally posted and believe it or not when your walking through a woods at an angle towards it you might not see a neon sign or a 10 foot tall fence telling you to turn around!!! THE RESPONSIBILITY IS STILL YOURS TO KNOW WHEN YOU ARE CROSSING THE LINE. WHY CAN'T PEOPLE FIGUIRE THAT OUT AND BE MATURE ENOUGH TO NOT TRESSPASS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

NOte to self: when lost, do not walk onto Gorilla's land.

Are we suggesting that if one is lost and comes up to a posted private land, one should just turn around and head back into the unknown and hope that a search party finds one?

Whatever happened to MN nice? Oh, it only comes out when people disappear like the fellow in nothern MN. Then, we feel sorry for the guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote:

THE RESPONSIBILITY IS STILL YOURS TO KNOW WHEN YOU ARE CROSSING THE LINE. WHY CAN'T PEOPLE FIGUIRE THAT OUT AND BE MATURE ENOUGH TO NOT TRESSPASS.


When will people figure out that sometimes people do make a mistake. I assume we are all humans here and humans are not perfect. It is your right to call the athourities if you see someone on your land, but you should also realize that maybe the person meant no harm at all and is actually simply lost. And saying that the person should know where they are and whose land they are on at all times is not a valid arguement in my eyes. The person should make every effort to know where they are but I can almost promise you that everyone reading this forum has been disorriented at some point while in the woods. If there is someone here that has spent alot of time in the woods and never once been turned around or lost their trail then lets hear from them becuase they are the only ones that should be making that argument.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've read many of the above posts, and compared those experiences to the experiences we've had on our land.

You just need to be like my dad. A harmless fellow with a reputation for being a bad-dude.

Don't get me wrong, my old man is nice and doesn't cause harm to anyone. But about 10 years ago, a dog started running our cattle around the yard, maiming a few and killing one. The thing was a rottwieler from Germany worth some big $$$. My old man did not hesitate to grab the .22. First shot bounced off the skull. Second one went in one ear and out the other.

Amidst the threats of legal action from the owner, and the town gossip, an article in the paper was run with the headline, "Local farmer shoots $10,000 dog."

Since then, we haven't had much problem with trespassers, theives, or any other trouble-makers of any kind smile.gif

Joel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trespassing really ticks me off but I can admit people often make an honest mistake, especially if land next to a public hunting ground such as a WMA or national forest is not properly posted. I know, I know. You should know where you're at, but you might wander a hundred yards or less into private property that's not marked without knowing it in some remote areas. I'm not talking about being miles into it.

I think its extremely important to keep a cool head about you and give the person the benefit of the doubt the first time, letting them know they're trespassing. The next time, I'd call it in since you then know it wasn't an accident. Reacting hot-headely puts both you and the trespasser in danger. Too often, people's first reaction is 'This is my land! I own it! And what the hell are you doing on it!?!?!It's mine! All mine! I own it! Get off!' And while it may indeed be your land, where you have every right to keep everyone else off it, stop and think a little before exploding on someone.

What if you dog ran into a patch of private property while you were pheasant hunting on a WMA? Wouldn't you go get him and hope the landowner wouldn't go off on you or call the CO before you could explain? Give others the benefit of the doubt at least once and then call the CO on them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Jnelson. Did he ever make good on his legal threats? I would have sent him the bill for the dead cow and the vet bills for the maimed ones! grin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me, that's what would've happened.

The guy came by, cussed out my folks, and then broke down crying. Interesting fellow. The deputy sheriff at the time was the neighbor and was also sitting at the table. He hinted, ever so slightly about the law, and who should really be sued. I don't think the conversation lasted much longer. smile.gif

Joel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that one needs to be rational when talking to someone that is trespassing. After all remember we are hunting meaning one or both members have guns. Even if it is your land you will get farther with being helpful then if you are hard headed about it. If it doesn't work then call the law and let them deal with it. That is what they are paid to do. There is no sense in us being a bunch of cowboys. Just remember the Wisc. shootings two years ago. That was a bad deal and I don't ever want to hear about something like that again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Posts

    • ANYFISH2
      sure odd to see the timberwolves mentioned in trade possibilities with the likes of a Kyrie Irving.
    • ANYFISH2
      I just dont believe that to be a Esox bite at all. Too much space between the Major wounds, IMHO!
    • delcecchi
      That is a strong possibility...
    • Hoey
      Here is a photo of the foot.  Looks like a toothy gator.  
    • BringAnExtension
      http://minnesota.cbslocal.com/2017/07/21/fish-injury-island-lake/   DULUTH, Minn. (AP) — An 11-year-old girl has undergone surgery to repair damage to her foot which might have been caused by a fish in a northeastern Minnesota lake. Maren Kesselhon suffered nine deep lacerations and tendon damage when she was injured while sitting on a paddleboard on Island Lake north of Duluth Wednesday. Maren’s dad, Ryan Kesselhorn, says his daughter told him she could feel her foot in the mouth of a fish and kicked at it with her other foot to free herself. The Dickinson Press reports doctors at Essentia Health, where Maren had surgery, say the razor-sharp cuts, some down to the bone, probably were caused by a fish. Island Lake is home to large muskies and northern pike. A Duluth fisherman caught and released a 47-inch long muskie Wednesday.
    • RoosterMan
      Captain Acorn, I fish Jiggin Raps quite a bit on Vermilion, have for several years now.  I Cast em, fish them vertical and move around and cover ground at a good pace with them.  I am not sure there is any key to getting snagged less, other than knowing your spots. They are certainly an effective and a great way to catch fish.  I personally do not remove either the front or the back hook.  Believe me if you fish these your going to donate a few to the depths, just part of the game.    Good luck! - Roosterman
    • Rick
      Walleye fishing on Mille Lacs Lake will remain closed until Aug. 11 to protect the walleye fishery, and ensure its long-term health and sustainability into the future To extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest on Mille Lacs New solutions are being sought to rebuild and sustain a healthy Mille Lacs walleye fishery New fisheries data collected by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources show the total safe harvest allocation for walleyes on Mille Lacs Lake (44,800 pounds) has already been exceeded this season. To protect the fishery and ensure the long-term sustainability of Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye population, the DNR announced today that walleye fishing will remain closed until Friday, Aug. 11. In order to extend the walleye fishing season through Labor Day, the state will allow for an additional 11,000 pounds of walleye harvest. Catch-and-release walleye fishing will run from Friday, Aug. 11, through Monday, Sept. 4, for the Labor Day weekend. Walleye fishing will then be closed from Tuesday, Sept. 5, through Thursday, Nov. 30. As these regulation changes were announced, Minnesota DNR Commissioner Tom Landwehr reiterated the state’s commitment to rebuilding and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery in Mille Lacs Lake. “Improving the walleye population in Mille Lacs is a top priority for the DNR,” Landwehr said. “We deeply regret the hardships these new regulations will cause for anglers and business owners. But they are essential to protect and enhance the future of walleye fishing in the lake for future generations. We will continue doing everything we can to understand the challenges facing the walleye fishery, and take whatever actions we can to resolve this very difficult situation.” Landwehr and DNR fisheries chief Don Pereira noted that allowing for additional catch-and-release fishing in August is essential for area anglers, businesses, and Mille Lacs area communities. The decision to allow for this additional harvest was made with input from the Mille Lacs Fisheries Advisory Committee. “We want to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible,” Pereira said. “So even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR will dip into the allowed conservation overage to reopen the season on Aug. 11.” Through the closure, anglers on Mille Lacs Lake may fish for all other species in the lake including bass, muskellunge and northern pike. When fishing for other species, only artificial baits and lures will be allowed in possession, except for anglers targeting northern pike or muskie, who may fish with sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. A prohibition on night fishing will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. However, anglers may fish for muskie and northern pike at night, but may only use artificial lures longer than 8 inches or sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Bowfishing for rough fish also is allowed at night but possession of angling equipment is not allowed and only rough fish may be in possession. Understanding walleye fishing quotas on Mille Lacs this year, and why that quota was reached earlier than predicted
      The DNR and the Chippewa bands that cooperatively manage Mille Lacs Lake agreed this year to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017. That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the 75,000 pounds conservation cap and the 64,000 pounds combined harvest quotas – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. Bi-weekly creel surveys show that state anglers already have reached their quota. “The DNR is using its full allotment to maximize opportunities to fish for walleye on Mille Lacs without violating our agreement,” Pereira said. “The DNR, just like area businesses, would greatly prefer to not have fishing restrictions in place. But sustaining and stabilizing Mille Lacs’ walleye population is our primary obligation and public responsibility.” Continuing the walleye fishing closure will reduce the number of fish that die after being caught and released, a condition known as hooking mortality. The likelihood of fish suffering hooking mortality increases as water temperatures warm. High walleye catch rates on Mille Lacs have increased DNR fishing projections. A hot walleye bite attracted more anglers to the lake, resulting in angler effort that is about double what it was in 2016. “Cooler than normal temperatures kept hooking mortality rates low, but more anglers fished Mille Lacs, particularly catching walleye longer than 20 inches,” Pereira said. “That increased the poundage of fish caught and put us over our walleye quota.” According to the DNR, bigger fish are biting, in part, because there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Mille Lacs’ hot bite also reflects the findings of studies done in many other fisheries that show catchability actually increases when fish population drops. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there is more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, creating a situation where a larger percentage of the population is in position to be caught rather than gathering in a less preferred but less fished area. More information about Mille Lacs Lake, the regulation adjustments and management of the fishery is available on the DNR website at www.mndnr.gov/millelacslake. New solutions are being sought to improve and sustain a healthy walleye fishery
      The DNR announced in June that a new external review team of scientists will take a fresh look at Mille Lacs Lake’s walleye fishery, using all of the best science available to gain a better understanding of the lake. This new review, led by walleye expert Dr. Chris Vandergoot of the U.S. Geological Survey, will provide additional recommendations to improve fisheries management of the lake, and contribute to a long-term solution to improving and sustaining a healthy walleye fishery for future generations. The group’s report is expected in time to help guide and inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. DNR encourages Minnesotans to fish for other abundant species on Mille Lacs Lake
      As today’s walleye fishing regulation changes were announced, the DNR encouraged all Minnesotans to visit Mille Lacs Lake to fish the other abundant species that the lake has to offer. Mille Lacs Lake’s other opportunities for top-notch fishing will not be affected by the regulation adjustment. Bassmaster Magazine named Mille Lacs the nation’s best bass lake in June and will send 50 of the country’s best anglers to the lake In September for its Angler of the Year tournament. Northern pike abound in Mille Lacs, along with muskellunge. In early July, a woman from southern Minnesota caught and released in Mille Lacs what may have been Minnesota’s largest-ever muskellunge. To learn more about Mille Lacs Lake and its many great fishing opportunities, visit the DNR website. To plan visit to the Mille Lacs area, visit the Mille Lacs Area Tourism Council website. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • Rick
      Q: What is happening with the walleye season this summer on Mille Lacs Lake? A: The closure that began July 8 and was set to end July 28 is being extended by two weeks. That means walleye fishing will reopen at 6:01 a.m. on Aug. 11 for catch-and-release only through Labor Day. A night fishing closure also will remain in place from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. through Nov. 30. Q: How does this affect fishing for other species? A: Fishing regulations for other species such as smallmouth bass, muskie and northern pike remain the same. During the night closure, there is an exception for muskie and northern pike anglers using artificial lures and sucker minnows longer than 8 inches. Q: Why did the DNR extend the closure? A: While the DNR wants to allow as much walleye fishing on Mille Lacs as possible, the state is also required to abide by cooperative agreements made with eight American Indian Chippewa bands. The two weeks of additional closure allows the state to abide by a harvest quota set earlier this year with the bands. The DNR and the bands agreed to harvest quotas of 44,800 pounds for state anglers and 19,200 pounds for tribal fishing. They also agreed that up to 75,000 pounds of walleye could be sustainably harvested from the lake from Dec. 1, 2016 to Nov. 30, 2017 in order to conserve the population That agreement allows the state to use a built-in buffer – the 11,000 pounds difference between the conservation cap of 75,000 pounds and the combined harvest quota of 64,000 pounds – in an attempt to allow catch-and-release walleye fishing through Labor Day, following the mid-summer closure. The latest creel survey data shows that state anglers reached their quota of 44,800 pounds of walleye caught from Mille Lacs in early July. Even though state anglers already have caught their quota of fish, the DNR is dipping into the allowed conservation reserve in order to reopen the season on Aug. 11. Q: Why has the walleye population in Mille Lacs declined? What is the DNR doing in the long-term to try to conserve the population? A: The vast majority of walleye that hatch do not survive to their third autumn in the lake. Walleye numbers have declined to the point that it has become important to protect spawning-sized walleye, particularly the class of walleye that hatched in 2013. It is important to protect the large 2013 year class to replenish aging spawning stock. Most males from the 2013 class are now mature, but females will not start to contribute in large numbers until next spring. The state is committed to conserving the population of walleyes born in 2013 to improve and rebuild a sustainable population for the future. Q: Why do we count hooking mortality during a closed walleye season? A: The amount that state anglers can kill (as spelled out in state-bands agreements) also must include fish that die as a result of hooking mortality, the fish that die after being caught and then released back into the water. During the closure, some anglers still catch walleye incidentally and some of those fish die after being released. Under the state-band agreements, those dead fish must be calculated and counted against the state’s allocation. Q: How did this cooperative management between the state and the bands of Mille Lacs Lake come to be? A: Recall that in 1999, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld lower-court decisions that allowed the Mille Lacs band and seven other Chippewa bands to exercise off-reservation fishing and hunting rights. The lower federal court also set up guidelines, known as stipulations and protocols, for both sides to follow. These stipulations and protocols provide a framework for how the bands and the state must work cooperatively to manage shared natural resources, including Mille Lacs fish. In their agreements, the DNR and the bands are required to annually establish the number of walleye that can safely be harvested from Mille Lacs while ensuring sufficient remaining walleye in the lake for a healthy fishery. Q: If the walleye population is in decline, why are anglers catching so many? A: Fish are biting for two reasons. First, there is a shortage of food for larger walleye. Last fall’s assessment showed that larger walleye were thinner than average. Second, studies in many fisheries show that catchability actually increases when fish population decline. In Mille Lacs, walleye congregate in preferred spots rather than disperse evenly throughout the lake. Fewer fish in the lake means there’s more room in the preferred spots for fish to gather, and anglers find these spots where they can catch a larger portion of fish. Finally, while the walleye population has decreased considerably (by half or more), the amount of fishing pressure has declined by a lot more. This means that there are more walleye per angler fishing Mille Lacs today. Q: How is the DNR using science and research to help the walleye population? A: Mille Lacs Lake is the most studied lake in Minnesota. It is also a complex and changing system. The agency conducts a large number of surveys on the lake annually. These surveys include assessing the abundance of young walleye; setting 52 nets to assess adult abundance; using fine-mesh nets each summer to determine abundance of food (prey fish) for walleye; and using interviews with anglers around the lake (called creel surveys) to estimate the number of fish anglers are catching. The DNR also periodically tags walleye and other species to provide actual population estimates. We are tagging bass this year in cooperation with angling groups, and will be tagging walleye in 2018 and 2019 when the 2013 year class will be reaching full maturity. Q: What is the purpose of the external review the DNR has initiated? A: The DNR has asked Dr. Chris Vandergoot to lead an independent review of the DNR’s scientific approaches to manage Mille Lacs Lake. Vandergoot is a key member of the international team that co-manages a very significant walleye fishery in Lake Erie. He works for the U.S. Geological Survey in the Sandusky Lake Erie Biological station in Ohio. His review report will be available to the public in early 2018 and will help inform fisheries management decisions for the 2018 season. Q: What does the future look like for Mille Lacs walleye? A: It is unlikely that Mille Lacs walleye production will return to the levels that state anglers enjoyed over 20 years ago. The ecosystem of Mille Lacs is going through extreme change, starting with increased water clarity in the mid-1990s, to impacts today from aquatic invasive species such as spiny water flea and zebra mussels. Longer growing seasons are also helping some species such as smallmouth bass but may be hurting others. While walleye will still be abundant, the future fishery will be more diverse, offering angling opportunities for a greater variety of fish. Discuss below - to view set the hook here.
    • bucketmouth64
      Thanks for the suggestions. I believe I'll be going with the 150 hp. My next question is trolling motor, 24/36 volt? I have a 24 volt now with a MK maxxum. I would like to get the MK Ultrex, but that has a 80lb thrust and the 36 volt comes at 112 lb. Is there a noticeable difference between the two? I noticed they come in ipilot and ipilot link. What's the difference? Not sure if I would utilize ipilot since I don't walleye fish. I use the trolling motor a lot while fishing.
    • guideman
      Maybe you need some new spots. Raised 9 fish last night in 3 hours. Hooked two boated one.   "Ace" "It's just fishing man"