Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
Dahitman44

Muzzleloading question for MN

Recommended Posts

Dahitman44

Is it legal in MN to have a muzzleloader with a scope?

Some say yes, some say no. Others say a 2x scope is legal but it is a waste of time because it doesn't help much

Anyone know the skinny?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shae1986

Sorry Hit

Not legal to have a scope, only legal to have a one power that is authorized by a doctor and an application is filled out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert

You can scope a smokepole and use it in a regular firearm season. Come ML season, the scope must come off.

There is a pretty good description of legal ML season sights in the DNR regulations.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

They should allow it -- would make more "kill" shots..

My thoughts.

Thanks, guys.

Hitman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

no need to start a debate here hitman, but the whole reason people don't want scoped muzzleloaders is to keep the firearm "primitive". Isn't that why you shoot a muzzleloader? Or is it to extend the gun season? I thought people shot muzzleloaders for a challenge? confused.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BiffleFan

I use my muzzleloader almost exclusively during slug season with a scope on top. I just feel better with it than the slug gun and know for absolutely sure where and what my load and bullet can accomplish. One shot one kill.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ScoutII

Well, I think the line was crossed with the "In-Line" muzzleloader. I guess "Primative" is just relative to who can lobby the best. Bad Bull came out with what sounds to be an elephant muzzleloader and now anyone who has a muzzleloader that burns nitro powder is not going to be allowed to use nitro powder. The nitro powder by it self as a propellant isn't the problem. Most weapons using it only gain 10% in velocity and 20% in energy. But this one manufacturer has beefed up their weapon and push a plain jacketed bullet with enough energy to probably take out an elephant and now the rest of us get lumped into the same catagory just because we use the same powder. Not too fair a conclusion I don't think.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

I am not trying to get into a debate. I am just saying that a scope would allow for greater percentage of kill shots. Just my thought on the issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bob/Mn

I do agree that a scope would make for cleaner kills.

<IMHO> Here in MN we have a Ml season not a primitive ML season. The states that have a primitive season usually set the season before the smokeless season and do restrict the ML to be a rock lock or side lock.

Since 90 to 95% of the Minnesota ML hunters are using Inlines I see no reason not to allow scopes. Actually the ML hunters get what is left over after 500,000 smokeless hunters hit the woods.

<BTW> I have hunted the ML season since its beginning and use a Lyman side lock. I would put a scope on the lyman in a heart beat if allowed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

all intresting points, especially ScoutII's comment about the in'line muzzleloaders crossing the line of primitive. I think this is akin to the difference between shooting a modern compound to a recurve bow.

I appreciate the fact that guys have managed to keep this discussion civil. Thank you!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shae1986

This muzzleloading question comes up every year and there are reasons for both. I do believe that MN should have a primitive season and a one week ML season where any ML may be used. I dont believe it needs to be 3 weekends and 2 weeks of full hunting. Even though in some places it may be needed.

I would like to place a scope on my muzzleloader, but people just need to know that if they are over one hundred yards with open sights that it is a difficult shot. I limit myself to 100, i shot a doe last year at about 10 yards. And thats how i like to do it, up close and personal.

ML is a great time and i love it, even htough this year again i have no buck tag frown.gif. But i will still get out there and have a good time. Have a good season boys.

A. Shae

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Dead --

Easy with the "primative" notation.

The in-line guns have made them a bit more accurate and a ton easier to clean. They are still fun.

More time to hunt. Perfect, in my opinion.

BTW -- we need a handgun season as well. That would be fun.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DEADhead

hitman I wasn't trying to knock the muzzleloader thing or anything like that. I agree that theres a big difference between a flint lock and the newer inlines. And I agree that they are just as fun as a modern rifle. I was just saying that I thought the whole reason to have a muzzleloader is to have a more "traditional" (how's that wording?) hunt. The technology is out there to have a muzzleloader shoot just as fast and as accurate as the modern rifle. I'm just thinking that if you make the muzzleloader almost the same as a rifle (nitro, scope, etc.), why not just extend the rifle season then, since there would be little to no difference? I thought the reason for using a muzzleloader was to make it more challenging than a rifle.

I think it's great that there's another oppportunity for you big game hunters out there to pursue your passion. The guys I work with have a blast muzzleloader hunting; seems to me they have more excitement and fun then, than during rifle season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Point --

I know a lot of people think it is easy to cshoot a tight pattern with a muzzle but I do not have that skill. I am learning to becomechallenge a better shot, but for me it is still a tough thing to do.

Just my thoughts on the muzzle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ZOOM

I've hunted with a muzzle loader for a number of years now and I think that it is all in the wording of muzzle loader. I mean no matter what kind of powder you use or weather its a flint lock or an inline, you are still limited to one shot and most all the muzzle loaders I have seen still have a muzzle volocity less than most leagal Fire arms. I do however think that the adding of a scope would possibly give the shooter a faults impression of being able to shoot farther than his or her muzzle loader is capable of.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

My point is that it will make your first and only shot more of a kill shot than a gut shot.

My brother in law shot a doe and gut shot her and still has not found her. What a waste. frown.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shae1986

Muzzleloaders are accurate guns even with open sights. Its a solid 50-75 yard gun. With a deers vitals haveing roughly 10-12 inch diameter circle, hitting them should not be a problem at 50 yards. If it is you really need to look at getting the deer closer to make sure you can. For myself i wont shoot one further than 125 for one that they look small in open sights thne and that is my limit. Also the bullet drop after 125 becomes outragous.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

2-shae --

Not. The shot is good for 220 yards without drop with 150 grain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
shae1986

I shoot 100 grains, bc thats all i need and if you can hit one at 220 you are way beyond my class of shooting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ZOOM

I do understand what you are saying and I agree with you. The problem is, is that a muzzle loader as of now is considered a primitive form of hunting and with all the advancements that have been brought into the feild these last few years I'm afriad that we all might be tradeing our new fangled muzzys in for flint locks.

confused.gifNext thing you know the only legal Muzzys are going to be something you have to rub two sticks togeather to fire off, if you know what I mean.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
huntnfish

I could see the DNR changing the definition of a muzzleloader in the next few years and making it an actual primitive season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Code-Man

some states have differn muzzleloading seasons. Primitative (Flint Locks) and inlines season. Flints are usually a lot longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dahitman44

Shae --

I didn't say I could hit them from that far away, just that they fly pretty straight that far. wink.gif

Naw -- 150 yards would be as far as I would want to try.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • gimruis
      I would avoid them if I were you.  All season.  There's often at least some current flowing through there and with these warmer winters, its just a bad idea.
    • gimruis
      If your getting some pretty close shooting (and gauging by your photos you are in those setups), you might want to use an IC (improved cylinder) choke instead.  Spread that pattern out a little more and switch to some smaller shot size with more velocity, especially if you're mostly just shooting as small ducks like woodies. I almost exclusively use an IC until the calendar turns November, for ducks, pheasants, and grouse.  Later on when you get more shooting at bigger, smarter birds that are on the edge of range you could go back to a modified.
    • Sunset Lodge
      Hello from the NW Angle!   Water temps are hovering around 48 degrees and fall fishing is phenomenal! Walleyes are biting anywhere from 14 to 30ft with jigging being the most effective method. Crappies are continuing to bite around sunken trees and deep holes with a good amount of perch mixed in. Anglers have had success trolling for large pike and muskies with jigging also bringing some to the boat.    We are getting fish houses ready for the 2017-18 ice fishing season and are very excited for hard water!   We recommending checking availability for winter ASAP!   Sunset Lodge
    • fishingdad
      Thank you for the responses everyone. You are correct Del I do not have the Fiber option.  We do use the Hot spot from AT&T at times but to be honest the Data does not last all that long, Even though we are right by Moccasin point & the tower is at the end of Frazer our signal is not the best at times.  We could also do DSL but according to one neighbor we may be faster sending up carrier pigeons & waiting for a response.
    • gunner55
      It's been a 1/32 oz. unpainted jig head & a small split shot along with a crappie minnow for me most of the time. Still barely see the rod tip load or wiggle a little on the bite. Even tougher with the wind lately & 20' or more down.
    • h8go4s
      Any channel on any lake is dangerous. 
    • PSU
      We are done as of Saturday as well. Was fishing in 35 feet in Smarts Friday and had a monster, monster fish on. Thought I was snagged for a few minutes, but then felt the wiggling. Fought if for probably five - ten minutes (drag flying out) and then up came an eight inch walleye. Never saw the monster, but guessing it was massive fish, perhaps a muskie? Anyone else ever have this happen?
    • Chris-Stanton
      added many new features and options
    • MNoutdoors99
      Hey I am planning on ice fishing on Lake Minnetonka this winter with a friend and I am using a snowmobile to get to the lake from the trails. I would enter onto the lake in Orono off the Luce line trail and end up in Stubbs bay. I was reading on other forums saying avoid the channels but it seems to be the only way to get around the lake to other bays especially since I am on a snowmobile. I was wondering if they eventually are safe enough to hold up a snowmobile in mid-late January, and if going through them faster helps possibly? I would like to fish around the Smith's bay area and the only way I can do that is going through channels. I know Lake Minnetonka can be sketchy with ice thickness and I don't want to end up through the ice, thoughts? Thanks.   Jim
    • delcecchi
      The DSL service is great since they ran the fiber down 24 a few years ago.   I was presuming that the poster didn't have that option if they were considering satellite.     AccessMN is another possibility if they are still around.