Guests - If You want access to member only forums on FM. You will gain access only when you Sign-in or Sign-Up on Fishing Minnesota.

It's easy - LOOK UPPER right menu.

  • Announcements

    • Rick

      Members Only Fluid Forum View   08/08/2017

      Fluid forum view allows members only to get right to the meat of this community; the topics. You can toggle between your preferred forum view just below to the left on the main forum entrance. You will see three icons. Try them out and see what you prefer.   Fluid view allows you, if you are a signed up member, to see the newest topic posts in either all forums (select none or all) or in just your favorite forums (select the ones you want to see when you come to Fishing Minnesota). It keeps and in real time with respect to Topic posts and lets YOU SELECT YOUR FAVORITE FORUMS. It can make things fun and easy. This is especially true for less experienced visitors raised on social media. If you, as a members want more specific topics, you can even select a single forum to view. Let us take a look at fluid view in action. We will then break it down and explain how it works in more detail.   The video shows the topic list and the forum filter box. As you can see, it is easy to change the topic list by changing the selected forums. This view replaces the traditional list of categories and forums.   Of course, members only can change the view to better suit your way of browsing.   You will notice a “grid” option. We have moved the grid forum theme setting into the main forum settings. This makes it an option for members only to choose. This screenshot also shows the removal of the forum breadcrumb in fluid view mode. Fluid view remembers your last forum selection so you don’t lose your place when you go back to the listing. The benefit of this feature is easy to see. It removes a potential barrier of entry for members only. It puts the spotlight on topics themselves, and not the hierarchical forum structure. You as a member will enjoy viewing many forums at once and switching between them without leaving the page. We hope that fluid view, the new functionality is an asset that you enjoy .
Sign in to follow this  
KidWalleye

buying a new rifle question

Recommended Posts

KidWalleye    0
KidWalleye

I am buying a new rifle and would like some of your input. I know ther are alot of knowledgeable people on the site. The gun I'm thinking about getting is a Ruger M77 MarkII 7mm rem mag. I want to use it for deer and elk. Someday I would like to go elk hunting and I don't want to buy another rifle. Also some help on a scope would be appreciated. I've looked at the Leopold 3x9. Thanks for the info, Kid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CAJ    0
CAJ

I think you have made a good choice on Rifle and caliber. The 7mm mag is very good on Elk and very good for Deer. An excalent coice for long or short shots. I've used one for years and with very good results. 3x9 scope is good for what you want. 3 power for close or woods and the upper power for long or still shots Good luck on the hunt in the future. CAJ from Montana

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Eye Slayer    0
Eye Slayer

Kid, you are basically looking at the gun I deer hunt with. Instead of a 7mm, I shoot a .30-06 though. I love it and love the Leupold 3x9-40 I have mounted on it. It shoots very accurately with a 150gr Remington Core-Lokt. Frankly, I wouldn't hunt with another gun.

deerhunting011ig6.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lawdog    0
lawdog

I'm a 30-06 guy, but the 7mm is a great choice and the two guns are really quite comparable. I have a ruger in all weather stainless and its been a great gun that I've shot TONS of shells through (.223 for prairie dogs and the like).

For scopes, I too agree 3x9x40 is a great all around choice. The bigger 50 millimeter objective lens could be nice in some places, but its certainly not necessary. I have a Leupold Vari X-II and honestly I've not liked it since the day I bought it. I'd trade it in two seconds for a Nikon Monarch UCC. I've gone to all Nikon optics now and think they are about the same or better quality for similar if not usually less money. Talk to Nick from Optics4hunting as he's a site sponsor here!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KidWalleye    0
KidWalleye

It's nice when you hear good things about your choice. I've settled on the rifle. I'm still checking out scopes, so all suggestions are welcome. Thanks again, Kidwalleye

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
FarByondDrivn    0
FarByondDrivn

Nice thing about Ruger is that you get the rings with the gun. I think they retail for arounf fifty bucks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cooter    0
Cooter

For the money($200) I think the Burris Fullfield II in 3-9X40 is tough to beat. I'd recommend that as the starting point($200 range) and if you can spend more, thats great - I myself wouldn't spend more than say $350 unless you're gonna hunt A LOT. Have fun with the purchase, bud!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Gissert    17
Gissert

I can find no fault with your choice. Plenty of gun for both elk and deer. Just find a load that shoots well with your gun. For elk, use a good solid bullet like Nosler Partitions or Barnes. Once you have that done, practice a lot with a 22 and you will be ready.

For a scope, I have a Leupold Vari X II 3 x 9 on my 338. I have shot three elk with it now, and lots of deer. I love that glass, no regrets. 50 MM glass is nice, but not necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xedge2002    0
xedge2002

I have the same gun only in a .270 and I love it. I also have a Leupold Vari-X III 3-9x40 and it is an awesome scope. When I look through mine then look through other scopes there is a huge difference. Looking through my Vari-X III is just like looking through a window. It is crystal clear and very bright. The Vari-X III are a little more spendy but after shooting with one I don't think I could shoot anything else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Rotwieler    0
Rotwieler

i don't own one but that is exactly my choice on the new rifle im gonna get. same caliber and scope

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Code-Man    0
Code-Man

I have a M77 Ruger All Weather. Got two does this season with it. I have a Scheels 3.5-10x 42 mm Riflemaster. 200 bucks and I love it. I can get nice paterns with it and that extra zoom helps out. If you can check out a scheels and see what you think. My buddy has a leopold but likes mine better. But leopolds are hard to beat but the price is high. 7 mm is nice but I saw a 7 mm WSM holy crap that is a fat shell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KidWalleye    0
KidWalleye

I ordered my 7 mil yesterday. I have 2 weeks to decide on a scope. I'm leaning towards the Leopold

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Whoaru99    0
Whoaru99

OK, I'll be one of the lone dissenters...

There is nothing wrong with the 7mm Mag, but IMO it really does not offer any significant advantage unless you are regularly shooting =>300yd. It does, however, seem (at least to me) to have lots of extra "bark".

I shoot a .270 (that happens to be a Ruger M77 w/Leupold scope) and it's a very good shooter. However, if I were to do it all over again in a mid-range (power wise) rifle, me thinks I'd go with a 30-06 if for no other reason than the huge variety of different loads available. I'm not sure there is any other cartridge that offers as much overall versatility.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
KidWalleye    0
KidWalleye

Whoaru99, I actually had a 30-06 picked out but from what I can gather the 7mm is a better elk gun. I plan on doing some hunting out west in the coming years. I do like to hear the other side of this discussion though. Even though I already bought the 7mm. Thanks for the info guys, Kid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
almostthere!    0
almostthere!

Leupolds are good quality scopes. Compare it side by side with Burris and you might switch your mind. Make sure you get at least a VX-II in the Leupold; if you can afford it, get the VX-III.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ccarlson    0
ccarlson

Exactly what is the difference between the VX I and the VX II?

I purchased a new set up this fall and spent about 3 trips into reeds deciding between scopes. They let me take them outside where I was able to look through woods where it was darker, across a lake etc.

I narrowed it down to the vx I, vx II and the Nikon Monarch series, all in 3-9x40.

Both Leupolds were hands down better than the Nikon in terms of brightness and edge to edge optical clarity.

But then I really spent time comparing the vx I to the vx II and I could not see any difference in optical clarity, brightness, edge to edge clarity etc. I opted to save the $100 and go with the vx I since I couldn't see any difference. It seems to sight in and maintain accuracy. Both have the same lifetime warranty, nitrogen filled etc. Still, I wonder if I should have spent the extra bucks and just gotten the vx II and I still may at some point depending on what I experience and hear about the two choices.

The salesman really pushed the Nikon until I pointed out how blurred the Nikon was on the outside of the view compared to the Leupold. He checked several and they were all the same.

ccarlson

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ddp    0
ddp

my 2 cents..

Long story short, our motorhome was broken into last year and unfortunatly we had our guns in there. Collectable 30-30's passed down from grandparents frown.gif Great brush gun!

I purchased a Browning 300 WSM A-bolt (micro) Great little/big gun. My father got the same gun but 270. I had that same question in my mind. I wanted a multi-purpose gun just in case I were to go for the Elk, etc. I hunt the big woods north of two harbors and the longest shot is 100yds if your lucky. I made the wrong purchase. I personally would go for the gun that is for your typical hunting situation and if the opportunity comes for an elk hunt, deal with it then smile.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hitman54    3
Hitman54

Since you have already decided on a gun and caliber I will comment on my experience with scopes. I do think the 7mm mag is an excellent all around hunting rifle for medium to large game animals. As is the 30.06. The best information I have found about calibers in "The Target Book for North American Big Game" by Percentage Tags. This book is full of ballistic information for many different big game calibers and is a great resource when deciding on a new gun purchase. As far as scopes go I own three Leupold’s and one Nikon. I have two VX II and one VX III on big game rifles. All are good scopes but the VX III is a little clearer in low light conditions. The Nikon I have is also a good scope for the money. It is clear and crisp but it is just a 4X on a .22. I think you should not skimp on optics. Buy the best scope that you can afford. With optics I think you get what you pay for. Just go to Cabalas or a similar store and look through some different scopes. I wish I could afford a Swarovski or a Schmidt & Bender because their clarity and light gathering capabilities are amazing! IMO I would not buy a $600 or $700 gun and put a $100 scope on it and expect it to be able to perform up to its capabilities.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
perchking    23
perchking

I have the EXACT set up you are talking about... I have a leupold 3x9 VX-III on mine and love it. Put as much money into the scope that you put into the rifle..

Just my .02 cents.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CommonSense Guy    0
CommonSense Guy

Buy it. I have one but in 30-06. It's light and shoots great. You can take the bold right out easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iffwalleyes    0
iffwalleyes

Since your gun is selected I wouldn't comment on that looks like you have it covered. The M77 is a great gun I have hunted with one myself. For scopes I would look for something with a 50MM objective and somthing with a higher than 9 power option since you want to go west with it. I discovered this myself with my .270 when pronghorn hunting this fall my 40mm 3-9 worked but a bigger objective and more power would have been nice. I myself love leopolds and have nothing bad to say about them what so ever. Nikons are good I personally don't like them as well. But a Zeiss scope would be really nice they are so clear it is amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
walleye vision    0
walleye vision

Kid, if you are looking for a place to buy, check out midwestoutdoorgear (Contact Us Please). they'll beat any price, just a new start up, but it's good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
almostthere!    0
almostthere!

Quote:

Kid, if you are looking for a place to buy, check out midwestoutdoorgear (Contact Us Please). they'll beat any price, just a new start up, but it's good


Just checked their website and the price they are quoting is the manufacturer's suggested pricing. I can go into Joe's or Cabela's and purchase the scopes with tax at a cheaper price.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quackersmacker    0
quackersmacker

I have a 243, 30-06, and a 7mm rem mag. In my opinion the 7mm rem mag is the best shooting gun around. If you want a gun for deer and an occasional elk or moose hunt ou west this is your gun. It is a flat shooting gun that has been around forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bassboy1645    0
Bassboy1645

Tikka T3 lite stainless is what i bought this summer.....i got mine in .270 Mine is topped wiht a 3-9-40mm buckmasters scope from nikon. Good scope for the money. I love the rifle. it is perfect weight fully loaded and slung for my hunting style and its fairly small and compact compaerd to some simalar rifles. I shot a doe wiht her this fall and grazed a nice buck when my bullet defelcted through a tree. My buddies give me some bs though. He bought a Ruger 77 and loves to bash the foreign " junk".......they say Tikka: Teeks u off lol....i love em all grin.gifgrin.gifgrin.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  



  • Posts

    • delcecchi
      I've been by a time or two trying to figure out which place is yours.   I was out on wakemup last night too.   Got nothing, on crawlers.  Started out at merry go round, went to "picnic island" (little island east/south of taylors).  rigged along edge of those two humps in like 18-25 feet.   Musky guys were coming so I turned.  They turned too, chunking baits in the vicinity of my boat.   Then some guys in a pontoon pulled up and anchored in front of me  and threw out bobbers.   Fished a while longer, and it was getting sort of dark so went home.   Weird.  I've been on those humps a bunch of times this year, and suddenly I get company.   And, even though it is a pretty big area they gravitated to where I was.  I'll be out today too, so if you need help with supervision, let me know.    But I will drive by to check out the new construction.   
    • gunner55
      Been getting a few on the weed line, early am when there's a little breeze, since the surface temps started coming down. That was about this month's full moon, for me. A very slow troll, fishing vertically, & just a 1/16 oz. jig.
    • delcecchi
      Still holding stable at 72 for the lest week or so
    • muskie-mike
      Finally, I try lead core every time I am up there and no luck so far..Seems the bite doesn't start til late August..Will try next week...thanks for the report...
    • CigarGuy
      Bottom bouncer/spinner/crawler.......lindy/leach,
    • Wakemup
      Thanks for the update cigarguy- were you lindy rigging?
    • CigarGuy
      Neighbor and I went out in Wakemup for a couple hours tonight and got a 18" and 19" and had a nice one come unbutton on the way in....Leaches and crawlers.  That's good for me!  20 - 34' off a break line.  Del, working on the last flight of the steps-was looking for you to stop by and help!
    • mtheis
      I used lead core on Friday and had a ball catching walleyes of all sizes.  I started in the morning and stayed out until I just got tired in the afternoon.  I probably pulled in as many as 20 or so.  My formula was:  90 feet of line, 19-24 ft of water, #5 rattling split deep shad rap.  Silver color.  I kept it right at 2mph.  I also did much better when I pumped the rod in a regular cadence.  Keeping it in the rod holder didn't produce near the fish. 
    • mtheis
      Ace, I hope you enjoy your retirement.  I hired you one time and my boy and I had a good time.  I appreciate the hard work you did on putting us on fish.  Good Luck and maybe "Little Ace" can continue the family business some day!   Michael Theis
    • delcecchi
      These are legal aliens.  Glad you enjoyed your lunch.